>Jane Doe in Cornell University case told campus police, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped," transcript showshttps://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/Do you have a problem with rape, or are you an Epsteinite?
>>543536774BELIEVE ALL WOMEN
This is according to "reporting" and not the actual police report, bear in mind. The way the tweet OP chose is worded, you might think the POLICE REPORT said something but it doesn't.It's quite easy to detect the lies of journalists once you know how. But, this is like fluffy gossip stuff for girls. And that jives with what we know about our shills and nannies here - they're almost entirely women. Shilling is women's work.
Women are animalsLock em up
>>543536883It's best to assume every single member of the ruling class is a rapist and / or pedophile You'll be right more often than not, and even if you aren't, they're almost certainly knowledgeable about rapists in their lives and do nothing about it.
>>543536897It's direct from the transcript.
Women enjoy rape, they are beasts
>>543536774I like people that are like me.Frat bros are not like me so I'm willing to wait and see.
>>543537016>mfw I'm a rape apologist
>some rando foid gets more than she bargained for hanging out alone with unruly young men >i'm supposed to care deeply about this no
>>543537300So you're an Epsteinite. Got it. Noted in your file.
Look, all I just need to know if she was blonde and if there were any niggers with their nigger dicks inside of her
>>543537080Women #1 sexual fantasy? Getting raped, studies show they fantasise about getting raped multiple times per month Women also have more intense orgasms during rape and the conception chance is higher
>>543537062Austrian truth-teller right here. I don't think I've known a frat member that wasn't a fucking retard.
>>543537461>rape is good actuallydemonic jewish mentality. I rebuke you in the name of Jesus Christ.
>>543536774Hearsay? Wow... such compelling evidence. There's no way this whore just regrets the reputation she earned after the fact.
>>543537012Can we see it? Your tweet says "According to new reporting," which is the journalist's way of trying to make something another journalist said sound official.
>>543537300If it was your sister would you feel the same? We're all brothers and sisters in the eyes of the Lord.
>>543537501You will never be able to please a woman like her rapist
Brown op trying wayyyy too hard to fit in here
>>543536774How come women don't get this angry at pakistani rape gangs?
>>543537694Pakistani women do.
my God, just thinking about being part of that group makes me as hard as a diamond. Please let there be video somewhere
>>543537803Epsteinite detected
>>543536774>I can say with 100% confidence I was rapedWho the hell says it like that other than ChatGPT?
>>543537949That's not even an LLM cadence, kiddo.
>>543537694Because non white men can do no wrong in women's eyes.
Anyone has her name?
>>543538124ESL sentence construction
>>543536774>I can say with 100% confidence I was rapedWho says things like that? Why would you need to give a measure of confidence? If I got mugged or assaulted, I wouldn't need to say that I was confident it was a mugging or assault. Either someone had sex with you without your consent or they didn't
>>543538280Because she knows this is being recorded and will be shown in court. When you make statements you should be clear. College women are known to fluff up when they speak too.
>>543537012
>>543536774That's not what the texts implied;)
>>543537988>That's not even an LLM cadence, kiddo.I try to avoid talking to zoomers when possible. But if that's not some chatbot talking, then they are truly fucked in their heads. No normal person would express their claim they were raped as a matter of confidence and supply percentage values. I do that shit at work for how likely it is that a technical proposal can be completed.>>543538280>Who says things like that?I know, right? Like, wtf.
>>543536774>goes to a frat party>drinks>takes drugs>fools around with guysat what point diid she say no? im just wondering how all this works.
>>543538365>When you make statements you should be clearTrue. But "I was raped" and then a statement of the facts is no less clear that adding in percentage measures of confidence. It just seems unnecessary and weird. As if she's aware that the facts and the perceptions at the time don't conclusively support her allegation
>>543538568we've simply lost snuff film technology
>>543536774>a chud looked at me, I can say with a 100% confidence he raped me!
>>543536883>#believenowomanFtfy
>According to the transcript, she said she didn't remember the end of the night "where I was raped" and didn't know how many people had sex with her.>When describing what happened later in the night, the transcript says Jane Doe said, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped.">I don't remember it but it definitely happened
>>543538621>She's aware this is going to be picked apart>Modern teenaged/ya foid is weird and adds unnecessary detailsModern young chicks are weird and robotic.
>>543539099If you woke up with cum in your ass with sore pain and didn't remember anything would you assume you weren't raped?
>>543539152If I knowingly consented to having sex with seven dudes and did a bucket of drugs for half the night, I wouldn't be 100% confident that the few moments I forgot were rape.
>>543537694that would be racist and women will sacrifice anything and everything to protect their social standing
>>543539152That's 5 noons out of 7 for a college partygirl
>>543536897>>543537576Here's foxnews if you don't like CBS: https://www.foxnews.com/video/6405777127112
>>543539303>consented to having sex with seven dudesSource?
>>543539152>If you woke up with cum in your ass with sore pain and didn't remember anything would youQuite a few people, whether or not they are alcoholics, have been blackout drunk before. If I was the sort of person who had blackout episodes, no, I couldn't be sure that I had been raped. How would I know whether I consented or not?And before you get into that bullshit about how I couldn't consent while drunk, what if the other person was drunk as well? How can drunkeness invalidate consent but not invalidate agency?Was she drugged without her knowledge?
>>543539457It's more circular reporting. Where's the police report?It's super easy to spot jewry in the media if you've been on /pol/.
>>543539303the original incident happened 2 years ago and how she described it was that she willingly got drunk, took drugs, and fooled around with two guys in a three-some kind of situation.she's now claiming that there was a snapchat group text from the guys sharing photos of her saying "free pussy, come get it" and that's how the count went to 7 guys now. those 5 others are the "buffet enjoyers" she's claiming joined in at some point throughout the night.what i don't understand is... if you're unconscious how would you be able to identify them at all? how would you know it's 5 guys or 10 or 3?and if you're conscious, at what point did things become non-consensual and how did you convey that?this doesn't pass the sniff test because it's likely bullshit or embellished. i hate college frat/sorority culture as much as the next but women are fucking just as degenerate and then regret it and want to get revenge for their own bad mistakes on the men who let them do it.
>>543537501>demonic jewish mentality. I rebuke you in the name of a jewshut up kike
>>543539492>Was she drugged without her knowledge?I think that's what she said .
>>543539492I mean if you're straight why would you consent to gay sex let alone bottoming? Plus, yes, drunk people cannot consent to sex. If two people have drunk black out sex they're raping one another.
