[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Saudi backed hijackers attack America
>So America invades.... Iraq
How the fuck was this explained back then?
Anyone here old enough to remember?
Reading about it is just absurd
>>
>>543648621
Saddam Hussein did it
>>
>>543648725
What's the proof of that?
I thought it was Bin Laden?
>>
Not just Saudi backed. Most were Saudi.
And the person who brought them to the US, and got them an apartment to live, and arranged their flight training, is a Saudi intelligence officer.

They never explained it.
But Saudi Arabia is an ally of Israel.
>>
>>543648621
Boomers were at helm along with silent generation. They eat up bullshit and very few outliers existed.
>>
>kikesrael and assorted zionists lie about weapons of mass destruction
>rabid zionist christian does an anthrax false flag which is blamed on iraq
>bush invades iraq for freedom, THE PROPHECY and a fat oil payout
>>
>>543648621
I'll explain
>Americans are docile stupid sheep
Easy to understand
>>
File: IMG_9650.jpg (76 KB, 1024x761)
76 KB JPG
>>543648621
lol, muh narrative.
>>
>>543648621
>Saudi backed hijackers attack America
Osama comes from the Bin Laden family. A wealthy family from Saudi. He had the money even though his family disowned him.
Iirc,his brother lives or lived in the US and is the the opposite.
The government did not back them back then. They were backed during Soviet-Afghan war, and subsequently the Chechen war, and then arrested all their citizens that went to fight upon arrival over terrorism charges. So many stayed in Afghanistan.

>How the fuck was this explained back then?
Americans are retarded. They thought all Arabs and Muslims are a monolith.
They just leaked "intel" of WMD and some retarded conspiracy theory that Saddam used anthrax to kill senators and other officials to help Osama when the anthrax was US-Military grade.

And Americans didn't have to buy it for Bush to go to war, because Israel already wanted to.
>"If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region."
>>
>>543648621
Dead muslims = good muslims
4.6 million wasn't enough
>>
File: islam7.jpg (532 KB, 1200x1450)
532 KB JPG
>>543648621
NUKE

MECCA

NOW

KILL

THEM

ALL

GO

GO

GO
>>
>>543648621
We invaded Afghanistan before Baghdad.
The explanation was that Saddam was enabling terrorism and about to give WMD's to terrorists, like bin Laden and Al Qaeda. So, while Saddam was nowhere near 9/11, he could've been a big help to Al Qaeda, and be very disruptive to our counterterror operations in the Gulf and Afghanistan. If Saddam was not removed first, we would've had a much harder time fighting Al Qaeda anywhere in the region.
>>
>>543649020
god i wish that were me
>>
File: 1638877447328.jpg (161 KB, 480x442)
161 KB JPG
>>543648771
>>
>>543648794
does nobody remember John Brennan being the one at the saudi consulate who gave the alleged hijackers their vias, ffs
>>
>>543651121
this is ai
>>
>>543648621
Nobody did, there were protests everywhere about Iraq
But we were already on a war footing in Afghanistan, then shock and awe toppled Saddam in weeks so suddenly opinion shifted to America Fuck Yeah
>>
>>543651186
ai did not exist when that screencap was made, faggot
>>
>>543648621
>How the fuck was this explained back then?
Colin Powell held up some scary yellow powder and called it "yellow cake uranium", claiming that Saddam had mobile centrifuge trucks driving around the country 24/7 enriching uranium so that America couldn't target them.

We already had the "war on terror" theme going so people just went along with it, or they manufactured consent to make it look like people were cool with it.

