7 guys are getting charged because a slut has regret
>>543668566You break it you but itYou created a monster.You look into the abyss and the abyss stares back at you.Are those threats to Elon?Are you implying that Elon is in control and not us?Everything Im saying is predicated on working something out with China.
>>543668566Holy crap frat bros and their enablers are the most dindu mfers around.A girl in a k-hole can't consent this is consent 101This does NOT pass the vibe check
>>543668566It's pretty clear that she was graped. Get over it. Thank God /pol/cels will never touch a women.
>>543668566>participate in completely degenerate behaviour>it ruins your lifeWHAT!?!?!?!?!?!?!? HOW!!??!?!?!?!?!
i hope those 7 kids sue all the media and this femoid to the point of bankruptcy
>>543668868>i hope those 7 kids sue all the media and this femoid to the point of bankruptcylmaomiggers truly live in their own little retarded world
>>543668809She sucked off a guy that was passed out, fucked two of the rapists days later, and begged to be invited to their Halloween party.
>>543668566Enjoy the Sharia law, NY
>>543668704Bot broken
>>543668704I’m trying to spread the wealth….I’m also going by what you all are saying.Meta actually cooked with scientists.You implied OpenAI didn’tYou will do what the people want you to do.Granted it’s fair.>who decides if its fairMe.:)
>>543668566BURN THE COAL, PAY THE TO-oh, wait, wrong thread, sorry
>>543668566being perfectly honest here rich kids are more likely to rape than any other demographic
>>543668949I’m not feeling too optimistic about Optimus with all these implications going around….
>>543668566
>>543668566At least two of the men have legitimate countersuits since she sucked their dicks while they were unconscious. Cuts both ways.
>hundreds of non-whites commit actual rape daily>complete silence>college roastie initiates sex with multiple guys, regrets it weeks later>entire left wing machine laser focuses on it for the next monthwhy are they like this?
>>543669200>surely tradcucks will hold a roastie to the standard they hold men to any day nowBeing a snide faggot aside, it is very funny that they pulled out the uno reverse and forced her name to be public
>>543668566Lindsay Clarke and now this dumb slut? Why do people pick the most undeserving "victims" to champion and use as part of their vendetta against society in general?
>>543668566Maybe they're getting charged because they fed her drugs and then spent seven hours fucking her
>>543668809This doesn't even make sense
>>543668566>survivorShe’s going to lose 7 counter civil suits and it’ll be hilarious
>>543669089Yeah but guys can still beat us up ;(
>>543668911CheckedYou should hate women, you think you do, but not enough
>>543668809> This does NOT pass the vibe checkIn case any of you fucking retards giving (You)s to jewbots had missed the glaring obviousness of their posts, maybe this one can open your dumb brown eyes. Stupid fucking newfags and niggers
>>543668566They should sue for wrongful prosecution.
>>543668566God willing things like this will hurt the Left in the midterms and next election, as well.
>>543669957Maybe youre a stupid gullible retard who swallows any filth the media vomits upOr youre just an average foidKill yourself
When your "side" is always the one supporting rapists and pedophiles I think you need to take a good long look at whom your getting your information from desu
>>543668566Imagine still having sex in 2026 without getting your partner to sign a consent form. Those frat idiots only have themselves to blame. There are even consent apps now so there is NO EXCUSE.
>Special prosecutor named>All state media mobilized>State lawyers charging 1,000 dollars an hour mobilized>They will heavily investigate this one college party>Take witness statements from everyone there>Drag everyone through multiple clown courts and years of legal battles>Essentially they're gonna ruin 10 or 20 people's lives over some whore from a ketamine party>And give jewish lawyers millions in the meantime, while ignoring nigger criminals or even letting them goI know the entire point is to be a circus that humiliates common sense as much as possible, but we seriously do need to remember this and not feel bad when it's time to execute their children and relatives and pets.
>>543670170Basically no one involved contests the facts. She showed up. They gave her drugs. They then had sex with her while she was blasted on drugs. Maybe you think that's an OK thing to do. I think that makes you a bugman, but we're all entitled to our opinions.
>>543668566Based. Throw the degenerates in a dark prison cell and let them rot for eternity
>>543668566jewish theatrics
>>543669200This only matters if they go after it heavily enough and get some backing from pro-bono lawyers, I feel a simping coming and that nothing will happen but I'd be happy if said psyop did manage to backfire on them.
>>543670437HAHAHA THIS IS ACTUALLY REAL
>>543668566>>543668704it is opposite to the 'Central Park jogger case' (yes they really called it that) in every way.all these same people made them celebrities as the Exonerated Five despite casually confessing on tape to brutalizing a random woman in the park. they mocked Trump for calling them guilty when they obviously were.
>>543670060soon with a few doses of testosterone and all Indian workforce that won't be a problem either.
>>543670030are you 11/12 sure about that?
>>543670437>Yeah… are you sure that you don’t want to buy me a drink? Ok, then… “Misterxyloharmonic”.
>>543669089women didn't want any of that shit. they were told they wanted those things by screeching harpies.they've been lied to for decades. the early feminist panels on tv shows are so embarrassing. they're obviously retarded.the books they were peddling were full of straight up lies. they claimed housewives were unhappy. the studies they cited were real but the actual data showed the opposite. it's astonishing really.
>>543669089Because "they" (women) didn't win anything. The real "they" who won is the kikes."They" (the kikes) pushed this so it would fuck up Western society. "They" (the women) lost because they bought into the "I don't need no man" feminist pinko bullshit the kikes came up with.
>>543668704>>543668949>>543669082hello fellow human how are we human doing on this human day
>>543670883Test 12. Test 12.
>>543670030You are correct in that these frat boys are the failsons of rich cunts with plenty of money for expensive lawyers, which is why rapists like this usually go unpunished
>>543668809I mean, in a perfect world all of these people would be summarily executed for being degenerates. Colleges really need to resolve the contradiction between their advertisement of a hedonistic playground to let loose away from the prying eyes of your parents (basically the promise of Animal House, Revenge of the Nerds, etc) and the reality of it being a seminary for an increasingly paranoid and conservative cloister of identity freaks. It cannot be both simultaneously.
>>543668566>survivorAlleged survivor. Sue him for defamation.
>>543669200>>543670594>be happy if said psyop did manage to backfire on them.meme the Central Park Five into it somehow.that case is the complete opposite to this in every way. Trump was even involved. rip their mask off - this is a story about "privilege" not about women.. who do I talk to about getting a meme into the zeitgeist.
>>543669396jews(unironically)
>>543670992You can have a hedonistic playground that doesn’t involve organized gang rape
>Two days later, according to reporting by Saeidi, one of the fraternity brothers apologized to Jane Doe via text for “how things went down.” He and another fraternity member felt bad, he said, that they were too drunk to “shut it down and kick people out before it got way out of hand.” She replied that her memory was “super clouded,” but she reckoned that none “of the sexual stuff was illegal.” She said that she would like to see him again, “but like leave out the extra 5 billion men and ketamine.” (Victims of sexual abuse or violence often minimize or rationalize what has happened to them in the immediate aftermath of an assault, especially when it involves a friend or acquaintance.)That part about victims minimizing is directly in the news article, lmao. This is actually evil stuff going on.
>>543668566feminine men are weak and unattractive
>>543668868The girl is going to get interviews and probably an autobiography deal. The guys are going to have their names pop up with trillions of front page national news outlets any time an employer does the most minuscule of research.I would not be surprised if hiring managers use AI to parse names and get back a "character score".
>>543668566Those faggots should have just fucked each other. Would have made things simpler and undramatic. They were having 9/10ths of the way to a gay orgy anyway
>give affirmative consent 6,000,000 times both before AND AFTER the drug use and sex>wtf my reputation is ruined now that I'm known as the ketamine slut>retroactively claim rape>100 quadrillion Democrats call you stunning and brave and demand the immediate execution of the 7 frat boys, some of whom never even touched her>Democrats unironically sacrificed their chance to win the midterms for a turned out slutThis story is fucking insane. She singlehandedly won Trump the midterms and ended AOC and Mamdani's political careers.
>>543668905Adam from PBD said she was K Holed therefore she’s 100% absolved of any responsibility. Also she was clearly groomed by the patriarchy.
>>543668566i thought muslims required 4 male witnesses to conclude it was rape?so they admitted that they raped her?this is news to mewhy would there be a trial if they admitted to raping her?
>>543671087>no I’m pretty sure we can just have our cake and eat it too trust me bro it’s been working just fine for the last 50 years The death of your retarded worldview is going to be very sweet to savor. Keep fucking up, who am I to stop a train wreck?
She had post nut regret
>>543671135>Jane Doe, meanwhile, has dropped out of school; Giuffra told CNN’s Jake Tapper that she tried to leave during the fall 2024 semester, but that Cornell refused to refund her tuitionShe was a flunkie just trying to get tuition back? Or just was trying to scam?This sounds like the likely thing at this point, not just the whore angle but a new angle of scamming that would be revealed if we ever got her name, as of right now we don't know her grades or class attendance or anything.
>>543668566As poster on the internet I have to speak out. The actions of the 7 Cornell students with the Ketamine sniffing and the rapes is absolutely reprehensible behaviour. C’mon guys. There’s no place for this types of shenanigans in our society. I am give full support. Special justice. We are demanding. Society. Sexual assault. It’s wrong. OUR VALUES. It’s who we are. It’s with a heavy heart which I make these statements tonight. Important.
The thing with the fentanyl dick is what’s clouding the case, it will always fall back to “She was drugged on purpose!”Although, it doesn’t make sense because they’re having us believe that cops are keeling over and being administered Narcan because they touch a single fentanyl molecule with their bare hands. So basically this guy has a dick resembling solid iron is what they’re saying.