>>543539303>Knowingly consented Most girls aren't consenting to fuck 7 frat bros. I know this site is filled with retards but thinking every woman guzzles cum in college is retarded.
>>543539551That's not a claim though there's a screenshot of it.
Redhead slut comes to frat house at night already trashed.Gets more trashed, fucks half the frat.Regrets it next morning, rounds it up to rape.Many such cases.
SEGREGATESCHOOLSBYSEXANDINTELLIGENCE
>>543539910>I mean if you're straight why would you consent to gay sexWhy would I drink to the point that my brain malfunctioned and I wouldn't remember what happened?> Plus, yes, drunk people cannot consent to sex. If two people have drunk black out sex they're raping one another.This is what happens when you take zoomer logic to its ultimate conclusions. Whatever you think of an act like that, the law doesn't exist to be a part of it and can offer no remedies.
>>543536774POUND ME TOO
>>543537062Agreed. Everyone involved in this story sucks. She went to a frat party to do drugs and to get fucked, she didn't like that it ruined her reputation or chad didn't call her back so now it's an issue. They shoulf all be publicly beaten men included and the campus police.
>>543537576>>543539457>>543536978Please provide the police report, not another news website.
>>543540032screenshot of what exactly though? then saying it, or them doing it? all 7?and even if there's a screenshot of them fucking her, how/when did she say no?
>>543537430What’s his name roastie?
>>543537430What does the elite jew fucking 16 year olds have to do with a college slut getting fucked by retarded frat boys? Is that a false equivalency? Got it. Go cry on reddit you dumb nigger.
>>543540130>Why drinkAny number of reasons. >No remedies It can arrest and jail rapists. >>543540284There is a screenshot of their frat chat saying free pussy in one of their rooms. The woman was able to identify some of them plus. She was drunk/drugged. She can't consent. Where is the video or text of her consenting to this?
>>543540440>Where is the video or text of her consenting to this?Where's the video or text her he NOT consenting to this? She went to a frat house drunk, purposely trying to get more booze/drugs but because no one wanted to date her after her disgusting degenerate behavior now she's calling it rape for attention. Case closed, you're a fucking retard.
>>543536774Yeah so can we see the transcript please mr fraudmerchant?
>>543539988>Most girls aren't consenting to fuck 7 frat bros. I know this site is filled with retards but thinking every woman guzzles cum in college is retarded.Per her own statement, she consented to sex with at least 3-4 of them.She also basically admits to raping Man 1 and Man 2. Those men were so intoxicated that they fell over and passed out while she was fucking them.This case is proof that male rape isn’t taken seriously. Nobody has even proposed the idea that she raped the two men she fucked that spiraling in a K-Hole and couldn’t even stand.The reality is this story will fall out of the media before anyone admits they were wrong.
>>543540590>Drunk If you're drunk you cannot consent. This isn't hard to understand.
>>543540645They raped each other then and she cannot consent because she's drunk.
>>543540661You have personal responsibility to go home and not continue drinking. Just because you're already inebriated that doesn't excuse irresponsible behavior on your part. She willingly went to a frat house to continue drinking/consuming drugs. She is just as at fault for putting herself in this situation.
>>543540440I'm not against jailing rapist. I'm just against believing all claims of rape without actual evidence and proof of non-consentual actions.Her original claim in 2024 did not mention being unconscious. How was she drugged exactly, did they put it in her drink unknowingly? From what I've read in the original reports she admitted to consensually drinking and consensually taking drugs, so no they didn't "Cosby" her.You're proving my point exactly, woman does a bunch of dumb shit she shouldn't be doing and wonders why it ends up this way. Gets mad about being a slut when going to a slut party acting like one, now wants to get back at the men who made her look like a slut.
>>543540807This. The anon you're arguing with seems to think women have zero agency if they're drunk.
>>543540799I just raped myself 3 times
>>543536774sounds like she wanted to be raped then changed her mind after the 3 dick entered her vagoo
Women scream rape after hooking up with men while drinking when they regret it the next day. Its just one of the many defense tactics these narcissist females use.
>>543539910Sorry, but that’s talmudic law, not logical law.
>>543539988Not every girl, but she certainly did
>>543540799sounds like no crime was committed, just drunk college kids exploring their sexuality but jews can't make money if the doors are closed
>>543540804>You don't understand. These guys just had to have sex with a passed out girlShut up retard. It's rape. >>543540807So she was drunk and high. She cannot consent. She was taken advantage of.>>543540869>People can have agency when impaired Retard
>>543537501>christcuck>simpMANY such cases
>>543540979>It's illogical that two people who are blackout drunk can take advantage of one anotherYou sound stupid.>>543541001Proof?
>>543541090Drunk and high people have sex all the time, is every instance of this now automatically rape? Some people actually prefer it this way, guess they are rape enablers.If she was passed out how did she identify all seven of them?
>>543540049where did you get that she was a redhead? She was latina.
>>543541176Yes. Some people might be ok with it but yes if a person is blackout drunk legally they cannot consent. Some people are fine with that and they're free to do whatever with their bodies. But in this case where this girl is not ok with it she has every right to take legal action against her attackers. Could be eye witness, could be she was in and out and remembers some of them. Could be she remembers who was there before she passed out.
>>543541323The men were drunk/high as well. Does equality only go one way in your mind?
>>543536897"reporting" "reportedly"This journalist speak to let other media know they made it up, so they don't get a million calls about source and what not.Other media will understand it was made up so they will report this way "according to cnn."Rather then report on the actual source. It saves on confusion.
>>543541323I agree with you that being unconscious means you are unable to give consent. However, this girl never claimed to be unconscious in her original report.And if she was unconscious, how would she know who the guys that did it were? If there are witnesses, then sure that's going to be important testimony.Remembering people at a party doesn't mean they were the ones who "probably" did it. It doesn't work like that.Imagine if she passed out, got her purse stolen and then said "it was probably one of the black guys there that did it because I saw them at some point".
>>543536774This is going to be another nothing burger false allegation like every single claim of campus gang-rape
>>543541090She wasn't passed out where's the proof she was passed out?
>>543541090So if men are drunk and or high they cannot give consent as well? So two drunk and or high adults fuck who raped who? You realize how fuckinf dumb you sound right now?
>>543541438So all a woman has to say is "I was actually PASSED out unconscious so she can thrown innocent men in prison. Is this the new whore regret meta?
>>543541428Yep. That's why I don't believe any reporters. They're inherently Jewish.