Btw, anybody remember those first few weeks after 9/11 when certain lawmakers had anthrax mailed to their offices? It started just as suddenly as it stopped and nobody ever mentioned it again. That was weird.
>>
Back then they had total control of the politics of the country and the election process itself through TV news. Remember when they had "debates" hosted by MSM tv news shows? I don't know if anyone even watched those pieces of shit after 2016. Sadly they are now trying to recapture that type of control through social media, but fortunately social media is inherently a million times more democratic than TV media so the house of cards isn't going back up again.
>>
>>543649084
>They just leaked "intel" of WMD
It wasn't leaked it was widely publicised and apparently the one holding up the dossier on Iraqi WMDs in front of the UN was none other than Netenyahoo himself
>>
>>543648621
part of the project for a new american century.
The us wanted iraq to be an ally so we could get the oil. this was before fracking so middle east oil was super important to control
>>
File: 1789590421505225.png (380 KB, 600x455)
380 KB PNG
Saudis didn't do this
Who controls hollywood?
>>
>>543651514
US and yoo-kay have had multiple leaders cycled through since then meanwhile Bibi has been King Jew for 20+ years. Imagine being israeli (lowercase, disrespect).
>>
>>543648621
We were pretty pissed off and GWB was up Saudi's asshole. Someone had to get bombed.
>>
>>543648771
>>543651186
when the guys who did it were interviewed by al jazeera american media blacklisted the journalist and have never aired the tape
>>
>>543650755
Based. Any Jewish War that gets Muslims to flee to Europe to exterminate white people is good in my book. Right-wing Israelis throw the ball, left-wing Jews in the West catch it. We're approaching a 100% win rate with this particular scheme. Goys really were meant to be slaves.
>>
>>543651835
>t. fetishistic jew
>>
>>543648621
From memory it was just intelligence that Sadam had WMDs. The atmosphere in the wake of 9/11 just allowed this simple accusation to be justification enough for military intervention.
The only link to 9/11 was the anthrax attack. Israeli intelligence operatives claimed to have witnessed a hand over of anthrax from Iraqis to Al Qaeda in Europe.
Of course the 9/11 anthrax attacks turned out to be perpetrated by a Jewish American scientist who was a Jewish racial supremacist. Yes, that is the offical narrative now. On wikipedia and everything. But it took many years for the truth about the anthrax attacks to come out.
>>
>>543648621
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BIOLABS IN IRAQ
watch colin power explaining the clownshow at the UN , its entretaining
>>
>>543648621
>So America invades.... Iraq
They invaded Afghanistan.
>>
>>543648621
Yes it was really frustrating, a whole lot of Americans are very much led by what the TV tells them. Liberals were actually cool back then and the most aware that things were really wrong
>>
>>543652925
We invaded both.
Also destabilized Libya.
Also bombed Yemen (a bunch, we still do sometimes just for fun)
And funded terrorists to destabilize Syria.
Now we're trading missiles with Iran.

Israel must really love us for attacking all their regional foes for them, I bet they pay us back with all kinds of great stuff and have eternal gratitude!
Right?
>>
>>543653002
>Liberals were actually cool back then and the most aware that things were really wrong
>very much led by what the TV tells them
yeah man, bill clinton was real cool man, he played the saxophone
>>
The WMD lie was the primary driver of the Iraq war along with the babies in incubator bullshit. Basically boomers are literal retards and trusted their Israeli coopted government.
Invading Iraq was a quite a boon to Iran and basically ended their war. Even back then at the height of US military power, Bush Jr the retard decided not to attack Iran.
>>
>>543648621
We invaded Afghanistan because the attack was coordinated by the taliban under direction of Osama bin Laden.
Afghanistan has always been a failed state, but he was the defacto leader of it at the time.
The attack was retaliation for... who fucking cares, we probably bombed some brown kids or something.
We invaded Iraq to secure oil supplies to europe.
The official reason though was that we believed saddam Hussain was working with Osama bin Laden and was potentially going to supply him with WMDs to do more attacks against the US
>>
>>543648801
This, the older generations were a lot easier to lie to.
Millenials and zoomers are all jaded and cynical.
>>
>>543648621
btw they literally caught a saudi agent who paid for the hijackers apartments in los angeles and for some reason they let him go and he went back to saudi and they never heard of him again
>>
>>543653296
>but he was the defacto leader of it at the time.
no he wasnt
>>
>>543653296
>We invaded Iraq to secure oil supplies to europe.
aside from the jews thinking they own that land,
Saddam was like fuck your opec shit I'm selling in straight euros and not using dollars,
+ tomb of Gilgamesh
>>
>>543648621
>How the fuck was this explained back then?
Same as every fucking other time, including their latest war with Iran.
Lies and propaganda.
Americans love it. They live to consume this shit.
>>
>>543648771
Neither, It was done by the kikes
>>
File: 1787352815596229.jpg (78 KB, 700x668)
78 KB JPG
>>543653296
You forgot that The Taliban was founded by the Americans as a retaliation for the Soviet invasion on Afghanistan, same for ISIS as it was founded by the Americans as well, so what the fuck is your point? Americans are fucking cucks
>>
>>543649944
Lol fell for the kike lies kek kek
>>
>>543653296
this is mental
you invaded because for twenty long years you had been creating and fueling the afghan civil war
>>
>>543653955
>founded by the Americans
the Taliban only became a problem for the globohomos in our gov once they started cracking down on pedos & poppies
we didnt create the Taliban, we propped 'em up and used them when it was convenient and then attacked them when they became inconvenient for the globohomos in our government
>>
>>543648794
Saudis arent allied with Israel. Their government just plays nice because they want our weapons. However most Saudis hate Israel and will never sign the Abraham Accords
>>
>>543648621
>How the fuck was this explained back then?
Muslims hate us for our freedoms
They want us all to die.
Saddam Hussein is a muslim.
He was weapons of mass destruction.
No, you may not see them.
He will kill us all.
>>
>>543648621
The planes were flown by Dov Zakheim's autopilot systems
>>
>>543653110
>>543653002
He's right, liberals back then were more the libertarian type than the marxist types of today
You know, guns and freedom of speech, actual science like the bell curve, separation of church and state, rejecting religious indoctrination of Christianity and doubly so Islam which was seen as backwards savages
Unfortunately it also planted the seeds of modern feminism and faggotory, which gave us the rot of today...

