To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the Revolution. Outside of maybe Virginia a century ago, nothing could be further from the truth for southerners.20% of you have nigger dna(niggers aren't founding stock). 3-4% of you have kike dna, and 10% of you have injun dna. That automatically knocks out at least 34% of you from being considered founding stock(or even white for that matter).The vast majority of whites in the south arrived after the Revolution, in the early 1800s. Most of them were irish and scots irish. The few Englishmen that did live in the south before the Revolution were overwelmingly loyalist, and provided the vast majority of loyalist troops to the British. The south contributed effectively nothing to the revolution, and all of the battles there were fought by Patriots from New England and the Mid Atlantic(Virginia would have been considered the Mid Atlantic at the time).This isn't even taking into account the fact that you're probably the most mutted group in the country, largely in part to two things. 1, the south was never as xenophobic or racist as New England, so various ethnic groups mutted together in the south because the south was more accepting of various backgrounds. 2, mass rape and intermingling during the civil war, which mutted you even further with german and nordic dna as most Union soldiers were German and Nordic. Yeah, despite dixiefag cope about unions being le mutts, the union army was almost entirely german and nordic, with relatively few irish.tl;dr why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half indian civil war rape babies?
>>543122009>to be considered founding stock you have to descend from the dumbest sons of bitches in the country.
>>543122134shut up, kike
>>543122009>hans gets off a boat and fucks annabelle jones>anglo mutt produced>repeat
>>543122009It would be rare to be 100% english settler stock. Nearly everyone is mixed in some way with other whites that came later.
>>543122009A Low IQ zoomer or shill made this post.Southerners and Euros who settled out west are more American than New England fags.
>>543124275True for everywhere but New England
>>543122009>revolutionfuck off newbie
>>543122009>To be considered founding stockthis is as retarded as fags claiming they're 1/16th cherokee or whatever
>>543122009>To be considered founding stockwho caresthis is just more classist bullshit
>>543122009>tl;dr why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half indian civil war rape babies?Because we aren't mixed.We've been tested.Have you?
I think if you lived in the south before air conditioning you might as well be a founding father
>>543122009English, early 1600s. Mixed with some Native American. Acadian.
>>543124275>Nearly everyone is mixed in some wayThat is absolute horseshit.You faggots want a peer reviewed study to know whether to wipe your ass after you shit, but THIS you accept without question.https://youtu.be/aNfM7xnUaOc
>>543122009Pretty much everyone is some level of mutt in the States, OP. Trying to argue racial purity is a fool's game.It is true that the South are hypermixed larpers though. You really can't take them seriously when a John Sanchez, with his insecurity over his slave ancestry, starts rocking a white hood because his skin just makes the cut.
>>543124324and in their case it's not a good thing
>>543124470It's not horseshit. This stuff was talked about even in the 1800s bro. People since the founding of America have been yapping about founding stock be it from Plymouth or Jamestown. It's always been a case of who is more American and who is better. Bros would be in their lounges smoking cigars talking shit about this very subject.
>>543124288New englanders made the country so your weird larp has as much credibility as Germans larping as Rome during the HRE
>>543124275The only person I know that brags about having English settler stock have granddaughters that are now partially black and has a faggot son. Do something or die in a ditch, faggot. I'm mostly German, English, and White nigger (Slavic). At least I'm from all of the people responsible for going into space and landing on the moon. Keep bragging about your noble English roots that are either in a chink's asshole or mixed with nigger genes. We're all very proud.
>>543122009>To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlersThat’s called colonial stock. Founding stock includes Scottish and a little Irish and German. Scandinavian and most German came in settler waves shortly thereafter, with most Irish coming around the civil war. Swarthoids all pretty much came after the civil war at the earliest.
>>543122009I’m part Native American. What does that make me you fucking faggot?
>>54312200985% of my ancestry is founding stock. 15% of my ancestry is Irish who moved to Canada in 1849 and from there to the U.S. circa 1870. I'm also related to Benjamin Franklin.
>>543122009im in texas, this place is disgusting and needs to be nuked.
ITT: 12th generation mutts desperately scrambling for a sense of identity
>>543122009demoralization propagandat. foundational American from Virginia with ancestors on the Declaration of Independence
>>543124556>British zoomieAnon New England fags are the biggest self hating whites in this country along with West Coast trannies. New York City is the heartland of race mixing and immigration.