>>543536774don't care, the slut prob enjoyed it
>>543541657She never denied this btw
>>543541657women will say she may have until the 7th guy and then she regretted it so all 7 are guilty and should have known better
>>543541395Were they at the time of sex? They had enough agency to let others know about a passed out girl to other frat bros. Men don't get drunk as fast or as much as women. >>543541438That original report was doctored apparently. Remembering who was at that party isn't proof but it does prove they were there. >Black guyWell I mean yea in most cases she'd probably be right there.
>>543536897/thread
>>543541454It's her own account but the bros didn't deny it. >>543541536They raped each other. Yes if a man is drunk and has sex with a non drunk woman he is being raped. Some people are fine with that but it's still rape because you can't consent while impaired. If you weren't retarded you'd understand this easily but since your probably didn't go to college and can't talk to girls you'll never have to worry about this.
>>543541692To be honest in these types of cases it's going to be difficult to prove rape unless someone has video evidence of her clearly passed out and some guy doing it anyways.College party of degeneracy and a bunch of he-said, she-said things at this point. I'm not saying its impossible that she was raped, it's just going to be interesting to prove given all the things she consented to up to that alleged point and conflicting reports of unconscious or not.Being a drunk slut doesn't make every guy who fucked you a rapist. And taking drugs you shouldn't doesn't remove all agency from yourself. This is exactly why you should not engage in behavior like this to begin with. If only these kinds of frat parties had a reputation people could know in advance what to expect and the risks involved... hmmIt doesn't mean women deserve to be raped. It just means you increase your risk of a potential happening with one bad decision after the next (alcohol, drugs, being around horny men at a party).Just like you don't deserve to have your car broken into and have your stuff stolen. In theory you should be able to leave your expensive things on display without it happening. But we all know why people with any intelligence will still put valuables in their trunk or under the seat/covered because they don't want to become a statistic. This is the realist versus the idealist.
>>543538280It's a fairly obvious response when someone asks you 100 times if you're *sure* you were raped. >>543540807Why did two get expelled then? And the others had to write essays? If they were innocent, why wasn't there a hubub before
>>543541941>Being a drunk slut doesn't make every guy who fucked you a rapist.It does though. If a person is drunk they cannot consent. Everyone with average level intelligence understands this. It's why it's fucked up to get a chick hammered to take her home, it's rape. They're impaired. They're incapable of giving consent. You can sign things or form contracts while inhibited, why would sex be any different? We live in the best country in the world. We should understand that people shouldn't be taken advantage of especially in college when people might be drinking or taking drugs for the first time. These men should be made an example of.
Also the girl OP reposted on /pol/?Yep - a Jew.I knew this tweet was Jewish inherently, you can easily tell such things after being on /pol/ for a while, but here she is, in all her Edomite Amalekite glory.
>>543542115Can't sign*
>>543540440well, she gave free pussy in one of their roomswhy not share this hedonistic info with the bros?
>>543541941It was seven hours. She had physical damage and the people invited into the room weren't invited by her.Whats fucked up is apparently the sorority knew and serve up a predrugged girl on a platter each year. Greek life is degenerate
>>543536774hot
>>543540661in vinum veritas niggerwhen we are drunk, we act how we truly feelshe wanted to be a fuck doll for many hot guysbtw, the guys were drunken too, must mean she is a serial rapists thenlock her up
>>543542115She admits she consented to a gangbang. What she claims is that other guys she didn't consent to fucking joined in and started slapping her, but she was asleep so she doesn't remember what happened.
>>543538280>>543538450Listen, I don't know if this lady is lying or not (my gut instincts say to not trust women's words anymore), but to try to pick apart something like this shows either extreme ignorance or attempts at denial to protect something tied to your identity.I take it neither of you have ever been on the receiving end of repeated gaslighting?Having to deal with narcissists in various places (home, work, medical offices, police departments, etc.) it's pretty common to find oneself in a position to have to convince these jackasses of something by giving a "I am 100% confident about my position" kind of statement when they keep pushing back on it.Dealing with those kinds of people typically goes like this:>That didn’t happen.>And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.>And if it was, that’s not a big deal.>And if it is, that’s not my fault.>And if it was, I didn’t mean it.>And if I did, you deserved it.They'll try very hard to keep things at part 1 of that by repeatedly delaying and gaslighting:>That didn't happen. >Are you sure it did?>You're positive that this happened?>I sense a bit of doubt. How sure are you about this?>I don't know, that doesn't sound right.>Well, [he/she/they/I] don't believe it happened.>Are you certain this the hill you want to die on?>Well okay, I can only take your word for it.Being dismissed like that leads to cutting to the chase and saying something most people would never have to say:"Yes, I am 100% confident that I was raped."Because the hope in saying that is even the most dismissive asshole could not have another dismissive response to that (yet, here you both are literally doing that)So how about instead of picking her statements apart you just wait for evidence?
>>543541090Just admit you're arguing that women are incapable of understanding moral choices and are therefore unable to be held responsible for their own actions. I'm pretty sure everyone here agrees that the female of the species should be stripped of all agency and legal suffrage and returned to her historical standing as household chattel.
>>543536774Campuses should not be allowed to have their own police in the first place.
>>543540440>It can arrest and jail rapists.You've just went circular. They're rapists by your retard definition, and that makes arresting/jailing them justified.There is no criminal mentality in two drunks fucking each other. There is no offense or insult to society or civilization. This causes no great amount of social dysfunction. Reasonable people see this occurrence as, at most, regrettable.What we really need to do is start euthanizing people with your opinion, because you're not salvageable. We can't rehabilitate you. The retardation is too profound.
>>543542352Yea that's in reference to being mildly drunk not black out. No sane adults true persona wants to shit and piss their pants but it happens. They raped each other then but it seems like she was passed out too so she can't act at all. >>543542397Well she seems to remember being hit and being raped. Two of them were already expelled.
>>543539988>Most girls aren't consenting to fuck 7 frat bros. I know this site is filled with retards but thinking every woman guzzles cum in college is retarded.u have to be 18 to post here
>>543542115>They're incapable of giving consent.This is stupid. You're not using the word "consent" as it is used or intended by intelligent people.For intelligent people, consent is a thought process (whether spoken or not) where a person understands what is being proposed to happen, makes a decision on whether or not they want to participate for whatever reasons seem important to them, and then cooperates or engages in the activity.That's all consent is. A drunken person can do this (if still conscious). This definition pisses off leftoids. If this is all consent is, then people can consent in circumstances where the leftoids do not want the activity to occur and wish to punish one or all participants to discourage it.
