[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Does race science debunk religion?
With darwin's discoveries of evolution and natural selection, in the west anthropological racism became popular, it replaced religious ways of looking at the world such as christian vs pagan, by biological such as european vs arab.
Science debunking religion is a common argument but i dont hear much about the racial aspects because its taboo but it seems objectively true
Scientific racism shows humans are genetically unequal debunking "all men are equal, in the image of a perfect god"
If you're christian and racist, its a massive cognitive dissonance that an inbred pakistani or an african is the image of this supposed perfect being
The more that i think about it, remove all the woke shit and smug atheists may be right about the world as its an uncaring cold darwinistic jungle
And race is just one aspect of science, many other scientific discoveries debunk religion
>>
File: 1775845028453551.jpg (232 KB, 960x720)
232 KB JPG
>>543515538
>Does race science debunk religion?
nope
the bible has always been a racist book
some people are cursed, others are blessed, and it's passed down to the children
- https://rentry.org/Deus_Vult_XP
>>
>Racial Egalitarianism: All Arguments Ranked & Debunked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVZ2I4lzUlI
>>
File: 1621519898394.gif (2.77 MB, 3558x3364)
2.77 MB GIF
>>543515538
>Science debunking religion is a common argument
the scientists in your science books are christian
>>
File: 1765253092556183.webm (2.59 MB, 710x400)
2.59 MB
2.59 MB WEBM
>>543515538
>its taboo but it seems objectively true
the official atheist position is anti-racist
>>
File: jew nor greek.png (126 KB, 1127x1350)
126 KB PNG
>>543515538
>all men are equal, in the image of a perfect god
we are equal in that we can all be saved
not that we're all equally tall or smart, etc
>>
File: 1676137807008389.gif (336 KB, 148x148)
336 KB GIF
>>543515730
>official
>>
File: 1779818965342378.jpg (144 KB, 1024x1017)
144 KB JPG
>>543515538
>If you're christian and racist, its a massive cognitive dissonance
christians have been racist for thousands of years
- https://rentry.org/Deus_Vult_NI
>>
>>543515677
>>543515694
Why would a loving god create an indian person? Its a simple question but hard to answer, try to answer it if you can.
>the scientists in your science books are christian
What makes science science, is the objective ideas themselves not the discoverers and communicators, the objective ideas doesnt depend on its discoverer, look at the word discoverer, not inventor
>>
File: 1771406849603719.jpg (1.12 MB, 2633x4096)
1.12 MB JPG
>>543515538
>remove all the woke shit and smug atheists may be right
there is no separating woke shit from atheism
they do not believe in objective morality
>>
File: 1782557826991485.jpg (423 KB, 1439x1282)
423 KB JPG
>>543515538
>many other scientific discoveries debunk religion
not at all
>>
File: 1779031305811975.png (139 KB, 977x205)
139 KB PNG
>>543515677
>>543515694
>>543515730
>>543515762
>>543515781
>>543515819
>>
File: 90qqwa5ox6hd1.jpg (45 KB, 564x564)
45 KB JPG
>>543515792
>Why would a loving god create an indian person
he did not
they created themselves with their sin

The people of Cain are cursed.
>The Lord said, “What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.”
>Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear. Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”
>But the Lord said to him, “Not so; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden.
- Genesis 4:10-16

The people of Canaan are cursed.
>"So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. Then he said: 'Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants he shall be to his brethren.'"
- Genesis 9:24-25