>>543124612More people should talk about English roots because it's more prevlanet in all whites than people want to admit. We always hear about Irish, Italian, ect... anything but English. Because it's too vanilla. Too racist for them. But the truth is, it's very difficult to be purely from that stock. The probability of every generation only marrying someone who also has only had colonial english ancestry is incredibly rare. But also, large portions of the population has some connection to founding stock in some way. Ancestry is so numerous going back to the 1600s.
>>543122009>To be considered founding stockyou have to be a kike that refers to humans as cattle.have you even thought about that you are using kike's terminology?>why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half indian civil war rape babies?found the bitter kike that couldn't have infinity niggers in 1870
>>543124767Your ancestors got mogged by John HanCOCK and his long, girthy signature. How maek feel?
>>543124852Either you are a low IQ homo zoomie or an Israeli shill, fuck off
>>543122009Damn that's crazy.How about instead I listen to what my ancestors said about the jews instead of listening to what the jews say about my ancestors?
What is this weird anti southern bait thread that keeps popping up? There's always some sort of >southerners belong in a wood chipper>southerners are Larpers>southerners are gayThis shit is so fucking boring. Get better bait
Here's your pure 100% puritan stock guys
>>543124769OK?... But New England made your country and New Englanders are indisputably the founding stock.Doesn't matter if they don't vote for our lord and saviour President Trump. That's a totally unrelated and ridiculous point.
>>543125144i heard he's legally allowed to open an IHOP with his background
>>543125111the left and neocons are big mad that there are people in 2026 with southern pride
>>543122009Shut up trash, only whites and Asians with IQ above 120 matter. The rest should be purged.
>>543124744This guy is 2% west african
>>543125200>Jamestown virginia was established over a decade before the mayflower settlers established Plymouth colony in New England. Arguably America has always been a sort of competing civilization between Jamestown settlers and their values vs Plymouth settlers and their values which themselves go back to sectarian and political issues in England. In a spiritual sense flipping the English north / south division in the new world.
>>543125200my feelings are hurt that you would say this, Nigel.
>>543125423>a nigger fucker and a freemason was the south's only real contribution to the RevolutionLmao. Read the OP before you post, faggot.Less than 4% of Patriot soldiers came from the southern states, and all battles fought in the south were fought by New Englanders.
>>543125508>Less than 4% of Patriot soldiers came from the southern states, and all battles fought in the south were fought by New Englanders.wtf are you talking about?
>>543125366>This guy is 2% west african
>>543125508Oh I see. Well your post was so bad that I didn't read that far. You are a moron if you think yankees are the only one's that fought the british.
>>543125508One of the most underrated aspects of the American Revolutionary War is that it was trivial for Britain to send troops and supplies north from the Caribbean to places in Georgia or the Carolinas. Without modern communication equipment, they had no assurance that their rebellion wouldn't be met with a swift landing by British regulars. Combine this with the poverty and rural nature of the region and you just had a lot of people who didn't want to be involved one way or another. Or who felt their livelihood of trade with the Caribbean would be disrupted and where thus more economically inclined to be loyalists.
>>543122009Let me guess. You are pure White founding stock?
>>543125607Learn to read, dixienigger
>>543125747The American revolution is a fake story
>>543126107You are wrong though, Ellis islander
>>543126166what's wrong with being an ellis islander? and yes, i'm an ellis islander
>>543126204You can be a johnny come late but don't make threads talking about founding stock superiority and then rambling about how the south wasn't vital in the revolution which is not true
>>543122009Southerners are not English, they are Scottish and scots-irish. They all have that portly walrus bodytype that Scots always have.
>>543126260nigger i just joined this thread kek
>>543126277Even with Scottish and scots irish and irish they were still dominantly English. try again.
>>543126277Exactly, all of which arrived after the Revolution.>>543126307He's an obvious boomer newfag, he doesn't know
>>543122009New York here.
>>54312550820-25% of the continental army were from Southern states and if you include militia forces 35-40% of overall revolutionaries were Southern.
>>543126673I’m marching through your lands as we speak. Teach my son with the girls, be handy.
>>54312200990% of USA culture comes from the south
>>543124483>Pretty much everyone is some level of mutt in the StatesSame can be said for a good portion of Europeans too. Most of them aren't ready for that conversation, though.
>>543126760which is high considering the population
>>543126760Objectively false. They were nowhere near that amount of the Continental Army, and while some miltiamen did help during the southern campaign, most of them fought for the brits.>>543126910Yeah, maybe modern US culture lol, which is a fucking cancer.
