To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the Revolution. Outside of maybe Virginia a century ago, nothing could be further from the truth for southerners.20% of you have nigger dna(niggers aren't founding stock). 3-4% of you have kike dna, and 10% of you have injun dna. That automatically knocks out at least 34% of you from being considered founding stock(or even white for that matter).The vast majority of whites in the south arrived after the Revolution, in the early 1800s. Most of them were irish and scots irish. The few Englishmen that did live in the south before the Revolution were overwelmingly loyalist, and provided the vast majority of loyalist troops to the British. The south contributed effectively nothing to the revolution, and all of the battles there were fought by Patriots from New England and the Mid Atlantic(Virginia would have been considered the Mid Atlantic at the time).This isn't even taking into account the fact that you're probably the most mutted group in the country, largely in part to two things. 1, the south was never as xenophobic or racist as New England, so various ethnic groups mutted together in the south because the south was more accepting of various backgrounds. 2, mass rape and intermingling during the civil war, which mutted you even further with german and nordic dna as most Union soldiers were German and Nordic. Yeah, despite dixiefag cope about unions being le mutts, the union army was almost entirely german and nordic, with relatively few irish.The south was also opposed to and eventually sabatoged Calvin Coolidge’s immigration reforms, which effectively allowed the majority Anglo North to be overrun with Italians, jews, irishmen, and slavs. They literally killed the last bastion of Founding Stock Americans.tl;dr why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half german/irish civil war rape babies?
>>543536736Idk why New Mexico gets included in the South. It’s nothing like southern states culturally or geographically.
>>543536736You will never be a real country or a real people.You have no history.You have no identity.You stole that country from the mexicans and they're taking it back.2040 cant come soon enough.
>>543536736
>Try to leave since they don't want to deal with the north's bullshit>north has been bitching ever since.Don't worry about us Yankee.
>>543537086Soon we will hang you from a tree spic.Go back while you still can.Whites are getting together in the south.We wont take this abuse much longer.
I live in a town named after one of my ancestors.
>>543536736majority of southerners, especially in the Appalachian region, are scots irish. scots irish played a huge part in the revolution. they were nicknamed the fighting irish. also they are the descendants of the border reivers. Neil Armstrong is a scots irish and his clan was one of the most prominent in scottish/english border. Also niggers did fight in the revolution, albeit a small number. Scots-Irish are a big enough population that back then that most of the South has scots irish DNA. The North is unironically more mutted up because of the irish, italians, jewish, and all sorts of later immigrations. Southerners are inbred while it may be true they have some injun or african admixture, theres way more pure "founding stock" in the Appalachia than anywhere else in modern times
>>543537314My town was literally founded by the dutch and my ancestors came from Wales and interbred with the dutch. It depends on the region too. Even today my home town is 90% white.Which is crazy to think about because niggers have niggerfied a lot of the town and there's mixed kids all over the schools.
>>543536736My family has been here since the 1600s. Theres no larping.
>>543536736>yankee cope revisionist historyHilarious.
>>543536736>To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the Revolution100% abject jewish d&c bullshitSo the Scots the signed the declaration of independence aren't founding stock?The Scots-Irish that signed it?The Fennoswede?The 1st speaker of the house who was German wasn't founding stock? Not established enough for you?1st Supreme Court Chief Justice who was of French extraction not foundational enough?The Dutch founding NYC was prior to Anglos showing up thereEndless examples of significant non Anglo contributions to the revolution and beforeWhen the revolution kicked off non Anglo Europeans were 39.1% of the White populationAmerica was from the outset a pan-European projectThat's why one of the 1st laws the founders passed, The Naturalization Act of 1790, said "White persons of good character"Not AnglosNot even those of the British islesWhiteYou're either a jew spreading d&c, or you're stupid enough to parrot their latest attempt at splitting the pro-White space
>>543536736I *am* a founding stock southerner
>>543537086>the most dangerous immigrants arrived in 1492i wonder what all those children the Aztecs sacrificed would have to say about that.
>>543536736>20% of you have nigger dna(niggers aren't founding stock). 3-4% of you have kike dna, and 10% of you have injun dna. That automatically knocks out at least >34% of you from being considered founding stockIs this fair to add the percentages together like this? There’s probably a lot of overlap between these 3 groups.
