I have some free time and I’ve been going over the patents of Stanley Meyer. There are some somewhat complicated pieces of this invention but the main concepts are simple. I’m looking for any anons that want to work with me on finishing the Stanley Meyer rebuild. I’d like to have several independent science anons verify my work and each others work so we can retrofit both a car and plane engine someday to run on water. The main concepts, 1. Get water from the tank to the engine split like a spark plug with high voltage pulse. 2. Control air flow so hydrogen doesn’t blow up the engine3. Refilter it back into the engine and resplit it back into HHO again for maximum efficiency 4. Get it done within three years before trump and Barron die on September 22nd, 2029. That’s right Donnie gets a third term.If anyone wants to join in this project I have a telegram. We’re going to hollow bros. https://t.me/+BQMIHzzn0nMwYzEx
Should also note for planes and cars the water tank and engine will have to be in a temperature controlled environment and then alternated to electricity to avoid freezing in the fuel lines.
What is the point of this? You're going to use a huge battery to split the water into hho so you can burn it into an ICE engine. It's just an EV with a lot of steps
>>543512175Stanley Meyer used a small battery and and an alternator to keep it recharged like a car. He was able to get 122 miles per gallon of water.
It was just a scam to sell shit to idiots through the mail.
>>543512223Why are anons able to replicate his high amount of hydrogen production then?
>>543512216Pretty sure he lied because that's a perpetual motion machine. Ultimately all the energy you're using to power the car is in the battery. You can't magically get energy for free
>>543512510You can if you tap into the atomic structure, or strong nuclear force. Also known as zero point energy.
>>543512091Pretty sure this is how a guy got assassinated by the cia.
>>543513067Don’t care Lel
>>543512284were you able to?
>>543512091Sure burning hydrogen and oxygen releases a ton of energy but doesn't separating h20 require even more energy?
>>543513436Midwit
>>543513436Not with the increased voltage. You just need to pulse the water rapidly with high voltage and the right frequency which I read was 12hz or something until it starts to repel atoms.
>>543512091Sorry my glowing friend, I science alone.
>>543513487Well no one else has been able to replicate it including you so...
>>543513528Why do these fantastic inventions always have super simple 1st semester electrical diagrams but no one can replicate the results?
The secondary circuit is almost identical to a microwave oven which I'm guessing is where he got the idea since microwaves work by moving water molecules. How is he getting that waveform though? Can a smartfag tell us if that is correct?
>>543512091scammer, and was sued.
>>543512216>He was able to get 122 miles per gallon of water Liquid hydrogen itself has lower energy density than gasoline you schizo midwit so imagine how much worse it will be with water.
>>543514538>Liquid hydrogen itself has lower energy density than gasolinehuh? Why are space rockets powered by liquid hydrogen instead of gasoline?
>>543512091You cannot create or destroy energy; it takes more energy to split the hydrogen than you get back from burning it. The only way it works is if you split the hydrogen with excess energy from whatever generation when you don't need it outright so you can store and use it later.
>>543514234This isn't my field but I asked AI and this is what it says:Based on the provided schematic diagram of Stanley Meyer's resonant circuit, the "REDUCED GATE TIME" staircase waveform circled in red is produced through the following sequential steps:• Pulse Packet Generation: The Pulse Generator utilizes a Pulse Gate Control to slice a continuous 50% duty-cycle pulse stream into distinct packets or bursts called a Gated Pulse Train.• Voltage Step-Up: This gated train passes into the Primary Coil on a Toroidal Core (acting as a transformer), which steps up the voltage amplitude before passing it over to the secondary Isolated Circuit.• Unipolar Rectification: In the secondary loop, a Blocking Diode serves to filter the incoming signal so that only positive-going pulses can pass through. Crucially, this diode stops the circuit from discharging backward when the pulse turns off.• Resonant Step-Charging: The Resonant Charging Choke (inductor) works alongside the Variable Inductor and the Fuel Cell Water Capacitor to establish an LC resonant charging pump. Because the diode prevents energy from escaping, every subsequent pulse dumps a new packet of energy into the water capacitor, building the voltage higher and higher in a staircase pattern.• Gate Modification: When the Pulse Gate Control reduces the Gate Time, it shortens the duration of the pulse packet. This cuts off the burst early, allowing fewer high-frequency pulses per block and resulting in the abbreviated staircase packet shown inside the red circle.