>>543127033Indeed. >>543127120>Approximately 20% to 25% of the Continental Army's regular forces came from the Southern states (primarily Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia), and that share rose to roughly 35% to 40% overall when including the heavily relied-upon southern militia and state troops.Yeah they were, spaceghostpube, you commie faggot.
>>543122009>Virginia would have been considered the Mid Atlantic at the timeLiterally nobody considered Virginia Mid-Atlantic. It was one of the Southern colonies.Seethe all you want, Yankee, but traditional American culture has been preserved in the South way more than in any other region of the country. My ancestors (old stock Virginia colonists) were all patriots. Several served in combat during the Revolution. I am more American than you, and definitely whiter than you.
>>543127214that anon has a real distinction in mind but it's upper vs. deep south not south vs. mid-atlantic
The founding stock in the south rivals that of new England. The Ellis island americans wiped out a chunk of this stock in new england, not so much in the south.
>>543127180>SAAAARS GROK SAID SO SAAAARS 25% SAAAARS
>>543127909Just shut the fuck up, you nigger-loving little bitch.
>>543122009Fuck you, newfag.Suuri Suomi--uraliin asti!>>543124288Many were descended from picrel
>>543122009>Founding stockLMAO. You stole some land, get over yourselves hahahaha founding stock, topkek. When are you going back to Europe?
>>543122009I'm sorry this is happening to you.
Most settlers, including founding fathers were germans tho
>>543122009OP has to be retarded. Most of the people who are actually from the South and not recent transplants are 100% descended from the original British settlers. Whites in the South are far less likely to be mixed than those in the north. The South was legally racial apartheid and race mixing was an actual crime in the South until the '60s. The One Drop rule was also strictly followed, and the few mixed race children who were born were considered 100% nigger. >the south was never as xenophobic or racist as New EnglandWe had a literal ethnostate and used niggers as farm equipment you stupid faggot.
>>543125200New England is mostly Irish now
>>543124275Wrong on both counts. If you ignore the recent transplants and only look at people whose family has been living in a region for several generations, they are usually 100% or close to it descended from the primary European settler group in that region, at least east of the Mississippi. People who are actually from the East coast are descendants of the original British settlers. Further inland to Appalachia are the descendants of the protestant Scots Irish. Lower midwest through Pennsylvania is German. Upper midwest is Scandinavian. Rust belt has scattered pockets of various types of central Europeans. Boston is catholic Irish. etc.
>>543122009I don't give a fuck, how about that
>>543124556New England is fairly underrepresented historically and a lot of them are just Welsh who pretend to be English. Theyre poor and liberal. The myth of the WASP is just a myth. There are no tweed jacketed aristocrats smoking pipes in $10,000 watches in a seaside town in Connecticut. The WASP was a projection of what non-Whites saw Americans as.They’re all poor, angry, shitlibs, and they hate White people.
>>543124483>Pretty much everyone is some level of mutt in the States, OP. Mutt cope. Not everyone is some mixed Ellis Island abomination like you. I consider scum like you just as foreign and unwelcome as some Haitian or Venezuelan parasite who just walked across the border in 2021.My 14th great grandfather was the Baron De La Warr who was the largest single investor in the Virginia Company of London, which had the charter to establish the colony at Jamestown. My family is officially FFV and has extensive documentation about all of my ancestry back to the colonial period.
>>543125508Disproportionately PA, NY, and Virginia carried the Revolution in manpower. New England and the Deep South didn’t contribute a fraction as much, the relevant historical figures heavily favor VA, NY, PA.The mid Atlantic it is called.Virginia then also included Tennessee parts of Delaware Maryland and West Virginia.PA included Ohio and parts of NJ.NY was mostly the same.
