[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1.82 MB, 1918x916)
1.82 MB PNG
Neuralink claims to have build a device that can translate your brain activity into speech.
Im not gonna write it all out for you retarded niggas, but if this is true it really is the beginning of the end.

https://youtu.be/_j806JHhCRo?t=325
>>
This is actually extremely moving and incredible.
>>
They want total brain transparency. Nowhere left to hide.
>>
>>543526438
They lie all the time about AI, probably bs
>>
File: 1782224408437590.png (523 KB, 816x810)
523 KB PNG
>>543526547
They will gather more data, similar to how they gathered driving data and made driving autonomous. At some point in the near future they will have models that can translate basically any humans brain activity into speech 90% accurately. Thats not even a hard engineering problem, its mainly a data gathering problem.
And once thats done, theyre opening the doors way for direct brain-software interaction, especially with LLMs. They will scale down prices for the hardware. every wagie who still wants to be competitive will need such an interface. Furthermore they will look for ways to make these devices non-invasive to make them more accessible to chuds who refuse to get chipped.

>>543526627
>They lie all the time about AI,
Have you tested Claudes new Opus 5.5 model? It is fucking insane. I was dismissive of that AI crap too but now it really is undeniable how disruptive that tech is, im not even kidding. People who still dismiss AIs capabilities are one or two years behind. If they connect that shit with our brains its game over.
>>
>>543526438
Install it in every goy. From birth.
>>
>>543526750
>Have you tested Claudes new Opus 5.5 model?
I'm not giving money to those Satanists
Why are you paying for it, just because ?
What's so special about it ?
>>
>>543526438
its nothing new we could do this and inject thoughts since at least three decades. The real achievement is miniaturizing it and making it power efficient which is still not possible. Read up how they discovered how the visual cortex works they essentially put probes into a living cats brain and watched the neurons get activated.
>>
>>543526438
That's not that hard to do. We've had, for many decades now, electrodes that go into the brain that can be used to do things like control a mouse on a screen so people can use a computer. I knew a guy who did research on cat brains 15+ years ago and with an implant he could recreate a picture of their visual cortex, and it was creepy as fuck, people in the video, there faces looked like cats. This was intrusive though and cats often died of complications.

It takes training, and even in your picture there, you can see the system is still learning to read his his particular neural pattern to get get better at recognising the speech. They've only gotten approval for things like people who are paralysed and can't move/talk because that's where it starts to be worth the risk of the intrusive surgery and having the implant inside you brain tissue. And if you don't care so much about safety, you can get better results but that's not actual progress, that's just being more intrusive to get better signal.

We're still far off from just putting a chip in your head and it knows your high level thoughts. Further still from brain scanning to do that (because of the noise clouding the signal). In fact, this is Musk's whole fucking grift, promising you a future (like cyberpunk or space colonisation) but he overpromises and never delivers.

The two kike companies (OpenAI and Anthropic) are doing the exact shame shit with this "AGI" nonsense. They need you to believe the hype because they aren't as good as they say they are.
>>
>>543526750
>Have you tested Claudes new Opus 5.5 model? It is fucking insane.
Of course you're glazing the AI kikes as well. Their IPO is in November, they hit a wall years ago. Creating bigger models and training them for longer has not given exponentially better results. The claims about a scaling law didn't pan out. That's fine, sometimes people have to take things to a limit to find that limit. But the way they then have been trying to generate massive hype and getting you to believe AGI is coming soon (it's just a few years away now for at least 4 now), just so they can dump their stock on the public market and it doesn't fucking matter then, they and all the investors will have made money and poor people (that don't even understand the technology but trusted a Jew) will be left holding the bag.
>>
>>543526844
>I never used it
As I thought. It can do anything on your computer you can and it can do it faster. It can generate any project you want and it can do it faster than you. Virtually every office job is seriously at risk.
>but... but... AI generated code has bugs
Youre still in 2024. The reasoning models are extremely powerful. It can ship big working projects, while it generates stuff it can check for errors and fix them on its own and make sure it works. If you prompt accurately and comprehensively it will obey and generate what you want. If it generates something you didnt want then you can ask it to change it and it will do so. For the final fix you may want some customisation and go into the source directly and change something but usually you dont really need or you could just ask the AI to do it.