And yes, these were passed down to their children too.
>"You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, YHWH, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me."
- Exodus 20:5
>"One of illegitimate birth shall not enter the assembly of the Lord; even to the tenth generation none of his descendants shall enter the assembly of the Lord."
- Deuteronomy 23:2
>>
>>543515831
100%
>>
File: 1759514244566271.png (1.21 MB, 1107x1420)
1.21 MB PNG
>>543515677
>>543515694
>>543515730
>>543515762
>>543515781
>>543515819
>>543515831
>>543515897
>>
File: 1773729119964009.jpg (600 KB, 700x6826)
600 KB JPG
>>543515792
>the objective ideas themselves
there is objective proof for the existence of god
>>
>>543515897
>>
File: faggotry (1).jpg (476 KB, 2550x3300)
476 KB JPG
>>543515919
>faggotry is not persecuted by christians
false
>>
>>543515923
Nope
>>
>>543515677
wow racist street shitters, we should adopt their foreign religion and pretend to be them!
Lmao
>>
>>543515538
Religion does not even require to be debunked. Nobody ever had to debunk Santa or the Easter bunny. God is no different.
>>
File: comp.jpg (2.87 MB, 5421x4070)
2.87 MB JPG
>>543515919
>the rest
not reading all that
happy that he's an ex-tranny at least
>>
>>543515781
That's aristotle not your christcuck retard
>>
>>543515978
You're a faggot
>>
>>543515762
Why is the physical world like that? The root comes from scarce resources, and god intentionally designed the world for that, and because of scarce resources not every organism can eat and reproduce, they have to compete, that competition evolves and creates evil, such as killing, murder exists because its a good evolutionary tactic to take other organism's resources and mates to pass your genes and end your competition's genes.
Same with the other sins, greed, envy, hate, they are beneficial in evolution, and this whole fierce brutal sinful reality comes from gods intentional design of there being scarce resources
Ive heard of a christian "heresy" that says the physical world is evil, this is very reasonable but the mainstream churches say this is wrong and heretic
Christianity would make so much sense if it just declared the physical world is evil and the unknown other world is some kind of reward for enduring this evil world without becoming evil yourself
>>
>>543515955
anon ypur religions priest are famous for one thing, and it's not good
>>
File: 1784641949298963.jpg (1.1 MB, 1600x1214)
1.1 MB JPG
>>543515963
https://rumble.com/v70fnss-st.-pauls-cathedral-from-glorious-to-groveling.html
>>
File: 1765981667200551.jpg (1.74 MB, 2550x3300)
1.74 MB JPG
>>543515966
>santa
is a real saint
and no, he did not drink coca cola
>the easter bunny
is pagan slop
>>
File: 1775086603229212.jpg (686 KB, 2400x2100)
686 KB JPG
>>543516043
>invite niggers into my country
Foreigners doing well in your nation is literally a curse from god
>"The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail. All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you."
- Deuteronomy 28:43-45
>>
File: 1783486555371086.jpg (967 KB, 1899x2511)
967 KB JPG
>>543516056
see what atheists are famous
here >>543515730
and here >>543515819

mainstream paganism is also woke
>>
>>543515897
So by birth someone is cursed? Not actions, not morality, not anything controllable but by birth?
God of the old testament is consistent with that, but the old testament god doesnt seem loving, perfect nor just.
What even is good, what even is just?
Isnt it simple justice that people are punished for their actions? Imagine if some stranger murdered someone, and you did nothing wrong but you were punished for someone else's crime. That is the justice behind collective punishment, whether its racial,tribal,blood. ALL collective punishment is punishing people for something they didnt do.
Indian is by birth, not by any evil actions, not by some inherent evil, but its by pure birth, you didnt choose to be born your race and nationality, no actions, nothing to control, but pure uncontrollable chance that you were born in your race,nationality and family
>>
>>543516049
>Why is the physical world like that
>god intentionally designed the world for that,
god, by definition, is all knowing, and all good
it's not our place to question his creation
>>
File: christian empires.png (45 KB, 1357x617)
45 KB PNG
>>543516049
>Same with the other sins, greed, envy, hate, they are beneficial in evolution
you say that
but not only did christians conquer the planet
>>
File: infidel (1).webm (660 KB, 560x560)
660 KB
660 KB WEBM
>>543516049
>>543516294
we're also being "selected" by your evolution
with christianity being the most populous religion on the planet
>>
File: white kids.png (151 KB, 924x1059)
151 KB PNG
>>543516326
as well as having virtually the highest birthrates
>>
File: 1765990464145931.jpg (662 KB, 1060x2620)
662 KB JPG
>>543516049
>the physical world is evil
in bulgaria, the gnostics were known as bogomils
they were expelled, because they mocked the god of the physical world, by having gay sex
in france they were known as the cathars, and were crusaded against
in england, they were the origin of the term buggery / sodomy, in reference to their bulgarian roots