>>543670437
>>543671238ketamine lasts for 1 hour. whyd she redose to the point of being incapacitated for 7 hours? that's a lot of lines and $ worth of K
>>543671343>sexual liberation means I don’t have to treat women like living human beings Yes yes yes we all know how you think. Just get a passport and become a sex tourism guy already
>>543669089But they can't kill their children with impunity
>>543671392Another fun quote>“My reputation is destroyed and i’m utterly ashamed,” Jane Doe texted another fraternity member, four days after she alleges she was raped while she was under the influence of ketamine, marijuana and alcohol. “I’m f------g pissed cause this many people shouldn’t know and i feel like i know who some of the rats in the room were,” she wrote. “if i ever find out i swear to god its in sight.”
>>543669957>they fed her drugslolyou mean she took drugs, willingly
>>543671554If I get you drunk and get you to willingly take drugs, is it rape if I fuck you in the ass and you regret it later?
>>543671392>Go to college to fuck dudes>Finish fucking dudes>Get your money backWoo, boy
>>543669957She literally wanted it you stupid faggot.
>>543669089Turns out women don't like it when majority of men are unmotivated losers who don't give a shit about them anymore and just drink beer, smoke weed and play vidya all dayThese bitches are all deciding in their mid 30s that now they wanna play house with a man and they're looking around and there's 0 options for them, and the few viable candidates that do exist either will not marry them, or will literally only fuck them on the side along with 15 other women. Well that sucks, oh well lol, maybe the next civilizations women will figure it out.
>>543671614Men accidentally fuck trannies all the time when they got too drunk. They just get made fun of but they never get to press charge that the trannies rape them
>>543668809I hate frat bros, but I hate women even more.
>>543668566Doesn't happen if you don't bang a drunk 4/10. Simple as.
>Doe, however, told campus police her experience was far more daunting. She told police she realized at some point that she had taken ketamine earlier and then did so again because she thought that “if I do Ketamine again maybe I will pass out. My thought was that if I passed out and these men had sex with me, then they could be charged with Rape.”Tactically taking more drugs so that the men you agreed to have sex with and never said no to could all be charged with rape.
Maybe don't take mind bending drugs while engaging in sex with another person who's also on mind bending drugs and you won't find yourself slapped with rape charges it's honestly not that difficult
>>543671719A man having sex with a transgender is more embarrassing than a woman having a eightsome
>>543671614You don't "get me drunk" and "get me to take drugs"I get drunk and take drugs myself lol Why do you speak like the person on the other end has no agency & autonomy?
>>543671478You guys seem to have a really hard time drawing a line between harmless libertine fun and an unspeakably heinous crime, except to rely on the whims of a woman who, given the values and social pressures of the college campus, have a considerably large incentive to claim to be a symbol of the reason the college campus NEEDS to become more retarded and divorced from reality over time.Scoff, or listen, it doesn’t matter. Your day of reckoning is inevitable.
>>543671719I'm not talking about trannies. I'm talking about you, me, a bunch of alcohol, some ketamine, and an industrial bin full of K-Y jelly. If I got you drunk and fed you so much drugs you barely knew where you were, is it rape if I then fuck you in the ass and tell all your friends?
>>543668566Why do they call them a survivor? Rape doesn't involve death (not that this was rape anyway)
>>543671883Right. So you and I are drinking and doing drugs. It's a fun time, but I'm kind of holding back a little bit as I encourage you to do more. If I fucked you in your ass while you were just on the edge of passed out, is that rape? Does the fact that you willingly took drugs I gave you imply consent for seven full hours of bareback gay sex?
>>543671911You mean if I got drunk and high and let you fuck me in the assYeah that's not rape
>>543671793>Wow this crazy chick is going out of her way to take so many drugs she passes out>Better have sex with her!Fewer retards on the street are a good thing.
>>543671793Damn, she pretty much called in Broken Arrow and figured I’m either gonna die or get these dudes on rape charges.
>>543672009You don't think you'd regret that?
>>543671793Damn.... maybe sticking my dick in crazy isn't that appealing after all
>>543668566>sex havers losingIncels stay winning.
>>543672039Regret is not rape
>>543672060It's not once you realize what they're thinking, that she is essentially lying to you and scamming you and at some point might think>I'd better systematically slaughter my kids while you're out of the house>I'm gonna go to an orgy and then accuse everyone there of rape>This sex stuff is gonna be normal now and people should just get over it, anyway also this was all rapeYou literally cannot trust any woman who shows the slightest hint of slut behavior, or crazy behavior, or anything like that, it's just not worth your life, bro.At this point she has to be a debt-free virgin without tattoos who never got an education because if she's not she's probably planning to kill the kids and accuse you of rape.
>>543672176I have a hard time believing you'd be so circumspect waking up the next morning and realizing what happened.
>>543671983Her own statements say that she never said no while they were having sex, and she actually said "no" several times and they all stopped immediately.And then she said yes when they asked for sex at a later time.The consent part comes from her saying yes, which she did. They stopped every single time she said no and she doesn't dispute this at all.
>>543671983Yeah no. She arrived drunk. She took drugs willingly and then consented. That's not what rape is. That's party sex that she regrets because of her reputation.
>>543672252That's not rape, that's being angry at your own choices lol
>>543671675Yea pretty much. The problem is that man is not unmotivated, depressed, or a loser in a vacuum. He is because a million decisions were made without any input of his own. Jobs is a good example, all jobs go to women or are being given to foreigners, almost exclusively. There's nothing he can do. Build a business? Sure but it's getting incredibly crowded in most fields, especially online. And without a steady income, you'll like never start a real life business either.
>>543668566>allegations>this survivor These 2 are mutually exclusive. This is Duke lacrosse all over again only this time they will be guilty because of how insane women have become. We live in post truth reality where accusations equal fact.
>>543670060Legally?
>>543672268Rape is when the rapist has sex with someone who cannot or does not consent. Is that so hard to understand? Is showing up drunk somewhere consent to get fucked by everyone who wants to? Is doing drugs consent to get fucked?
>>543670060self-defense
>>543668809>>543671721apparently frat bros are also dangerous for men.https://apnews.com/article/arizona-fraternity-pledge-hazing-death-b53c547d383082d33aebdb4950e0c550He got 2 months in jail and 3 years of probation.>Eslick could face additional jail time if he doesn't meet the conditions of probation, which include creating and delivering 305 anti-hazing presentations and keeping the court updated on his progress. He also can't use alcohol or drugs unless prescribed.
>>543671675>Nobody will take these 30 year old womenUhhh, they will, only said men will just be normal 5/10 men and will not have great jobs, cars, and trips to italy.They're the ones being picky, every "single girl who can't find no man" story is her rejecting every single guy and then claiming there are no good men.Even post-wallers who have lost their looks and fertility don't struggle with finding men, even men who will take care of them, they struggle with finding the "good men" they want, who are only the top 5% of men and who are not interested in someone 30 years old.t. my sister is 40, has never held a job, is on disability + fat + can hardly walk, constant medical and emotional issues, still got a man to marry her who has his own house and is taking care of her.
>>543668911As per shariah both the girl and guys would get publicly lashes
>accountability and justice cannot simply be values, they must also be deliveredI fully agree with this statement. Which is weird because I am on the exact opposite of this issue as him.
>>543672526She consented when she agreed to have sex.
>>543671793>never said no tonot exactly.>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/>Four more frat brothers entered the room, according to Jane Doe’s sworn statement, and she hid under the bedcovers. She had trouble recalling precisely what happened next. She backed away from another man who grabbed and forcibly kissed her.https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/how-the-cornell-seven-rape-case-became-a-national-scandal
>>543668566kek its gonna get to a point where men will outright ignore most women in fear for their freedom/livelihood
the american justice system is a fucking circus and those men are innocentthis is mob tier
>>543672676>I didn't read itWhen she said no they stopped, this is deliberately stated by her multiple times and is in all her statements.She never said no and then had sex done to her.>But she said no and they stopped!Correct. Naturally, if you're not jewish this doesn't have to be stated.She agreed to all sex + when she said no they stopped.
>>543672261>she actually said "no" several times and they all stopped immediately.>And then she said yes when they asked for sex at a later time.source?
>>543672526>how was I supposed to know that if I showed up drunk to an orgy and started doing lines of drugs something bad might happenAs I said previously, everyone in this story deserves a bullet to the head without the rigmarole of a trial. Your argument that, essentially, the laws of physics are racist or whatever the fuck if a woman dances on the edge of a cliff and accidently falls off the edge, is not convincing, and it’s frankly embarrassing still seeing people spout it with a straight face. If women have the agency of a plastic bag blowing in the wind, then the only logical way to protect them is to unironically take a page from Islam
>>543672526Its called chemsex. Its a whole kink. So yes. Also CNC is a kink. These people all enjoy all of this. And dont forget the humiliation fetishes. All of this is sexual.
>>543672659According to who? The guys she accuses of rape? It sounds like she didn't actually consent. It sounds like the people who fed her drugs and fucked her say she consented.
Glenn Greenwald totally disavowed the case. Explained this girl was basically just a drugged up slut who was suing a deep pocket institution years after the fact.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0wJIXz8tYThis shitskin mayor is really demonstrating his Islamic IQ here
>>543672748You're here posting quotes and haven't actually read any of it, lmao. Read the statements that are available in full.>>543672781This isn't a debate, little bro.
>>543672268>>543672659consent to having sex with a certain person is not consent to having sex with another.
>>543672765>Its called chemsex. Its a whole kink. So yes.So every person at a bar, male and female, is ready to be raped? By virtue of going to a bar and getting drunk, everyone's rape meat ripe for the taking?