If an AI were to completely take over a company’s internal and external communications, handle all administrative tasks, and rely on human judgment only in rare cases, when dealing with nuances, or when making creative decisions, then, on the one hand, there would no longer be enough work for everyone because the demand for creative judgment isn’t great enough. On the other hand, most people aren’t even capable of making high-quality decisions in a “vacuum.”
>>
>>543526438
its bullshit, as usual. Your brain doesn't generate words
>>
>>543527126
>Your brain doesn't generate words
It generates signals for the mouth and face muscles which can be translated into words, genius.
>>
>>543526438
>Look at a girl's ass
>It says out loud what I think
I think i'll sit this one out
>>
>>543526913
>They need you to believe the hype because they aren't as good as they say they are.
>>543527025
>The claims about a scaling law didn't pan out.

Its all cope. I was like you before too. Not anymore because I saw for myself how good the models really are, and they will get even better. Do they hype their shit up? Yeah. Is AI a bubble? Financially speaking, yes, up until now. That doesnt change anything about the disruptive nature of it. Anything involving just "brain work", thinking, logical reasoning, or any work that is done on a computer and adheres to certain patterns and schemes is at serious fucking risk.
>>
If the elite want a text readout of anime girl names and racial slurs they can just ask me.
>>
>>543527144
Maybe? Words are not the same as muscle contractions, how would a machine determine what word you are using anyways? Humans produce a very small amount of sounds when speaking, most of them are a combination and the pattern we use them in. Meaning is completely derived from context rather than the words themselves, how would a machine figure that out? It can't
We use the same muscle contractions to create different sounds, its not as simple as looking at the action potential from the axons.
>>
>>543526438
My brain can already kinda do that without neuralink THOUGH. Might be good for comstose people or something
>>
>>543526438
>a device that can translate your brain activity into speech
You mean like a mouth?
>>
>>543526750
Opus 5.5 is complete garbage. Opus 4.6 is the only good model that was ever created. And just the fact that their models are getting worse and not getting better, should tell you everything you need to know.
>>
>>543526844
Claude sucks. I was using it to make software to translate my mouse & keyboard into a controller so I can cheat in video games. It wrote the code but wouldnt add tweaks to evade anti cheat like not snapping to a full joystick push immediately but ramping it up like a real controller. Pasted it into google ai and google added god like anti cheat evasion & even suggested things I hadn't even thought of.
>>
>>543527740
>Opus 5.5 is complete garbage
I bet youre not even a dev.
>>
>>543527776
>evade anti cheat
The models are hardcoded to be gay - especially claude - which is not a testament to their capabilities.
>>
>>543526438
This technology has been around since at least the 90’s. Seriously. All neuralink is doing is trying to make it more mass producible
>>
>>543527776
Based
Google hallucinates a lot, I go between it and Grok for better accuracy
>>
File: .....jpg (180 KB, 1200x675)
180 KB JPG
>>543526438
Haha sorry. I'm not putting a computer chip in my brain. I don't care if it would give me super powers. I know, I know. I'm just not going to is all.
>>
>>543526627
Well Enron Musk would never lie or make false promise.
>>
File: 1629285336821.jpg (65 KB, 750x697)
65 KB JPG
>>
File: 1764507110468382.jpg (254 KB, 1920x1080)
254 KB JPG
>natalie cygan

this is who builds neuralink
lol
anti-women chuds lost
>>
File: 1786729487822819.jpg (532 KB, 3000x2250)
532 KB JPG
>>543528060
you're a nobody
no one gives a single fuck what some internet chud thinks

money = power

https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/
>>
>>543526627
You don't need AI for this shit. BCIs have existed long before AI. All they're doing is matching specific states in the probed region of the brain to words or phrases. It's a case of manual calibration more than anything.
>>
>>543527439
>how would a machine determine what word you are using anyways?
it’s not hard at all. you don’t even need some fancy gadget plugged into a brain. take me for example, what word am i thinking about right now? you get one hint
>N
>>
>>543526438
Don't believe anything that boosts a Musk stock until you actually see it with your own eyes
>>
>>543526547
Agreed. Now if Elon can only be constrained to task this technology to doing good.
>>
File: 1787860125281436.png (354 KB, 373x439)
354 KB PNG
>>543529577
Why are you excited to let elon into your fat body?
>>
>>543529577
>Nobody cares
Lmfao. That's not true. And no, influence is power. Money is a proxy for influence.
>>
>>543526913
>but he overpromises and never delivers.
Literally launched the largest object ever into orbit yesterday. You know, the starship X has been building. Also AI only gets better with every update. Cope.
>>
File: 1786791260652810.jpg (459 KB, 1904x1428)
459 KB JPG
>>543529844
>>543529924
keep coping
you're nobody
time to accept it