>>543537086Far right has most Spanish dna most likely, her ancestors arrived in 1492.>>543537314Line of Ireland* i mean. They had a reputation of being fiery and independent soldiers in Washingtons army. Remember they arent really irish though, they are scots-irish. So english/scottish mutts from England>>543537593Yea Appalachia is literally like a time capsule thanks to the remoteness and inbreeding. there are other places, but this is a big one>>543538149Canada reminds me of Louisiana/New Orleans. How do French Americans founding stock? They fought in the revolution, very small number. But also the French empire helped us out a lot.
>>543537314Cope. If you take into account transplants from other parts of the country, then at least 25% of ‘white’ southerners have nigger DNA
>>543539249Most studies put it max at like 15% for Louisiana and 9% for rest of south to have trace amounts (1%) of African american ancestry. almost all of it is from white slave owners mixing with enslaved african american women. The north is just too mutted from the 19th and 20th century waves to claim to have more founding stock.
>>543536736stfu nerd
>>543536736they hate america and want the founders to be lumped in with retards that just wanted slaves
>>543539249SAAAAAR
>>543536736POSTED IT AGAIN AWARDYOU'RE BROWN
>>543540026Are you pleased with America being a surveillance state run by foreign pedophiles? Does this not spark hatred within you?
>>543540472sar please love the jewish state sar it lets us into your country to ruin it sar
>>543539784Yes, and if you take into account transplants, at least 25% of native white southerners have nigger dna. This isn’t including southerners that have injun and jewish dna. That’s at least another 10% and 5%.
>>543540582sar you made that up sar
>>543536736Both of my grandmother's were Daughters of the Revolution. I was born in the Texas Panhandle.
always bump threads mentioning Calvin Coolidge
>>54353673610% of union soldiers had been born in germony. greatest shame in germon history
>>543536736>>543537314>>543537689The scots irish were half english from northern english, not le gaelic irish, and southerners overwhelmingly descend from southern english settlers from the 1600smuh scots irish descent is a myth. additionally colonial americans hated highland scots with washington calling them tyrannical and jefferson complaining about "scotch mercenaries"southerners won the american revolution
>>543541364Based>>543540618Simple ancestry data will confirm what I say, plus basic 4th grade math. Also, none of this is taking into account modern day race mixing, only whites with nigger dna.If you look at the modern south and the race mixing there, it’s literally worse than Brazil.
>>543542690If southerners are le mongrels why do they cluster exactly with southern englishmen? >>543541751
>>543543058Because it’s only taking into account Europoor dna, excluding any potential non euro dna.
>>543543159this is a cope
>>543536736Why do southerners live rent free in your reddit head
>>543537314this is not true. "scots-irish" settled in that region more than any other group originally, but the average english stock followed after it became more heavily settled. thus there were just as many english and welsh there as scots-irish eventually. you can take any family tree from most of the region, and you will realize that. "pure" scots-irish is not a thing in 2026. it wasn't in 1926. appalachia got huge waves of new people after the civil war, when sons spread out from their original family birthplace following the war. they brought their brides with them. the average family tree from appalachia(va/wv border region specifically) has english, welsh, and gaelic names. there are even a ton of germanic names that you would find in the french/german border regions like belgium, luxembourg, switzerland, and then dutch(especially when you cross into pa.) 9/10 appalachian towns are literally 98% white, and have changed very little demographically in hundreds of years, mainly because no jobs means no transplants. the few towns that even have "black areas" have always been heavily segregated, and the total number of blacks is still like 1%, and in a town of only 2000 people, you can do the math. you can count the blacks n one hand. I'm talking about true appalachian mountain towns, up in the actual valleys. if you go deep into central or western wv, I'm sure it gets a lot different. everyone calls everything appalachia even if there aren't any mountains around. my family is iterally from up in the most mountainous parts, adn I can assure you that it is completely white. even with all the older ww2 generation having died off, if you go there now it feels like you're in a demographic time capsule.
>>543543211Once again, this is only taking into account euro dna. An actual genuine dna test, taking into account all dna and not just limited to Europe, would show show that for the south overall about 13% would have nigger dna. If you taken into account transplants that make up about 35% of the white population of the south, for native white southerners that percentage would be around 25% to 30%, possibly even higher when account for nigger dna only.