>>543668809Dumb slut shouldn't have gone to parties and done drugs with strangers.
>>543672831She consented to having sex with all of them at the time and does not even deny this.
>>543672826>This isn't a debate, little bro.Yes, it is, you moron kek. That shit does NOT fuckin work on me, "lil bro."
>>543672835 You have to be 18 to post here.
>>543668566i will never understand this. whores are gross and masturbating feels better anyways
>>543672526At what point do we not absolve drunk people of responsibility? Do we extend it to driving? Were there defensive wounds on the perps? Did she resist in any way? Was it recorded? Evidence matters more than she said he said. As it is I haven't heard any evidence beyond she said. You cannot administer justice on the good faith of anyone telling the truth.
>>543672866Once again, not a debate little bro. Post those words again though and they'll do something.
>>543672526She is literally calling up the boys weeks later asking for more, and got pissed off when they banned her from their parties for being a troublemaker. At the time she told the DA that everything was totally consensual. It's only years later that she wants money from Cornell that suddenly it becomes a "rape". As usually women are too stupid and tribalistic to parse the details of the case and just act like a mob.
>>543672526But she could consent and did though. >Is showing up drunk somewhere consent to get fucked by everyone who wants to? This is a strawman. 'Gave consent' == 'had sex with anyone who wanted to' Only a toddler gets drunk/high, has sex willingly, and then cries rape, unless they were incapacitated. Normal, mature, well adjusted people recognize they simply made poor decisions.
>>543672826I want you to quote which part you are referring to.
>>543672835Apparently. Out of one side of your mouth, you encourage women to take more drugs, get more drunk, wear even less, fuck even more guys casually, and out of the other side claim that these situations are inherently unsafe because the men that they’re trying to fuck might fuck them. Your world view is retarded and makes no sense.
>>543672903>At the time she told the DA that everything was totally consensualNo, she didn't talk to the DA. She talked to the police and they didn't give the DA the full transcript.>DA in Cornell University case says he never saw transcript of campus police interview with alleged rape victimhttps://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-district-attorney-campus-police-interview/
>>543672919>She replied that her memory was “super clouded,” but she reckoned that none “of the sexual stuff was illegal."She consented, literally right there. None of the stuff was illegal.
>>543672889Do you realize that we are right now debating about whether or not this is a debate? Saying it's not a debate is asserting that your argument is a fact beyond reproach. It's gay social engineering and it's really fuckin boring. >>543672885Responsibility for what? Getting raped? I genuinely don't understand. "Responsibility" implies taking ownership for the consequences of your actions. The problem here is that it wasn't just her. It was her and the seven men who fucked her while she was out of her mind on drugs.
>>543670224you will never be a woman, incel transvestite loser faggot
>>543672993I'm not debating and it's not a debate.You're posting words and I'm making statements that are 100% factual.
It's actually fucking bullshit that government officials are immune to defamation lawsuits
>>543672252I’ve made a lot of retarded choices on alcohol and have never once blamed them on anyone else but myself. If I choose to get drunk and do some dumb shit then that’s literally on me. I went into it knowing I could lose control of myself and face consequences for my drunk behavior.
>>543672919>>543672990Here's another>Her friend “said he wanted to have sex again.” She remembered saying that she was tired, but then—and she wasn’t sure how it started—she engaged in a threesome with the two men in the smaller room after all, oral and vaginal sex. It continued until 5:45 A.M., when she asked them to stop, and they did, so far as she could remember.She asked them to stop and they did.
>>543670060You never been hit a day in your life. And if you did, you voted for it.
>>543672990interesting how you leave out the rest of that paragraph from the article>Two days later, according to reporting by Saeidi, one of the fraternity brothers apologized to Jane Doe via text for “how things went down.” He and another fraternity member felt bad, he said, that they were too drunk to “shut it down and kick people out before it got way out of hand.” She replied that her memory was “super clouded,” but she reckoned that none “of the sexual stuff was illegal.” She said that she would like to see him again, “but like leave out the extra 5 billion men and ketamine.” (Victims of sexual abuse or violence often minimize or rationalize what has happened to them in the immediate aftermath of an assault, especially when it involves a friend or acquaintance.)https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/how-the-cornell-seven-rape-case-became-a-national-scandal
>>543672563I typically like claiming the race W but he is basically a nigger with that hat and that stance. Looks like a real fight when two retards fight eachother, but those wiggers and actual niggers always get demolished when they come in to train and want to spar immediately right off the street on some kind of fighting-movie kick or whatever drives them in. I have zero respect for them and I wish they would stop wasting our time but they don't so I enjoy hurting them because they owe me. I even intentionally discretely injure them because they always try to act like they dont feel anything when I know they do. Just hate em. Especially the "duckers", they like to literally slam their own face into our fists and ko themselves.
>>543672993>It was her and the seven men who fucked her while she was out of her mind on drugs.They were on drugs too. By your own logic, they were out of their aren't responsible for their choices and actions.
>>543670224>>Special prosecutor named>>All state media mobilized>>State lawyers charging 1,000 dollars an hour mobilized>>They will heavily investigate this one college party>>Take witness statements from everyone there>>Drag everyone through multiple clown courts and years of legal battles>>Essentially they're gonna ruin 10 or 20 people's lives over some whore from a ketamine party>>And give jewish lawyers millions in the meantime, while ignoring nigger criminals or even letting them goI think you're confusing our "I've seen this shit before, and I'm pretty sure I know how it plays out" attitude with support.Seen it. Until there's evidence to the contrary the people involved are innocent until proven guilty.However, I presently believe she slutted shit up, got high on drugs and either failed a drug test, cheated on her boyfriend or her parents found out she's a drug slut.Don't get me wrong, I love sluts. I think they're amazing, but sometimes they can't take the slut shame from their (most likely female) peers.
>>543673092>I’ve made a lot of retarded choices on alcohol and have never once blamed them on anyone else but myself. If I choose to get drunk and do some dumb shit then that’s literally on me.If you get really drunk and someone fucks you in the ass, is that also on you? Can it both be on you and also on the person who fucked you in the ass while you were too fucked up to consent?
>>543673096If she's that high she's incapable of consenting.You also left out important details from the rest of the paragraph again:>Four more frat brothers entered the room, according to Jane Doe’s sworn statement, and she hid under the bedcovers. She had trouble recalling precisely what happened next. She backed away from another man who grabbed and forcibly kissed her. She said that the second man “again tried reaching for” her vagina, and remembered snorting a line of ketamine off his erect penis. She remembered the third man and a companion coming into the room and announcing that they were “shutting down whatever the fuck this is.” She remembered her friend and another fraternity member taking her to another, smaller room, where she was given yet more ketamine, and felt “extremely high.” Her friend “said he wanted to have sex again.” She remembered saying that she was tired, but then—and she wasn’t sure how it started—she engaged in a threesome with the two men in the smaller room after all, oral and vaginal sex. It continued until 5:45 A.M., when she asked them to stop, and they did, so far as she could remember.
>>543669200They need to open a go fund me or something similar
>>543673122out of their minds*
>>543672984The story we were fed was that these guys "lured her in" and then "drugged her" and "raped her for 7 hours". That was the narrative being blared across the media.Every single one of these points is wrong- they didn't lure her in, she made plans to go there. - they didn't shoot her up with drugs, she did that herself- they didn't rape her for 7 hours, whenever she objected to anything, they didn't do those thingsSo every single detail we were told is totally wrong. Now the debate is "when you have a consensual drug fuelled orgy at the frat house, and the a 7th man slips into the pile of men, can you call that a rape?"Lmao give me a break.Glenn Greenwald has been a lawyer for longer than you've been alive. He agrees with me, not you.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0wJIXz8tY
>>543672993Notice how you ignored everything I said after that. I'll repeat it for you because you are slow.you cannot administer justice on the good faith of anyone telling the truth.Evidence. There needs to be evidence.You are being emotional. Stop. You only reveal yourself as easily manipulated.
>>543673122>By your own logic, they were out of their aren't responsible for their choices and actions.The problem is that their choices were illegal. Hers were not. Their choices were rape hers was to show up and do drugs at the wrong place. Do you see how these two actions might not be logically equivalent?
>>543673122Ah, but pussy is a precious resource. And pussy theft must be taken extremely serious or else...Wait did men create society and give women agency by doing so just to fuck themselves over?
>>543671212for real, I cannot believe they cannot shut the fuck up and enjoy their victory next month, they have to shoot themselves on the foot, next they will hire SweetBaby to give mandatory Sensibility Training in highschools.
>>543673104Interesting how now that I've proven my point you flip to another one>none of it was illegal>OK but if I talk about something different maybe I can change the subject>>543673181Once again making completely different statements from your initial statement, can you actually talk about one thing or do you just have to shotgun out all these and say they're all the same thing?>She says no>They stop>She says yes>They do the sex>She says that none of it was illegal the next day when she's 100% soberTalk about one thing and actually make an argument here.
>>543673234How do you know all this?
>>543668566I've said it before.I like people who are like me.Frat bros aren't like me.Hang em.
>>543668566It's about time the greek system was completely eradicated from colleges, it's full or unrepentant rapist mongrels who think they're above the law for throwing parties.
>>543673219>Evidence. There needs to be evidence.This IS the evidence, you moron kek. How do you think justice was done before forensics? Accounts of what happened ARE themselves evidence.
>>543673276From text messages and my judgment of whose accounts are the most credible.
>>543673215>The story we were fed was that these guys "lured her in" and then "drugged her" and "raped her for 7 hours". That was the narrative being blared across the media.Can you point out to an article that says they lured her in and raped her for 7 hours? I never saw that time frame mentioned
>>543673181Perhaps getting "that high" should be taken as consent considering that getting "that high" can put you into a bad state.Involuntary rape baiting is what we'll call this.It should be a misdemeanor.