trinity in the Old Testament
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvE5E9BImE4
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp92-3aBL-A
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CBh8lmgecs
>>
File: 1784623191575382.jpg (178 KB, 622x1024)
178 KB JPG
>>543516049
>some kind of reward for enduring this evil world without becoming evil yourself
i mean, life literally is just a test
read the book of job if you want
it speaks of god allowing satan to torture a guy called job, in order to see if he will abandon god

that does not mean that the world itself, or god himself, is evil
>>
>>543516243
>not anything controllable but by birth
it that not what atheism preaches too?
>the old testament god doesnt seem loving, perfect nor just
again, god is beyond human comprehension
that's why he came to us as a man, so we can better understand him
>What even is good, what even is just?
god is the creator of all, as such, all belongs to him
anything he wants is good and just
>>
File: 1782930585661750.jpg (102 KB, 830x951)
102 KB JPG
>>543516243
>you didnt choose to be born your race and nationality, no actions, nothing to control, but pure uncontrollable chance that you were born in your race,nationality and family
how do you know that?
can we not be living in a video game?
maybe we're all aliens with 10 hands and no feet, designing our avatars, and putting on a headset, the play the hottest MMO "life on earth"

does atheism allow for such a scenario? ofcourse it does.
we could also be figments of the dream of a greater being, and as soon as it wakes up, we're going all to disappear
etc

atheists do not have answers
they simply do not want to be christian, because they want to shove things up their butts, among other sins
>>
>>543516275
really visualize this, imagine you're born indian, you're poor, live in misery and shit, everyday is hellish pollution, dirtiness, sickness, the food is slop because you cant afford anything else
You go on the internet and see no pity, its people calling you subhuman, making fun of you
You're poor, bullied and treated lesser than poop, and for what crime? No crime, just because you were born dysgenic that superior apes in the jungle get to bully you, good and bad doesnt apply here, what applies is darwinian, dysgenic gets humiliated and conquered by the superior genetic competition
Ask yourself this, if you were born indian, would you think the world is created by a good god? This is the sick reality for 1.4b billion people
>>543516326
>evolution selected for religiosity
I agree religion is very beneficial for a civilization, in its social aspects i like religion, but this topic is about the nature of religion itself, whether religion is true or not. My opinion is that religion is false but its useful for society so religion should still exist while everyone kinda knows its false
>not anything controllable but by birth
Dont strawman some woke redditor, but interpret ideas by their pure essence. 20th century eugenic/social darwinist ideologies are what i agree with most because i could call them classical atheism without any retarded shit with it, the nazis being the best example, they were darwinists and understood life was tough, not everyone could get all the resources they wanted and the strong gets to kill the weak for the limited resources of the world, thats why they wanted to exterminate untermensch, take their resources for the aryans.
Wealth, race, nationality, parents, things that deterimine so much of your life is determined by something you have no control over which is birth
>>
>>543516892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FokCShBfceI

