[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I feel like I am in a medieval kingdom where the aristocrats just don't give one flying fuck about their people.
I mean, sure, there has always been a hint of that, but now it is out in the open and overtly demonstrated.
>>
You are mistaken.
Im medieval times the feudal lords would muster the arms to repel the saars rather than invite in a foreign horde.
>>
>>543606268
I agree with you in the main, but I am sure there were some traitorous shenanigans in Spain as the Jews cooperated with the Muslims to invade. At least some native Spanish leaders had to acquiesce.

This guy here in OP pic lived in the Netherlands, he didn't like the English at all.
>>
>>543606170
The only aristocrats I like are the ones who fight on the front.
Warrior kings is where its at.
>>
They know they can get away with murder.
All 'leaders' side with the jews to stay alive and get rich
>>
>>543606936
>All 'leaders' side with the jews to stay alive and get rich
When will this end? Is it even possible now?
>>
>>543606268
>feudal
what's that
>>
>>543606170
mutt education: the thread
>>
Name how many strangers you care about. What do you do for them. How much do you contribute to their well being. How often do you base your decision making on what is going on with complete strangers.
Then ask yourself why you believe in any way shape or form that complete strangers are supposed to do any of the above for you. Where did this propaganda come from. And why do people still cling to it like needy children.
>>
>>543606170
There were no aristocrats in the medieval times and the picture is also not medieval.
>>
Americas aristocrats got completely btfo because they didnt have the antisemitism or racism spells to defend themselves. Also owning everything through secret financial instruments is way easier to get away with without offending the masses than having a big fat family name or monopoly corporation. Now I believe our entire civilization is honeycombed with mossad agents and jewish moneylenders who will destroy anyone who tries to oppose them.
>>
>>543608610
explain

>>543608691
Leaders are not the same thing as strangers. IF you want the power and privilege of leadership, then you should hold that trust. All Western leaders today, in any domain, hate their people. CEOs hate their customers. Senators hate their constituents. Child Protective Services abuses and trafficks children. Presidents and Prime Ministers hate their nations. Pope's hate their Church. It is everywhere.

>>543608810
Who cares. I pulled a pic. He was foreign and massacred the Scots, good enough for our purposes.
>>
>>543606268
Feudal lords also protected jews and put down any peasant uprisings against jewish exploiters
>>
>>543606170
Did people back then look at the people in that painting as not being gay pedos that eat children? If anything today they arent as open about it because none of them look like that.
>>
>>543606716
that died in WWI-II when most of noblesse got killed in the industrial meatgrinder, whatever remained was the worst of them who have sold their nations for positions in the house of lords, blood money or a place at the table of the new order.
>>
>>543608908
>explain
William III isn't medieval dumbass, and the Dutch have never had much in the way of aristocracy
>>
>>543608488
only if you acquire power
I think SSJ level would be enough to reconquer Earth
but billions would die defending the JWO that feeds them

Are you the man capable of doing that?
>>
>>543606268
This
>>
>>543606170
>barely taxed you 10%, in wartime
>didn't force you to live with browns
>didn't put you under surveillance
>didn't draft people (military slavery) except the nobility which was built for it
>mostly left you alone if you were European and Christian
>expelled Jews regularly
>had to get his budget voted, not by fellow politicians but by the rich big taxpayers themselves
>couldn't get away with telling you to vote harder next time
Medieval kangs (1700 is not medieval mutt OP) gave much more of a damn about their subjects than the current overlords.
>>
>>543608691
this only works on goyim
i want wellbeing for everyone
>>
File: dog_bait.jpg (14 KB, 244x200)
14 KB JPG
>>543609294
>didn't draft people (military slavery) except the nobility which was built for it
The Ottomans did, like the Ukrainians do today.
>Medieval kangs (1700 is not medieval mutt OP)
I am a Master Baiter
>>
>>543609732
>Ottomans
>medieval
>as if the Ottomans in any way represent Western Europe
Apparently so.
>>
Ukraine and Iran indicate that WW3 will consist almost exclusively of civilians and their infrastructure being targeted by drones, artillery, and long range missiles, with blockades on food and goods where possible. The peasantry can't be induced into a war fervor, and the State lacks the means to forcibly conscript enough soldiers to feed a meat grinder. Conventional warfare isn't working against the drones anyways. I think they will give up on the idea of a conventional ground war altogether.

The war goal will be to induce the opposing State's population to "rise up" against their government. Whatever replaces that government will have to be a puppet of the victorious State, or the war will resume. Domestically, those attempting to "rise up" will be considered domestic terrorists, and the full force of the military (who aren't useful on a battlefield so are being kept in reserve for "defense") will be used against them so the incumbent government can maintain control.

I am effectively describing Neo-feudalism, but there are some key differences. Firstly, the prize being fought for in the Middle Ages was the right to extract taxes and labor from the peasantry. If the peasants were all dead, there would be no point in the nobles wasting their money financing the war. They wanted a "turnkey" economy. Secondly, the current ruling class do not have outright ownership of their nations, nor do they want it. Ownership implies responsibility, liability and stewardship. The global parasite class makes their money by using PUBLIC goods for PRIVATE gain. It makes no sense to strip mine land that you own. You instead sign a contract with someone else, whereby you gain the right to strip mine their land, and you give them a pittance in return. When the land is used up, you simply move elsewhere and leave them to deal with the aftermath.

Both of these points support my claim that mass civilian deaths and environmental destruction are of no consequence to the Neo-aristocracy.
>>
>>543610020
I ran out of space to complete my thinking:
On the first point, civilians offer little to the parasite class. They plan to automate all labor. Peasants represent mouths to feed, with the potential to overthrow them, and with little use as soldiers in modern warfare. So killing all of the peasants in the course of the war doesn't matter to them.
On the second point, destroying the land with drone fiber optic lines, landmines, reducing the landscape to mud with artillery, or even nuclear fallout, means nothing to the parasite class either. They don't consider 99% of the Earth as livable. They will maintain safety and stability in their chosen enclaves. And in the aftermath of the war, the corporations and their largely automated factories that constitute the global economy will move as needed, locating wherever is most advantageous to them.
That's why I claim they don't care about civilian deaths or environmental destruction.
>>
>>543606170
Medieval lords cared infinitely more about the people below them than the managers of the large scale multicultural hellscapes we all live in.
>>
>>543606170
Aristocrats did care about their people. You've swallowed a ton of lies about your history.
>>
>>543610020
>>543610478
Thank you for that, I appreciate the thoughts. Like the old /pol/ , where we could actually engage in intelligent discussion when we wanted to.
I cannot find fault in your reasoning.

I award you one Lara Logan.
>>
>>543609218
>SSJ level
what is that?
>>
>>543606170
>William III
>medieval
>>
File: 1781696352456295.jpg (8 KB, 243x250)
8 KB JPG
>>543606170
>tfw you never kill thousands of Danes and Dutch attacking the walls of Limerick
>>
>>543606170
No duh? They've been squeezing every penny from you and slowly working out ways to screw you over every day since the first fiat bank was put in place 200 years ago in increments. I'll let you in on an even more horrifying secret. It's whips all the way down. Some fag lord on a mountain of mud whipping everyone else below, and them in turn whipping people lower than them. Even worse, the nobility never died. They went into hiding after throwing anyone with a shred of decency in their ranks under a bus. Even when you get past the senators and get to the kings, there is beyond them an even higher power. Like a pyramid. It's a pyramid scheme Anon.

You're on a pyramid.

WAKE UP!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56hqrlQxMMI



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.