>>543512510its not a perpetual machineit charges the battery via an alternator that collects excess energy generated from the combustion of the hydrogen and oxygen gases from the water, its not free energy, it requires gas to be powered,the gas is created through a process called electrolysis separating liquid water into its main elements HHOworks the same way as a gasoline combustion engine just with extra steps and cheaper more abundant fuel supply
Stop trying to give niggers water fueled cars and nothing bad will happen to you. This is a warning.
>>543514750liquid hydrogen has a higher specific energy, ie energy per kg which means it's lighter for the same thrust over time, but the tanks need to be bigger.
>>543512091>high voltage pulseTalk to this guyhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg45A-ph7Eu8jQgfrwDkHLg
>>543513938quality of materials and specific requirements and tolerances in manufacturing the devices are hard to replicate by the average joe
If you pour enough H2O into an inlet port of a containment system on the vehicle, in theory, you could power a small impeller turbine driving a electrical generator, to charge a battery array, for the electric drive.
>dude it's magicCan we see it?>NO NEVERFake and gay.
>>543515445
>>543515133The funnier part is where OP says something about resplitting back into HHO which I assume to mean H2O. Would have been funnier to say Dihydrogen Oxide. Splitting a molecule with electrical pulses doesn't take much energy at all. Ionizing hydrogen atoms to split off the electron has net zero energy. Solve this and you would free the world.
>>543514234Breadboard connoisseur here.Its gibberish. Like he copy/paste random shit from a Radio Shack mail flyer and threw in (variable) just to say "youre not doing it right!!" when nobody could reproduce the results. Bullshit scam artist that never let anyone inspect his shit.Id undergo open heart surgery with an Indian doctor before I ever took his design seriously.
>>543512091You could power a car by separating hydrogen from oxygen and using a hydrogen combustion engine, but it wouldn't be practical. The apparatus to separate that much hydrogen from oxygen would be better off being installed stationary in your home, then you stop by and fill your hydrogen tanks. It would take days to get enough hydrogen to power even a small car, and the gasses that hydrogen combustion engines give off are horrible for the environment. Hydrogen vehicles exist but only for racing, powered by hydrogen sourced in the typical ways.Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles would be more practical, which is a hybrid vehicle that uses electric motors entirely, which are charged by hydrogen tanks for extra range when needed. The hydrogen tanks combine with oxygen in the air coming in through the vehicle's grill, then the combined molecules release a charge which is captured and used to charge the batteries, leaving water behind as waste (wet roads being the only downside). These already exist but were mostly a flop because hydrogen fill stations never took off and started Jewing on price. That's still the most environmentally friendly and cheapest way to power a motor vehicle though, if hydrogen production and distribution would take off. It also castrates oil moguls in the middle east, so expect quiet and loud assassinations of anyone who actually pushes to make it practical.
>>543512175Worse yet. Conservation and entropy. The two most fundamental principals of the universe. You can only get back out what you put in, but you will always lose some due to inefficiency. You can't create a net energy by splitting water molecules and then re-burning the hydrogen. You're breaking all of the laws of thermodynamics.
>>543516018Stanley Meyer solved the entire system you just presented. He was able to create combustion on demand for an engine. He figured out with extremely low current and high amperage with the right frequency and number of pulses per second that you could summon enough hydrogen on demand to run an engine. And then just like a rocket after it combusts back into water you can refilter it for more usage. Complete waste of time to store hydrogen gas in any form but water. The tanks explode and are extremely heavy and negate all of the energy you add.
>>543512091Electrolysis takes more energy to do than it provides
>>543517406Is there video of him driving it
>>543512153>>543512216>>543512284>>543512665If you're such an expert on this topic why are you asking a mongolian bison taming forum for help doing it?
>>543516943>You can only get back out what you put in>You're breaking all of the laws of thermodynamics.Explain pic related then?Water cavitation heater are factually verified to achieve over 100% efficiency. Often around 120%. You get way out more energy than you put in. Folks on /sci/ say it's because of different types of energy, as in electric converted to thermal.But isn't that happening here too? You're expending electricity to split water molecules, which is then converted into heat and light. Same thing. Different type of energy.