>>543537314That is not true at all. Scots-Irish is overstated because certain modern authors have tried to make this niche image of Scots-Irish being some unique fighting stock in American history when they weren't, and no such division ever existed. Everyone that was British and Northern Irish was just Anglo American*, and moved West as Anglo Americans and fought together regardless of which branch of Protestantism they were in. Methodists were the majority, and English were always the plurality group everywhere within the Anglo-American group, as you can see if you follow the line of Scots-Irish making their way to Texas - every state on the way was founded by English people, and Presbytarians were the #3 or #4 protestant group. Even today there is not one county in any US Southern state where Scots-Irish, Irish and Scottish combined are the same size as English. * as attested to by the fact even Sam Houston wrote of helping to spread the 'Anglo Saxon race' while probably not being Anglo-Saxon, it was just a catch all term.If you think anywhere in America existed with a 'Scots-Irish' frontier population, you know nothing and read nothing of actual American frontier history, but modern warrior fiction books like Born Fighting that has no relation to reality. Ultimately it is all English and all British, and OP is spamming this thread because he is German and to try subtly add in the lie that it America isn't English, as if English just stayed in New England, when English founded every state in their current iteration, not just some of them.
>>543543885cope
>>543537314Also, Appalachia and the south are completely different culturally and demographically. Therefore your fanfic is completely blown the fuck out. As someone who has personally moved from Appalachia to the deep south, I can assure you that the demographics and even most of the behavior is a culture shock.
>>543537086why do germtrannies rage at all other white people because they lost 2 wars in a row??
A lot of southerners in rural isolated towns have deep ancestry in the early United States or colonial period. My father's line goes back before independence. My mothers line is split Cherokee and English settlers before independence. This isn't uncommon. If I go to rural graveyards where my ancestors are buried their surnames and given names are all super British.
>>543543896it's like how americans with german surnames take on an entire german identity even if they are otherwise 3/4 english. it sounds "exotic."
>>543542690dumbass niggerjeet
>>543544298My wife's family has a German sounding surname and after paying real money for ancestry research they found they're like 80-90% English, with a bit of Celtic mixed in, and that's it. Their "German ancestry" was like one ancestor in an otherwise british/irish line.
>>543536736> Italian who'se family emigrated here in the early 1900s and mixed with Puerto Ricans and Dominicans tells you how white you are.
>>543544298There are actual enclaves of germans, at least there were before the third world shitskin waves and jewstate policies to destroy rural white communities. But yeah a lot of the good germans became farmers, go figure. The ubermensch in the US know where the good shit is at, and it's not in the concrete jungles full of communists
>>543536736Yes, Southerners are idiots.
>>543544398That's because most "German" names are not German at all. Normies see "Germanic" and think it means German. 50% or more of English surnames are Germanic. Even lots of French names.
Fun fact about the Scots-Irish:They were Scottish people that England moved to Ireland to colonize it. They lived in Ireland for hundreds of years but kept their Scottish culture and didn't intermarry with the Irish. Then, they moved to America.
>>543536736Most don't. We're mainly Ulster-Scots that raped indian tribes and the bigger question should be, why do southerners larp as tribals when they only have 1-2% niggerfoot?
>>543544539fun fact, it's an excuse to dump overpopulation into other countries. That's all the US is, now the dysgenics send their trash here
>>543544539There are lots of Gaelic names in Appalachia that could be Irish or Scottish. The fact that they have been Anglicized makes it even more difficult. Obviously they are more than likely to be Scottish, but considering they came from Northern Ireland it's not completely unlikely that some couldn't have also been Irish. but yeah, most of the actual Irish in america came to New England, and then the deep south. Not Appalachia.
>>543536736>St. Augustine was founded in 1565>Jamestown in 1607 you came second
>>543544827literally noone has heard of that place + it sounds gay
>>543536839OP is a jeet. Oklahoma and Kentucky being included as the south is questionable as well
>>543537289Niggerville?
What the union fought for was always going to end up with the goal of humanising the nigger. If they could make you fight side by side with subhumans with the goal in mind to free all niggers and other slaves in America and lay a mythos from abraham lincoln, that slavery is inherently bad, then you have the "society" you've fought for today. Same goes for WW2. The jews have made you think slavery is bad, when White people do it little, natives and a few blacks doing it, but when jews use Whites, niggers and others as direct or indirect slaves it's fine as long as jews gets to run the show with their moneylending and usury. In the confederation there was an aristocratic system and ruling of a healthy hierarchy, that had roots from Europe and the union's mission was to destroy every trace of that
>>543539249>If you take into account transplants from other parts of the country, then at least 25% of ‘white’ southerners have nigger DNA1. Why the fuck would you include transplants from other parts of the country? That is just as retarded as counting Haitians and Venezuelans who walked across the border under Biden as "White Southerners."2. It's not even remotely close to true anyway. Nearly all White Americans from any region are 100% White. We have always followed the One Drop Rule and had strict racial segregation until the 1960s. Any mixed race people were and are still officially considered "black" or "mixed race," not White.
