and when did it startNever saw it on /pol/ until about 18 months ago
>>543086570I always hear it from euro shills who act like they've won by asking retarded questions.I believe it's part of the shill cycle.1. shill says something stupid2. you prove how the shill is retarded3. shill says "I accept your concession"4. that is the signal for other shills call you retarded5. your opinion is invalid because now because multiple people just said stupid things in responseit's a glownigger tactic I think.I always see it with French, British and other euroflags.
>>543086570That's an old meme. It peaked years ago and thankfully I don't see it nearly as much as I used to
>>543086570Communist shills
This meme was from the Certified Meme Council issue catalog #94.
>>543086570>i accept your concessionit's a reddit thing and since glow niggers base their existence on reddit... that's where it comes from.funny how this is in the top results if you google that...
>>543086570>debate ensues >two sides make valid points>one side gets btfo >losing side calls other brown, tranny, or nigger. Etc. >"I accept your consession".
>>543086570Shonen anime discussions
>>543086570Its old, used to be very common back in the tips fedora days
>>543086570>Never saw it on /pol/ until about 18 months agolurk moar I guess
I accept your concession
>>543086570>1 pbtidI accept your concession
>>543089126
>>543086570Debate often hinges on logic, so if you can't debunk facts and instead rely on faith, anecdotes, and your personal theories, you're conceding the point. Anyone can bring up their own faith, anecdotes, and theories, but these can be argued with endlessly. Going with something more solid and seeing the inability to address it or stay on topic as a concession is a way to save everyone time.
>>543089126This, honestly. If you write out a serious post and the only thing someone who disagrees can say is to call you a Jew/tranny/Jeet, then that feels tantamount to them admitting they got nothing.
>>543086570>retarded question I accept your concession.
>>543089491And that's because often times debating with a rightwinger is like debating religion with a monarch in the 1600s; it doesn't matter what facts and logic you're bringing to the table, even if you convince them that their religion may be wrong or at least nothing that should be used to structure power and wealth in society, it doesn't matter. They'll call you names and try to kill you because to them, debating wasn't about enlightening themselves and learning anything, it was about defending the system of power that benefits them. You're an enemy for trying to poke holes in that. To you, it's just facts and logic, maybe even your own liberation, but to them, you're endangering their way of life and their familes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgtqNx0T3WYnewfag
that and "who are you quoting?" are my favorite 2026 phrases
>>543090016>2026 phrase
>>543086570Morons
>>543090060what year is it now broski?
It was to fuck someone who can't understand an argument or logic. It's a cheat card. An automatic fuck to (You) and a win, no matter the hand being played. Fuck to you!!!!!
>>543090133They're saying "who are you quoting" is older than 2026.
>>543089088East of the Rockies, I shit my pants.
>>543089454I said it better. Fuck to you.
Some faggot glowie probably added it to the toolkit because they got their jimmies rustled by some anon who used that retort to ridicule them. Exact same thing happened to "2 more weeks", which started because anons would use that retort to ridicule fear mongering Hillary's shills and the pepe reaction pics which they started to spam so now its associated with shilling.There is also "vatnik" which the Ukraine shills spammed all the fucking time, which usage coincide with the self exile from Russia and subsequent hiring by Ukraine propaganda department, and is now barely posted which I suspect is because the guy got fired and they updated it out of the toolkit since then.
>>543090215yeah he might be a negro (nigger) viajador del tiempo who knows
>>543089911>aka a nigger took your leftshit gaslighting as a hostile act and gave you your wages for such, responding with hostility in kind.ftfy
>>543089491The worst imo is how the ad hom doesnt even make sense within the context of that specific argument, and is obviously done out of sheer pettiness to derail the discussion. I've been called a jeet over being critical of Islam, Dalits and India more than once, even if it make no sense nor would it even change anything to the validity of the argument.
>>543086570>Let's see if we can go older
>>543090554>vatnikIt's zigger now. As in death to ALL ziggers or, if you prefer, TOTAL zigger death. That includes you, zigger shill.
lol
>>543089911The projection here is so absolutely delicious. Debating left wingers is impossible because of your reasons and their inability to follow common definitions ie conflating legal and illegal immigration
>>5430908622 more weeks ahmed
>>543088957This. It's ancient b/ stuff. Back before Israel overtly meddled so much.
>>543090862Natofag parasite
>>543091106How is it projection? The lefty equivalent can be like debating eugenics with a black person; to you it could just be science, but to him it's about the rights and value of his family. It's still asymmetrical.And your point is a good way to show the asymmetry of debate. It's like how when debating the legal status of Haitian immigrants, Vance called them illegal when they were legal, processed with visas. He then said "I don't see them as legal". Arguing definitions is common and is a both sides thing.