>>543512091without nuclear fuel rod it aint happening.if you want to improve electrolysis you need to add chemical catalysis, generating frequencies and pulses will make you lose out on conversion efficiency.you can already tell by his name that Stanley Meyer is a retard.
>>543513938They write just enough to be granted the Patent and conceal as much trade secret as possible.
>>543512091>I’d like to have several independent science anons verify my workEngineer hereIt takes about 140 MJ of energy to split a kilogram of hydrogen out of water via electrolysisYou get about 120 MJ of energy by burning a kilogram of hydrogenWater is not a fucking fuel source, it's a net lossWater powered cars are always a scam, there's some hidden battery somewhere where the energy is coming fromTANSTAAFLAll is energy
>>543517633There are no bisons in Mongolia. This is a Lao Leek Pickling Forum btw
I wish I could help more with this anons, I'm a STEM smooth brain, but Stanley's work reminds of this video from 18 years ago, that seemingly works on the same premise but has some nuclear isotope making it work.https://youtu.be/BX2RxlXCZKA?si=s50aRvatyvUEL-ZNWho's killing the hydrogen car: it's only ten minutes long.
>>543517913No mention of frequency or high voltage pulsing. Jewish shill detected.
>>543514750most of the thrust comes from solid rocket boosters
>>543517777Checked.
>>543514234>>543517913>>543517670>>543517523>>543516943A catalyst and the right microwave radio frequency correctly modulated,Causes water to change state by changing the bond angle. Water does this to a certain degree on any surface when it has EM energizing the usual bond angle slop into something more organized.So the catalyst + the little amout of EM cause the widened bond angle 'water' to crack. -the whole water column is not immediately fuel but there is a 'demon' edge here of concentrated EZ (exclusion zone) water.
>>543517645Same marketing scam as every heatpump. It's moving existing heat from somewhere else and they're only counting the cost of moving it. Basically what they're doing is using 0.5 gal of gas to drive to the station, filling a 5 gal tank, using 0.5 gal to drive back, then pointing to the 5 gallons and going "I only put 1 gal in, 500% efficiency!"To put it another way they would claim PV solar is INF% efficient because the light "is already there," instead of looking at how much light came in vs energy out, which will always be less than 100%.
>>543517645>Water cavitation heater are factually verified to achieve over 100% efficiency. Often around 120%C'mon, anon pic related
>>543518134>I'd like to have several independent science anons verify my work"that won't work and here's why">BUZZWORDS! JEWISH SHILL!You retards are so dumb. What are you sliding?
>>543517645>Explain pic related then?I can explain it with the simple fact you are here shitposting instead of building a thermal power plant off of this Clarktech and becoming the richest man on the planet.Let me guess: "they" are preventing you from hooking it up to a bog standard steam turbine through gang stalking that coincidentally gets worse when you forget your meds.Or is it because you are too traumatized from getting molested by your mother, sisters, aunts, cousins, babysitters, and every other female figure in your life, including your favorite sitcom starlets who talk to you through the TV.
>>543512091Show us your basic diagram, with details like voltages, currents, frequencies and materials.
>>543513067boomer tinfoiler.
>>543512665How did you jump from electrolysis to zero point energy?>>543515413>Use electrolysis to charge a battery to run electrolysisyou don't understand how machines work
>>543520586Because the amount of energy to split atoms in normal electrolysis is enormous, and sneaking behind enemy lines and splitting h20 with resonant frequencies mimics the idea of zero point energy. Which is abundant energy at virtually no cost.
>>543519627https://patents.google.com/patent/US4613779A/en
There are 13 ish patents that Stanley Meyer filed. Everyone needs to download them all. Some of his later patents were modifications to his earlier systems so there might be redundancy in his work, however it should all be there. You can see where his ideas revolutionize too.