>>543536736I didn’t know anyone in the south was. Also- New Mexico? Hahah this has to be an ai.
>>543537289My surname is some northern England (yorkshire i think) surname that isnt very common here anymore, but a lot of people from there emigrated to America in 17/18th century so its somewhat more common on the east coast/New England. Theres a town named after it. Ngl it looks comfy
the south will rise ag-
if you ask me, our ancestors FUCKED up by letting niggers into the country. wish they would all just die. this current timeline of wokeism is our punishment.
>>543544708They won't just come from Northern Ireland, there were Protestant all over Ireland before their independence and partition in 1922. though the north had much more than the south which is why that partition took place. Limerick is in southern Ireland one of the biggest republic's biggest cities.
>>543545708
>>543544827Most Southerners who are actually from the South and aren't recent transplants are 100% descended from the original British settlers.Zero hispanic Americans are actually descended from Spanish Floridian settlers. Virtually all of the Spanish forts, missions, and other settlements in Florida failed and were abandoned in the 17th century at the same time the British colonies were expanding. In the early 1700s, the British destroyed what was left during Queen Anne's War, and the Spanish presence in Florida was reduced to a couple of fort towns in northern Florida.
>>543544539They are literally half northern english, not even fully scottish, and the "scottish" part is lowland scots anyway>>543544708There's nothing gaelic about appalachia, 90% of the names are Anglo Lowland Scots and Northern English surnamesthe most common surnames in west virginia are smith, miller and johnson not gaylick surnames
>>543536736because most southerners are miggers. they're very good at larping about loving america, being white, being wealthy, being successful, having a rich history of winning, etc
>>543545890a reason for this division is probably because of the ports used. Scots-Irish would leave from Derry and Belfast and arrive in Philadelphia, from there they would spread south and west. Welsh and southeast England would leave from Bristol and arrive in Virginia and South Carolina (the oldest English routes as New England was Dutch). Ships from London would go to New York and this is the route Catholic Irish later took on steamships from Liverpool and Cork.They would arrive in different places and say they were from different places so you get this division even though they were from the same country. It's still like that here.https://celticancestrygifts.com/blogs/news/scots-irish-in-america-origins-migration-legacy>The majority of Scots-Irish migrants arrived initially through the port of Philadelphia, which was the main entry point for Ulster emigrants throughout the eighteenth century.
>>543546371*southwest Englandwe call it West Country
>>543546100most of west virginia is completely diffrent from the wv/va border region at the peak of the appalachian range. we have tons of anglicized gaelic names. I'm not gonna dox myself however. but like I said, over time, as more people moved to the region and intermixed, of course nobody is "pure" scots-irish, scottish, or whatever else. most family trees where I'm from are an even mix of germanic english, welsh, and anglicized gaelic names.
>>543536736IDK why do yankees larp as anything but the jewish money grubbing nigger loving liberal pigs that they are
>>543536736Now even New Mexico is being considered "the south?" What.
>>543546100There were lots of Irish in the South. Even in the Texas Revolution it had a few Irish generals. This modern, insufferable leftist Irish identity didn't used to exist, and there many Irish in the Mexican American war, in fact there is essentially no one but Brits and Irish in that war, including General Kearny who won some major claims.
>>543546371the reason ships would go from Derry and Belfast to Philadelphia specifically is because they would trade flaxseed between those places. People would use routes already used for trading goods.https://www.derryjournal.com/heritage-and-retro/heritage/derry-to-philadelphia-the-irish-gateway-to-america-4053641
>>543546712I don't consider Texas to be truly southern. Draw a line from Dallas to Houston and a line from Dallas to New Mexico. That's the the "south" part of Texas.
>>543546953To clarify I mean anything north or east of the line.
>>543546953If we are talking "traditional" south, most wouldn't even consider oklahoma, louisians, or even maybe arkansas the south. they are their own things. arkansas aside. if you track the movement of people who spread out and settled new areas after the civil war, many sons of the confederacy from places like virginia moved to states like mississippi. the majority of the southeast was populated by people from places like virginia, which were a population supercenter, especially towards the coastal side.
>>543536736>founding fathers
>>543547236part 2clik file name opens new tab clik plus sign
>>543536736why do you keep making this thread?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ0pMO-FDkA
>>543546371>Ships from London would go to New York and this is the route Catholic Irish later took on steamships from Liverpool and Cork.and Boston obviously, but Boston was mostly shut down for trade with Britain during colonial times and this led to the Boston Tea Party and the war. Philadelphia was used instead. After independence Boston will have been used much more as the trade restrictions were gone.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Port_Act
>>543546953The people who created Texas were Southerners. There were 2 movements, one from Virginia-Missouri route which included Stephen Austins and Sam Houstons families, and the other the deep South route, as Terry G Jordans Southern Roots of Western Ranching book goes into.