It's a shame Christopher Hitchens died of cancer, if anything it'd be funny watching him get cancelled
>>
>>543648621
Something something weapon of mass destruction..something something yellowcake. It was all shit and some of us (i was in my early 20s) knew it was complete horseshit. They did bomb Afghanistan first.
>>
>>543654778
>He's right, liberals back then were more the libertarian type than the marxist types of today
Absolutely false. There were people who were libertarians at the time who might have thought they were liberals because they only started to pay attention to politics because of 9/11, didn't like Bush and the neocons, and assumed that their enemies must be the good guys, or at least allies. All that went out the window during the 2004 election. Anyone who was still deluded was completely disillusioned when Obama got into office and all the protesters suddenly stopped giving a shit about war and drone bombings and shit.
>>
>>543648621
Yep that's exactly how the events happened. It was as stupid then as it is now. Plus patriot act and everything else.
>>
>>543654490
Ironically of course that Saddam was one of the few leaders in the region that kept the Koran thumpers at bay
>>
>>543654947
That was the COVID of that decade. When you looked around at your fellow "humans" and couldn't believe that 75% of them were falling for it. SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!
>>
>>543653955
america just supported whoever would shoot russians, its not complicated as u say
>>
>>543654778
>liberals back then were more the libertarian type
LOL
you could have just prefaced it with
>I wasnt alive at the time, but sources tell me
>>
Saddam was an asshole but he was mostly playing nice with everyone in 2003. Claims of WMDs and intent to use them were based on false info.
The world got caught up in this idea of "Being against terrorism means everyone MUST have democracy" and so men like Hussein, Gadafi, and Assad were ousted for the terrors they committed against their people...when those regimes were the ones keeping jihadists at bay. The US/West decided to try to solve a problem that wasn't theirs in the first place. And it's had awful consequences.
>>
>>543648794
Three Saudi princes planned and carried out 9/11 they all died in a week of each otherin July 2002, were relatively young, and under very interesting circumstances. They were never blamed but going against the King never ends well.
>>
The idea was they were going to rework the entire region. Bringing freedom to all. Once everyone experienced all that sweet freedom, nobody would waste their time with terrorism.

They did rework the region, but Iran is the last losers who haven’t received the freedom yet.
>>
>>543648621
They’re all the same shit let’s stop pretending
>>
>>543651121
al jazeera is an islamic mouthpiece funded by qatar.
bin laden went on air in 2004 admitting 9/11 bragging about how al qaeda orchestrated it to the minute. it was your own jihadist hero you are stealing credit from, shill.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.