I love how much this song beautifully visualizes the darwinistic nature of the world and being the victim of being dysgenic and natural selection
If you dont speak russian, you can look up the lyrics and translate it
>>
File: G0QIE3HaYAE8q6L.jpg (162 KB, 1374x1080)
162 KB JPG
>>543516892
>would you think the world is created by a good god
from your (atheist) perspective, you're implying that evolution is evil
and that therefor it is a good (personally beneficial) to do evil

on the other hand, i'm saying that he has certain blessings (left as inheritance) and certain curses (left as a debt) passed down to him by his parents.
and as i said, his goal in life is to be tested >>543516419
regardless of how much money he does or does not have
he is called to be moral
as are niggers, and most of them reject the calling, choosing to obey demons instead
>>
>>543516892
>useful for society so religion should still exist while everyone kinda knows its false
the french revolution attempted this
they called it "the cult to reason" and "the cult to the supreme being" or something like that
and guess what, it doesn't work

if what your propose was successful, how come we don't see it anywhere?
where is the proof that "pretending that religion is real, but actually not believing in it" creates a functional society?
it's like looking for a matriarchal society (ran by women). it doesn't exist, because as soon as you try it, it fails.
>>
>>543517193
God to niggers
>Let me create you genetically more likely to be violent and sinful which you have no control over, then blame you for sinning
What kind of shit is this
As with the theme of this post, its not soul or morality or free will that determines your actions and whether you sin, its not really a choice as religion says it is
Its already determined genetics that science proves, in this case race science so the choice to sin doesnt really exist, as free will or the soul does
>certain curses (left as a debt)
The idea of a curse by the simplest thinking is completely unjust
By the simple foundation of justice, a man is responsible for his actions, any idea of inheritince means a man is NOT responsible for his actions but for the actions of other people, whether that be his ancestors, tribe members, race members, so it is not just for anything inheritiable to exist, making god unjust
>>
>>543516892
>the nazis being the best example
the national socialists have always advocated for christianity
- https://rentry.org/Deus_Vult_KA
>>
File: Race traitor atheist.jpg (147 KB, 1024x975)
147 KB JPG
>>543515538
>"all men are equal, in the image of a perfect god"
Bible never says that
>inbred pakistani or an african is the image of this supposed perfect being
Bible never says that
>>
>>543517391
Its easy to see nazis used christianity to manipulate the public while being pagans and darwinists themselves.
>>543517475
Acts 10:34-35
>Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right.
So a 5 foot balding indian janitor who has faith in Jesus is better than a nordic handsome atheist?
Just look at the different races, theres massive inequality and favoritism , god creates beautiful perfect nordics while creating ugly browns, thats clear inequality and favoritism
>Galatians 3:28
Speaks for itself
>>
>>543517364
>let me create you, them blame you for sinning
see >>543516419
and >>543515897

>its not really a choice as religion says it is
taken to it's logical conclusion
this arguments leads to "free will does not exist"
"you are violent, only because of your brain chemestry", "you prefer cheese and not pineapple on pizza, only because of your brain chemestry", "you were enjoying your comfortable bed, so you slept in, and missed your work shift, thus you got fired, and now you're a begger, but you keep looking at people angrily, so nobody gives you anything, and then you died of freezing... only because of your brain chemistry"
do you see my point?

you're arguing for
>we have no free will to choose to do anything
>and if we did, we should choose to do evil, because this is advantages to us
>>
File: 1757866475399298.mp4 (3.73 MB, 960x540)
3.73 MB
3.73 MB MP4
>>543517637
>pagan
the national socialist not only promoted christianity
not only says it "combats the jewish-materialistic spirit" (also known as communism and liberal capitalism)
but they even rebuked paganism, pic related

but even if you were right
does that not mean that you too should act this way? and promote christianity, instead of arguing against it?
>>
File: 1613684441747.jpg (352 KB, 1214x725)
352 KB JPG
>>543517637
>So a 5 foot balding indian janitor who has faith in Jesus is better than a nordic handsome atheist?
Bible never says that
>god creates . . . ugly browns
Bible never says that
>>
>>543517657
>let me create you, them blame you for sinning
I didnt say that, i said genetically more likely to. It would make sense if we were racially all equally likely to sin, but certain races are more likely to be violent, thieving, alcoholic and so on
My argument isnt on the god creating people sinful, but its on the part of comparison, why are some people more and less likely to sin than others by their genetics?
Why create one race more likely to sin than others? God just decided on a whim, make it harder for a certain group of people from their creation, from their nature, and make it easier for other people by their nature?
>this arguments leads to "free will does not exist"
I think free will exists but its bounded by someones nature, like imagine someoen born mentally retarded, that person isnt some droyd controlled by chemicals, the mental retard can go do whatever he wants, even attempt to succeed but he is bounded by his nature. My personal opinion is free will exists within a boundary, and for a nigger, he is not a droyd of violence, not every black person is a robot programmed for violence but genetically more likely to which means thet statistically committ more crime, their boundary makes them more impulsive, lower iq, and its possible for a black person to really fight back against their nature/boundary and use their free will to be good, but why does that boundary exist? Why did god create them more likely to sin compared to other people?
>>
>>543517637
>Galatians 3:28
see >>543515762