>>543520863*evolve too
>>543520811> It is a principal object of the present invention toprovide an electrical arrangement that is power isolated but yet, permits increased power transfer to a utilization device.> Another object of the present invention is to provide such an electrical system that is free of opposing magnetic fields, contacts, slip rings, moving wires, and the like.> Another object of the present invention is to provide such an electrical system that has an output potential that may be varied in magnitude.> Another object of the present invention is to provide a structure that is not affected in size and that may be duplicated in cascade for high power outputs.> Still another object of the present invention is toprovide a winding ring having induced therein multiple discrete voltages.You're a massive faggot for making me read all that.I curse you with a permanently increased chance to meet hostile spiders.Checked.
>>543512091Stay right there, we’ve got you surrounded! You just couldn’t leave well-enough alone, anon, you had to keep asking questions.
>>543514750Some rockets use hydrogen because it's low mass gives it a higher specific impulse (roughly equivalent fuel efficiency) but that same high mass means it has poor energy density.It's also super leak-prone bevause of it's low mass, to the point that even NASA just has an acceptable level of leaking rather than trying to prevent all leaks.Most modern rocket engines have already switched to methane because hydrogen is such a bitch. It doesn't burn as clean as hydrogen, but it's still much cleaner than RP-1/kerosene.Hydrogen still has some potential use cases for lunar exploration, though. You can create hydrogen on the moon, but not methane.
>>543520797There is no zero cost energy. I don't care what you're using to split the molecules. That uses energy
for the retards who don't understand the difference between resonance and brut force...
>>543522148You'll never take more power out then you put in.
>>543512091Theoretical physicist here, my name's Gordon. I did a quick scan of the patents you mentioned and things seemed to check out. Possibilities of a resonance cascade are well within normal parameters. What lab you out of?
>>543522148This is on par with the rife machine. Supposedly some orchestra guy was testing this theory against cancer cells to cause them to pull apart when a certain frequency is made.
If it works why doesn't he just use the net energy gained to just separate more hydrogen until he has unlimited energy instead of trying to sell everyone some shit that may or may not work?He could just amass unlimited energy and own the entire planet.
>>543513938Because the process itself is usually difficult to replicate. It’s like trying to copy Coca-Cola or Colonel Sanders’ secret recipe. They may list the ingredients, but the actual process behind it remains unknown.
>>543512175its an EV with an added inefficiency module>yes I'd like my car to be electric powered but i'd like to lose 70% of my energy by throwing water in the mix
>>543512091if there is any magic to this, it is in the step that performs the electrolysis for free. ditch the car, ic engine, and attach a hydrogen fuel cell directly to the output of the magic electrolysis device.
>>543522662The energy is already in the water.Like the energy is already in the bridge in this video - they thought it was bunk but they proved it is real...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSB-nmlbkdA
>>543523858>The energy is already in the water.whats your output if you're trying to extract energy from water? you can't just turn it into hydrogen and then burn the hydrogen to turn it back into water and say you did anything. You need to produce something even lower energy than water for anything to happen.
>>543523858>The energy is already in the water.No the energy is not in the water. That's why you need to use energy to split it first before you can burn it to get your energy back. You're using energy to create chemical potential to get it back. Except nothing is 100% efficient so you're just wasting battery power by turning it into heat.
>>543512091For me, its the Hendershot resonator. Water powered cars are so 1973.
>>543516943>Conservation and entropyNot real, energy is constantly being created and destroyed. If it were true you couldn't explain how anything exists at all. Law of conservation is only true if your definition of energy is pure potential/rest. In that case it's true from the ultimate level this never changes as it's the essence of all things, but it's literally infinite by definition, so you don't need any kind of input, reality doesn't need a kinetic input when it spontaneously manifests existence, likewise if humanity understood cosmic mechanics we wouldn't need a kinetic input either, all we would need to do is create the conditions for spontaneous manifestation.
>>543524342> reality doesn't need a kinetic input when it spontaneously manifests existencethis is to say that motion is the OUTPUT, it's an effect. The cause of motion is the release of energy (stillness). The mover (the input), cannot itself be moved.
>>543524342>energy is constantly being created and destroyedif you could prove this you'd win a nobel prize in physics.
>>543524627>Law of conservation is only true if your definition of energy is pure potential/rest. In this sense there is only transformation from compressive state (creation) to an expansive state (destruction), while the medium which is being compressed or expanded remains the same in it's essence, just as vortexes in water or air doesn't change the fact it's still water or air. But in this case the medium is stillness. Entropy only explains the destruction part of the cycle but if there was only destruction then nothing could arise at all.