I got a question What happens in Utah? I've got an online family tree and it's mainly maintained and researched by a lady who lives here, from a branch of my family that split off about 5 or 6 generations ago and moved to the US.
>>543547593anywhere from texas westward has been completely beaned for generations. it's to the point where white hispanics are seen as white people there. been that way for decades. plus, the culture is entirely different. we only started getting flooded with beaners in the southeast in the 2000s. In the 90s, you only had like 1 random mexican in a classroom, and he didn't speak english. By 2010, 50% of every classroom was 2nd generation beaners. I can't even imagine what it's like now. blacks got outbred in like 20 years.
>>543547753If they're well-off, they're Mormon or the Shabbos Goy equivalent of Mormon.
>>543547847Interesting. Thanks for the reply!
>>543537689
>>543547978Obviously I'm partially joking, but it's somewhat true. Another partially joking but more reasonable answer is that in the 80s and 90s, a lot of boomers from the East who grew up watching western movies and shows moved out West to live out their dream. Land was dirt cheap back then and it was easy to just pick up, move, and find a new job. I have some family that did that. Not in Utah, but close.
>>543547585Immigrants from other European nations will have used the London route as it's the closest port to mainland Europe. They wouldn't have travelled from Germany or Sweden to Derry or Bristol. They had their own ships leaving from their own cities in Europe (Amsterdam, Hamburg, Copenhagen, Bergen etc.), some would stop on the way in London, some would avoid it entirely. Their port of entry would have always been New York and Boston (Boston did trade more with other nations due to restrictions with Britain) so you get this other division of the South receiving British immigrants and New England getting all kinds of immigrants from different countries that still exists today.
>>543545451Which town? I grew up in Bellingham.
>>543536736>10% + 20% + 4% = 34%Low IQ nigger doesn’t know how percentages work >why doThe Carolinas and Georgia were part of the original 13 colonies (and the rest of the antebellum southern states were granted statehood shortly after the Revolutionary War) you absolute retarded fucking low IQ nigger
>>543548082I've got direct cousins out in Seattle too, but I see them every few years. There are so some third cousins who are in NYC and work in finance but they look a bit American Psycho and I don't think they'd be interested if I got in contact.I have always wanted to visit the US and meet the more distant branches - it would feel like I'm in a movie, walking down the street of an American town lololol
>>543547585>Before the 1773 tea crisis, Great Britain heavily favored and relied on trade with Philadelphia because it was the largest, wealthiest, and most commercially vital city in British America.>: Around 1776, Philadelphia was the largest city in the American colonies, with roughly 30,000 residents. New York had only about 18,000 residents during the same period.> New York City surpassed Philadelphia in population by the first official U.S. Census in 1790 (post-independence, when New York had 33,131 people and Philadelphia had 28,522 within city limits) and has remained larger ever since. Today, New York City is more than five times larger than Philadelphia by population.
>>543548332I used to be very into history, linguistics, and the immigration history of the country. It really is a small world when you realize how such a small amount of people in the grand scheme of things led to what we have now. This is especially true if you are from the east coast founding stock. People had like 8-12 kids up until as recently as the 1920s in many places. I can directly trace ancestors who owned hundreds of acres of land in what would now be the Washington DC capital area... but do you think I'm rich? lol no. The modern world truly is a rat race.
>>543548609>>543546371>The main ports of Virginia and South Carolina during the colonial era included major hubs like Charleston in South Carolina and Norfolk in Virginia, though trade in Virginia was uniquely decentralized due to its navigable rivers>Much of colonial Virginia did not rely on large urban port cities. Instead, shallow-draft merchant ships sailed directly up the wide, deep rivers (like the James, York, and Rappahannock) to individual plantation docks to load tobacco.
>>543549379
>>543546371londonderryalso muh celtic scots irish, the scots irish despised actual celts
>>543549477
>>543549854I know, I didn't want yanks to confuse it with London so used the fenian name instead
>>543548687did you ever come across picrel? im reading it now. very interesting
>>543549854I understand the point you're trying to make, but like I said before. There are quite a lot of actual Gaelic-derived surnames where I'm from. Literally Catholic Saint related surnames despite nobody being Catholic. If that isn't a Gaelic surname I don't know what is.
