we live in a gynocracy driven by capitalism/jews. women are easily capitalized upon, consequently, all facets of culture and pop culture, ranging from legal frameworks regarding legal jurisdiction and maternity leaves, to netflix series, celebrations of life, empowerment narratives, and politics (etc.) prioritize women because of how easily they can be commercialized for profit. meanwhile, men, who tend to be more productive yet less easily commercialized, have become heavily dehumanized.essentially, the world is ruled by a capitalist engine that empowers women due to their high commercial viability while marginalizing men, who are often viewed as disruptive to the system and less necessary for immediate consumer enrichment. naturally, men tend to be more vigilant of their surroundings, often finding ways to bypass or critique capitalism, whereas women are more deeply immersed in and engaged with the system, so they have been prioritized
>>543349838Cool now they get to pay taxes for bullshit.Good job bitches.
>>543349838Weak men did this
>>543349838the hierarchy is actually like thishigh status menwomenlow status menall the systems that you're describing that women exist within and which empower women, there are men at the top. capitalism is run by men, the media is run by men. most men just don't belong to that club. a small group of men have depowered the rest of men so that they don't have to compete.
Not a real gynocracy until women are topless 24/7
>>543350079>it’s not the harem>it’s the guy running the haremIt’s definitely both lol you’d have to be retarded to think Solomon wasn’t controlled by his wives
>>543350020it was jews anon
>>543350173Herod chopped of John the Baptists head for his wife. Adam gave up his agency for some fruit his wife said, dude trust me bro. Tale old as time.
>>543350079jews are at the top“high status men” are just jewish lapdogs mostly
>>543350079let me correct it for you, leafy>high status jews >women >low status menactually i dont believe jews did this, like vast majority of /pol/ believe. i think capitalism exist as itself without any human really being in charge. capitalism being its own thing, a living entity, who consumes all, is already explored by nick wand, and you don't need to be a filthy commie to realize thatthe anwser for me basically catholicism, facism or (god forgive us) communism. i believe facism and communism can be capitalized as well but catholicism could actually save the world
>>543350303i meant nick land sorry i am a ESL manolo
>>543350303nick land is retardedan all white country would be fine as capitalistscapitalism is a problem because jews and other shitskins and womenare selfish solipsistic thiefsthey cannot wield power and belong nowhere near itwe need more henry fords
>>543350421nick land is retarded i agree, i never agreed with him in anything except this. the reading of capitalism as a living entity is very real, because when the jews in power die, other jews will come, and when all the jewish RACE disappear from earth, other people will come to take the lead, but the power structure still there>>543349838>>543350303trannies are a good example of this, in order to survive, autistic men that are the lowest in human hierarchy, have been been massively groomed on behalf of their condition to force them to become women, so they can escape the harrowing reality of being a man with all the social conditions that entails being a man
>>543350421i always though that this idea of raciality is so stupid. of course niggers and jews are bad. it is endorsed because there is an agenda to end the white race, and capitalism has made our women fall in love with inmigrants. white people basically saved the world from barbarism and are the only people who can defeat this unhinged dystopia in wich we live, that's why they have want us deadwith this said, i don't think capitalism with white people would function either way. probably the same white genocide would entail if capitalism was left alive
>>543350608power isnt the problem its who wields itin fact, a good man must be powerful to bind a bad man who wishesharm on a weaker person
>>543349838Become a hermit and live on welfare until it runs out then use that gun you keep in the dresser to shoot your self.
>>543350741i dont agree, at some point, freedom and capitalism go hand in handbecause the alternative is “you didn’t build that”which invalidates individual enterprisewhich is not desirable because free people are more productiveagency and autonomy are requirementsof human flourishingalternatively, national socialism also only works in a homogenous populationthe problem always goes back to jews forcingracial unconsciousness at the end of a gun barrel of the state
>>543350303Capitalism in itself is ok.The problem is centralisation.Think about it for a bit.What's the one thing that mainstream capitalism and communism have in common? All the money in the hands of 1 institution. For capitalism that's a corporation, for commies it's the state, which is also just a corporation really.Decentralised capitalism however is great. Every worker building a pile of capital, trading skills and products for capital in order to build a better future for their children.Decentralised socialism sounds weird too. Perhaps it doesn't, when you learn what the #1 ambition of a certain gouvernment was: building up every individual from a rightly depressed, unemployed wreck, into a strong sovereign stalwart creator and worker who can support his family himself.That would be the German gouvernment of the 1930s, which did objectively succeed in uplifting the NEETs created by the Weimar Republic into a first world economy powerhouse in just 2 years.How was that achieved? By creating a new currency exclusively issued and controlled by the state treasury, which couldn't be loaned with interest and had purchasing power to rival the British pound sterling thanks to limited printing and a high minimum wage.You see, high minimum wage itself achieves nothing. It needs to be worth a damn first.And to do that, they couldn't take all the money and evenly distribute it.They had to support individuals in creating the wealth themselves, decentrally.Obviously it didn't work in the long run, they lost the war.But in 2 years, a completely dependent slave state gibbeted by the Anglo-French clique picked itself up by its bootstraps and undid 16 years of rape.The method? Keeping the money where the workers create it, in their own fucking hands.Decentralised capitalism with minimal taxes and high wages.
>>543350875i don't care about the individual, i genuinely believe freedom exist in God and i believe we should live in a theocratic dicatorship. "Muh freedom" basically has justified things like abortion or teenagers hormoning themselves becoming freaks before they turn 20. the reality here is that this is also the capitalization of the human life and health
>>543350990there is definitely something to be said about a non liberalsocietybut those are only viable in a homogenous populationwho has some kind of organizing principlethose dont really exist anymoreor they are incoherentthe religious systems end up becoming jew apologetic systemsin most casesso the organizing principle has to be differentthan some mainstream religion
>>543350956this seems great but seems excedingly difficult to apply
>>543351095then what would you say is the ideal economic anwser?
>>543351165>then what would you say is the ideal economic anwser?We make soap out of jews and then sell the product -- profit
>>543349838based. fuck islam and christianity branches of mosses's story.
>>543351133It's about perspective, as I see it.People work for the money. Is that true? It's what they say all the time...What do they need the money for? To buy free time.People start businesses and grow them huge in order to gain the capital to pay other people to do all the work, in essence buying free time.But some people love their work. They put all their free time into a project or passion, and happen to create wealth by doing that.Perhaps then they have their freedom, their free time, and they're filling it with what they love to do.Perhaps that should be encouraged for all.Not everyone can do everything, but there's always something they wanna do a lot.There's nothing wrong with letting them do that.All the state then has to do, is ensure that there's enough money to go around, not too much, no interest rates, and minimal taxation.Perhaps they can keep the tax on paying a salary, but revoke the income tax for workers and for entrepreneurs' own salary.That way every worker gets a fucktonne more purchasing power, which propels the entire economy.Look at that, decentralised capitalism.And while we're at it, ban usury. No need for that when you, for example, implement this limited printing through a currency-per-capita system.
>>543349838fascism is the way
>>543349838well we sure as fuck don't live in a patriarchy
>>543349838We truly do. The world has been so thoroughly feminized its completely out of balance.