>>543122009>To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the RevolutionThe 100% Anglo shit is retardedThe Dutch founded NYCThere were German farmers a plenty in PennsylvaniaFrench fur trappersWelsh, Scots, Swedes, Finns, etc all signed the Declaration of IndependenceThe man who turned the Continental Army from a ragtag force into a drilled European style army was GermanA German was the 1st speaker of the houseIrish were 1/3rd of the Continental ArmyA pollock saved Washington's life at BrandywineCountless examplesAmerica was a pan European project from the outsetThat's why, despite any misinterpreted shitposts from Benjamin Franklin, The Naturalization Act of 1790 read "free White persons of good character", not Anglos, not of the British Isles, WhiteBy 1775 Anglos were less than half of the total population of the colonies, granted if negroes were removed from the count they'd be a majority of the WhitesNonetheless, other Euros played important roles in the founding and to not call them founding stock is pants on head jewop retarded
>>543124773No, it's because about 95% of American identity comes directly from the original British settlers. No one unironically calls themselves British-American because it would be redundant.Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans and every other kind of hypenated obsess over their pasta and St. Patrick's day parades because of the narcissism of small differences. They are all almost completely assimilated from their ethnic ancestry into the core "British-American" identity, but cling to the small, relatively unimportant differences to try to maintain at least some of their ancestral identity.
>>543125392Yes, the American Civil War was basically English Civil War 2.0. Virginia Cavaliers and landed gentry vs the puritanical New Model Army Roundheads of the urban North
>>543122009>To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlersThe Irish were being sold here to work tobacco since 1620. Germans had already been here for a decade. These are the Founding Stock of America.
>>543122009>why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half indian civil war rape babies?Have you ever read a book that didn't have pictures? For the adults, a better reflection of historical records can be found among agricultural and industrial publications of the 18th and 19th century.
thank God the Freemasons are tearing the constitution apart. You guys are a bunch of insufferable faggots.
>>543122009>you have to be anglo>otherwise you can't be part of country whose entire identity is "not England"Yankees need to get their schizos under control
>>543124275Not necessarily. Episcopalians married other Episcopalians, Presbyterians married other Presbyterians, etc.
>>543124275In this case, the joke is that you used "mixed." Nevermind that the produced crosses have always been present in Europe.
>>543122009I have German family that came to America on their own dime in 1697. do they count as founding stock?
>>543122009I'm Scotch-Irish, German, Scandanavian, a bit of Russian. Have no Jewish, African or native, shitskin blood. Just European. Quite proud of that fact. took 3 different DNA tests, all 3 came back exact same results.
>>543122009I'm half Mayflower, half 1780s Irish immigrant. 95% of /pol/ is less than 1/10th as white as me.
>>543122009Euros laugh at your "founding stock" meme. And if you're trying to larp for some kind of purebred hyperborean whitey, just being from across the pond makes you unworthy. FACT.
>>543122009Hey, our retards killed each other on both sides of that faggot war. Then we bred like rats. You're welcome, America.
>>543122009Fucking tribal retard. Your tribe has lost, goyim, no matter who you think you're better than, you are still below the tribe that won.
>>543122009You will never be the real Israelites kike.
>>543122009niggerhandstypedthispostlmao everyone point and laugh at this silly city nigger
>>543122009What a dumb idea. Genetic and cultural diversity makes the US what it is. Why do these people hate the USA?
>>543122009I'm actually french stock from ~Kansas. Idk what my status is but it's probably not worth mentioning.
The scots irish were half english from northern english, not le gaelic irish, and southerners overwhelmingly descend from southern english settlers from the 1600smuh scots irish descent is a mythsoutherners won the american revolution
>>543132286more liesmuh continental irish 1/3 army lmao stop LARPing and stealing history taig
>>543122009>heritage>20% >3-4% >10%>adds all three like a retardFound Habsberg Waldo
>>543122009OP is a pathetic anti-white coper
>>543122009
>>543125392What you say about competing cultures going back to the very start is true, but as others have pointed out, New England was the fountainhead of American nationalism whilst the South was mostly loyalist until decades after it had been dragged away from British hands by the New Englanders. The only reason it was dragged along for the ride in the new American national project was because it was practically completely vacant of people save for cash croppers and their armies of slaves. So can the south really be said to be founding stock when it was opposed to the creation of the United States and was already a rival culture to the founders? The south was closer to a British Caribbean sugar colony than to the real metropole of the early US.
quick on the heels of that English fuck telling his countrymen that they aren't really English. So this is the new Esptein class meta?
>>543125111It is a seething jew that got bullied in middle school by a redneck and will never let it go.
They couldn't inspire our patriotic spirit to enslave and make drone bait out of us so they want to make sure we don't use it to free ourselves either
>>543122009>all the battles there were fought by New England and mid Atlantic soldiersThis is just false. A lot of generals that lead them were from the Northern colonies, but the average soldier fighting battles would have been from the south. This goes double for the militias there. Granted, southern militiamen were basically seen as greenskin like in nature, hyper violent brutes but quick to flee from a line battle. What you’re getting a lot of your ideas from stems from the south also having a large loyalist population, but they contributed plenty to the patriot cause as well.