>>543547593Nigger you think I don't know Texan history? We literally take it as a course in the sixth grade. Or at least we used to. Point being it is vastly different from the other southern states.
>>543549858some Europeans were invited to settle these kind of southern plantation areas so they had their own towns, but this wasn't the independent mass immigration of New England. >Orangeburg, South Carolina>European settlement in this area started in 1704 when George Sterling set up a post here for fur trade with Native Americans. To encourage settlement, the General Assembly of the Province of South Carolina in 1730 organized the area as a township, naming it Orangeburg for William IV, Prince of Orange, the son-in-law of King George II of Great Britain. In 1735, a colony of 200 Swiss, German and Dutch immigrants formed a community near the banks of the North Edisto River. The site was attractive because of the fertile soil and the abundance of wildlife. The river provided the all-important transportation waterway to the port of Charleston on the Atlantic coast for the area's agriculture and lumber products, and for shipping goods upriver. The town soon became a well-established and successful colony, composed chiefly of small yeomen farmers.>Orangeburg's first church was established by a German Lutheran congregation. It later identified as an Anglican Church, which was the established church and exempt from colonial taxation. The church building was erected prior to 1763 in the center of the village; it was destroyed by fighting during the Revolutionary War. A new church was built; during the Civil War, it was used as a smallpox hospital by General William Tecumseh Sherman on his march through with Union forces.
>>543550029https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFkzQhIx25o
>>543550068Catholics needs a cathedral and a diocese, which is why they didn't usually emigrate to Protestant countries until much later. In the outback there were no cathedrals, you had to start your own church which is the point of Protestantism. Any who emigrated would have converted, the very act of emigrating to colonial US would have been an implied conversion and surrendering their land.
>>543550098And by that I mean sixth grade back in my day our history class was totally dedicated to Texas history. Then it becomes "social studies" again, then in freshman year and sophomore year it was world history or some shit, who cares, then in junior year it was government/economics.
>>543546953I was always told anything the Souths westernmost border is Houston. >>543536736This is a communist from X named spaceghostpube, "NuketheSouth", that hates Southerners because "they're too racist" and he comes on here and posts inaccurate stats.
>>543550364maryland was founded as a colony for english catholics.
>>543550394I'm from the Waco area and I now I live in East Texas in nigger swampville. It is almost like a different state. Even the trees change.
>>543550476then Catholics would have stayed in Maryland, they were arriving in Philadephia then moving out. that's the Scots-Irish.
>>543536736someone had his gf fucked by some good old boy. jesus youre mad. what are you angry about? how yankees destroyed half the country, and then created millions of orphans that were sold as slaves to western farmers, but is ok because they were white, and it was ALL for niggers?? thats according to yankees, btw. the war WAS ABOUUTTT SLAVVEEERRRYYYYYYYYYthats all they say ad nasueum. ok, so it was to free niggers. you did all of that because your ansestors worshiped niggers while mine owned niggers on plantations. i know for a fact my ansectors owned slaves and cotton plantations, and yours were crying about niggers feelings so hard, you destroyed it all, imported infinity irishmen to die in the south for literally nothing but niggers. this is what youre so proud of. lol
>>543550364I'm just telling you that many of the "scots-irish" do in fact have Anglicised Gaelic surnames, and aren't just all Northern English.with a "Smith" or whatever name. We have actual Scottish ancestry as well. I'm not gonna claim that 90% of the are highland scots or anything though. Plenty of Gaelic surnames in Scotland originated in Munster for example.
>>543550544
>>543550627I am agreeing with you. Changing religion doesn't mean they had to change their name.
>>543550502Yellow pines? The whole South is covered in them, except for the mountains.
>>543550151>we wuz heebst. burger-foid
>>543550684Yeah. It transistions from massive trees like pecan and oak into mostly thin and tall pines. And the massive trees around here are shit like Sweetgum. Do not even get me started on Sweetgum.
>>543550815Yep, that's the South. I come from the coast so we had a lot of Live Oaks covered in Spanish Moss too.
>>543550098Clearly you didn't pay attention in that class, or your teacher was a marxist. I can guarantee you that the books I have read on Texas are a higher level than whatever shit you've been taught if you think it isn't part of the South when it was literally created by Southern slave owners. What part isn't the South? The only difference is Texas is the boundary point between the subtropical South East and the arid South West. The people are not different, its the same group. See DW Meinig SouthWest Peoples in Geographical Change 1600-1970DW Meinig Imperial TexasWilbur Zelinsky The Cultural Geography of the United StatesTerry G Jordan North American Cattle Ranching FrontiersDavid Hackett Fisscher and James C Kelly Bound Away Virginia and the Western Movementand TR Fehrenbach's Lone Star.I probably have more books on Texas history than most Texans.
