How the fuck would that work? Was Hitler ever employed?
Step 1: not be slovenia
Bump
Good idea in theory, tricky to apply in practice
>>543234180the point is essentially that you were able to get rich as an employer as long as it benefits the peopleyou fuck with people's rights or culture, and you're screwed. if you don't, and invest back into the country, you're free to win more shekels it's similar in nature to that China does with it's companies, but without enforced government [partial] ownership
>>543234180>SocialismAnother Jewish Socialism thread? KYS.
>>543234180In the German context it literally mean nothing more than institutionalizing the idea that everyone should be paid in proportion to their output. So if you own a bakery and one employee makes twice the dough as all the others, that person should be paid more. They didn't need to be strict about it, just push things culturally.The key was expatriating niggers and jews and gypsies. (Or in our world, jeets and spics.) Under the wage slavery implied by forced migration, labor experiences a forcing function to minimal payout. Nothing more than an oversupply.
>>543235021You are talking about employer-state relation, but the quote is about the employer-employee relation.So when an employee wants a week off but employer won't permit it, how can they be united? It is a zero sum game.
>>543235077>CanaanitesMeds
>>543234823>tricky to apply in practiceIn other words he butchered the entire pro-labour wing of the party and then sent striking workers to concentration camps.
>>543235119But this is nothing special. Even the USSR had that and it was communist. The quote is about employer-employee relations not two employees when one is working harder than other.
>>543235120A zero sum game is when one side can only win at the cost of the other. This is nothing of the sort. Employers are simply expected to respect workers, and workers are expected to work their hardest. Its just difficult for modern plebs to grok because we're conditioned by social media to be confrontational about everything.
>>543235209To be fair, communists also banned unions and strikesIt is one slave ideology to anotherPeron was the only one who allowed his workers to strike if they wanted to.
>>543235231I just gave you an example. You can either have a week off or you can't. And the wage you are paid per hour is a zero sum game too. Every cent you get more, the employer gets less.
>>543235228>Even the USSR had that And they won every single tier of the space race. It isn't special, you're right, and ALSO its absent from the contemporary world. Both things can be true.See how you're proving my point about modern people being conditioned to confrontation at *literally* every word, even when people are agreeing with them? That's what you're doing right now.
>>543235325This is dumber than an LLM. Just stop posting. You're stupid.
>>543235276And capitalists hire paramilitary groups to do the killing for them.Unity between labour and capitalists or statists is impossible.
>>543235361So no argument ...>>543235337Yeah and they collapsed in 1991 lol
Nah you can find things like this going back e.g. encourage workers owning shares in their companies/distributism or the mutuals and cooperatives movement
>>543235209And then Dr Mengele turned them into orthopedic insoles!Never forget
>>543235603>encourage workers owning shares in their companiesBut this is not working together, shares are a fixed slice of the pie, if workers have shares, that is the profit that the capitalist sacrificed.