>fear god and do what is right
if the bald indian was: chaste in his sex life, temperate with his food, charitable to others, diligent in his work, kind in his interactions, patient in everything, and humbled himseld in humility
while the nordic was: chopping of his genitals lustfully, stuffing himself with drugs gluttosly, exploiting his people greedily, laying in bed all day slothfully, watching celebrity tv enviously, attacking people wrathfully, and posting on the internet pridefully

then yes, the christian jeet will create a better sociaty, despite being short and brown, and the atheist/pagan nord will create a worse sociaty, despite being tall and blonde

and before anyone takes this out of context, that's not me saying that i want to import "good" jeets into my country.
i want a homeland for my people (whites) who are of good moral character (christian).
>"But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever."
- 1 Timothy 5:8
i want what is best for my people, which is for them to be christian
>>
>>543517838
yes it does
>So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
>With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse human beings, who have been made in God’s likeness.
>Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
God created humanity, you can infer all humans are created by god then, brown people are objectively homo sapiens, therefore whatever dysgenic group you hate is a creation of god
If you're gonna make the argument non whites arent humans, and not creations of god, what are they? Creations of what? Then animals? God created everything right so that still means the subhumans you hate are gods creations
That argument even supports the lack of free will, create some people to be evil and ugly, punish them for it, with no chance of them being good
>>
File: 1787735739009687.png (734 KB, 640x727)
734 KB PNG
>>543517973
>Why create one race more likely to sin than others? God just decided on a whim
again
you are in no position to judge god >>543516275

>nature
that's not an argument
how are you brain chemicals outside of nature?
>>
File: 1790395624102910.jpg (182 KB, 801x1200)
182 KB JPG
>>543515919
Sent that freak flying.
>>
>>543518142
The christian jeet who tries to be his best, will forever be an outcast in his pagan cow shit society
His family, people will discriminate him at best, kill him at worst
In india, being of trusting, moral by christian morality makes you a sucker, being scammed in that low trust shithole.
He will be christian alone, make it to heaven alone while everyone else he knows goes to hell.
But i guess this doesnt attack christianity, maybe even supports it. That the external world is simply a temporary test for suffering, for a greater reward after death.
I suppose it could be true, this world is a hellhole meatgrinder of suffering, and we must taste misery and suffering to truly grow and be in conflict with evil to prove ourselves and comprehend good
If we were born with no evil, we cannot comprehend good then. If i was born in a world with no darkness and bright light absorbed everything, i wouldnt even know how to imagine darkness, so i guess bad exists for that reason
Its still hard to have faith when the world is still a darwnistic meatgrinder of suffering and religion isnt even proved but i guess thats why they call it faith
>how are you brain chemicals outside of nature?
What i mean is, we're not absolute robots, we can still choose to live within a boundary of free will. A robot cannot function without his programming while a human;s brain isnt commands but uncontrollable things that incline soomeone towards certian behaviour and that behaviour can vary, its wrong to say we dont have free will, but still bounded by uncontrollable happenings
>>
>>543518194
>yes it does
No it does not
Ugly is the adjective you used
Ugliness comes from bad genes
God did not create bad genes
Humans created bad genes via the cause and effect of sinning.
Ergo God did not create ugly subhumans

If you create an apple pie and someone defecates into it, you did not create an apple poop pie.
You created an apple pie and someone else messed it up.