>>543512091>1. Get water from the tank to the engine split like a spark plug with high voltage pulse.>2. Control air flow so hydrogen doesn’t blow up the engine>3. Refilter it back into the engine and resplit it back into HHO again for maximum efficiencyIt's being disclosed already as a subset of studies over LENR/cold fusion effects (to much dismay of redditors still calling it a scam) with a few companies like the Italian Prometheus https://www.prometheusreactor.com/home/homepage already being in talks with national institutions, the EU and research institutes like ENEA in order to theoretically validate the concept and make it commercially viable.I mean, if it's not killed off during development.
>>543512091This is a scam you fool. I like conspiracies when they don't contradict thermodynamics (like this engine) or when they are not utterly retarded (fool cell batteries).
>>543512091Get over this hurdle
>>543512091>>543522148What water did he use?Distilled? Deionized? Tap water? Piss?
>>543522148Is there a photo of this circuit with coils anywhere?
>>543523642The difference is there are a lot of Coca-Cola and KFC knock-off available. You don't really need any secret sauce to make soda or fast food.
>>543512091How to power your car with water:1. Build a hydroelectric dam2. Drive an EV
>>543513528Is it just voltage? If you take 9volt battery and in reade it's output to something ridiculous will it work or do you need energy aka voltage and ampere?
>>543512091Make sure everyone working with you burns a talmud in front of each other. Just in case.They're gonna end you otherwise.
>>543525490No, energy in closed system cannot be created or destroyed, it must stay equal to original sum unless outside forces act on it.Because universe is closed system we cannot create nor destroy energy only transform it.
>>543527465>universe is closed systemSays who?
>>543527547Jewish physics
>>543517406The energy you get from combusting hydrogen is the exact amount you spend splitting the water. This is the sort of thing you learn in middle school if you live somewhere without a meth problem.
how could it possibly workit has no caloriesyou cant even walk drinking water alone, you need to eat food too so of course you'd need something more for a car
>>543517406Then mess with those variables and do it yourself then become a billionaire. I will warn you about corporate assassins and Saudi assassins. Shit possibly even the CIA if certain politicians are paid off enough.
>>543517913Wrong. You can get a water powered car if you're not a schizo. React water with Li/Mg/Al to get hydrogen. But then again, it's just a safer but shittier H2 pressure vessel lmfao.
technically you could power a car with ice if you wanted to. all you need is any state that is different from the environment. that just cant be done with normal water.i dont expect normies to know this but hydrogen + metal will kill your metal and hydrogen + lubricant will produce serious toxic waste. the only way to meaningfully use hydrogen are fuel cells and these need some platinum too.
>>543512091>Get it done within three years before trump and Barron die on September 22nd, 2029. That’s right Donnie gets a third term.Huh? I mean i knew he would be getting a third term, but not about their deaths.
>>543527547As far as we know there is nothing outside our universe.
>>543512091I've heard about this and I've seen hydrogen engines but how efficient is this ? As in how many liters of water per kilometer (or crocodiles per school bus in American measures).
>>543512216>He was able to get 122 miles per gallon of water.I call BS
>>543521767>You can create hydrogen on the moon, but not methane.Wanna bet ?https://youtu.be/XqdrLYRs-ik
>>543528719Superimposed, not outside (QED)
I also heard about this stan meyer guyGo for it anon, maybe you really can get enough energy from water using the right technique Just like we can get enough energy from petrol or diesel using the right techniqueOfc in case of petrol or diesel its easierAlso lookup bob lazar (the ufo guy) , he also done something but different, he produced hydrogen using normal electrolysis but instead of storing it in pressurized contaneiner or in cooled liquid form he stored it in metal hydride which was safer and less problematic to store and then he burned itThere are many inventions that never see light of day i guess or lost technologies such as atmoshperic electricity generators used in past
Also its funny how people here quote wiki and ai as source of truth
>>543512091>>543517645you may appreciate https://chavascience.com/en/hydrogen/langmuir-excess-energy-from-hydrogen
>>543530808I still dont see as a concept how one cant opera sing water at its OH stetch bands and have it expose the free H on H-HO.