>>543122009My dad's entire family tree is Anglo pre revolution but he ruined it by marrying my German mom. Now I'm some kind of mischling.
>>543144586Also I should add that part of the reason they fled so much was because they carried rifles, which didn’t really lend themselves to line fighting well back then.That, and a lot of them were just raiders who never really wanted to get bogged down.
>>543132251how many kids do you have?
>>543122009Nothing you wrote is even true and you know it isn't, and you're clearly the same German American that posts some variation of the same D&C thread every day around the same time, often using that same image. English were the largest component of both the South and North and the majority of the Continental Army in every single colony. In terms of racemixing, English don't racemix, but Irish and Scottish Gaels do, and this was recorded in American history with Highland Scots going native and into the Indian communities. The US South votes rightwing because of English. The US South is the least effected by globalhomo, and is the only place pushing back against gay rights laws, because of the English.Most of the Union Army, and Confederate Army...were English. Germans were under 15% of it, about the same size as the Irish. Literally everything you wrote is factually incorrect.
Btw the subtext of what OP is promoting, as it always is, if you read between the lines, is that there are Anglo-Americans but they're contained in one small space in NE, and the implication is that the rest is German, when in reality its all English/British. There are no German states, there are no Nordic states, there are Slavic states - they're all British and under English Common Law and English language, other than Louisanna which is French yet the largest white population is English..OP is so malignant that he's literally thinking of new threads to make every day which chip away at the truth and create a defacto idea that America isn't English but that South is non-white and the rest is German. These krauts are totally fucked in the head with ethnic resentment towards English people as they hate the English roots of America.Why would a New England Yankee that won the Civil War promote the idea that the Union Army was German? They wouldn't, as to do so would be to hand over the win that was 70% English to 15% minority. Hence OP exposes the fact he is German.Btw OP lives in Iowa, that is how easily identifiable he is with these malignant threads he spams daily.
sometimes it's easier to define a thing from the outside in. for example we can be absolutely sure that there are categories excluded outside of "founding stock" or even just "american at all." let's start with pajeets.OBVIOUSLY, south asian subcontinental pajeets never had anything to do with the founding of this country, or any of the early or middle or late history of this country. pajeets basically just showed up for charity inclusion with hart-celler and then exploded in mass migration right around the time of a global health crisis. OBVIOUSLY not american, so that narrows it down a good chunk. billions are out of the question, and never will be anything but hyphen-asterisk "americans"
>>543122009>To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the RevolutionSo literally no one kek
>>543132286>The 100% Anglo shit is retardedthe funny thing is if you look at the areas of the country where the heritage IS dominated by english, they are generally impoverished with small enclaves of wealth..but generally speaking they are uneducated unhealthy and poor regions which also have some of the highest black populations.. a relic of the retarded slave plantation ideal vision of those "Americans".
>>543150209keep in mind this is only the results based on who has taken a dna test with the company, if every american were tested you’d likely find the british proportion to be even greater.
>>543124324>New England is still EnglishExplains why they're fags
>>543150373i think it depends on the resolution of the metrics with regard to individual "british" populations would matter a great deal. The map i referenced has greater resolution than just "British/Irish" and i think that's an important distinction and has been for a long time.
>>543132286>pan europeanistthis reads like masonry, the early sign of a kalergi plan, a mutted nation,
saar you must be a britisher of the former british empire to qualify as american saar
>>543150373in other words 55% of the genes of tested non hispanic whites derive from britain, while only 15% derive from france and germany combined. german immigration to this country was not in such great numbers to upset the clear british predominance in all states, and so most ‘german americans’ are just selecting the most exotic ancestry that’s not british (english mainly) to list as their ethnicity on the census, leading to a massive undercount of british descended americans.>>543150551most of the british is english, even where scots irish or irish is reported as the ethnicity on the census, where your maps info came from. english is pale and stale and basically nobody reports it outside of the mormons and the northeast, in the south the mostly english population reports their ethnicity as american.
>>543150209posts larp map that pretends ulster scots are """irish"""taig spastic
>>543150659>>543150674in case anyone wasn’t aware, the great bulk of the population growth in america was due to the colonial descended population having large families as they moved westwards, not immigration.