See how that works?

It is childishly simple I don't know why it confuses you.

>If you're gonna make the argument non whites arent humans, and not creations of god, what are they?
I don't make that argument because it does not meet my high standards
However, the Bible does speak of demons breeding with women and it is very hard to dismiss it as simply being figurative.
>>
File: 1790316090825129.png (372 KB, 900x900)
372 KB PNG
>>543515677
>checked
>revelations
I will only say this one time. The book is called Revelation. It's not plural. The book is about what is revealed to John in his vision. One vision. A singular revelation. Stop pluralizing the fucking book.
>>
File: 1775909699959994.jpg (55 KB, 447x518)
55 KB JPG
>>543515538
Of course. Race exists, therefore Jesus was wrong, yes. But that's not the main complaint even. Evolution doesn't just contradict the idea of equal souls, the story of Genesis or an intelligent maker, it refutes the background idea to all religions that humans are the main characters of reality. Evolution doesn't just imply that humans are merely one descendant of prior species, but also that the "making" isn't done yet. Evolution is still occurring. Humans are not the final form of life. If that's true, how could it possibly be that any of our religions which feature us as the ultimate goal and purpose of the entire universe are true? They all must be wrong because they place this emphasis on human primacy that is not reflected in the world around us This is also why we saw opposition to heliocentrism but not round Earth from the medieval church. Round Earth still leaves Earth at the center of creation, which was fine. Heliocentrism put the sun at the center of creation, which was not.

I think only White Christians have noticed there's anything inimical between religion and evolution, which is why it's mostly a Christian-specific phenomenon. Muslims might get evolution deniers too once they notice.
>>
>>543517657
Hurricanes don't have free will, right?

If you could throw a hurricane in prison before it reached the coast, wouldn't you?
>>
>>543515538
Yes. It is a truth that is denied because it means all the genetically inferior races are irredeemable unless something like genetic engineering is invented.
>>
Put yourself in a non white 3rd worlders perspective such as me.
>Born to a shithole, be more poorer, uglier, unhappier, sicker, suicidal than if i was born in a 1st world country
>no one is your brother, you live in a society of hostility and low trust
>Have no belonging, there is no belonging in your real life
>go on the internet to find some kind of belonging, everyone hates you, tells you you're a subhuman, worse than diarhea stains on a toilet, insults and humiliates you
Everyone else hates you, you're a villain for everyone, and quesiton for what crime? No crime, you did nothing wrong, but this is just how reality works, be punished for doing nothing wrong
It made me realize there is no good or bad, seeing how fucked the world is, human history is, the endless unequal death and suffering,humanity is no different than a jungle, what matters is not good or bad, only strong vs weak, superior vs dysgenic, and its freeing realising nothing matters and we're apes in a jungle
>>543518693
Humans created bad genes via the cause and effect of sinning.
Look from the perspective of an individual, as ive explained here
The idea of a curse by the simplest thinking is completely unjust
By the simple foundation of justice, a man is responsible for his actions, any idea of inheritince means a man is NOT responsible for his actions but for the actions of other people, whether that be his ancestors, tribe members, race members, so it is not just for anything inheritiable to exist, making god unjust

I thought beauty was created from sexual selection, not very religious, western steppe herders selected a mutation of blond hair and blue eyes because its beautiful and within the tribe the non aryan looking ones were the bottom rejects, not reproducing while the beautiful ones reproduced creating today's nordics
>>
>>543519076
genetic engineering is costly and nature optimizes for cost effective, most efficient ways
Its gonna be good old natural selection, the ugly inferior weaker ones are rid of the gene pool, by simply not reproducing, look at the massive amounts of non white incels in western countries, its darwinism
I think suicide is the answer for inferiors, they are born this way, and death can fix it. Death is not bad, its eternal peace because it is true boundarieless freedom, being a human has its boundaries
>>
File: 1603753739023.jpg (486 KB, 750x938)
486 KB JPG
>>543518758
>Race exists, therefore Jesus was wrong
Imagine being this dumb
Jesus used all the words for genetic race that existed in koine Greek (or rather what he spoke in Aramaic was written down as such in Greek)