>>543542474I never said they weren't incapable of understanding but this doesn't have to do with that or choices this was an assault on a impaired individual. Even if women are returned to household chattel that doesn't mean they should be free to assault so their value is lost. >>543542607>Retarded definition >Easily understood definition and is recognized by lawThere might not be any "criminal mentality" but that doesn't matter. Niggers don't think they're doing anything wrong when they commit crimes but they are. Hilarious you're calling me a retard when you can't understand basic legal concepts.
>>543541941You have a fair take on this, anon.Regardless of whether a crime occurred or any criminals can be brought to justice, it makes sense to try to take precautions to prevent the entire situation in the first place. It would be nice if we could just trust each other to not commit crimes, but it's not very pragmatic to approach life that way.
>>543542802And a drunk person is impaired. Which makes it so they can't consent. You can't legally sign contracts while drunk because you're impaired. This isn't a left or right thing this is just simple intelligence which you are clearly lacking. Go to a bank clearly piss drunk and try to open an account.
>>543542626so if a random girl tells you "black out drunk" and "rape", you are on he side, no matter what?truth is, she wanted to act wild, did it and came to regret being a known college sluti don't know how often this ploy played out, but every single time the media is pushing one of those stories, they were wrongdidn't prevent lots of guys losing their future to lies though
>>543542441>Listen, I don't know if this lady is lying or not (my gut instincts say to not trust women's words anymore), but to try to pick apart something like this shows either extreme ignorance or attempts at denial to protect something tied to your identity.That's the problem with leftoids. She doesn't have to be lying, for this to not be rape. She can be lying, or she can misremember. Or she can be mistaken. She might even have fucked up ideas about what rape actually is (feminist "penis-in-vagina sex is always rape"). In fact, there are so many ways for it to not be rape even without her lying that I can't reasonably list them all.In other words, I do not care. If she were my own daughter, I would not care. My own daughter has been taught that if she goes to frat parties with drugs and blackout-drinking, that she should expect things like that to happen and that crying about it afterward wouldn't change anything.>Having to deal with narcissists in various places (home, work, medical offices, police departments, etc.) it'sOften I can detect the narcissists simply by watching for people who like to use the word narcissist alot. You might not be a narcissist, I suppose, but you're sort of fucked in the head if that's the filter through which you view the entire world.
>>543536774>>543536883she changed her story, retard. her first report says she consentedthis is a she said she said situation.which woman are you going to believe?>>543537080>>543537501pic related
>>543542959Unlearn reddit spacing you stupid euro and then reply to me.
>>543543073whoops forgot pic
>>543540231thisterminate all greek life on all universitiesexpel all female students on all universities
>>543539551>the original incident happened 2 years ago and how she described it was that she willingly got drunk, took drugs, and fooled around with two guys in a three-some kind of situation.source?
>>543540807i dont remember where i heard this but apparently they forced her to take ketamine or something? COuld be innacurate though.
>>543542817>There might not be any "criminal mentality" but that doesn't matter.That's the only thing that matters. The difference between a human-caused death being a crime and just being an accident is the mentality, dumbass. We don't punish such accidents, because there is no point. No guilt, no reasonable possibility of deterrence (we're all being as careful as we can except for the negligent... but that's negligence, also prosecuted as a crime), no need for sequestration.There is nothing for the law to remedy. No reason for it to be involved.You are a mental retard. Your opinions are invalid, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote or offer any influence in politics. I'd be ok with them surgically removing your tongue if your imbecilic blathering continues further.
>>543543166the initial report, which CNN refers to here:"Van Houten said this week he will reopen the case, adding that he recognizes “the reality that it can take years of therapy and healing for victims of sexual assaults to fully process and understand what happened to them.”Others online have tried to tie the Cornell case to high profile incidents that were determined to be unfounded and the alleged perpetrators wrongly accused, such as cases involving Duke University lacrosse players and a fraternity at the University of Virginia that was the subject of a retracted Rolling Stone article."https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/29/us/cornell-rape-case-sexual-assault-debate
>>543542397>She admits she consented to a gangbang. Source?>What she claims is that other guys she didn't consent to fucking joined in and started slapping her, but she was asleep so she doesn't remember what happened.COuld she have been semi awake yet passed out at a certain point?
>>543539988all women are whores, all women are appropriately treated like whores. simpniggers will hang in nigger hell.
>>543543269>>543543166wait hold on that's the wrong cnn link stand by
>>543542940>And a drunk person is impaired. Which makes it so they can't consent.They clearly can. They mouth the words, they had the thoughts. It's that you don't like their consent, so you pretend it doesn't exist.This is you trying to change the definition I already provided... to something like "does society approve of this copulation" (and where "society" only includes people with your mindset).
>>543543166>>543543282" Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”Van Houten’s office has not released the full police report. CNN has asked Doe’s attorney for a response to Van Houten’s statement and for a copy of her complete 2024 police statement. "https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/29/us/cornell-university-rape-case-investigation-wwkit's a "she said she said" situation. "believe all women... even when they contradict themselves"
>>543543226>We don't punish accidents We do though you fucking retard. We punish drunk drivers, we have manslaughter charges. Ever heard of negligence?>Remove tongue Hey retard we're both typing unless you're using text to speech because you're mentally handicapped. >That's the only thing that matters is how someone feelsFunny you have such a lefty opinion for a guy sperging out about leftys. Kill yourself.
>>543542940"a drunk person is impaired, so they don't have to be held responsible for their actions if they drink and drive"oh by the way women consent while drinking all the time. some of them literally intend on drinking and fucking. that's their choice.
>>543542940I will note that there's degrees of drunkenness. Someone who drank a few sips isn't the same as being blackout drunk or unconscious.>>543543390Can you respond to this part of what he said:>>543542940>You can't legally sign contracts while drunk because you're impaired.
>>543543390They can't. You can't even refute my other statements because you're a dip shit. You're probably a child.
>>543536978This. It's every politician and like anyone making over 200k a year.