>>543550632
>>543550974It just didn't follow the same path as other southern states, man. Have you ever even been here? I have traveled from CenTex to Florida by car over the course of a month.
>>543550815>Sweetgumi visit with an old widow here in Missouri who planted a couple sweetgum in their yard when they were young. They sure are pretty in autumn
>>543551148Yeah they're cute and all until they pour spiky balls of death that your lawnmower sends them richocheting off your house and into your face.
>>543551026Philadelphia is at the start of the Appalachian mountains, which is how you get it filled with Scots-Irish. the valleys go down into the South.
>>543547799This is false. States like Texas, California, and Arizona were 90% white as recently as 1960. The only US state that has always had a large Hispanic population is New Mexico (which is why NM is currently the only Hispanic majority state)
>>543550664>>543545708
>>543551051I've been to Texas and other states. Its not that different. Rural Alabama is not any different to much of Texas. If it isn't part of the South, then wtf do you think it is, and don't larp about it being some special unique place that nowhere else can compare to, as that is bollocks?
>>543550974Go to Austin the new tech hub. Then go to any other southern state capitol and have fucking fun in Atlanta. Houston? Largest medical center in the entire world. Dallas? Gigantic largest art district in the US.
>>543551227hah yeah those are wacky. she has one of these picker-uppers which work surprisingly well
>>543551608I don't think that Texas is "special" by any means. It's just fucking different. And I spent five days in Alabama. Literally the worst state I have ever visited. I talked to a girl at bar once and asked her where she was from and she said Alabama. So I said "I fucking hate Alabama" and she walked off kek.
>>543551608Unfortunately people are collectivist retards about shit like that here. I'm in east New Mexico which is basically Texas and white people here tard out over how "They ain't no Texan, sheeit son" Retarded. Like they are in a rivalry, even though they are the exact same thing. Such individuality
>>543551657Yeah I have one. But when there are like ten trees on your property what the fuck are you supposed to do with them all? They're a bitch to burn. I have just given up. At one point I filled 20 fucking 40 gallon trashbags with them
>>543551629I'm not talking about business. Obviously Texas is a massive focus of investment now, and jeets. Unless that is what you mean, the other places don't have hindu statues?
>>543551847You think the beef with New Mexico is bad? Woo lad you should see Texas and Oklahoma.
>>543551913Houston has been a medical powerhouse fsr before the jeet invasion. The medical powerhouse is the cause for the jeet invasion you absolute fucking idiot.
>>543551913And Austin was huge before the tech too. Live musical capitol of the the world, nigger.
>>543552156Okay but none of this changes anything. Its like saying England and London aren't the same culture because London is focal point for commerce.
>>543536736All Southerners are founding stock. Our ancestors were here since 16 or 1700s. We fought and won the Anerican Revolution. And many of us have native american blood.
>>543536736Bro, your whole effortpost paragraph is lies and incorrect..
>>543552227Not it's like saying North Ireland doesn't have everything in common with South Ireland.
>>543536736The original English settlers were puritans and somewhat still obedient to the crown.Eventually they rebelled, today have been subverted by Unitarianism and Catholicism.There is no "founding stock" any longer. Only founding ideologies preserved by the constitution and bill of rights.
>>543552299My grandfather swore up and down he was Mohawk. He seriously had a green mohawk and hung out with some group of Mohawks. Guess who has zero native DNA? My grandma thought he was descended from Geronimo too which is obviously Apache lmao.
>>543536736>whites>parasitic race that destroyed functional civilizations >destroyed entire ecosystems >just to instill fiat banks globally and decree the worship of Israel this thread is a fucking joke
>>543552370There actually isn't any difference in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Even if you spent some time in England then flew to Ireland, it is barely different.
>>543544539Yes.>t. Scots-Irish>>543546100Massive copium there.We look visibly Scottish.Even if you go to Appalachia you can see the Englishmen vs the Scotsmen.Us Scotsmen are pure warrior blood gods, while the anglos are fat white trash.
>>543552722There is enough of a difference to differentiate them, no?
>>543552758the scots irish are literlally half northern english you spastic
>posted it again award
>>543552816Some are.But we look Scottish as fuck to the point you can see someone is a Scot.I love all Southerners I am just saying those that are not part scottish vs those that are, are visibly phenotypically different and honestly scottish maybe the master race
Scots are the true White israelites. Not the jews. We are the chosen people.
