in poland you can covert your gasoline car to use liquid gas which costs $3 per US galloninflation? i dont have any money anyway
gasoline is already liquid
>>542855751what happens in a crash, with a tesla?
>>542855751>indonesia>flammable tank inside passenger areairrelevant SEAmonkey garbage
>>542855751>you can covert your gasoline car to use liquid gasso what was it using originally?
>>542856038It's called petrol. If you call it gas, you're speaking the indian version of english.
>>542855751EU gibs, these will be over soon, believe it or not.
>>542856038he's using propane. our laws prevent this
>>542856212Ya I'm not taking english lessons from a fucking austrian
>>542855751Given you need a much larger tank I'm assuming it is much less energy efficient than gasoline, so you probably pay twice or more what an american does per mile traveled.
>>542855751good luck anonhttps://youtu.be/5-nOPvXiIWQ
>>542856274You're mixing up austria and australia again
>>542855751That a propane tank? I use that on a forklift.
I'm using horse he only needs grass and water, so long niggers
>>542856073>>542856075at this point these installations are pretty safeyou don't really hear about them blowing upalso it's cool to have a 400hp car and fuel it for like $3 per gallon. Even with like 30% more fuel consumption it's a good deal when you diesel is like $10
>>542856266LNGA lot of vehicles use it, but very regulated. no easy conversion
>>542855751Ethanol is $2.78 right now where I live
>>542856420eastern europe perfected this stuff for decades now. But I guess it's not easy to do in murrica
>>542856266Wait, so what you're saying is that Propane is a liquid and a gas?
>>542856310my 260 hp BMW consumes around 15 liters per 100 kilometers. It's not that bad.
>>542856406is it LNG? do you have to cool it?
>>542856368yes propane/butaneyou can have one in your spare tire storage>>542856437either jeets or brazilians maybe both drive cars made for ethanol>>542856420>no easy conversionyeah the same way that commiefornia spent hundrds of billions on a few miles of highway>>542856512it's gas in normal cirumcstances but when pressurized it's liquid
>>542856212>it's called petrol, if you abbreviated the correct word(gasoline) instead of petroleum...Brits are cancerous retards when it comes to English.
>>542856310you need a much larger tank because it's pressurized, i can do 400km from a tank that fits in spare tire storage space i dont even think the tank is bigger. it's slightly less energy dense but it's a very small difference
>>542856484yes. we envy the tech breakthroughs in E. EuropeWe use LNG mostly in construction, heavy equipment. isn't considered worth it for passenger vehicles
>>542855751Liter isn't liter, energy density is different.
>>542856212~AAAAAAaaaaa GASO-LEEENNA~
>>542856484a lot of our municipal busses run on it
>>542856642you're talking to an inbred continental anon
>>542856758our busses often run on electricitywhat's fucking weird is that we had them like 50 years ago decades before anyone even though of making tesla
>>542856073if you get in a crash, you have bigger issues to worry about at that point
slavtech
>>542856836L*P*G you fucking cretin
>>542856821I'd rather not be in the Tesla. So it matters
>>542856588Propane is less fuel efficient than gasoline, so while you're paying less per gallon you're also getting worse fuel efficiency per gallon. It probably costs the same when it's all said and done.
>>542856905oh. we call that propane, and are aware of its magical properties to power an ICE
>>542856266No, there are tons of propane conversions and public transportation used themBut i think you cant put em in underground parking and stuff like that
Why not just use coal?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergius_process
>>542856212Gas ks shorthand for gasoline.No ody calls it petroline
>>542857002it's like 20% difference gas as in petrol is 3x the price at this point>>542857185stirling engines were showing promise in the 80s or maybe 70s but they got killed off
>>542857002Stop calling it propane, it's called LPG. And you need about 20% more but it costs less than half of petrol.
>>542857485it's literally 3x the price of petrol it hasnt gone up in price in like 5 years at all
>>542857422>stirling engines were showing promise in the 80s or maybe 70s but they got killed offyou can run coal based gasoline in a regular engine.>"The Louisiana process method produced automobile gasoline at a price slightly higher than, but comparable to, petroleum-based gasoline but of a higher quality."
>>542856682Id only ever want to run off propane is if i had an RV that has the capacity for multifuel use in the motor- or because its more cost effective than diesel would be
>>542856358kek
>>542856181Some cars can work with the gas you use in your gas stove o algo. It's not gasoline.
>>54285769499% of LNG conversions are multifuel since you need to heat the engine up first but there's some niche skoda cars that run on lpg from factory not sure if those are multifuel or noti cant imagine lpg would work well in an RV since it's somewhat less energy efficient
>>542856587no, lng is methanewhat's used in cars in Poland is propane-butane. You don't have to cool it and it's rather safe. But there are a lot of safety standards around it. A good installation is just a few thousand dollars though and there's thousands of workshops that service them. You could probably install this stuff, but In USA servicing this would probably be pretty difficult
>>542856420>LNGLPG. Only a small amount of heavy trucks use LNG, in cryogenic tanks (not liquid at room temperature, regardless of pressure).
>>542856758now that I think about it, maybe your forklifts run on it too. forklifts in Poland run on propane-butane pretty much exclusively
>>542857934ive heard of CNG being used in germany or maybe it was US but it's not widespread afaik
>>542857901>LNGlng is methane
Diesel is for fuel efficiency, but costs a lot right nowEthanol costs less and gives more power, but is not fuel efficient. Propane/Butane is retarded Gasoline is still the best compromise.
>>542856406>also it's cool to have a 400hp car and fuel it for like $3 per gallon. Even with like 30% more fuel consumptionmy old dodge beater gets 30mpg on the highway and im paying around 4.50 for e0 gas so between the cost of converting your car to run on natural gas and the less efficiency you get it doesn't seem worth it unless hyou just dont have access to gasoline but do have a lot of natural gas available
>>542856695you're being sarcastic, but you don't understand this stuff. LPG installations for modern cars are pretty sophisticated. Also you can get some cars from the dealer with it
>>542858117bro it costs $1k and the efficiency is like 75-80%
>>542856588How long does it last for? My dad used to have a gas truck a million years ago, and it ran out of fuel quickly. It wasn't cheap back then.
>>542858106>ethanol gives more powerEXCUSE ME. STOP CONFLATING TERMS.
>>542855751Polish niggas so poor they use wood gas to drive to the breadline
>>542857913>difficult to serviceYou underestimate woodgas moonshine hillbillies, ones who also burn the coal eith dunkin donughts fryer oil in thwir lifted supertrugg diesels
>>542858106>Propane/Butane is retardedyou're retarded
>>542858206installation i'm not sure but you definitely need to change the tank every few years i can do 350km-400km >>542858235if you adjust for the amount you need to spend to live away from niggers the median disposable income is probably pretty similar
>>542856406your country is trash
>>542858267i meant LPG installations for modern petrol engines, which are a pile of electronics and hoses the engines that can run on woodgas can run on anything and you don't have to worry about burning the valves
>>542858217i meant e85
>>542856073tesla burn, this nothing
