He would own /pol/ in a debate
about why getting child porn is a good thing?
He permanently lost every debate when his response to his abandoned son joining a pedophile ring was "based."
>>543181130Nobody could beat /pol/ on that particular subject
>>543181084>Twice divorced repressed homosexual deviant with no credentials or degrees The fact that you watch his streams and listen to that fag talk about his opinions is pathetic.
>>543181227>joining a pedophile ringwait what
>>543181084FUCK OFF EGLIN
>>543181084He would own /pol/ in a dicksucking contest for sure.
You do what that anti-israel guy did. Just call him an idiot who reads wikipedia instead of books and he just crashes out.
>>543181084ah elections coming up, we're back to these posts.
>>543181227qrd
Yeah, by repeatedly asking about things everyone knows via common sense.>You think that immigrants changed our lives significantly? Define "significant change".The only way to defeat him is by mocking him and pressuring him to discuss the actual topic.
dude annihilated him in this debatehttps://youtu.be/8wl2zPHIscA
>>543181084All leftist politics and views are ultimately borrowed from conservative and/or, "classical liberal", principles, while at the same time seeking to undermine those principles for results-based egalitarian religions; holistically self-defeating.that said I don't care what people's opinions are if they live well and prosper
>>543181084I would send him to Israel, forever
the face of nu-/pol/
>>543181084I would just lift him up over my head and throw him into the trash and then go up to the mic and say QED. The audience would cheer, and I would deeply bow in honor.