>>543543461>Being a victim is the same as commiting a crimeRetard alert.>>543543472There are degrees of drunkenness? No way! Did you know spoons can usually be found in the kitchen. He won't reply to that last bit because he has no argument and doesn't understand the law.
why do women drink if it leads to them getting raped
>>543543407>" Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”>Van Houten’s office has not released the full police report. CNN has asked Doe’s attorney for a response to Van Houten’s statement and for a copy of her complete 2024 police statement. ">https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/29/us/cornell-university-rape-case-investigation-wwk>it's a "she said she said" situation. "believe all women... even when they contradict themselves"What Van houten says is contradicting the police report:>Jane Doe in Cornell University case told campus police, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped," transcript showshttps://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/>Van Houten says his decision not to bring charges was based on the contents of Jane Doe's signed 2024 statement. >But he told CBS News New York's Saeidi on Tuesday that he had never seen the transcript showing what Jane Doe told campus police before his office decided not to bring charges.>"I'm going to follow up on this because this is news to me," he said.>When told Jane Doe had said she was confident she was raped, Van Houten said, "That wasn't information that I had, first of all. Second of all, that is a legal conclusion.">"If she had said those words, we certainly would want to have explored that more," Van Houten continued. "Like I said, that wasn't provided to me.">The DA said he'd seek the transcript and follow up with Cornell Police.>"Nobody knows this information about the transcript and that gives me something to really dig into because that changes the landscape for me," Van Houten said.>Cornell University said its police department provided the results of the school's investigation to the DA.
What kind of rape?Just looking at woman is considered rape these daysIs it the kind where she woke up the next day and regretted acting like a whore?>I was drunkSo was everyoneMaybe you raped them
I'm getting echoes of the UVA gang rape case. Anyone else remember that charming story?
>>543543657Basically: Van houten, the district attorney, says he didn't see the transcript of the police interview where the victim says she was 100% certain she was raped, but the other cops say they gave him the transcript of the interview.
>>543543445>We do though you fucking retard.We don't. You're the retard. We punish negligence. The mentality. The criminal fucking mentality of negligence.Where no negligence occurs, there is no crime.This is the trouble with you people who got Cs through high school, and even those Cs were just to keep you from flunking and repeating years of schooling. You can't reason. You can't think. You have no understanding, not even of the things that happen in day-to-day life that affect you. You're a spiritual jeet. I thought you faggots were supposed to be the intelligent faction?
>>543543725how is this comparable?
>>543543782>Negligence >Accident Whatever. Keep sperging out with reddit spacing. >You're the retardSorry I struck a nerve junior.
>>543543582she consented. being intoxicated does not change the fact that you can consent.>>543543657anon the report indicated she consented
>>543543472>Can you respond to this part of what he said:I already did, and there's no point.I plainly stated what consent was, and how it occurs even in drunk people. He's saying "but they're impaired". He's complaining that the consent wasn't good enough. That he wanted higher quality consent. As if that happens in sober people. Most people are impaired by average IQs, impulsive behaviors, and distraction. But their consent somehow meets his standard?If you're pissed that the process of consent in some drunk bitch's skull doesn't arrive at the conclusion that you wanted it to reach, then you have a fundamentally different idea of what the word "consent" even means. An idea incompatible with anything other than a totalitarian police state... which tracks, they are leftoids after all.
>>543543782>We don't. You're the retard. We punish negligence. The mentality. The criminal fucking mentality of negligence.That's doesn't contradict what he said. What do you think the word involuntary in involuntary manslaughter refers to? It means it was accidental.https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/homicide/involuntary-manslaughter/> What Is Involuntary Manslaughter?>Involuntary manslaughter generally occurs when someone unintentionally causes another person's death. It's a less serious form of homicide than murder. > Elements of Involuntary Manslaughter>Involuntary manslaughter involves an unlawful but unintentional killing of another person. To get a conviction, a prosecutor usually must prove that the defendant acted with negligence or recklessness in causing the death. However, extreme recklessness that shows an indifference to human life may support a murder charge instead.
>>543543980>What do you think the word involuntary in involuntary manslaughter refers to?Unlike you, I'd look this up in Black's Law Dictionary, or even in the relevant statute. Where, it turns out, they actually lay it out that it requires negligence, indifference, or some other similar term.Your argument is, retardedly, just my argument but you're too dim to see it.
>>543536774Why does the retard bitch in the tweet say the DA lied when the article she linked says he didn't know about the statement where she said it was rape?
>>543543945>anon the report indicated she consentedWhere does it indicate that? All that's mentioned in that link is the statement of van houten, who admits he didn't read the full transcript of what the victim said to the campus police.
>>543544093His point is that we do punish accidents if the person who made the accident was reckless or negligent. How is what you are saying contradicting that?
>>543543960Because it's not consent when they're impaired. There is no level to consent. If you're drunk you cannot consent because you are impaired. If you are not impaired you can consent. This isn't a hard concept you're just willfully ignoring facts for the sake of your argument. You lack understanding because you're a child incapable of listening to ideas that aren't your own.
>>543544095>Why does the retard bitch in the tweet say the DA lied when the article she linked says he didn't know about the statement where she said it was rape?If we look at the article its probably because the police department are contradicting the DA:>The DA said he'd seek the transcript and follow up with Cornell Police.>"Nobody knows this information about the transcript and that gives me something to really dig into because that changes the landscape for me," Van Houten said.>Cornell University said its police department provided the results of the school's investigation to the DA.
>>543536774MUH RAPE MUH RAPE MUH RAPEthis is and abortion is legit all women ever give a shit about
>>543543960why can you consent to sex but not signing contracts?
>>543543074i don't think you know what reddit spacing isdon't shills get an introduction course when they get hired?
>>543544169It's not. He's a dipshit who can't argue without sperging and ignoring facts that don't fit his agenda. He's like a lefty who knit picks to fit their own agenda. It's funny he keeps sperging about leftoids when he argues like one.
>>543544266Go back.
Civilization wouldn't end if Russia nuked Europe. Europe can't do shit and the US wouldn't do shit either. We're not risking MAD over a bunch of war-mongering pedophiles who are busy replacing their own people.Russia needs to teach a lesson, one that will be learned for the rest of history. You simply do not wage war against a nuclear power, not even a gay jewish proxy war. And they will, it will be Putin's legacy. People will celebrate him as a hero all over the world. Not just in Russia.
>>543536774Believe no women, if you know any woman who says she’s been raped, assume she’s lying lest there is video evidence.
>>543544317>using a site that needs an accountkek no. you should find it comfy there, since you are a white knight for drunken sluts, like most of them over there
This bitch intentionally took GHB or Ketamine and was in another world.From an outside observer she was in her right mind and could answer yes or no questions and suck n fuck all night.She wasn't raped.She just doesn't remember anything because of short term memory impairment because of the hard drugs she purposely took.