>>543122009The "founding stock" thing is stupid. It's also why America is so schizophrenic between religious authoritarianism (the first Puritan settlers) and radical libertarianism (the later European settlers).That first group were responsible for the Salem Witch Trials, while the second group forged a nation from nothing but hard work.
do you qualify for the 8/8 gr8 club?>you are 8/8 gr8 if all eight of your great-grandparents were born in the country indicated by your flag.join today and receive your free decoder ring!even more anons can be in the 4/4 b4 club:>you are 4/4 b4 if all four of your grandparents were born in the country indicated by your flag.still pretty good. that's a start. your kids might be 8/8 if you play your genes right.>a-ok! so then what about the 2/2 too club? what do we get if both parents were born here?you get to keep earning your citizenship. one or more of your grandparents were immigrants. that might have been novel and cool in moderation in the 20th century, but now it just means kalergi replacement. your family should be audited for merit and kept on homeland security probation until the immigrant generation passes.>why are grandparents the cutoff?because most people grow up with their grandparents as elder archetypes, the living representation of their ancestry and belonging in a territory. if your grandparents came from somewhere else, you share a definitive disconnect with them as your living roots trail far away with divided memories, sensibilities and loyalties.if you're only concerned with relatives born in your present country, then you stand to gain nothing by dismantling its foundational culture, and there's no question as to where you belong. only immigrants and their orchestrators might benefit from new societal compromises in the name of multiculturalism and DEI
>>543122009we're going to destroy all you fags in Civil War 2.0Fuck the English
>>543125345I know a lot of chinks like you.
>>543150929the founding stock forged this nation, the immigrants were a bunch of minorities brought in as servants and scabs, leading to anarchism, socialism and communism, riots, gang violence and the mob, among other ills. what’s made america ‘schizophrenic’ is a lack of unified identity due to the incomplete assimilation of millions of white minorities. america was never meant to be a smorgasbord of minorities forming ethnic enclaves and serving their own interests against that of the majority founding stock.
chinks built a lot of railroad here, and several generations of chinatowns. if lifetimes count for anything, they have a yuge head start over other "asians" claiming to belong now
>lol
>>543124275this is how brown mutts cope
jews and pajeets prefer to say "brown" or "white" because it's geographically nonspecific, facilitating kalergi migrations of cheap labor and political loyalty across oceans and continents. reject "brown" or "white" description and specify geography
>>543131875I lived in Boston for 12 years, and I met plenty of people with Anglo last names, definitely at least as much as Irish last names. I even dated a girl whose grandfather came from Ireland, met him, old as fuck. Something kind of cheesy about being from Boston, Mass, and having Irish ancestors lol. As for me? All my ancestors have English last names, with one coming from the border area of Scotland, but still being a name rooted in Old English. I've even been to the ""Fatherland"" -- visited Britain for two weeks, had a good time with my Anglo Blood Brothers and Cousins lol. The food was surprisingly good too. It's definitely a meme that Brit food is bad. I had a meat pie in a restaurant that was absolutely phenomenal. Holy fuck it was great, plus another meat pie, and fish and chips and full breakfasts were great too. The girls weren't too ugly either. Saw a number of hotties. One thing that's fun about being in an American in Britain is the way they react when you speak the same language, but with this foreign American accent, it takes them a second to register that they can understand you. This doesn't happen in London of course, because they are used to non-Brit accents, but in Northern England and a couple small towns, some Brits will just kind of have a confused look on their faces when a Burger speaks, then they smile and answer the question. Ah, world traveling. I recommend it bros, especially if you're good looking and have money. LOOOOL
>>543150209This picture is complete bullshit. German-Americans make up about 11-12% of the total population. They aren't the majority population in all those counties colored Orange. Absurdly stupid map.
>>543122009Could not be farther from the truth.Southerners were predominately of English stock especially in Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia.Some of the settlers in Appalachia were Scots-Irish but the majority of them were Anglo settlers looking for more land.The Civil War was actually about Anglo Founding Stock vs Lincoln and his never-ending Immigrant horde and their jewish factories in the northeast.They started the war in the 1830s by placing a tariff on manufactured goods and the only exports we had at the time were agricultural products which hurt the South at the expense of the North.Southerners are founding stock.Northerners are typically immigrants. Irish. Italian. German.Deal with it.