Jesus knew race existed
>>
>>543519197
Didn't engage with the meat of the post I see. Regardless, Jesus didn't say anything about those races, other than acknowledging that they existed in the minds of the people he was talking to. There's several stories where he crosses traditional tribal/genetic boundaries to offer forgiveness and salvation or suggests that others should; Canaanite woman, Parable of the Good Samaritan for two examples; and exactly none where he suggests racial holy war. Neither Jesus's teachings nor his examples suggest racism as a morally good or desirable viewpoint.
>>
>>543515677
The most solid definition of racism is not the woke redditor definition of, whatever i dont like is racism.
Racism can be defined as
Judgement of mankind through a racial perspective. The bible says mankind should be judged by faith in jesus, not race, so these 2 contradict by its core question "How to judge human beings?"
>>
File: Anti-Christian Kikes.png (1.02 MB, 1660x887)
1.02 MB PNG
>>543515538
Hey /pol/ want to know whether you're talking to a kike or not? Ask them about Jesus Christ.

If they reject/hate Jesus Christ, they're a kike. Every Christ hater is a kike.

The greater the hatred of Christ, the more evil that person is (Trump, Netanyahu, Epstein, Clinton, etc.)

There is no greater litmus test of a person's character than that person's attitude towards Christ Jesus.

>so why does this matter?
Jesus Christ is Truth & Love, kikes are filled with lies, fear & hate. This means that when we deal with kikes, we must understand that they hate the Truth (since they hate Jesus Christ) and so cannot engage in honest discussion (which is why you're always so frustrated in your discussions with them). Hence you're better off simply exposing them and not paying them any attention afterwards.

Jesus Christ is King of kings. He is Yahweh the Son who Abraham had a personal relationship with. That is why only Christianity is Abrahamic, every other religion & ideology is simply anti-Christian paganism.
>>
>>543518142
Thank you for fighting the good fight, anon.
>>
File: 1600716798963.jpg (165 KB, 1776x576)
165 KB JPG
>>543519091
I don't care about your retarded tangent/deflection that falsely tries to link biology to God being unjust (he is not)

Your statements:

>>So a 5 foot balding indian janitor who has faith in Jesus is better than a nordic handsome atheist?
>god creates . . . ugly browns
Have no Biblical basis
I pointed that out and you communicated I was "wrong"
I fully defended myself and then you changed the topic to justice

Stick to the topic or shut up and admit defeat
>>
File: epicurusonevil1200.jpg (314 KB, 1200x475)
314 KB JPG
>>543519525
Age old question, why good god create things, then why bad exist?
Why did god create these evil kikes?
Create a certain group of people naturally completely evil, then blame them for being evil? As if its not gods responsibility that their nature is completely fucked up, and what is behind their nature? The events that determine their genes which determines their behaviour that make them evil
>>
>>543519655
>no bibilical basis
Im inferring obviously, everyone has a different interpretation of the bible, then from those interpretations inferences, so a bunch of different ideas root, not one unified truth
I guess ill do stick to the topic, explain why are genetic inferiors the way they are? Is it by their birth which they have no control over, or some other thing?
>>
File: 1790367630867376.png (46 KB, 998x755)
46 KB PNG
>>543515781
>>
>>543519370
>Didn't engage with the meat of the post I see
I didn't need to after seeing your comically invalid statement that showed your severe lack of basic understanding and logic


>Jesus's teachings nor his examples suggest racism as a morally good or desirable viewpoint.
Jesus never taught bestiality is morally bad
Does that mean it's morally ok or do we have to extrapolate?