>>543536774roastie rides the train gets barfed on then has a sore pooper like Nick Fuentes on a Friday night then squeals RAPE... LMAO
>>543536774wow sounds like there should be a lot of evidence that she was raped and physically assaulted then, huh? I assume she went to the real police, took a rape kit, had her injuries documented, and gave statements to those actual police as well? not just to the college-employed campus babysitters?
>>543544169>His point is that we do punish accidents if the person who made the accident was reckless or negligent.Dumbass... are you completely mindless?That's the "criminal mentality" element. We don't punish crimes without criminal mentality. Mens-fucking-rea. Punishing two drunk people who fucked each other serves no purpose. Not their own, not society's. You are truly nigger-brained... this is "but I did eat breakfast this morning" territory.
>>54354425395% of women literally have no actual purpose outside of sex and reproduction, and they know this and behave to this effect on a subconscious, instinctual level.
>>543544196>Because it's not consent when they're impaired.It very much is consent. That's what consent is. It's a mental process (whether spoken aloud or not) where the person understands what is being proposed to happen, measures whether or not they want to participate against whatever criteria that person uses for such things, then cooperates or engages in the activity.That's all consent is. Nothing more. Drunk people do this too (though perhaps poorly). Why do you fucktards have such trouble understanding this? It'd be one thing to disagree with me and propose some other meaning for the word/concept. But instead I just keep reading "but Brawndo has what plants crave"... deep in the jungles of Africa there are giant retarded gorilla niggers, and they are smarter than you.
>>543544196If that's the case why don't women do this to everyone they've ever fucked?You know how many stoned and/or drunk girls have had one night stands?You know how many women are currently on psych meds rn? A woman's mind is always altered in some way.Can a woman consent due to her ovulating? Women are hornier during that time and will fuck someone they normally wouldn't.Antidepressants and antianxiety meds also make them attracted to men they normally wouldn't be, how does consent play into that?
>>543544753Get drunk. Go to a bank. See if you can open an account. Contracts can be voided if one party is drunk. Why? Because they are impaired. When you are impaired you cannot consent. You don't understand the law. You are stupid.
>>543544787Some women are ok with it. Some aren't. They can decide this. You understand some women don't take pills and what not and just consent normally too right?
>>543544833>Get drunk. Go to a bank. See if you can open an account. Contracts can be voided if one party is drunk. Why? Because they are impaired.It's difficult to understand what point it is you think you're making.I doubt that being drunk would get me thrown out of the bank, or that they would refuse me an account drunk. Nor would I have an actionable tort after the fact even if I could prove I was drunk at the time... nothing about opening an account is irreversible or damaging. Bank tellers aren't bartenders, they aren't expected to know or understand when people have "had too much to drink" (unlike bartenders).Whether or not contracts can be voided for a party being drunk is irrelevant. Nowhere in such laws or case law is the reasoning that "drunk people can't consent". The law can be arbitrary when there is a compelling government interest. In other words "if the government wants it that way and they can prove to a court that it's important that it be that way". One of the reasons that might be important is they've discovered that drunk people entering into contracts causes too much fucking nuisance to the courts.
>>543544833what in the actual fuck are you babbling about. there is no law against opening a bank account while drunk, and I've never heard about it being a company policy at any bank either. and your insinuation basically means that if anyone can get drunk but still behave "sober" enough to "get away with" opening a bank account, then consent to anything else while drunk is a non-issue.
>>543545147You cannot sign contracts while impaired. This is in law and court cases. >>543545278Look above. I can't believe retards like both of you actually exist and continue to be so stupid and hardheaded you can use logic or reason.
>>543543657When this silently falls out of the news cycle, it will be at roughly the same moment the police report actually gets released.Because more than likely, she didn't say she was raped. Probably even admitted it was consensual. It was 2024, in the depths of believe all women bullshit. Had she actually said that, those men would have got their asshole blown out by the legal system two years ago.What's happening here, is "jane doe" probably got tired of being rejected by people who knew about her slutty college behavior. All it would have taken was a single guy to tell her to get lost, that they don't want a used up gang bang slut for her to immediately start looking for ways to turn it around. Like most women seeking to evade accountability, they chose "it was rape, actually"
>>543536774women lie
>>543545477>You cannot sign contracts while impaired. This is in law and court cases.So? In your mind, I suppose, this makes sense. You've scored points and won the argument.The rest of us though are wondering how the fuck you made the leap from "you can't sign contracts while drunk" to "you can't consent to sex while drunk".These two things are probably associated in your head, though you can't explain to us or even yourself why. They aren't associated in our heads, nor in statute, case law, or even journals. You are profoundly unintelligent.
>>543544908>32 posts defending some whoreYou probably can't even bring yourself to admit that she's a whore. Willingly went and got drunk, went with some guys she wanted to fuck. Had regret the next day, or in this case, years later.
>>543540049If she was so drunk that she was incapable of giving consent then it was rape. Sorry, buddy, but that's how it works.You can't get a girl absolutely plastered with drinks and then claim "she wanted it" lmao
>>543540064>SEGREGATE SCHOOLS BY SEXOh, you want more boys turning gay? Fucking homo lmao>AND INTELLIGENCEYou can just say "race". We get it
>>543537461>Anon can't tell the difference between fantasy vs reality>She fantasizes about it so wants it happenSuch a cope bro
>>543546205They're both decisions made by a person. If you're having a hard time understanding that you're the profoundly stupid one here. It's clear you're a child because you're mostly using ad hominems because you can't argue on merit or even listen to reason. I have won the argument. Thank you for admitting it.
>>543536774Fun fact. Every single person alive today, and infinitely into the future can only benso because of rape.Technically, everyone is a rape baby.
>>543538568Even if she said yes and enjoyed it all night long it can still be considered rape if she decides it was rape at any point in the future
>>543537501shut the fuck up, faggot
>>543547052if you want to destroy the social contract and usher in the collapse of civilization, sure, but we're already well on our way to that for many other reasons than stupid whores being able to cry rape whenever they feel like it and be taken seriously.
>>543538568they started hitting her and brought in more guys.
>>543546073>When this silently falls out of the news cycle, it will be at roughly the same moment the police report actually gets released.>Because more than likely, she didn't say she was raped. Probably even admitted it was consensual.So why is the district attorney admitting he didn't read the police interview where she said she was raped?
>>543545147https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/small-business/can-customers-sign-liability-waivers-or-contracts-while-drunk/
>>543536774Ok.What the hell actually happened here?Was she just some coal burning slut or was she honestly raped?
>>543546227In NY if you are voluntarily intoxicated, it doesn't invalidate consent. She showed up to the house already wasted.