>>543131987Oh look more morons who believe they are inbred in the same city for 400 years. Surprised this thread is still going. >>543134604Not my fault you look at whites as one race when we are mixed and we are mutts
>>543151899My ancestors were at Jamestown, kys NIGGER
Kill all yankees. Curbstomp yankees. Cook yankees in cornbread. Make scarecrows out of yankees. Lynch yankees. Enslave yankees. Make yankees pick cotton. Blow yankees fucking head off with a 44. Suffocate yankees. Strangle yankees. Drown yankees. Burn yankees alive. Tar and feather yankees. Feed yankees to the hounds. Dump yankee bodies in a holler. Dump yankee bodies in a swamp. Feed yankees to the coyotes. Dump yankees in the gulf of mexico. Castrate yankees. Geld yankees. Draw and quarter yankees.
>>543154794>we are mixed and we are muttsDo you have any sources or documentation about how "mixed" American whites are between different Euro ethnicities? Also, it's not even really "mixing" if it's North/Northwestern Euro plus North/Northwestern Euro. The difference between British, Irish, Dutch, German, Scandi, and hell, Northern French, is negligible and essentially irrelevant in most any context, outside just being a historical factoid or something to learn about your family.
>>543122009stop stop, he's already dead!
>>543155208When you say that, you are killing the those unique cultures with your stupid leftwing ideology of everyone being the same "white race." You are in of itself, anti white because you want to blend it all together.
>>543122009My first male ancestor in America came from Sweden by way of Germany in the 1840's. He grabbed a French Cajun woman on the way through Louisiana and built a homestead near what is now Rusk, Texas. There were no humans living in the area at the time. He didn't colonize. He was a frontiersman. I'm more founding American than 99% of you faggots.
>>543155907>He didn't colonize. He was a frontiersmanSo are you saying you are morally a good person because he wasn't an evil colonizer? Well his Cajun bitch wife sure was
>>543155558if they want to maintain their culture and ethnic identity then they should return to their homelands, because this isn’t theirs unless they assimilate.
>>543156180No, kill yourself yankee cocksucker
>>543150659Mormons call themselves English because they're all part beaner
>>543122009No one gives a fuck about you "founding stock" like holy shit delusional
>>543122009no, founding stock also includes natives and whatever percentage of blacks existed at the time, and everything else, but mostly white. i say this as something of a racist, but thats just what the term means. contrary to what leftoids say terms like "founding stock" or "original demographics" aren't inherently racist concepts.
>listen to me saar my homeland was redefined thirty seven times by foreign conquerors, so i know all about nation building
>>543142279This is a very disingenuous argument. The south had two main competing cultures at the time: Cavalier and Borderer. Cavaliers were a majority in large numbers on the east side of the fall line, Borderers in comparable numbers from my research to the west of it. They mixed in the piedmont. Most the cavaliers in the Carolinas, for example, were loyalist because they were Scott's who aligned with the crown and that's who gave their land grant. Virginia is unique, as most their Cav's from my research were not loyalist. They came after the English Civil War and hated the crown for quite awhile. These same Virginians flooded into the backcountry of the piedmont and mountains from Virginia to Alabama along with the borderers. The Virginian's and Carolinian's had a large population of ex cavaliers (ie second-fourth generation removed from Jamestowns and Williamsburg) and borders (ie basically english) combined with various minority groups such as Morravians, Freed Irish and British indentured servents, Huegonauts, and Bavarian Germans to name a few. There's no real controversy as to their contributions to the Revolution, which was substantial and it's dillusional to think otherwise. Hell, NC rebelled 10 years prior to the start of the revolution against its government, starting the independence movement to begin with. Hence why the Scott's were brought in. These same families stayed until the south for the most part until immigration to Dixie picked up in the 90's. Idk why this is even controversial. One could argue all the positive american cultures are from the south. New England and the rust belt for the most part became the dumping ground for cheap immigrants for the factories over 100 years ago. I don't listen to half of them because they never pick up a fuckin history book. But also, their contribution is just as important to independence, despite their founders being in a schitzo cult.
>>543155558bruh, I have light blonde hair and hate anti-white stuff. It's just a biological fact that all those people overlap a lot genetically, compared to more distant Southern and Eastern euros. Honestly, if I had a little white Anglo daughter, I'd greatly prefer her to be with an Anglo American instead of another NW Euro American, which sounds kind of crazy lol, but whatever. There's just something that sticks in my craw about other white Americans talking about non-Anglo ancestors. We should've shut the gates to the country long before the Civil War. We dun goofed. badly.
