>First threesome with Male 1 and Male 2. She said she agreed and was “pretty OK.”>Male 1 falls asleep. She and Male 2 make out briefly.>Male 3 comes in, kisses her, >Male 2 gropes her. Then Male 2, Male 3, and she have a second threesome on the bed next to sleeping Male 1.>Male 1 wakes up and asks for a foursome. She says “Hell no” (she told police she thought that meant anal).>More men walk in. She hides under covers, squeals. One kisses her; she pulls away. Male 2 tries to touch her vagina under the covers.>They ask to do drugs off her body. She says “Sure.” Group pours ketamine on her. She snorts a line off Male 2’s penis.>Male 1 wants “redemption” sex. She asks “what happened to just you and me?” Then she says she does not remember how it started, but she then had a third threesome with Male 1 and Male 4 (oral and vaginal). That is the part she called 8/10 drunk and “coercion.”Was it rape?
the search for morality outside of biblical values
>>543539799Bible only states the obvious, bro. These people hate the Bible because it states the obvious. Their morality is fake.
It's a whore and failure of society who should understand women have no agency. Repeal the 19th and this won't happen so often.
>>543539799Cracks me up because the bible would pretty much say she's at fault here.Deuteronomy 22:23-24If there is a young woman, a virgin already engaged to be married, and a man meets her in the town and lies with her, you shall bring both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death, the young woman because she did not cry for help in the town and the man because he violated his neighbour’s wife. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.
Imagine being so boring at sex you make a guy fall asleep while having sex. Basic bitch problems.
>>543539732No it was a roasty Rumble... she got drilled in the ass too many times or more times than she cared for.
>>543539732she was trisomic or something ?
The only clear line in any of this is the no anal part. But she didn't even say that out loud.How is 3+ guys and one woman, and a lot of drugs ever going to be logistically smooth unless it had been planned out, like men form a queue and rotate or whatever. Of course it's going to be awkward and all over the place.But you know that's not actually rape. That's just bad sex that you regret and your antics getting revealled doesn't also make it rape either.
>>543540141Women are really out here trying to micromanage an orgy like they're HR.
>>543540074>A trisomic organism or cell has three copies of a specific chromosome instead of the normal pair.Quite the insult there, my frog friend.
maybe male 4 was a weirdo who had to fly under the radar and even introduce drugs to get the fresh leftovers from 3 previous males, but it still wasn't enough to not creep her out so she started having second thoughts and now males 1-4 all have rape cases on their heads.
We should start jailing women for fraud.
>no analshe deserves gang rape
>>543539732Muttmerica needs to be burned to the ground
Funniest part is I bet nobody was even really having fun that night
>>543539732You forgot the best part of the whole story.>Men ask for Threesome #1>She says yes>She asks for Threesome #1 to end>The men stop>The men ask for Threesome #2>She says yes>She asks for Threesome #2 to end>The men stop>The men ask for a foursome>She says no>The men respect her wishes and don’t precede>Threesome #3? starts>A man that Jane Doe doesn’t think is hot tries to kiss her>She says no>The man respects her wishes and refrains>Another man tries to touch her pussy>She pushes his hand away>He respects her wishes and refrains>Men ask for threesome #4>Jane Doe doesn’t “doesn’t remember” if she consented>Threesome #4 starts>She says she’s tired>The men respect her wishes, end threesome #4, and go to sleepThe men were actually very gentlemanly and showed a lot of restraint in a 7 hour, drunken, drug-fueled orgy. They were playing red-light, green-light the entire night, got affirmative consent every time, and ceased sexual activity everytime she became uncomfortable.What more can you do?
>>543539732be aware that OP made up this shit from his ass. But you can talk about it hypothetically,
>>543539732>Was it rape?Who cares
>>543541253Oh, did the new york times make it up as well
>>543539732Between this and Lindsey Clancy they really want to show that women can't be responsible or control their own actions. Is this a push to take away their voting rights?
What was her major?
>>543541464She dropped out
>>543540415Yes, that wasn’t the right word. I meant someone with limited understanding, nothing more, no insult intended.
>>543541410The new york times is not a good source of information
>>543541522Nah, it was good. Its like saying the bitch is retarded but in a smart way. Considering she does sound retarded, very good insult.
>>543539732An 8-some and no anal???I'm shocked.
>>543541120>what more can you do?not fornicateit's very clear what God saysthere are no cheats or workarounds. you either have sex in marriage or not at all. there is a reason for this, no?
>>543539732Swear to god, shit like this makes my blood run cold as an older millennial, we had some properly depraved nights at university on molly and now thinking back on it you realise it will only take one person involved to change their mind about their level of consent at the time and go and ruin a bunch of peoples lives. I'm fairly certain anyone I was involved with was pretty much well up for it at the time, but its not like anyone has a signed consent form or some shit to shut down any claims that you can show in court. Its their word against yours except for a bunch of other people you no longer even remember the names of or how to contact to provide witness statements in your defence.
>>543541120Okay so where do men 5 6 and 7 cumin?
>>543542435Agreed. In this new culture of "you can change your mind at any time," shit gets dangerous. It's genuinely safer to just be married.
>>543541963Nobody said there was no anal. Just not necessarily with her.
>>543542490Read the report. Men 5, 6, and 7 never had sex with Jane Doe. They were mostly just bystanders. They might have been the guy that was rejected after kissing her and the guy that was rejected after touching her pussy.
>>543539732I'm an actual female, and I think this is just post-sloppy sex regret. It sounds like she really wanted sex with the first guy but he wasn't that deeply interested in her. So then she made a series of dumb decisions thinking she could get him more interested in her, and then everyone present was also stupid. So a weird night of sloppy, bad sex ensued. They don't deserve to be accused of rape now nor to have their photos circuiated, especially if hers isn't. There was no crime (beyond having drugs and being stupid), just really poor decision making. If anyone is causing injury it's her now. They all deserve to be embarassed privately, but it does not need to follow them forever publicly.If I were one of the dudes, I'd see if I could sue her back. Start fighting back against these dolts who don't take responsibility for being dumb sluts. She was irresponsible towards herself, but now wants to put the blame elsewhere.
>>543539732Execute everyone involved especially the female.
>>543539732I don't like that picture. Not. One. Bit.
>>543541410The unstated corollary of the libertarian "what people do in their bedrooms is their business" bromide, is that I don't have to fucking hear about it.
>>543539732she changed her story. her first accounting specifically indicates she consented"believe all women, even when they contradict themselves". typical she said she said situation