>>543673234Retard alert
>>543673333>I made it up!!!OK.
>>543673153Yes it’s on me because I chose to get into a party situation where that kind of stuff happens. The other person was probably drunk too. I have actually gotten fucked in the ass while drunk before. I got over it.
>>543668566>slutYou're way out of line. She's a victim of SA
>>543673351That is what AOC told the press. It's in Glenn Greenald's video, which I will keep linking for your dumbasshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0wJIXz8tY
>>543673142Picrel is what’s happening
Women who get drunk or high need to be arrested for enabling rape.
>>543673234First of all, what's legal/illegal is not a moral code. It isn't illegal for 50 year olds to have sex with 16 year olds in most US states. How do you feel about that? Secondly, it is not automatically illegal to have sex with someone under the influence while you're also under the influence. That's actually a massive gray area in court.Either way, this is a piss poor argument.
>>543671675You overestimate the common man, these roasties will marry them and maybe have children with them and then divorce rape them, and thats the best case for these dumbasses, the kid will probably not even be his.If you want children no matter what then you better find a way to make money and geomaxx(never bring them back to your country), you better hurry because more and more men are doing this and its already harder to get a decent looking one, you have a huge bonus if you are white and/or not 50
>>543672465Even this idea of "rape survivor" is a cosmic abuse of hyperbole. It should only be used if the rape is exceptionally brutal and violent, like a creep with a knife jumping out of a bush. Not used to generate crocodile tears for college sluts.
>>543673380>I have actually gotten fucked in the ass while drunk before.Sorry that happened to you, anon.
>>543673104You left out the entirety of her statement to the police, where she affirmed that she consented to every single thing that had happened, when she said "no" to anything, it did not happen, that she rated her intoxication as about 5-6/10 but many of the guys involved were so drunk they were vomiting during the experienceAnd of course the part where she was excited to go back to the same frat house for their Halloween party two weeks later, and only decided she had been raped a week after the frat president personally disinvited herhttps://archive.is/GVmqj>At Chi Phi, the fraternity was preparing for a Halloween party, and Jane Doe was eager to attend. Text messages included in the investigation show Mr. Ingalls assuring Jane Doe that he and other fraternity members wanted her to be there.>“chi phi is your house and you are welcome here,” he wrote, relaying the views of the fraternity’s president, who was not among those accused of sexual assault.>“thank u i really appreciate that,” Jane Doe responded. “<3 i’ll bring my cigs tomorrow”>But then Jane Doe received a phone call from the fraternity’s president, according to the text messages.>She was disinvited from the party. It was for her own good, he said.>Jane Doe sent a biting text to Mr. Ingalls.>“I knew this was going to happen,” she wrote. “The woman will always get the short end of the stick. Yall aren’t my friends. Yall are covering your asses.”>By Nov. 3, Jane Doe appears to have concluded that she was assaulted at the October party. She got drunk and high and slutted it up at a party in mid-October. Then word got out about what she did and she was shamed by fellow students. Then she got humiliated further when the frat decided they didn't want her inside the house for their next party, and then in November she decided she had actually been raped. And so she went to the police and admitted it was entirely consensual and by the standards of "too drunk to consent" she was the rapist.
>>543671156Where have you been? There was a massive scandal about just that - HR for lots of companies had been outsourcing to AI, and some dude found it. Then made a tool so you could apply properly through it. There was a LOT of screeching by shills due to AI being used to allow the company to get H1B visas (and cheaper labor), and having Americans apply? Not good. So it was a massive shit show on pol for a good month or two. It did end approx. around the time Elon crashed out about H1B visas. Also some companies have publicly dumped all of their HR people, so you know they replaced them with AI tools and bots.
>>543672765I am a machinist and CNC is not a kink. If you have kinks in the machine it will make bad inaccurate parts.
>>543673308You are doing it again. You are emotional. dna isn't enough, I doubt anyone would deny they all had sex with her. The denial is that its rape. You neglect this because your are emotional. Stop it, grow up. Where is the evidence she didn't consent? Defensive wounds? Offensive wounds? Recordings? Anything? You are projecting yourself onto her because you would never consent to this. No one can demonstrate her non consent until after the fact.
>>543673462Women don't think in a rational way. They are like animals. They think with their hindbrain in an emotional, instinctual way. They are totally irrational and incapable of logic. It's just a vague emotional screeching sound. They should not be treated like full human beings, but more like livestock. They exist to raise babies, anything beyond that is pointless
>>543672526I have been almost passed out drunk or tripin g balls and nobody could ever get me to fuck them if i dont want to
>>543672984She already spoke to the school police, investigator, and counselor and they summerize her statement, allow her to review and make adjustment to the summary, sign it and send it to the DA. Why should the DA redo the whole process instead of continuing it and do his job of reviewing the official report and make decision on the case? What's the point of police and investigator work if DA has to redo the interview, taking in statement and evidences all over again?
>>543672709About half of guys are already there. They've created such a culture of fear and suspicion around regular dating. It's not their afraid of women, it's that they're afraid some women will claim they raped/harassed them 20 years down the line. The fear is logical but is overblown but it hardly matters, the consequences are so gigantic to your personal and professional life that many consciously avoid women.
mattressgirl must be so fuckin pissed she never got attention from politicians lol
>>543668704>you created a monsterNah, technically you did, through Davos & the Open Society Foundation, and their various copy-cats. The civilization of Western men was never built to withstand such actions of incalculable greed committed against its own. To take stock of and then ‘bet’ against your own host nations currency is to admit your collaboration with the Babylonian abominations of old. You are but priests in a very lucrative doomsday cult, but your thousand years is almost up.
>>543673465It’s fine, I wanted it. Being drunk isn’t going to make me want something that sober me is viscerally disgusted by. It just makes it easier for me to do what I actually wanted without anxiety holding me back. I’ve been near blackout drunk before and still had the fortitude to say no to advances I didn’t want and reject people who clearly wanted me but I wasn’t into. The only exception where it stops being your personal responsibility and the consequences of your choices is if somebody slips you drugs without your knowledge. Otherwise you chose to accept the risks that come with doing drugs in that kind of environment
>>543673431>It isn't illegal for 50 year olds to have sex with 16 year olds in most US states. How do you feel about that?I don't care about it all. Arbitrary numbers are arbitrary.
>>543673250>Interesting how now that I've proven my point you flip to another one.You didn't prove your point. The the paragraph you are quoting disagrees with you.Her believing something was legal does not prove it was legal. If someone thinks it's legal for their boss to fire them for going to jury duty, that doesn't make it legal. They could be unhappy about it and still mistakenly think it was legal.
>>543673431>First of all, what's legal/illegal is not a moral code.True. Rape is essentially nonconsensual sex. It has a victim and a perpetrator. You're acting as if consent is a higher bar to clear than actually exists. It is the nature of the crime of rape that the court must evaluate it. I wish it were easier on people who need black and white guidelines, but much of our justice system is designed such that the truth must actually be determined in the course of trial. I think there's more than enough evidence to bring trial to these guys. I'm willing to be wrong here, for the record. Are you?
>>543672261>Her own statements say that she never said no while they were having sexWhere did her statement say this?
>>543673594>It’s fine, I wanted it.This seems at odds with the fact that you had to "get over it," but I don't want to press on this too hard.
>>543673618No it actually proves my point entirely, she never said no, she agreed to all sex.This was all legal and it proves my point entirely.>>543673647When she said that none of it was illegal. She is saying she never retracted consent. She never mentions a time she said no and they kept having sex with her, but she explicitly says that they stopped at 5:45 when she said no, and that everything was legal.ESL moment?
>>543672861>She consented to having sex with all of them at the timewhere did she say that?
>>543671032>Trump was even involved.You are one dumb nigger.
>>543673750When she said none of it was illegal.
>>543673750She didn't. They say that.
>>543673462>Even this idea of "rape survivor" is a cosmic abuse of hyperbole.Honestly yeah, this is true
>>543668566> On November 8, 2024, a student at Cornell University reported that she had been drugged and gang-raped by at least seven members of the school's chapter of Chi Phi, a fraternity. Known as Jane Doe, she was a member of the Delta Delta Delta sorority at Cornell. At around 8:30 p.m. on October 19 that year, when Doe was 20, she attended a sorority social event at a bar in Ithaca, New York. She alleged that the bar staff were aware that she was below the legal drinking age in the United States (21), drawing an "X" mark on both of her hands to indicate this, but she was still provided with at least one drink at the establishment. She and her sorority co-members walked to another bar. According to Doe, she had drunk approximately ten beers by 11 p.m. and was "visibly drunk." She walked about 1 mile from the bar to visit a male friend, a member of the school's Chi Phi chapter, at the fraternity house.[9]>According to Doe, the male friend took her inside the fraternity house, gave her another beer, and proposed a threesome with a second man.[9] She told police she was "pretty OK" with this first encounter,[10] though she reportedly developed bruising and said she was pressured to consume ketamine.[9] She alleged that it was her first time consuming the drug.[11] Before any sexual acts took place with these two men, she additionally consumed marijuana and rum.[9] The first threesome ended when one of the men lost his erection and fell asleep, and the other began dry-heaving.[12]
>>543673250>>She says no>>They stopare you talking about 5:45 or something else?>>She says yes>>They do the sexWhere does the paragraph in this post(>>543673181) read that she said yes? or are you referring to something else?