>>543547848She's a turbo slut that agreed to fuck around BUT one of the nerds sent out text messages to everyone there was 'free pussy available' and a month later once the entire campus found out she cried rape and all 7 guys got expelled and that frat shut down. You never brag and try and izzat farm when you're fucking sluts because even if she wasn't snorting K off their dicks she would've cried rape once her reputation on campus was whore status
>>543547661and there is of course documented evidence of this since she went to the police and they did a medical examination, right?
>>543547831do you visit a lot of prostitutes that make you sign liability waivers and demand you be sober while you do it?
>>543547985I checked and you're right. Unusually based behavior for NY lmao.These guys have their lives ruined by court of public opinion already thought. Remember the Duke Lacrosse Team hoax? Those guys got fucked over and couldn't even get any compensation via their own court cases.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_rape_hoaxAnd yet we somehow don't live in a matriarchy....>>543547986>You never brag and try and izzat farm when you're fucking slutslmao what a fucking retard who sent KOMPROMAT like thatWhat is up with zoomers?They either are either KHHVs or stick their cocks in pussy that was literally just jizzed in by another dude.... wtf
So apparently she was like 6 drinks in, high af on keta and fucked for 7 hoursAnyone saying this isn't rape is plain retarded
This woman is a whore. She is suffering the consequences of her own actions and is now regretting it, for whatever reason.Case closed.
>>543541322Anons have been posting the name Lucy Hagen with shots of a redhead woman.
>>543548801She got drunk before walking alone to a frat house. She snorted ketamine off their dicks after she got there then took turns fucking and sucking them for 7 hours. Seven hours and not once did she go, you know what, I've had enough sex, it's time to go. No, she fucked and sucked and loved every minute of it until she was sated. She herself gave a six page statement to the police when she reported it (because her friends told her to after she bragged about it later and they disapproved). Six pages of only her side of the story of everything she did that night framed explicitly as an "I was totally raped" fantasy and the district attorney still didn't think there was enough to charge any of the 7 guys with actual rape. They had 12 faculty hearings at Cornell to interrogate the guys involved. Over a dozen hearings conducted by liberal college professors and they still didn't think there was enough to do more than give them a slap on the wrist.The liberal university didn't think there was a rape. The police didn't think there was a rape. The district attorney didn't think there was a rape. But I'm sure sissy little faggots on 4chan know better.
>>543536883NEVER BELIEVE MEN
>>543536774It didn't happen, but even if it did, why should men give a shit about what happens to women?>Your Pussy >Your Problem
>>543538931Kek, giga based
>>543549726>The police didn't think there was a rapeSource?
>>543536774
>>543537501>rape is goodis that what anon said? no, he said unregenerate women seek rape the way unregenerate men seek whores to take all their money
>>543539490
>>543539988>Most girls aren't
>>543536774>She told campus policeOkay, so not the DA office or the real police then. How could the DA office respond to things it wasn't told?Furthermore, if she states something like>I was 100% rapedand then explains through her testimony that nothing that happened was actually rape per the law, how could the DA have prosecuted just on her uneducated assertion that it was rape? Even if she felt it was rape, if what she described in the testimony wasn't rape, then the DA has to go with what the law says about what she testified to, not what she asserted as a judgment on the incident. And if she or her lawyers think it was actually 100% rape, why are they pursuing a civil suit instead of just going back to the DA with whatever evidence supports the assertion that it was 100% rape in spite of what she said about it at the time? Probably just because civil suits have a lower bar of evidence, right?The DA made a very cogent argument that what was described could not be prosecuted whether he personally agreed with what happened or not. This tweet is just saying,>Well she judged it to be rape so it was.and calling the DA evil for correctly stating that it was not rape as rape is defined in the law.If women wanted a W after Clancy, they sure messed up in picking this one.
>>543541090Then it follows that if the men doing the alleged rape were drunk then they had no agency either which is retarded.Women need to be told to eat shit if they get themselves into obviously risky situations and then maybe they'd stop.
>>543540661consent doesnt exist, women revoke it months and years after the fact
>>543536774If you get beat up and raped why wouldn't you go to the police immediately when there is still physical evidence instead of 2 years later?
>>543536774More psyop faggotry. Do not care. Women are nothing but second class citizens and this will never change./thread
>>543536774>had a train ran on her>texts leaked>branded a whore>full of regretI was raped
>>543539535>>543540267From the DA's statement it sounds like the actual report isn't and won't be available publicly, since it includes names. Which doesn't contradict your point. Any journo who's saying "reportedly" about the police report is just as unable to get the actual report as we are, so their statement on it is less authoritative than the DA's. The DA's office has actually read the direct statement and they're the only ones who have aside from the cops who took it.You could marginally claim that it's getting leaked to a journo by a member of the DA's office, but even then the DA employee could just be making it up as well and there's still no way to verify that it isn't made-up without that DA employee naming themselves (and getting fired/prosecuted).Ultimately the smoking gun here is that Jane Doe has still not gone back to the DA's office to try this criminal case as a criminal case and is pursuing a civil suit instead. The only reason to do that is for the lower level of evidence required in civil trials; "more likely than not" rather than "beyond any reasonable doubt." Her lawyers looked at the evidence and agreed with the DA, this cannot be pursued as a criminal case.
>>543541941So many people park at the Niagara Falls casino and end up with their wallets or passports stolen after leaving them in their vehicles.People know something is a probably a bad idea and do it anyway and then bad things happen and it sucks but was with a little foresight, avoidable.
>>543553093The whole concept of suing someone in civil court for a conviction you can’t get in criminal court is the most Jewish concept imaginable. It was one of those things I heard about when I was a kid and I was like well that must be fake, the person who told me just doesn’t understand how the system works. Clearly they would be a retarded and evil way to do things.Same with affirmative action. I think was freshman in high school and someone told me what it was and I was like lol that doesn’t exist. Then I asked my dad and he was like yea that’s pretty much true
>>543542012School actions aren't court actions. The school is only held to whatever level of evidence it demands of itself, including none at all. If the school simply decided it didn't like the look of being associated with the two accused students for its brand and public image, it could expel them regardless of whether they were innocent or guilty, without even taking any action to determine whether the woman's accusations were fair. Exactly that type of interaction was all over the place in the height of #MeToo, universities would hold a secret kangaroo court where you couldn't confront your accuser and they assumed guilt, then would expel you saying that they'd judged the accusations to be true, pretending to be courts when they were not, which is what got their wrists slapped.