(I don't care what your answer is so don't bother)
>>
>>543519662
>Age old question, why good god create things, then why bad exist?
Yahweh created everything Good, Evil is simply the corruption/distortion of what is Good.
>Why did god create these evil kikes?
God is not the author of Evil and so did not create the evil kikes. Kikes are evil because they hate God (and so they hate Good, Truth, & Love)
>Create a certain group of people naturally completely evil,
Nope, they corrupted themselves due to their hatred & rejection of God.
>then blame them for being evil?
They didn't want to be Good and would rather be Evil.
>As if its not gods responsibility that their nature is completely fucked up, and what is behind their nature?
God created them Good, they abused their position and chose to rebel against Good (because they preferred being evil).
>>
>>543519938
so you're saying choice exists, its not genetics?
Pretty mainstream bluepilled belief or something. Behind racism, it is darwinism, and saying some people are genetically corrupted, such as blacks being genetically violent.
So this
>chose to rebel against Good (because they preferred being evil).
contradicts racism, and says its individual choice and not genetics that makes someone good or bad, while nazis and other 20th century eugenicists said its genetics that determine your goodness or not
And of course no one chooses their race and genetics, its by birth
>>
>>543519753
>Im inferring obviously
You inferred something that was wrong, changed the subject, and are now cowering away since you can't defend your original inference
>explain why are genetic inferiors the way they are?
I already did: bad genes that were not created by God

You clearly have no intention of discussing anything in good faith so don't bother replying
>>
>>543520046
Genetics is pretty irrelevant. In this world you either love Christ or you hate Christ.

The stronger your hatred for Christ, the more evil you are. The stronger your love for Christ, the less evil you are. Understand that everybody is evil and nobody is good except Christ alone.

I am never concerned with what men teach (unless they are men of Yahweh) since men know nothing. Socrates expressed a humble truth in saying that he knows that he knows nothing.

I am only ever concerned with what God teaches since He cannot lie and is always right.
>>
>>543520144
bad genes are created by what then?
I thought an omnipotent god would be behind everything
Bad genes can be explained by evolution, natural selection and sexual selection which then means humanity is created from evolution and natural selection
Beauty is by sexual selection not good or any abstract idea
ape see a trait he likes in the other ape, ape decides other apes are uglier, and uglier apes dont get to reproduce, the beautiful apes get to reproduce making the whatever trait that attracted mates dominant genetically in that population
in humans it is aryan traits such as intelligence and blond hair, blue hair, while the ugly discriminated traits are inferior subhuman traits like big noses or slanted eyes
>>
>>543520255
>bad genes are created by what then?
The dishonest retard shill proves he can't read a 3rd time after asking a question I already answered above:
>Humans created bad genes via the cause and effect of sinning.
Not wasting anymore time with you

I accept your defeat
>>
>>543519882
Cranky he got caught for not reading. And still not engaging.

The only reason to reply to that line of my post with the claim Jesus used words for race in the Bible is to try to imply that Jesus cared about race or had racist views. What I pointed out is that your implicit argument, which you were so lacking in confidence on that you didn't state it directly, is contradicted by what Jesus actually does positively teach. So your comparison to bestiality is off the mark. I'm not using an absence of evidence to debunk your implication, I'm using positive evidence that exists in the "holy" text to debunk it. It's not that Jesus says nothing that relates to race and we're extrapolating, it's that he does.

You implied Jesus was a racist or considered race something worth dividing people over, when his explicit teachings and actions (which in the context of the Bible are just implied lessons themselves, why tell the Canaanite woman story in the book except to make a point?) show that he deliberately transgressed against sentiments which roughly equated with racism at the time. The earnest reading of these passages is the same one every Christian missionary over the past 500 years has made; race is no boundary to salvation or brotherhood in Christ.
>>
>>543520511
>Cranky he got caught for not reading. And still not engaging.
we're not really interested in engaging with false religions. Racism is just another kike belief.
>>
>>543515538
Darwin's discoveries are fake that's why it's illegal to go to the gallopagos



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.