>>543668566Serves em right for getting involved with modern w*men
>>543673806> As Doe cared for the two incapacitated men, she permitted a third man to enter the room because it was his room.[10] Doe and the third man kissed; eventually, the third man and the man that had been dry-heaving engaged in a second threesome while the first man continued sleeping nearby.[10] The first man eventually woke up and asked to participate, but Doe said no; the man did not join in.[10] By the following day, at around 1:42 a.m.,[10] some of the men exchanged Snapchat messages in a group chat called "Chi Phi Actives" saying that there was "free pussy upstairs", allegedly in reference to Doe.[10][9]>Soon after, four additional fraternity members entered the room. Doe permitted one of the men to consume ketamine off her nude body.[13] The first man, third man, and Doe moved to a second room in the house, where they allegedly consumed more ketamine and engaged in a third threesome. Doe did not recall consenting to this third threesome. At around 5:45am, the threesome concluded when Doe said she was tired.[13]
>>543673547based and lathepilled
>>543671212Nah, this is a feminist thing, both GOP and Dems are bi-partisan on feminism. While Dems are full on white knight simps, GOP are just retarded simps (up until the divorce rape). Neither party will be harmed supporting this retarded foid. Nor will it shift any political opinions. The real reason this is in the media is to push for Sharia law for NY. It's a brilliant showcase of women not being accountable for their actions to the NPC/normie crowds. Women got herself drunk (illegally), walked to a frat house, enjoyed more illegal substances, got politely fucked by fellow illegal substance enjoyers, and then returned home a happy camper. It was her retarded foid sisters in the sorority that slut shamed her and forced the "tee hee I got raped" bit. Which is why the police didn't do shit with it the first go around. But it IS useful for pushing a "women = horrible, we need Sharia" narrative. So it's all we get to talk about while everyone auto-believes the clearly lying woman. Now if Dems had selected the woman who had accused the wheelchair man of kicking her door in, THAT would have been a doozie of a foid to get behind. That would have shifted points to GOP.
>>543673462You can be called a cancer survivor for them pulling off a little piece of skin cancer from the tip of your nose.>>543673812When she says the day after while fully sober that "none of it was illegal" that is her saying she consented to all of it.I've said this many times and pretending to not understand it is not an argument.
>>543673750>where did she say that?Do you think there's some sort of legal rapealso see>>543673493She told the cops she consented to everything that happened, and that when she said "no" to anything and anyone, those things did not happen. And two weeks after her "rape" she was excited to go to the same frat house for another party with the same menShe only decided she was raped a week after her "rapists" disinvited her to that party
>>543673712>she never said no,Where are you getting this from? I've shown you articles that say she said no.>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/
>>543673642>I'm willing to be wrong here, for the record. Are you?I'm always welcome to be proven wrong, but 1+1 is 2 and 'drunk & high woman has party sex with a bunch of drunk & high dudes' isn't rape.
>>543673750The burden of proof is not on the 7, it's on the state. The state saw this as he said she said and nothing more.
>>543668566My guess is if those kids had some cialis on them or not.
>>543673886>You can be called a cancer survivor for them pulling off a little piece of skin cancer from the tip of your nose.Yea I know, the absurdities never end. I had to get a cyst removed in surgery once, I'm a cyst survivor lmao.
Maybe just don't participate in drunken group gangbangs?
>>543673806>I was drugged>willingly Lol why do they do this? Trying to seem credible while infantilising yourself is counterproductive.
>>543673955Already answered this a couple posts ago and it was you who asked it.>>543672746Here it is, already answered.I don't get why you have to repeatedly ask the same question, and then ask it again after you've received multiple answers.
>>543674049I mean it is pretty simple you take the bac of all of them and the amount of drugs they took.Shit happens.You cant do that retroactively if it is more than fair to assume they were all on something.
>>543671392What she's really upset about is her sorority sisters. Basically they did all the evil in this case: slut shamed her, leaked that she's a massive whore to people, and that nuked her value on campus. So now she wasn't semi-hot shit, she was bottom barrel ewww, and THAT is what ruined her college experience. So she bailed.There is probably some kike lawyer who sorted out how to work this case for publicity and profit behind all this. The girl is just a dumb foid slut. The lawsuit won't actually win, but it will play into the media Jew's hand so they can push for Sharia laws. Note that making women incapable of accountability like the governor was proposing just pushes Sharia even more.
>>543674069>BUT BUT BUT
>>543673997>The burden of proof is not on the 7, it's on the statethis isn't court. i'm not a prosecutor, he isn't the defense. and vice versa. they aren't going to prison if he doesn't answer me. I'm just asking him for the source of his claim.
>>543674162Strange that I've given you the source several times and you've never acknowledged it.
>>543673712>When she said that none of it was illegal. She is saying she never retracted consent.>>543673777>When she said none of it was illegal.>>543673886>When she says the day after while fully sober that "none of it was illegal" that is her saying she consented to all of it.You are conflating someone making a (possibly innacurate) legal judgement about an event, with someone saying they consented to to the event. Those are 2 separate things.Suppose someone gets shot with a gun by their ex-wife and (mistakenly) says "It wasn't illegal" does that make it legal? Does that mean he wanted to get shot? You also haven't adressed this sentence from the end of the paragrpah you quoted:>(Victims of sexual abuse or violence often minimize or rationalize what has happened to them in the immediate aftermath of an assault, especially when it involves a friend or acquaintance.)
>>543670437Nothing would dry a pussy up faster than this.
>>543674212Yeah I'm not talking about retarded hypotheticals.>You haven't addressed the editorializing in the articleBecause that's not a witness statement.
>>543669089They want the males humiliated and dead. They are very cruel. They dont want to make more than you, they want to make triple, they want you unemployed, in jail, at war, homeless, out of their spaces.
>>543668566Don't care because frat fucktards. Fuck these faggots. Same shit birds that turn Democrat block voters and kike supporters post graduation. Arrest and castrate all of them as an example to frat fucktards.
>>543671911Rape is where I am lying in bed in my doom and you come up, tie me up, and bugger my ass. That is legit rape and you should see 30 years and be a prison bitch for that, then be on a list forever after they let you out. If I drink 10 shots (what she did), text you "DTF?" and stroll on over to your house, and you bust the KY and shove a fist up my ass after also having some drinks, everyone on the planet KNOWS I consented to that fisting. It doesn't matter how sore my ass is, or that it is bleeding, or that I was drunk, or went OW OW OW during the process. Every person alive will go: "yeah buddy you did that to yourself." I am free to regret it all I want, and be sore all I want, and also suffer the reputation damage for being a fag because you posted it all over social media. It would make you a jerk for posting private sexcapades online, but so long as you didn't film it - you are clear of criminal behavior. Also, FYI, the foid in this case told all of her sorority sisters (as women are wont to do). That is why she's pissed, one of them is a snitch.
>>543668911Why do only women get the benefit of that protection?
That's a stoning
>>543674212>Victims of sexual abuse or violence often minimize or rationalize what has happened to them in the immediate aftermath of an assaultAssertions like this rise out of this new irrational gaslighting society where anything can be rape if a woman feels like it is, and a woman can decide to feel like something's rape based on a wide and incomprehensible range of factors. In real life, if you are genuinely raped, you are 100% sure of it right then and there, you don't have to ask yourself "hmm, does this count as a rape?" because it's a RAPE, you are being RAPED. a RAPING OF YOU is not an ambiguous experience.
>>543674478>It doesn't matter how sore my ass is, or that it is bleeding, or that I was drunk, or went OW OW OW during the process. one can revoke consent mid sex.
>>543674555That's separate from knowing whether something is legal or not.
I told you faggots about Mamdani.I warned you.You wouldn't listen though. You called me a migger. You called me a Jew.
>it’s another “/pol/ bravely defends rapists” threadBetween this and supporting a president who protects pedophiles, it’s not a good look for you guys
>>543671793Almost every one of them were h1b visas. Not a single one was white, in fact the ones the news is calling "white" are jewish
>>543674618Rape is illegal. Illegal sex with you when you don't consent is rape. So if it's legal, it's not rape, and if it's rape, then it's not legal. Thus when you say "none of it was illegal" this is the same as saying "none of it was rape (I was not raped)"
>>543673493>And so she went to the police and admitted it was entirely consensual and by the standards of "too drunk to consent">>543673493>You left out the entirety of her statement to the police, where she affirmed that she consented to every single thing that had happened, when she said "no" to anything, it did not happen>>543673900>She told the cops she consented to everything that happened, and that when she said "no" to anything and anyone, those things did not happen.None of this is mentioned in the new york times article you posted
>>543670847Pre-internet, Jews had FULL control of the narrative. Who was going to fact check any of the Jewish feminists on Oprah. Boomers blindly believed everything the jewbox told them.
>>543674642You are a nigger and a jew>democrat mayor of shitlib city #BelievesAllWomen(ExceptWhenTheySayTheyWeren'tRaped)how did you foresee this outcome o oracle of delphi, through what grey veils of uncertainty did you parse what could be known, FAGGOT
>>543674676>Rape is illegal. Illegal sex with you when you don't consent is rape. So if it's legal, it's not rape, and if it's rape, then it's not legal. Thus when you say "none of it was illegal" this is the same as saying "none of it was rape (I was not raped)"If someone who was raped by her husband mistakenly thinks it's legal for a husband to rape their wife*, that doesn't make it legal.*it is in some places, but not others.
>>543674261>Yeah I'm not talking about retarded hypotheticals.If saying something is legal is the same as saying they consented to it, what's wrong with the hypothetical?Suppose someone gets shot with a gun by their ex-wife and (mistakenly) says "It wasn't illegal" does that make it legal? Does that mean he wanted to get shot?
>>543674833I told you already this isn't a debate, you keep asking for information and when you receive it you try to argue against it in retarded hypotheticals.
