If women were in charge we wouldn't have any wars. We need a female president
I'd give a female president a shot but I'd be skeptical she'd be better than a man. Anyone assuming a woman would be better has ignored the behavior of women
Man, what a retardHe also doesn't know because he's never had a women
>>543283740He>believesHe’s >confidentHe’s not certain though. I believe he’s wrong; in fact I’m confident he’s retarded.
>>543283740Cringe 80s stand up comedy premise that millions of liberals unironically believe still despite mountains of contradictory evidence. We put women in charge and it turns out they have as little or less empathy than men do about men dying in wars. Who could have guessed? Well besides everyone that has ever met a woman I guess.
>>543283740aren't women significantly more murderous?
If women were in charge there would be more wars with more atrocities and conducted less efficiently. Women are more viscous than men. They just don’t have the same competence.
>>543284779*vicious lmao
>lol
>>543283740>If women were in charge we wouldn't have any wars. We need a female presidentNice bait. Who was Indira Gandhi?
>>543283740if they can’t handle the kitchen they can’t handle a country
>>543283740It'd just be a load of countries not talking to each other... Which I... *guess* would be peaceful? :/
>>543283740things would be better if we simply put the simps in camps.
>>543283740Define woman.
>>543283740you are confused. a woman president would encourage men presidents elsewhere to start a war with us
>>543283740>If women were in charge we wouldn't have any wars. We need a female presidentonly a virgin faggot who never witnessed how spiteful and cruel women are could say such nonsense unironically.
>>543283740A niggerfaggot was close enough.Let's not make the mistake of letting women kill us all.
>>543283740It would have to be a specific type of women, just like shitblooded semitic men do a dogshit ass job, unlike us.If we specifically stipulated that>only squatemalan abuelas can practice lawfor the next 5 years, and no other (no kike women), our society would 100% improve.But this is mostly because our current crop of kike and mutt slaves are terrible stewards. Anyone would do better.
>>543283740>We need a female presidentNot big mike then.
>>543285026thiswe would start fighting like muslims>alright marines, mommy orders a suicide strike to provoke the other country into fighting us, then we can call the other bigger countries to help us cancel our enemies so they can never sit at the cool girls lunch table ever again
>>543283740Women have been the majority of voters for 100 years and look how that's turned out
>>543283740Women were given the vote and rights and they destroyed western society in less than a century. Female teachers are purposely failing boys in school to elevate girls and birth rates are down and men are being discriminated against in all areas of society
>>543283740>If women were in charge we wouldn't have any warslmao, look at the eu and the extreme hyper damage their women have caused, bringing them to the absolute brink of the most brutal war imaginable against a country absolutely capable and willing to go to the woodchipper mud-pit over it all with no mercyeu-women picked a fight with the absolute most dangerous, violent nation possible, completely unprovoked, out of pure delusional hubris
>>543283740Most women can't even properly manage their own cuntholes. They seriously can't figure out who to and not to fuck and what the merits are of fucking one guy over another.
>>543285632pretty sure the Bible warns about this.