>>543552779If Ireland was physically attached to Britain, you won't know you've gone into a different country driving from Britain into Ireland, other than the accents and small percent of their road signs that are different. Its not like going to the Netherlands or Belgium that are similar but different. Its just the same.
>>543552917yank thinks hteres some huge phenotypical differences between northern english and lowland scots, you absolute spazi bet you claim andrew jackson as le scots irish despite him coming from yorkshire
>>543552917A lot of us are Scottish we just intermarried with different races as time went on. My family on mothers side was raped by Cherokee in Tennessee, or maybe Comanche in Texas as they migrated to Texas I can never remember which Indian race we were raped by but who realy cares.
>>543551243>Philadelphia is at the start of the Appalachian mountainsWhat the fuck are you talking about? The Appalachians extend from northern Georgia and Alabama up into Maine and then into Canada. Philadelphia is on the flat coastal plan almost 100 miles from the Appalachians, in the middle of their range.
>>543551882lol, i feel like it is opportunity. an overlooked resource that just falls into yards and people try to get rid of them instead of processing into cough syrup or whatever. your sweetgum-retirement fund awaits realization anon
>>543553056Okay well if east and north Texas were separated physically you would think they are a different state from CenTex, South Texas, and West Texas.
>>543553235meaning you can go from Philadelphia, a major metropolis, into the Appalachian mountains easily and start settling it, it's adjacent to it.>>543457446
>>543552684I know living in a world that the White Man built is a giant humiliation for you, niggerjeet, but you’re going to miss us when we’re gone. It’ll will be like the post-Roman dark ages where basic technologies disappeared for a millennium (and there’s no guarantee the technology comes back next time).
>>543536736Southerners were mostly Anglican/Episcopalian like their ancestors until the Great Awakening when the Baptist denomination spread throughout the South.
>>543553547Its still just part of the South though, No one is visiting Texas and maybe thinking they have gone to PA accidentally. But you could easily be in other Southern states that are highly similar to the point of indistinguishable to Texas - where the main difference is topography. Eastern Texas is part of South pine belt anyways, so it the same ecosystem as the rest of the South.
>>543537086LmaoThese girls are clearly descended from the spanish "invaders"We spics carry the blood of the conquistadors. Trying to LARP as a modern "native amerindian" is retarded when we would not even exist without the discovery of the America continent in 1492
>>543536736>this retard has posted this same thread, word for word, at least 20 times>along side countless other D&C threads like this>these threads still regularly hit the bump limit, as this one likely willSite should have stayed dead in 2025
If only we could have been better friends.
>>543536736Of all the americans, the southerners are uniquely retarded
>>543554593they love the Middle East, like we do
>>543536736Cause we are you dumb nigger you >>543554297This is true. You have no idea how lucky you are, that your ancestors were raped and allowed to survive in the modern age. If it were me your whole bloodline would have been cleansed after raping you
>posted it againThe South and Appalachia mogs all, based soul of America
>>543537086Bold words from the Russian rapebaby.
>>543554762>RussianNo he’s an obvious turk roach or some other form of MENA brown muslim mystery meat
>>543554762>tf>tp
>>543554593Pretty funny given floating off-shore oil rigs were invented by a US Southerner and you were a Stone Age society until oil was found in the North Sea. Not only that but your oil was discovered by the Phillips Petroleum Company from the US South.Literally dragged from the Stone Age to modernity in the space of 50 years by Southerners, which allowed you the money to rent your flag from Napajiri clothing brand
>>543554924Turks are more impressive than Russians unironically. Their women certainly behave much better. Russian women have this specific kind of predator thing that requires Russian men to physically beat them, it’s how their race functions.>>543554957Ok Rajesh
>>543554194Do you think all people from Texas have southern drawls or something? If you were to blindfold a person from CenTex and put them in say Longview, Texas, they'd probably think they were in western Louisiana.
>>543555993Texas accents are Southern accents.https://aschmann.net/AmEng/#LargeMap3Right
>>543556212But most Texans don't even have the fucking accent is my point. They have a basic bitch American accent. Don't get me wrong, I sometimes throw in ya'lls and whatnot but gen X and down has lost the accent. Nobody in my family aside from my grandma would say "warsh" instead of "wash." The weirdest thing about my fellow Texans is for some reason they call Whataburger "Waterburger." Back when I was a kid everyone called soda coke. That's not the case anymore. We have shifted from the other southern states.