>>543520811go build it thenyou wontcos it doesnt work.
>>543512510i always thought he built a hydrogen powered generator and charged the battery with it
>>543517406ok then split the whole project downbefore you attach a angine and a car solve the improved hydrogen production first it you got this the rest is a cakewalk
>>543519183bro schizophrenia is nothing to make fun of, its a disability like if someone lost their legs in a car accident, come on
>>543532751>implying I wouldn't make fun of Stumpy McNoLegs
>>543512091Blacklight energy made a car engine run on water from the airthey somehow went bankrupt, go figure
>>543512223you are retarded willfully performing satans work. for non subhumans reading this, look at the water powered cars breaking land speed records in the 1900s.
>>543512091All you have to do is acquire a Toyota multifuel engine (announced 2 years ago iirc), a water tank, some filters (or use distilled water), an electrolyser, hydrophobic and hydrophilic material, 2 tubes, a little hydrogen compression tank for buffer, throttle valve and the right length wire, and a fuel injector that's happy to inject vapour.Run an alternator off the shaft for the electrolyser, supercapacitor in-between.There's enough specific impulse in hydrogen combustion to generate the energy needed to split water and have leftover impulse to drive the car with competitive horsepower, and the O2 you've got from the split can be pumped in to make the combustion extra rich.If you don't do that it'll just burn atmosphere which is fine but leaves energy on the table.The only exhausts are vapour and O2.inb4 sciencefag claims you can get more energy out of it than it costs.People forget that tonnes of megajoules get lost in the extraction and cracking of oil into petrol/diesel.Electrolysed hydrogen costs 33% of input energy, which is cheaper than petrol cracking.Do it in the car and you save costs on transport.And again there's enough energy to split the water and drive the car.
>>543512510>petrol costs nothing to manufacture
>>543514750Specific impulse.Liquid hydrogen takes up way the fuck more space, but per-mass a hydrox combustion cycle has more boom for longer.Otherwise we'd still be using methalox like the V2 did.
>>543538330Starship still uses methalox
>>543515413>the gas is created through a process called electrolysis...which takes more energy than you get from burning the hydrogen>water>fuelwater is ash, hydrogen is fuel
>>543517406>summon enough hydrogenah, that is how he is breaking the laws of thermodynamics: summoning fuel from the demonic plane! If you're a wizard, you don't have to explain shit.
>>543521767good answer, probably a regular on /sci/sfg/
>>543512091>screeching about water cars and free energy>finds water in his gas: also start screechingdafuq's wrong with you
>>543514538Water is more dense than LO2+LH2, double so since you don't need cryostorage.Using pure O2 instead of atmogas gives you more efficient combustion for chamber pressure, and less mass flow for a given power level.Dumb fuck
>>543540965There's a company launching a little satellite soon that has an on-board electrolyser and a water tank so it can test this mechanism in space.Split water, pump hydrogen and oxygen into combustion chamber, boom comes out of the nozzle.The idea is that if this works, it can be used to refuel on worlds or on asteroids that have water in/on them by simply drilling the water up.That gave me the thought: "why not do that in cars with hydrogen combustion engines like that new Toyota multifuel".I don't care if it's less efficient than petrol.Water doesn't have petrol taxes slapped on it.Water is ubiquitous.Water comes from the fucking tap it's that well provided.I'm sure a practical application for long-term use would require distilled water and/or a bunch of filters and biocide, to keep the tank clean, but driving even 40mpg on water is supremely liberating compared to begging a jew or arab for oil.It would obliterate the geopolitical world.
>>543512091>Water powered It's just steam isn't it
>>543512091IT WAS SIMPLE ELECTROLYSIS AND FEEDING HHO GAS INTO AN ENGINE.It is nothing complicated. Auto companies and the rothschilds realized if everyone put 100 car batteries in their trunk, they wouldn't need to buy gas any more, so they killed him.
>>543516943>You're breaking all of the laws of thermodynamics.das rite boi
>>543512091>I’m looking for any anons that want to work with me
>>543515631kek
>>543512091>high voltageThat's where the idea dies.
