[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3801.jpg (1.32 MB, 1449x1911)
1.32 MB JPG
>hack into shipping company website
>change destination to Hong Kong

And no one working there questions it LOL. Why didn't the USSR pay some American dock workers to ship US military tech to St. Petersburg?
>>
why are they still pretending like the F-35 is this magical wunderwaffe? literally targeted by some alibaba AD in iran. can't even be used there anymore. it's just more overpriced, overengineered western trash designed for the showroom and to make shareholders money. not to win wars.
>>
>>542880205
i mean we sold it to canada so the chinks have full access anyway.
>>
>>542880271
Even if its almost useless in practice its invaluable for china and russia
>>
>>542880205
>Why didn't the USSR pay some American dock workers to ship US military tech to St. Petersburg?
They technically try at least 30 times
>>
>>542880271
The F-35 is better as a global element of modern “network” warfare. If you need to covertly penetrate someone else’s air defense zone, transmit target coordinates to allies, and deliver a precision strike, the American concept is more effective.

The Su-57 is better as a classic air superiority fighter. In a hypothetical one-on-one duel (if the Su-57 can close in and engage in close combat), its speed, missile armament, and maneuverability will leave the F-35 no chance.
>>
>>542880548
if



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.