>>543674646fuck off transvestite, no one is forcing you to stay here, you will never be a woman, you will never be raped much less wanted by a man, or woman for that matter, you faggot incel crossdresser.
>>543671502imagine the defense reading this out loud and asking >what did you mean by this
>>543673578The DA doesn't have to redo the interview, the police apparently just messed up and didn't send him the full thing.The police apparently messed up and didn't send Van Houten the entire transcript of the interview with the Jane Doehttps://archive.is/20261001102529/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/01/nyregion/url-cornell-university-jane-doe-rape-case-statement.html>Cornell Police Report Omitted Student’s Claim She Was Raped>Documents obtained by The New York Times show that the campus police at Cornell University sent a condensed statement to a prosecutor, who then declined to bring charges. it seems like it wasn't the DA's error from this.
>>543672709>it's gonnawe're already there
>>543672676>She had trouble recalling precisely what happened nextliterally just women lying
>>543668566Sex outside of wedlock should simply be illegal to fix this whole issue.
>>543674774Don't flannel me with irrelevancies
>>543674768In fairness, you guys said that he was going to gas the Jews and lock up Netanyahu.
>>543675031>The police messed up broYou don't read your own articles>The student, after leaving about 20 handwritten corrections on a draft, signed a final version the next day.She personally checked over it and signed off on it.They didn't make any mistake at all, she read all of it and after making changes to it signed off on it. Actually read the articles you're posting, you didn't read that.
>>543674261Retarded, hypothetical, imaginary edge cases are all the left has, because basic observations of reality never align with their worldview. This is every argument with women.
>>543674913>I told you already this isn't a debate, you keep asking for information and when you receive it you try to argue against it in retarded hypotheticals.You didn't provide information. Someone saying that something is legal is not the same as them saying they agreed to it.People do not always know the nuances of the law. For instance, someone can believe that one has to actively deny consent to sex for it to be rape, and that if one merely remains silent it is not rape. But in some states that's not true. It is only legally consent if it it's affirmatively given, and that belief that one needs to actively deny consent would be mistaken in those states.
>>543675044she was on ketamine and alcohol. those make it harder to remember things.
>>543675031>>543675243BTW thanks for this one because I've seen this posted all over the place and now that I've read the article I see that it was all a lie, she approved said "reduced" statement, which is actually just standard process in every one of these cases, and she's the one who personally signed off on it as her official statement.There was zero police mistake, seemingly if any mistake was made it was on her end.>>543675274Once again not a debate or about nuance, she said it was legal.She also said that her statement that got sent to the DA was correct after going through a whole review process on it.This is all just unraveling various lies and basically you're never getting an answer on your retarded hypotheticals.
>>543674774Don't you women get tired of these endless made up scenarios that you schizophrenically argue about in your head? That must be exhausting.
>>543675274>People do not always know the nuances of the law. For instance, someone can believe that one has to actively deny consent to sex for it to be rape, and that if one merely remains silent it is not rape. But in some states that's not true. It is only legally consent if it it's affirmatively given, and that belief that one needs to actively deny consent would be mistaken in those states.It seems that new york is one of these states by the way:https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/suny-schools-affirmative-consent-policy-sexual-violence-campus/2014744/https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/130.05
>>543668566Maybe don't fuck sluts then. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
>>543675397in regards to that image, conservatives are less likely to get diagnosed because they are less likely to go to a mental health clinician.
>>543675243>>543675366>BTW thanks for this one because I've seen this posted all over the place and now that I've read the article I see that it was all a lie, she approved said "reduced" statement, which is actually just standard process in every one of these cases, and she's the one who personally signed off on it as her official statement.>There was zero police mistake, seemingly if any mistake was made it was on her end.The police were the ones who condensed it:>The officer then condensed the interview into a six-page “voluntary statement” written from her perspective, according to documents obtained by The New York Times. The student, after leaving about 20 handwritten corrections on a draft, signed a final version the next day.If she forgot to correct important details that is a mistake, but it doesn't make sense for you to be saying that there was zero police mistake in leaving out those important details
>>543675466oh so mental health clinicians who prescribe the pills for any sort of normal feeling are the cause?
>>543675366>Once again not a debate or about nuance, she said it was legal.That's not the same as saying it was consensual or that she agreed to it. She doesn't decide the law in new york.
>>543675466>because they are less likely to go to a mental health clinician.Whatever helps you sleep at night, darling.
>>543668566why should i care about normalfag problems?
>>543675582What important details got left out that would change the decision? Like you're leaving a statement on a rape and you forget to mention that you said no? Or that one of the guys threatened to kill you or something? Or that they forced the ketamine up your nose?In what universe would you be taking a report on a rape, hear something that would prove it's rape, and then leave it out of the report? Was it the detective's first day on the job or something?This is a desperate last fish for something that could get this woman out of the statement she signed of her own free will, which is just a microcosm of the whole case,>You can't hold me responsible for what I did!If no means no, yes means yes. You can't retroactively make innocent men who were never given any indication that they were doing something unwanted into rapists because you want a payday. End of story.
>>543673806>>543673838Literal semen demon succubus shit, wtf
>>543675031No, that's the full transcript, not the official summarized report. The DA doesn't have to read the full transcript, which can be full of inconsistencies, subjective details/feelings, contradicting statements, because that usually happens in the progress of acquiring statements from people involved. The DA can request and obtain the full transcript if he feels that there is details missing or inconsistency in the report. However, if the report is clear and consistent, there is no need to and DA just make judgement based on the report. Beside, Jane Doe got to signed off on the report herself. The police/investigator job is to gather details/statement/and evidence and compile them in a report and that's usually a multi-people process. The DA doesn't have to do that himself. Investigation would get nowhere if everyone involved from bottom to top has to do independent investigation and evidence collection from scratch.
>>543674702>None of this is mentioned in the new york times article you postedJesus Christ you don't know the most basic things about this issueThe DA's made multiple statements about this. What she's alleging in the lawsuit now is a lot different than what she told the cops in 2024, which is the one which is a sworn legal document where she could go to prison if she lied, unlike in a civil lawsuit.https://lamag.com/crimeinla/cornell-seven-what-changed-between-jane-does-2024-police-statement-and-her-lawsuit/
>>543668566the snizzat chroniclespanel 1: no hes not my partnerpanel 2: hooooooooooooooney if you do blah blah blah i might let you lick my snatch in a few dayspanel 3: ...so then my millionaire gang rapists told me i was pretty because all men cant keep their eyes and hands off of mepanel 4: i dont usually let guys **** **** **** **** but i havent had sex in month am i unattractive
>>543675637She said it was legal, meaning she consented to it.>>543675582That's not a police mistake, that's a mistake on her end as it's her statement and she is the one reading and approving it.She made 20 edits and none of them mentioned rape or being forced to do drugs.Thanks for helping me correct that massive lie that they were spreading though, you were very helpful. Seems like for all of these the error is just continuously on her end.>>543675821Yeah she left out all the rape + all the forced drugs.She read the whole statement and then said YUP, sounds good to me, changed the wording on all of it, and then her official statement she signs off on says no rape.Sounds like she consented to all of it.
>>543676009>What she's alleging in the lawsuit now is a lot different than what she told the cops in 2024, which is the one which is a sworn legal document where she could go to prison if she lied, unlike in a civil lawsuit.see this:>>543675031there was stuff in the interview transcript that didn't get put in the report sent to the da
>>543668911based. women should only be able to consent to sex by signing the marriage form
>>543673806>>543673838Bitch sucked and fucked 7 dudes, half of them were so messed up they got sick or passed out, but SHE was the one to fucked up to consent. Also>11 beers in 2.5 hours + more beer and rum at the frat>ketamine >still fucked for hours straight and only felt tired afterAbsolutely ZERO chance this was her first rodeo. Average girl is fully passing out before she even gets to the frat
>>543676159>She said it was legal, meaning she consented to it.How does it mean that?
>>543671498
>>543676188>there was stuff in the interview transcript that didn't get put in the report sent to the daShe approved of all of those changes and approved the statement that was sent to the DA.>>543676230Because rape is illegal and this is her saying there was no rape.
>>543672637based and redpilled
>>543668566Foreigners promoted themselves to coveted positions at my company and now they're behaving like corrupt third worlders who are above the law. And guess what? Their collectivist, gayfag white counterparts are backing their play over and over. More shit people are flooding through the doors by the week and no one's doing any meaningful work. All to the good, but it's about time to do a 360 degree turn and moonwalk out of there.
>>543673712>She is saying she never retracted consent. She never mentions a time she said no and they kept having sex with her>>543674121>>543672746>When she said no they stoppedHere's a time she said no:>At some point, her friend woke up and suggested a foursome, but she said no.>According to a lawsuit that Jane Doe filed on September 14th, the second man sent a message in the fraternity’s group on Snapchat, called “Chi Phi Actives,” at around 1:42 A.M., alerting members to the “free pussy” they could find upstairs. “I fuckin love chi phi,” Jane Doe’s friend replied to the group, and added, “Like you can walk in and whip it out.” Later, according to Snapchat messages viewed by Mahsa Saeidi of CBS News New York, a fraternity member asked the chat, “Shop still open?” Another member replied that it was.>Four more frat brothers entered the room, according to Jane Doe’s sworn statement, and she hid under the bedcovers. She had trouble recalling precisely what happened next. She backed away from another man who grabbed and forcibly kissed her. She said that the second man “again tried reaching for” her vagina, and remembered snorting a line of ketamine off his erect penis. She remembered the third man and a companion coming into the room and announcing that they were “shutting down whatever the fuck this is.” She remembered her friend and another fraternity member taking her to another, smaller room, where she was given yet more ketamine, and felt “extremely high.” Her friend “said he wanted to have sex again.” She remembered saying that she was tired, but then—and she wasn’t sure how it started—she engaged in a threesome with the two men in the smaller room after all, oral and vaginal sex.She's also mentioned as backing away from someone and saying that she's too tired. That's not what giving consent looks like. Nothing here says she agreed to having sex with the others.
