I prefer the second honestly
>>543642128"It's easy to hate the rich. Do you hate the courage to hate the poor?"
Kill the richest and the poorest easy
>>543642128That's why we need abortion
>>543642128
Both can be gone.
>>543642265>>543642343the point is to determine who is worse
>>543642128Unintentionally racist pic. If we're taking about the top 1% in the world the disappearance would be disproportionately white. If we're talking about the lowest 1% in the world no whites would be effected. Do the right thing, cull the bottom 1%. Or 90%.
>>543642128It doesn't work like that.The top and bottom 1% will always be there.
>>543642128fewer people using “less” when they mean “fewer”
>>543642615>If we're taking about the top 1% in the world the disappearance would be disproportionately white>whitedo you even know who runs the world?
>>543642128If billionaires disappeared, there would be smaller local economies with more competition and less investors to give profit to. More investment in communities, more killing people who would disrupt that instead of shrugging about a world that makes you feel too insignificant to invest enough care to keep the streets clean.
>>543642128>Services gonelmao stopped right there
>>543642461Why? You’re both subhumans. Comparing jews to niggers is pointless
>>543642461>the point is to determine who is worseYou should never grade evils, for if one is the worst, then you might be tempted to kinship with the least.
>>543642128Eradicating the top one percent here, means also eradicating the root cause for the bottom one percent. I know a win/win when I see one.
>>543642128The real (((top 1%))) agitates the bottom 2% and enforces rules for the rest 93% to prevent them from solving the problem.So yes top is worse, to kill the snake you need to cut the head necessarily.
>>543642128remeber that when the government says you need to have AI checking your face 100% of the time in your car because "you could be drunk" that's still the government becoming mommy because of the bottom retardation of the 2% imposing on you.
>>543642712They're only .2% of the world. The other .98% of the disappeared would be white. When we talk about 1% in the US, it's very different than 1% of the world. White people, under a very loose definition, are about 8%. We're not talking about just billionaires but white doctors and engineers disappearing, nearly 1 in 8 whites, and disproportionately from the United States.
>>543643007>muh government slippery slope >muh made up scenarioRemember that you're a fucking retard playing a what if game in place of seeing how billionaires actually control government and what they're doing with that power. It's true that there can be too much regulation, but call it out when you get there, don't give the billionaires more because you're afraid of what the government might do with their technology.
>>543642128Things will never change until the intelligence agencies, underground military-industrial-complex lairs and defense contractor facilities are stormed and the glowniggers and parasites who work there are executed and the data they collect is leaked to the public so that the rest of these government assets, zogbots, mercenaries, glorified jannies and authority figures can be hunted down and exterminated.
>>543642128Kill them both. Be balanced in your extremism, chudly.
This is why I wish /pol/ didn't get addicted to populism/nationalism. You guys are based on like 99% of issues, but when it comes to rich people it's like your brains are just broken. You people just become seething commies.
>>543644030If we’re right on everything else consider that you shabbos kulaks actually do deserve it
>>543642461They subsist on each other. Both must be removed.
>the rich don't murder, rape, use drugs, and not pay taxesOp confirmed faggot again
>>543642128The top 1% are nothing but wealth accumulators, if they disappeared all their wealth would become available for the rest of the world.
>>543642128Sorry OP spiritually Jewish first
>>543644731This. Capitalism demand we think of the rich as enterprising smart people looking to serve needs and get rich off making life easier, but they're groups of investors who collude against these people when they're not just buying them up and giving them a smaller slice of what they could have got on their own, inserting more middle men and syphoning off more wealth and value from the locals.
>>543642128it would be trivially easy to just replace the top 1% with AI though
>>543642128Retarded unfair comparison because the 1% includes (You)If you live in the first world and you have a job, you are the fucking 1%, you fucking faggot. The 1% includes every productive member of society, every doctor, every police man, every soldier, everyone skilled worker. Maybe if you work minimum wage you are maybe in the 2% or the 3%The bottom 1% are the absolutely fucking bottom. How you define who the bottom 1% is, it could just be the entire prison population worldwide.This is such a disgusting pro-billionaire kike pilpul. Pushed by Asmongold, a fag owned by jews who is in the 0.0001%
>>543642128Top %1 gone = less satanic child rape
>efficiency and progress is ours once amore>now that we have the neutron bomb>it’s nice and quick and clean and gets things done
Guillotine the top 1% and you get rid of all the people currently causing all the problems. Repeat every 20 years or so, FUCK THE ULTRA-RICH
>>543642216"It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich person to enter heaven".
>>543642128>lots of specialized expertslmao nigga these are usually completely dysfunctional degenrics
>>543642128This is a pile of horseshit false equivalencies.
>please make a choicerape the medium class, which is the human equivalent of cattle
>>543642128isn't this just get rid of jews or get rid of niggers?
>>543642128The properties of the top1% aren't going to disappear with them though. You forgot to add that to your image.Without their properties magically going poof, somebody else down the chain of command would take over or a whole lot of shit would get nationalized overnight. Captains of cargo ships aren't going to forget where they were going just because the people who originally owned the ships are gone now, etc.Furthermore, with the top1% gone we would be getting so many of the bottom1% imported to inconvenience our lives
>>543642128the top 1% can't exist without the bottom 1% (and bottom 50% to steal from)
>>543642128Jews are both
>>543642128I prefer if the top 1% disappeared, solely so we can accelerate.