you will go wagecucking for shit salary til the day you die
>>
>>543529634
I used "AI" colloquially, as in "them computers".

They always have some breakthrough shit but after a month nobody talks about it.

What's confirmed is that guy on Rogan who's paralyzed but they made a cursor which he can move with his brain after years of practice, they are nowhere near translating brain waves into speech
>>
Racist MGS codec calls when bros
>>
File: 1787816264029209.jpg (46 KB, 590x350)
46 KB JPG
>>543529982
>i want elon all up inside me
Its just an odd thing to randomly spam. Almost unbelievable...
>>
>>543530048
This is closer to those videos of dogs hitting the speech buttons on the floor than what you're probably thinking of. This guy isn't a mute or suffering from locked in syndrome or something. He's able to speak, think clearly and communicate with the people helping him calibrate. All they need to do is get probe readings of him thinking or quietly saying something so they can get a good reading of the "brain wave form" of the word or phrase in question then associate that with the given phrase output on the TTS software. It's the same principle that allows that quad to make the cursor go up when he thinks "go up" only instead of moving a cursor around on a screen he's selecting words or phrases and making the computer speak on his behalf with a voiceover model created using old examples of his voice.

This is far from groundbreaking tech. Scientists have been doing this shit with BCI tech for the better part of 50 years on a small scale on animals. They just didn't have a sophisticated enough hardware/software situation back then to facilitate near realtime utilization of the output to do something like mirror audible speech. The biggest breakthrough here is they've found a way to do the implantation process so it'll halfass persist for more than a few weeks, be durable enough to not break off the first time the cable gets snagged and not cost a fucking fortune to do at any scale. Plus the more modern multiplexing techniques used on the implants mean you don't need a cable bundle the size of your thumb anymore. The story isn't the fact he can speak with his mind, it's that he can do that shit using an implant that a person could reasonably live his life with it sticking out of his head and it's somewhat affordable.
>>
File: Internet of Bodies.jpg (286 KB, 569x569)
286 KB JPG
>>543526438
The internet is proof that we are able to build an artificial consciousness. All data and all memories are shared in the cloud. Any machine connected to this cloud is able to fetch whatever data whenever it wants from it.
Through this cloud we can also remotely communicate. We are only restricted by the speed we type our messages in, but the machines send this info to the receiver almost instantaneously.
Internet of Things is the collective unconscious of the machines. The machines are able to interact with each other without the need for an external command prompt (i.e. a human telling the machine to notice another machine or transmit data to it). Botnet might sound like a familiar concept.
The transhumanists are building this same collective unconscious for humans - the Internet of Bodies. The usual suspects are to blame.

"Covid" was the catalyst for the IoB. It was all planned from the get-go and the vaccine was always the reason for this event. The vaccine is known to contain nanographeneoxide (NGO), which is able to interact with electromagnetic fields (EMF). Just type those two words into Scholar and you'll find quite a lot of papers about it. Remember when the 5G and microchip "conspiracies" first surfaced? It was the earlier days of the pandemic, before April 2020 iirc. This is all planned by them. They want to ridicule the whole concept with over blown lies (i.e. there is an physical chip in the vaxx, 5G causes covid etc.) in order to discredit the whole premise. But there is also a pinch of truth in every lie.
The NGO is the chip which can be manipulated with correct 5G frequencies. Reddits favorite - Elon Musk - is building the 5G satellite network, which will cover the entirety of the world, no blind spots. The bi-yearly boosters are to ensure that you don't get overblown effects by too much NGO injected in a short span. It needs to settle to different organs, but most importantly the brain.
>>
>>543528060
Why do you think you have a choice?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.