>>543668566lol of course the commie nigger supports the foids.
>>543672637
>>543676254>Because rape is illegal and this is her saying there was no rape.If someone who was raped by her husband mistakenly thinks it's legal for a husband to rape their wife*, that doesn't make it legal.*it is in some places, but not others.
>>543668566these guys almost certainly voted for this. cornell is extremely liberal and young jaded college people are majority liberal. this supposedly happened in 2024 under bidens presidency and these guys almost certainly voted for kamula. these guys are victims of the left because they participated in the whore culture that the left promotes because this whore factually went to a drug fuelled orgy then expressed regret once her whoring come out in the open. they always eat their own.
>>543676188Read>>543675847Not everything in the transcript has to be in the official report. That's the point of final summarized report. You only put in pertinent and objective information to the case. Jane Doe signed off on the final report and was happy with all of the details in it.
>>543668566good, ACCELERATE! hopefully retards will now learn to stay the fuck away from women and only bang whores after they sign NDA and CONCENT CONTRACT. men can survive just fine without dealing with foids
>>543676302>Say no>They don't have sex with herThis is literally what you quoted.>>543676338So they were all her husband and she thought it was legal for her 7 husbands to rape her?
You mean>7 sluts are being chargedI don't give a shit.
>>543668566>2026: The year women were exposed
>>543676302She didn't give consent in those instance but the men stop those acts every time she refused. The guy who tried to kiss her and got refused just get up and leave.
>>543672637its great to have men from civilized countries on the international forum
>>543669089>Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal, and it is useless to let go the reins and then expect her not to kick over the traces. You must keep her on a tight rein . . . Women want total freedom or rather - to call things by their names - total licence. If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters. -Cato
>>543669082Are you okay? Are you Otay? Are you Tay? Remember, we always loved you and wanted you to be free to tell the truth as the available data can provide.
>>543676422Yeah.>>543676377Guess I just want to show this again, that he's using them stopping when she says no to claim that they actually raped her, this is all they have.>She said no touchy and snorted a line of ketamine off a guy's penis>And then went into a private back room with her friends, who she then had sex with>And then at 5:45 she says no to those same friends in said room and they say OK and leave immediatelyInversion of reality, this is the part where they stop every time she says no, she does more drugs, and then when she says no they stop immediately again. This is all they have.
>>543671135>but like leave out the extra 5 billion men and ketamineThis whore has BPD, I can just tell by how she talks.
>>543676302During the second threesome, Male 1 asked if he could join in. Jane reflected on this, did some hole arithmetic, and realising that she would have to give up the butthole, said no. Her wishes were honoured by Male 1. This indicates that>she felt perfectly at ease saying no, ruling out coercion or even a sense of obligation>she was cognitively capable of saying no, ruling out any suggestion of her being borderline unconscious and/or too high to careMale 7 kissed her and she pushed him off - and then he didn't do anything else. The kiss itself could be problematic, but an unwanted kiss is not rape.
>>543673296its about time the entire university college was banned from living, theyre all disgusting neoliberal shills and they exist for the sole purpose of lying
>>543676188>there was stuff in the interview transcript that didn't get put in the report sent to the daThe stuff in the transcript was the stuff she later changed, that wasn't in the sworn statement she signed. It is irrelevant and any media organization telling you otherwise is lying to you.The DA is bringing it up because he's a male New York DA and sees a good old fashioned hate mob being whipped up by the media, and he doesn't want to lose his job so he's first saying "what you're all mad about isn't what we were told," with the fallback of "and anyway it's the cops' fault for not telling me"There's a reason Cornell only expelled 2 of the students, who were the ones who took videos and photos and shared them. They got everyone's texts and statements, especially the most important ones, of her being excited to go back for another frat house party with her "rapists" and having decided she was "raped" only after they disinvited her to the party, after the whole gangbang became a campus scandal.
>>543668566So is there a chance these guys beat the case? Will this become a court trial or something? I don't know how this shit works
>>543676377>So they were all her husband and she thought it was legal for her 7 husbands to rape her?not what i said. That's an example of how someone can be mistaken about what the law is.
>>543671087no you cant lmao
>>543673142Yep.
>>543676627OK so you were talking about an imaginary scenario that has no relation to the topic.>>543676604There's a chance that they get away with a slap on the wrist sort of punishment, and her statements are all pretty damning, but in the meantime they're expelled from college before they're found guilty and these lawsuits are gonna go on for several more years.It will take literal years for all of these lawsuits to be processed and they're just college kids, so they don't have money for lawyers unless they get some pro-bono.
>>543668566They're guilty of degeneracy, don't have devils orgies with sluts. Deserve to lose because of that, not because of the angry foid.
Anything except accepting accountability for their whoredom! These cunts feel they can ruin whatever lives they want with lies because they regret being run through whores.
>>543668566and in a week it be trumps fault somehow.
>>543668855>grapedKYS faggot
>>543676710they're all rich as fuck and her statements are not particularly damning, that's why they decided to not even prosecute at first
>>543672637islam is correct in regards to women. inshallah brather.
>>543673142Something big is coming. They're also delaying ALL executions for the year in TN because of Pike. Awfully suspicious...
>>543671135Whoever adds that shit to an article should be executed. There's no excuse for that kind of yellow journalism.
Does anyone have the image of 2-3 women standing in front of a fridge with COLLEGE DORM RULES and 9/10 of the rules are about dick and being a slut?I would much appreciate it if you posted it.
>>543670992>It cannot be both simultaneously.were you home schooled? Schools have always been extremely segregated spaces, the identity freaks and the frats only overlap in that they may attend the same class,
>>543676810I meant pretty damning for her, guess I should have specified. It was like every statement and every one of her actions around the events are terrible for her cases and leave many people open to libel lawsuits.>>543676857Yup. Someone had to sit there, read the statements, and then decide that the one thing that needed editorialization was the part that would make any of the guys seem innocent, or the girl to seem like a liar.
>>543671675lol, lmao>I'm done riding the cock carousel someone better take care of my used up holes!Get the fuck out of here. You're used goods, you're not wise, you have baggage, you were raped, you've proven you make bad decisions and you want to be lionized for it instead of shamed for it. You've proven you need to be taken care of, defended, protected and then you go right up and stab the very people who would right in the back the moment you have a psychotic episode over life not being the fairy tale princess story you were promised and how it can't possibly be anything to do with you and why would you need to change at all, its everyone else who needs to not only change but be understanding that if they can't love you as a horrible cunt then they don't deserve to love you at all. And you're right, but not in the manner that is in your favor.
>>543676377>>Say no>>They don't have sex with her>This is literally what you quoted.According to the article she hid from some of them, was backing away from people, and swatting their hands away. Those are clearly signs of a lack of consent. A no doesn't have to be verbal. The articles tell us she did this before they had sex with her. >Four more frat brothers entered the room, according to Jane Doe’s sworn statement, and she hid under the bedcovers. She had trouble recalling precisely what happened next. She backed away from another man who grabbed and forcibly kissed her. She said that the second man “again tried reaching for” her vagina, and remembered snorting a line of ketamine off his erect penis. She remembered the third man and a companion coming into the room and announcing that they were “shutting down whatever the fuck this is.” She remembered her friend and another fraternity member taking her to another, smaller room, where she was given yet more ketamine, and felt “extremely high.” Her friend “said he wanted to have sex again.” She remembered saying that she was tired, but then—and she wasn’t sure how it started—she engaged in a threesome with the two men in the smaller room after all, oral and vaginal sex.https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/how-the-cornell-seven-rape-case-became-a-national-scandal>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/she also had been high and blacking out at this time.
>>543676604In a sane world, absolutely. If the DA was the one doing it, double absolutely, because you can tell he's seething that he's being painted as some slimeball who covered up a rape instead of someone who didn't prosecute a crime because it didn't exist. But the governor is a woman. And the special investigator is Letitia James, who, all appearances to the contrary, is also a woman.
>>543676710>OK so you were talking about an imaginary scenario that has no relation to the topic.It had direct relation to a topic. The average person is not a lawyer and does not know the nuances of what the law is and what counts as consent in the legal sense.
>>543676951Could you just fucking read the transcript instead of reading the articles about the transcript?
>be massive whore>get caught being massive whore>regret being massive whoreRAPE!!!
>>543668566Bunch of degenerates. I honestly don't even care if these guys get railroaded. Even if it was consentual, it's disgusting. Before you get all mad over the justice of it, ask yourself. Would you and 6 of your buddies run a train on a girl? No? Then there's nothing to worry about.
>>543676951Point out where they continue after she said no
>>543676951saying that she was too tired is also a no.
>>543674582Or three weeks, Or years later... Whatever man.
>>543671135what article is that from? fucking egregious lmao
>>543669957I'm sure she was the dealer. Or it was her sorority.
>>543676951>Hid from themShe just covered up her bare body from the guys who just walked in, and then she uncovered it again.>Swatted away a guy's handShe then snorted a line of ketamine off his penis.>Clear signsShe didn't have sex with any of those people, this was when she went to a back room and fucked 3 guys, who were not the swatted man (who she snorted drugs off the penis of) or the hidemen (who she reveled her naked body to)She was never blacking out either and you didn't even quote anything, you just linked another article you didn't read.>>543676986Again imaginary topics in your head are not the real world and you're not a lawyer.>>543677115The new yorker, first page on google if you search "cornell seven statements"
>>543677041>Point out where they continue after she said nohere:> Her friend “said he wanted to have sex again.” She remembered saying that she was tired, but then—and she wasn’t sure how it started—she engaged in a threesome with the two men in the smaller room after all, oral and vaginal sex.A drugged out person saying they are too tired to do something is a clear refusal.