Asmongold thinks heritage americans include white europeans and niggers
The Southern “English stock” lost their right to lead or form core America in 1865. It’s been not stop cope and pretending from them ever since.
>>543159986english have blonde hair, Irish have blonde hair, germans have blonde hair, swedes have blonde hair, poles have blonde hair, italians have blonde hair. Same for blue eyes ect... we all have genetic overlap but it's globohomo to start abandoning individuality. I agree with you and I'm mixed with German. America should never have let my hun blood into this nation.
>>543160576Yeah we know dumbass look how America turned out being led by New England bankers.
>>543122009who the fuck would want to be *ngloid
there's a way to fix this btw, just give anglos green cards on request without any prerequisites, we'll fix the genetic issues introduced by germans
you might be surprised who wants to abandon their heritage and belong among others. it's more common and widespread now than anyone has ever seen. accident?
>>543160922You can come if you bring your sister and she must look slagged up
>>543161194unfortunately she's woke, you might be able to fix her though she's a wild one
>>543160496niggers that were slaves technically are heritage americans, they have been here longer than many whites. Blacks are culturally influenced by the south. There is a clear difference between them and someone from say haiti.
>>543122009Not founding stock, my great great grandparents came to the dakota territory in the mid 1800s from Norway, they walked to Washington, then the Oregon territory before the railroad got put in.Family has been here almost 200 years now.
>>543161451if you can't trace your heritage to a free man (most of which were english) before 1776 then you ain't no heritage murican
>>543161560okay well if you only count them as being free after emancipation, then they are still more legacy americans than a large portion of americans that came in waves after.
>>543161733correct, a lot of you are only citizens of the usa, you aren't actually american
>>543161995But what constitutes american and not american at this point? Circle back to OPs shitpost. This has always been a matter of boasting among Americans since colonial times. Even under the British crown. It's a stupid argument that even the Bible touches on when people would brag about being Jewish in the New Testament. I have potentially have 4000 ancestors going back to circa 1600. What makes someone pure?
i do not recognize the so-called authority of your maritime admiralty code of high seas pirates as indicated by the aspect ratio and gold fringe tassel trim like a french whore's boudoir curtain right where you sit in judgment over the people who pay for your luxurious enrobementations
>>543162512An American is an ethno-cultural identity exclusive to the descendants of the original founding population, whereas people who immigrate later are merely citizens possessing legal paperwork but no claim to the true national identity.
>>543122009>memeflag>vpnjeet>RAYG BAYT!!!>1pbtidThis fucking place is unusable
>>543163121But America wasn't a fully developed country like modern day and was developing into the 20th century. The idea that we are just nation of immigrants isn't true. If you wanna go down that route, I mean we could pick apart the British as the most mongrelized mutt people in existence depending on how far back you wanna go.
My ancestors are Spaniards, Prussians, and Danes.
>>543142279The very loyalist Virginia that produced George Washington and Patrick Henry?I would agree if you're speaking about the Carolinas or Georgia. And honestly South Carolina and coastal Georgia even today have cultural heritage of the time they were a sugar colony. It's surprising the extent to which the Caribbean influenced them if you haven't been.
>>543163413Americans were culturally distinct from my English ancestors by the time of the Revolution, so much so that it caused a lot of tension. Many people like Vox Day agree with the sentiment that the divide between who is an American and who is just a citizen starts after 1776. It's unfortunate that your ancestors decided to open up the flood gates so readily a few decades after you gained independence but it is what it is and you either live with your mutt status or let us back in to fix it.
>>543164070with that kind of attitude you can go fuck yourself, we are full. Brits are the most cucked people. Descended from people too scared to get in a fucking boat.
>>543164184We are descended from based coastal Germanic tribes, crossed the seas to populate Britain in waves and navigated the ocean to set up colonies so you don't know what you're talking about. At least 75 million of you are English to a significant degree, use English common law as a basis for your own, speak English, half of you are Protestant and your culture is largely based on English customs, it was even English inventors that propelled society to such a degree as to enable the industrial revolution.I guess you think that it was worth being mutted and forgoing the original American identity as it allowed your population to swell to such a magnitude as to exert your power and influence over the world given how much resources you control and squander on visits to Buc-ee's with your comically large SUVs.
>>543165174you talk gay and your shits all retarded
>>543165387That's funny because to us you talk like retarded West Country farmers.