>a car that runs on water, man
>>543541910>It's just steamNot necessarily. Picrel.
>>543512665>zero point energyBrainlet detected. You probably think ionic "thrusters" are novel as well.
>>543512091
with this device you can make 1kg hydrogen per day and it will fill up a gas bottle too
hydrogen keeps winning guiness records
>>543512091It's just a hydrogen powered car and the tech is already being advertised to various takers and slowly introduced. They just have not announced it or used the membrane in such a fashion but they will. It centers around salt electro mining using cheap homemade ion exchange membranes. Something like $2 to make a membrane that would cost up to thousands commercially. The inventor has done the correct thing and made it public domain, avoiding the pitfall traps other inventors suffered. Through it you can reclaim waste tailings, plate metal at cold temperatures and preserve and manufacture your own solvents. It cost far less than coal to process metal this way. The same membrane can be used to crack hydrogen more efficiently from water. The future is still not the personal automobile however. The writing is on the wall that autonomous taxis will replace all normie drivers in the next decade or two. Perhaps faster than that.
>>543545948but they would rather shoot thousands of tons of it into space and deplete our ozone layer in the process
>>543512091This is about as stupid as a jeet free energy device.
>>543538216I never said anything about money
powerpaste is a solid state storage solution for hydrogenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnTp3PbXza8
>>543546330
the technology has been around for years the public just need to demand it they keep it artificially in a dead end by not building refueling stations and inflating the prices they always talk about implementing it but they do the opposite and delay it into the future because they have different plans for us
two of these and a wind turbine will produce a ton of hydrogen every day which would supply hundreds of cars with fuel
Bump
>>543512091Free energy nutcases are worse than furries. >t. had a schizo on upwork threaten my life after telling me about his overunity concept>idiot was sure it'd work but refused to build a demo
>>543546737I'd rather have nuclear to synthetic gas
>200 000 barrels of nuclear waste in the atlantic ocean (officially)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOSV-oSneOA
>>543548639Nuclear is the best form of energy ever created. >Muh waste!non issue especially for next gen reactors
>>543551925solar makes nuclear completely obsoletecheaper and faster to build and easier to maintain with zero risk or wastechina has build a solar park with 21GW output (or 21 nuclear plants)no new technology requiredthese could have been built in the desert or offshore decades ago and we would have zero energy problems today
>>543552262Yeah and the panels and the batteries take up a fuckload of space and require you to destroy the environment. >muh ChinaChina is building solar, nuclear, coal and everything else. They are building everything because they understand that GDP = energy transformed and they are happy to bet on everything and destroy as much of their natural environment as possible. Additionally solar makes little sense in Europe. China has a desert. You don't
>>543512091But enough about julian brown and his plastoline.
>>543552473we have north africa and the mediterreneanbatteries are not required since it can be turned into hydrogen right awayindustrial sites can be built below the panels but there is enough space anywaythere is no reason for nuclearit's completely obsolete and only serves the purpose to enrich material for nuclear weapons which no one needs
>>543552746>we have north africathere's sandniggers there anon, also niggers nowadays, it's horrible
>>543541495what this actually is: converting solar power (the best, most abundant energy source in space) into thrust. In that case, water as propellant makes sense: cheap and easily tanked, and the combustion products have both high thrust and high ISP (for combustion). The even more efficient option in space are ion thrusters of various flavors (e.g. Hall effect), but then you must settle for very low thrust, and less dense propellants like Xenon or Argon.Note, these materials are NOT FUEL; the energy comes from solar. They are reaction mass.
>>543524342>likewise if humanity understood cosmic mechanics we wouldn't need a kinetic input either, all we would need to do is create the conditions for spontaneous manifestation.based ancient wisdom enjoyer
>>543512091 >>543512153why hasnt anybody smashed this kike slide thread by mentioning that picrel is supposedly a volkswagen single port Type 1 air cooled engine being propelled by water? even got the aftermarket crank pulleyyet it still needs a fan to cool? and another two bullshit external oil coolers?
>>543517913No, you're not an engineer. You're not even White, lol.
>>543558860its not a single port, i just saw the exhaust manifold, its a dual port((((meyer))))) is probably the reason why this is going around the internet again
>>543512091get in the retard chamber.