>>543642128The 1% is a disingenuous class. It doesn't exist. It's the 0.000001% using the rest as a meat shield.
>>543647320This. It's like how in America, the estate tax only kicks in if you have a net worth of over $15,000,000. If you have five kids and die, you can make them all millionaires without being taxed. Still, you have people crying about the estate tax like it's a middle class issue, like prioritizing eliminating it is to really help you. Then you can't find the states Medicaid and you cut it because you just want to hurt who you think are the bottom 1% and now you can't afford a family.
>>543646319I assume some abrahamic shitskin said this. makes sense, since all abrahamic shitskins are evil and retarded.
>>543647320>>543648711there is no economic defined class. the wealthy jew and the poor jew are on the same team with the same interests, because they are jews. "Jew" is their "class" and "polity". you've been mindraped by communist rhetoric into believing this idea of the "proletariat" and "capitalist system".
>>543644592>implying that most billionaires are drug addictssure buddy keep dreaming in fantasy land
>>543642128Companies wouldn't be in chaos because Jewish shareholders dont operate the company.
>>543646047retard learn percentages>>543649689you need some operation even if you're rich, who makes the decisions? some random ceo? no, the boss of the operation
>>543649404Feminist vs patriarchyCapitalist vs communistRepublican vs democratLiterally all made up Jewish terms.
>>543649404Even when you see the issue like that, combating jewish nepotism and corruption combats all nepotism and corruption. There is no need to make the distinction unless you want to discredit and distract those efforts by making it about magical racial hivemind connections you can hardly explain. There's no need. Just regulate "jewish behavior".
>>543649809Fucking retard the CEO IS WHO MAKES THE DECISIONS. The board and shareholders dont do shit but give general direction to head.
>>543642461Is inflation worse? The thing that makes everyone poor but the rich? Is lobbying worse? Sending off Americans to die in war or Vietnam? Clearly, the wealthy are worse because they skirt every karmic punishment for their actions. I wish quarters were still silver, but alas, the wealthy and their loan collecting to consolidate more because don debt and what they have while those that have not become easier to target by the wealthy. Would the poor even be poor if it weren't for 99% of the dollars value being inflated away, so those that work and safe: just become more poor for trusting the system that uplifts the rich and punches down the less fortunate or those with families that hate them.
>>543649842Patriarchy is like monarchy; it's all just words, but they represent real things you can support. Patriarchy is based and redpilled, it's traditional, but you don't want to use the term because of the baggage.
>>543642128bottom % only exists because top % exists
>>543646047Bottom 1% worldwide are probably all protohuman tribalists that have no concept of personal property and have no little to no interaction with the rest of society.
>>543642128>poopjeetshttp://www.google.com/search?q=toilet+witches+indiahttp://www.google.com/search?q=codex+pajeethttp://www.google.com/search?q=india+jamboyhttp://www.amazon.in/s?k=cow+dung+cakeshttp://www.google.com/search?q=india+poop+festivalhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2Pi4-zWJTghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JDGGcY0wDUGO BACK TO INDIA YOU STINKING PAJEETS>GO BACK TO INDIA YOU STINKING PAJEETS
>>543642128Well since a massive population drop occurring we will see if this chart is true when the bottom 1% goes away. And when none of those things comes true because it's obviously false, what will be the next zionist take graph then? Those had things on the second occur entirely because of the jew governments want and makes them happen.
>>543644731And if you gave that wealth to the bottom 1% do you think it would make the world a better place?
>>543642128The people making the most in corporate jobs (700k+) are pretty useless to society and the company. These are paid cushy jobs most of the time. You don't get to this level by having deep technical skills and keeping the machines running.>To be in the top 1% of income earners in the U.S., you need a national average annual income of approximately $731,000vs. the top end of what an autist with technical skills is likely to make:>A Head of IT or IT Director at a major bank in the United States earns an average total compensation ranging from $150,000 to $195,000+ per year, with total packages often scaling higher depending on bonuses, equity, and the size of the institution.
>>543642128I say we just rid of central banks.
>>543642128Retard
>>543642128>1% of what?Learn to English you stupid faggot
>>543642128how do you define the top and bottom? purely economically? in that case removing the top 1% would also remove virtually all subversion from government, finance, academia, media, etc, put an end to many currently ongoing wars, and ensure that no new wars are started in the future, and would also, over a relatively short period of time, create more policies in favor of legitimate Americans, expulsions of illegitimate ones, the creation of negro reserves and removal of them from White communities entirely, and ultimately lead to a longer lasting, safer, cleaner, high-trust society than the removal of the bottom 1% of poors who would simply re-breed themselves back in a single generation anyway.
>>543642128Top people in companies go missing all the time and nothing changes. A ceo or vp goes hiking or skiing or flying in their death machines and crash and no one can find them and everyone just assumes they took an extended vacation (since they make their own schedules.) and the world keeps turning. Try to say the same if even 10% of the lower work force doesn't show up.
>>543642343My sentiments exactly.They have more in common with each other than either has with the rest of us anyway.
>>543642128Why not get rid of both? Why stop at 1 percent?
I don't get it. This makes no sense. Who is this "top 1%" and why would them disappearing kill the planet?