This thread is too long and you're all shills but whatever here She's lyingAnd if she's not I don't care
Guys, the perps weren't white
>>543536774California changed its definition of rape due to this, because it doesn't matter if it was consensual at the time, if she changes her mind and "feels" like she was raped, then she was raped. Many libshit states are following bullshit legislation like this.
>>543544514If you're voluntarily taking that shit then you don't care what goes into your body anyway.
>>543542012>why did disciplinary action happenI am not sure exactly, it could be a number of reasons and not all point to proven guilt. It could have been just an easy out or optics."Well this accusation came out so we need to look like we did something even if we found nothing, so lets expel two and tell the others accused to lesser degrees to also do some lesser punishment." That doesn't inherently make it correct, it could have just been lazy knee-jerk reactions.Why were none of the guys arrested or put on trial for actual rape? And why would they suddenly be now 2 years later? Citing snapchat as revelational evidence doesn't really seem like the bombshell to me unless they have clips of them admitting to it or doing it.
>>543546466>They're both decisions made by a person.So now consent is boiled down to "it's a decision". Please explain how drunks don't make decisions. I'd like to hear it.
>>543552667Women like alcohol and drugs for this reason, it gives them an out on their accountability. When men do something while drug or high it's "a dumb decision and you should have known better", but when women do they remove all consequence and agency apparently.
>>543536774>physically hit very hardTranslation: She let Chad slap her ass
>>543536897She was a fucking trashy slut who was fine getting drugged up and gang banged until the dumbasses bragged and now she had to recover her izzat.
>>543536774Whore lets 50 guys run a train on her, experiences regret. Many such cases. I am expected to believe that 50 I've league students were willing to participate in a gang rape, instead of one dumb foid making a stupid decision. Of course she decided to try and destroy the lives of all those dudes instead of facing her personal consequences. That's just how women are. Let that be a lesson to men everywhere, if it seems too good to be true, it probably isn't.
>>543552799>If you get beat up and raped why wouldn't you go to the police immediately when there is still physical evidence instead of 2 years later?Women are both stupid and psychologically aberrant. It's entirely possible that something in their head prevents them from making timely accusations. However, making untimely accusations allows for those who cry rape falsely to get away with their crimes because it sets the standard that one need no evidence whatsoever except testimony. Laws should be changed that rape reports not made within 72 hours of the crime or 72 hours after the victim has escaped her rapist's ability to harm her are just null and void. "Sorry, can't help you, should've came to us earlier."
>>543537080his name is spelled wrong on the chalkboard? Epstine?
>>543539490Here's a link to page one of the DA's office explanation of why they chose not to prosecute originally. (prior thread) The whole document is there. It includes much of her original complaint. Read and judge for yourself:>>543437220
>>543537080that looks like a p actually. wtf. Epstinpthey released pictures of his apartment with hidden symbols on chalkboards. that butterfly could be legs spread. wtf is epstinin the most famous pic of him there's a girl in the background who's shirt says >I don't know who I amand I haven't seen anyone ever comment on that.
>>543537080did this moron spell his own name wronghttps://www.leparisien.fr/international/etats-unis/epstein-ou-epstine-comment-se-prononce-le-nom-du-criminel-sexuel-americain-27-02-2026-BH7NOFH255CN7NDZDUFGTCFF34.php
>>543537080Epstein-Barr is a virus.but also Barr is who hired him to work there?wtf is really going on. we'll probably never know.
Sorry guys but I have to admit...I was there and we raped her. We were all chanting >gang bang that ho and blasting Three 6 MafiaAnd yes, I busted inside.
>>543544608There's plenty of instances of strict liability where no mens rea or specific intent is required. But thanks for your input, counselor. t. Actual attorney
>>543544608>That's the "criminal mentality" element. We don't punish crimes without criminal mentality. Mens-fucking-rea.Yes I know. That doesn't contradict what i said about accidents being punishable by law.>Punishing two drunk people who fucked each other serves no purpose. Not their own, not society's. Depends on the context. For instance, If one is unconcious and the other just had a few sips, then its serves a purpose.
>>543546205>>543553999Why are they different?
>>543552799>If you get beat up and raped why wouldn't you go to the police immediately when there is still physical evidence instead of 2 years later?>>543556106She didn't contact police 2 years later. She had an interview with the police a few weeks after the incident: https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/
>>5435550697 people, not 50. There's nearly 30,000 people at cornell. and these were frat members.
>>543556106>Laws should be changed that rape reports not made within 72 hours of the crime or 72 hours after the victim has escaped her rapist's ability to harm her are just null and void. "Sorry, can't help you, should've came to us earlier."That's stupid. Plenty of victims wait very long time before telling anyone. 47% in this study waited about 5 years: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10695522/
>>543553048QED
>>54355782145 years ago I was raped by bob dole. I don't have a single shred of evidence for this but my word is all you should need. Please pay me 10 million dollars in compensation and subscribe to my instagram.
>>543557925Most people who are convicted for sexually abusing a minor were convicted without physical evidence of sexual abuse:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1881730/ The thing is that in those cases the prosecutor can show the child would have known the perpetrator or interacted with them.
>>543558082That's nice but I can't help but notice you didn't address my point at all and instead moved the goal post.
>>543536774She actually believed this flyer and thought that just saying that she was under influence of alcohol and drugs is enough to claim it's rape. Was shocked when she found out the law doesn't actually work that way and she's still responsible for her own actions.
Libtoids starting up #MeTwo right before an election they are slated to win is certainly a choice.
>>543558232I don't have anything to say I just love this post
>>543558151What is the point that I didn't address. Be specific.How is your post about bob dole even relevant? There was evidence in this cornell case.
>>543536774Anyone else not even have the tiniest emotional trigger about hearing a foid getting raped? It use to slightly trigger something but not anymore.
>>543558301It doesn't move the needle for me at all. In fact, I was planning on sitting out the midterms, but I might just go vote Republican to spite these Netflix-brained cunts.
>>543558298>There was evidence in this cornell case.The only "evidence" we know about is a sworn statement from the "victim" that showed nothing illegal happened. Nobody's denying that there was a lot of fucking, just whether it constituted rape. The only new "evidence" is a Whatsapp message from one guy to another guy that there was a horny girl in another room, which is also not evidence of rape. The Jane Doe has never returned to the police or DA to recant or change her statement.
>>543537016She was wearing a dress with a long rope
>>543558499>The only "evidence" we know about is a sworn statement from the "victim" that showed nothing illegal happened.She said she was forced to have sex with other people. How does that show nothing illegal happened?
