Why don't you watch cricket, /pol/?It was invented by the British, taken to all the places they colonized, and to this day is still only popular in those places.>inb4 indiaIndia is a cricketing nation because they were ruled by the British first. The Indian affinity for cricket is a remnant of the era of British rule. In other words, the Empire lives rent free in their heads through sport.
>>543251480Test cricket specifically. The other formats are niggerlicious.
>>543251480In what other sports are the athletes so pathetic and lazy that they'd lose to Indians?
>>543251480Cricket?
>>543251549Based>>543251568I think it has to do with popularity. England is more focused on soccer and Australia is more focused on Aussie rules/rugby league. India, meanwhile, is cricket-obsessed because they don't really have anything else other than a folk game called kabaddi which recently got professionalized and turned into a franchise thing. It's the same reason why the USA gets BTFO in the World Cup every four years: the country's main focus is on things other than soccer.
>>543251893Doesn't matter, they're still professional players, highly paid and no other obligations. And they can't beat Indians, the weakest and least intelligent race. This is like a mens team losing to women, totally inexcusable
>>543251480My Sottish mother once told me -" It's a English puff's game - and if I ever catch you playing it i'll cut yer baws off"
>>543251480Whites should reclaim cricket now that football is brown infested
>>543252216Google "USA cricket team"
>>543252216Faggot>>543252262Pajeets
>>543252262>>543252283Yes, it's quite unfortunateBut realistically who else in the US would be into cricket?
>>543252503Boring game anywaay.
>>543251480>White man's gameNot from what I've seen
