[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gettyimages-2174079304.jpg (245 KB, 2000x1335)
245 KB JPG
I got a real question for americans.

Let's say Iran had developed nuclear weapons before us and were the world's #1 superpower and told us we were not allowed to build one or they would completely obliterate out civilization, would you think we need a nuke of our own or not?
>>
>>543484282
If my Grandma had wheels she would have been a Trycicle.
>>
>>543484282
This post is antiseptic
>>
>>543484282
I would think after our revolution against a tyrannical monarch we should NOT form another tyranny with religion. I would also think joining the global economy and playing nice with our neighbors would be good. Spending money on terrorism instead of the public good should have been done. Making child soldiers illegal also should have been done. So your delusional fantasy still implicates Iran as the villain they are.
>>
>>543484282
No. Only Jews (and Jew-approved shabesgoys) are allowed to have nuclear weapons.
>>
>>543484680
"Terrorist" just means anyone opposed to jews now
>>
>>543484282
USA isn't a religious tyranny seeking domination and genociding millions of people in Syria and Yemen tho
>>
>>543484282
Well, do you kill rioters?
>>
>>543484853
I knew a president who asked if we could just shoot them in the legs or something. That count?
>>
>>543484843
It's Iran starving Yemen?
>>
The world is not fair, the strong take whatever they want from the weak, this has not changed for 10000 years, you may not like it but it is what it is. Currently the US is strong and Iran is weak
>>
>>543484930
Yes
>>
>>543484853
>it's "rioters", and not "protestors" or "freedom fighters" now
kek
Thanks for the honesty, Moishe
>>543484953
It's Iran that is imposing a blockade on Yemen?
>>
>>543484282
not really. The USA only needed nukes to be a global power-player. Iran only needs nukes to be a regional hegemon. Most countries get by fine without nukes. USA, in your scenario, would probably be a relatively isolationist country, like before ww1.

Also, countries (except for Pakistan, India, and Israel) agreed not to build nukes in 1970 (the NPT). Did USA, in your hypothetical, agree not to build nukes? If so, it's better to abide by agreements when you're able to.
>>
>>543485111
They blocked Hormuz, they allow weapons to the Houthis, both of them steal aid from starving civilians



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.