Guys, can any of you hear this? I'm currently blowing it as hard as I can. A leftie friend of mine said you guys could hear 'em.
What's that? Some kind of, sounding rod?
People don't use dogwhistles. That was just an excuse for progressives to harass random strangers for attention.
>>543070071>Guys, can any of you hear this?No
>>543070071> Puts "heil hitler" on all buildings> Says others are governed by fascist group belongingYou realise what you do with the pride flag is the same as what all the other fadcists do. They need to actively show group belonging to not be targetted.No space targets free thought like the fascist left.
I can, no matter how high pitch I set it to.
>>543070071I was wondering why my bat was flying around in circles all pissed off
>>543070071I thought I could hear the one at the end of the Sgt. Pepper cd.
>>543070071Maybe if I wasn’t on the opposite side of the planet to you I could
>>543070071
>>543070071>dogwhistleWell he's wrong, your friend, because the only ones who carry on about them are lefties so there
>>543070993Yeah I almost forgot Trump's greatest achievement earlier. Ending cancel culture.Remember when leftists had control and even having a contrary opinion made you unemployable.That shit was worse than any right wing totalatarian stuff I have seen.Logical debates shut down anywhere they had power.It was very clear which side rules with an iron fist.
>>543072238>aka "jews turned it off so we would think we were "winning" and get us to cheer for jews winning because it made lefties mad"and mindbroke so many that even now, when it couldn't be any clearer, they STILL don't give a shit about anything but this perception lefitsts lost
and it's certainly not just y'all they do the same shit on the left
fucking entire absolutely mindbroken country
>>543070993To be fair, the original study that image comes from is kinda dogshit and the graphic is misleading:https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12665First off, they weren't really testing the "diversity of thought" among participants. They were basically doing a pilot run of their new tool to see if it can be used to reliably identify clusters among different viewpoints at all.The sample was nearly 60% Democrat and less than 14% Republican (yes, there were about twice as many self-described Independents in the study than Republicans). They used weights developed by Gallup to account for the disproportionate relations here.
>>543072919That makes sense.I don't expect actual conservatives to be more diverse than left wing conservatives.The fascist left has gotten out of control however.>>543072238Men fight back by taking a stand> These are dangerous nazis/incelsMen say they are victims> Homos, man-children, losers, weakHis second term is super fucked though.At least he is fighting back against leftist cultural control using government funding.You are literally paying for all the leftist shit you hate that is also made by people who hate you.
>>543073173Another issue with the study is they only asked 8 questions. So it really only tells you Democrats are most extreme on those 8 things. Based on some choice wording in the discussion section, I think it's fair to chalk it to left-wing bias on the part of the researchers unconsciously selecting issues uniquely important to Democrats:>Starting with an optimistic interpretation, group cleavages might be easier to overcome based on issues in which identities are not tied to a specific position. For instance, the present data suggests that normatively acceptable viewpoints for Republicans on gay marriage, abortion rights, and environmental protection through business regulation range from mild agreement to extreme disagreement, hence, providing a potential space for political negotiation>A pessimistic interpretation, however, would be that because neutral issue positions are largely embedded into the Republican belief-system (rather than being equally distributed between Republicans and Democrats), they may get “pulled over” to the Republican extreme. And finally, the "spread out" look in the graph isn't really reflective of ideological diversity at all. It's a design feature of the tool they were using and would subjectively look about the same no matter how ideologically "compact" Republicans were.
>>543073576Which software do they use to visualise that?
>>543070537>What's that?his dad's cock
>>543075548Not a "software," per se. It's just an analytical method.Response Item Network (ResIN).Formal explanation here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03037-xThe key takeaway with that graph here >>543070993 is that the dots don't represent people. They represent individual answers on the questionnaire. So a participant in the study maps to 8 dots. The distance between dots shows how often one answer correlates with another.
>>543076136That does mean that there is less correlation between the answers of republicans than leftists, though...Which means that republican were more diverse (ignoring the other problems you named).I always would expect, that there is more similarity among the ideologically dominant group (locally).So in a highly republican environment liberals might actually be liberal.
>>543075548>>543076136Here's another image from the study with the same network color coded differently. Dark blue is "strongly disagree," dark red is "strongly agree." And I'm sure you can fill in the blanks from there.
>>543070537>I now remember sounding is a thingFuck you
>>543076354Yes and no. What we see is a dense cluster of "strong disagree" and then a mess of "everything else." We still see a relatively dense cluster of "strong agree" on the far right as well. Just also a broader level of "moderate agree" or "neutrals" surrounding it. The more interesting find would be multiple distinct clusters which all map to self-reported "Republican" allegiance. That would indicate a fundamental division in thought. That's what you'd expect to see if it were reflective of, say, libertarian republicans vs. nationalistic republicans.