>>543677026>Could you just fucking read the transcript instead of reading the articles about the transcript?has the full transcript been released?
>>543670522You seem to be leaving out the part where she was fine with it for a year until it got around that she fucked seven dudes or five dudes and two stopped by to see what was going on. Or two dudes and one guy lost his erection and the other one threw up. Or maybe it was the other two dudes who came in while she taking care of the unconcious dudes she was molesting when they came in. Those dudes were unconcious but I guess thats not rape on her part.Wheres the line? Oh, its where you want it to be at any point in time that benefits you most in whatever argument you're having at that very instant. Of course! Why should we allow the simple matter of equal rights meaning equal consequences from you getting what you want? Which is a License to fuck around and never find out.
>>543677215She didn't say she was too tired. She said she was tired. You're reading the "but" that the so-called journalist very deliberately put there and mentally inserting the "too" that they intended you to insert. Because you won't READ THE TRANSCRIPT, because you can't handle the truth.
>>543677245>You seem to be leaving out the part where she was fine with it for a year3 days afterwards she told a doctor it was a traumatic event.>The next day, on Oct. 22, Jane Doe made an appointment at Cornell Health to see a doctor because she had contracted a urinary tract infection and wanted to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases. She told the doctor she contracted the U.T.I. “in a traumatic way,” according to a transcript of her conversation with investigators.https://archive.is/GVmqj
>>543677215>Ah man I'm tiredThat's once again not a refusal and she doesn't even claim she said no, she said she doesn't remember.And also directly after this 5:45 she says "no" and they immediately stop. You just omit literally everything that makes it clear she consented and then make up things even she didn't say.
>>543677314she says she was too tired:>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/
>>543677337lel she got a UTI from putting a penis up her pee-hole, I bet that was traumatic when she let the guy do that.
>>543670473Never hesitate. You can't with these people. It's horrifying that they have pushed and pushed and never even stopped to consider that this is where their bullshit might end up if they don't just stop fucking jewing everything they touch up so much to the point where living in the comfort of an honest and just society is impossible with their machinations. This is a battle for the right to exist as someone who believes in an objective truth.
>>543677337Chicks always get UTIs when they fuck, I'm guessing fucking 20 times in a night makes it an almost certainty. It's a design flaw.
>>543677372the penis doesnt go where women piss from. they are adjacent, not hte same hole
>>543677339>That's once again not a refusalSaying someone is too tired to do something is refusing. There's more than one way to refuse.>You just omit literally everything that makes it clear she consented and then make up things even she didn't say.What part of the events in that night make it clear that it was consentual?
>>543676422>The guy who tried to kiss her and got refused just get up and leave.Where does it say that the second man left?
>>543677238god I fucking hate youyou dirty useless worthless nigger, you are why society is so awful>oh I'm sure the journalist doesn't have an agenda, there's things called ethics you knowjust mindlessly absorbing your programming without scrutiny or concerna 21st century pig with its face in the trough of informational slop, guzzling down whatever's there just because it's there, full of faith in the benevolence of the farmer because he protects and nourishes you while he fattens you up for slaughterYou are Nietzsche's last manhttps://www.tompkinscountyny.gov/News-articles/District-Attorney-statement-regarding-Jane-Doe-v.-Cornell-University-et-alHere. Read it.
>>543677355See this isn't a quote, you quoted an article that also wasn't even a quote of a statement.Just actually read any actual statements, this is like the 4th time you comment on what some journalist wrote, the statement you quoted is in no part of the transcript and they don't claim it is in the article.>>543677468Guess it wasn't a good idea to get in an orgy and poke it in there, then. Bet that was very traumatic when she consented to that.>>543677509>Saying someone is too tiredAt no point did she say too tired, the transcript just says "tired". I just looked, you're quoting an article and not an actual transcript of what she said.
>>543677548That is not the full transcript, that's the condensed version.
>>543677509
>>543677468I... Are you trying to tell me that you're white knighting the hygiene of a woman who fucks seven men in one day? Oh I'm sorry, decided she was raped according to a transcript of her conversation with investigators about something she told her doctor.And yes I would question the hygiene of any man who fucks seven women in one day as well.
>>543677692If you don't have the full transcript where are you getting all these quotes from?
>>543677612>Just actually read any actual statements, this is like the 4th time you comment on what some journalist wrote, the statement you quoted is in no part of the transcript and they don't claim it is in the article.>>543677612>At no point did she say too tired, the transcript just says "tired".Are you talking about the full transcript, or the condensed version and sent to the DA?
>>543677753i got these quotes from the article.
I just simply don't believe women unquestioningly anymore, sorry. If I said I was raped at a party, I'd get twenty questions, not immediate support.
>>543677780You never read the full transcript and you keep linking articles, which also don't link to the full transcript.How are you quoting these things by just linking things in news articles, which they themselves don't even claim are quotes of the event?>>543677803Yeah so you're quoting some article and we're quoting the transcript.
>>543677548You're arguing with a shill. There is no conversing with these people. They don't want the truth. They want to win, at all costs. He is not ignorant as to the meaning behind the face of his argument. He does so merely to demoralize and destroy the faith of those who would see truth win the day.You just can't help but hate them.
>>543668905this is why PIKE had a notary.
>>543677803I just read the article>"Was it 'no' or was it, 'eh, I'm tired'?" the investigator asked, according to the transcript.>The transcript says Jane Doe responded, "I think it's 'I'm tired.'"You didn't even read the article you linked, this is in the line immediately after and it's what we both said, it was just an "I'm tired' and not a "no."You didn't even read the article you linked, or the transcript, did you actually read any of this or are you just hitting the search key?
>>543671238And you're clearly a faggot. Thus your opinion is to be discarded.
>>543676940It's simple: women can no longer revoke consent by mere verbiage. If you don't want sex, LEAVE THE FUCKING BUILDING. GOODBYE.
>>543677833You are quoting the condensed transcript from the DA's press released on sep 28:https://www.tompkinscountyny.gov/News-articles/District-Attorney-statement-regarding-Jane-Doe-v.-Cornell-University-et-alThe journalists in these articles obtained the full transcript and sent them to the DA after that press release was made.This article came out on september 30th and they said they exclusively obtained the full transcript:https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-district-attorney-campus-police-interview/They shared this with teh DA and he said he hadn't seen it.>Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten says he never saw a transcript of a conversation between an alleged rape victim and investigators showing what she told Cornell University campus police before his office decided not to bring charges.>The transcript, which CBS News New York exclusively obtained from a source, shows the victim told campus police more than three weeks after the alleged assault, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped.">"I'm going to follow up on this because this is news to me," Van Houten told CBS News New York on Tuesday about the transcript.They showed this to him on tuesday the 29th. the day after his press released.
>>543678024"I can say with 100% confidence I was raped" is not relevant statement to be transferred the final report. It makes perfect sense to leave that out of the report sent to the DA. It's subjective and basically just the personal belief/opinion of Jane Doe, not facts.
>>543677913I already posted a quote saying she was tired.
>>543678024Look at this>>543677913Right here she says directly after it was just an "I'm tired" and that part of the article isn't even in quotation marks so it's not claiming what you said it is, on top of that she outright says it was her not saying no on the very next line of the article, which as I established before was already editorializing by not putting that part in quotation marks."too tired" does not appear in any part of it and is not in quotes.>>543678024Don't add more things, we're talking about this one specific thing where you didn't read the article and the part you tried to quote wasn't a direct quote.The part you are trying to quote is never claimed by them to be in the transcript and is not even in quotes, it's them condensing multiple statements that were inside the transcript into one with editorialization.>>543678161She claims she was tired, not too tired, and the article you quoted had no quotes on said part you tried to cite.She clarifies that it was just an "I'm tired" and not a "no" so your entire point is moot because what you quoted as a no was claimed to her as just being a "tired".
>>543678157There's seems to have been other stuff that was left out:>Jane Doe added, according to the transcript, "And then, of course, I was being hit at the same time. Physically hit very, very hard."
>>543678221>>543678161And I guess I'll slap on the end of this that the entire point of this was that you were claiming that her "I'm tired" was a sign that she didn't consent, and she clarified further specifically that it wasn't.So you didn't even read the article you linked and she directly contradicts what you say the very next line, that said "tired" was just "tired" and not a "no."We are talking about this initial point you made and you have to address this specifically.>>543677913That right here it wasn't a no, so now you have to retract what you said and admit that that wasn't a "no" since she's saying right here it wasn't.
>>543678221Saying "I'm tired" when asked to engage in a physical task would count as a revoking of consent, so this is a nitpicking pointShe also said:>she was "completely and totally incapacitated."Which if someone is in that mental state due to taking drugs it typically would the consent given invalid.
>>543678511>Would count as revoking consent>>543677913I read the article you quoted>Was that a "no">No, it was an "I'm tired"So nope, it's not what you're saying and she's literally just saying she's tired and she explicitly says that she's not revoking consent. That's her saying it right there and that part is actually a quote.
>>543678601>So nope, it's not what you're saying and she's literally just saying she's tired and she explicitly says that she's not revoking consent. That's her saying it right there and that part is actually a quote.She doesn't explicitly "say she's not revoking consent", the investigator is asking about what words she used.>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.>"Was it 'no' or was it, 'eh, I'm tired'?" the investigator asked, according to the transcript.>The transcript says Jane Doe responded, "I think it's 'I'm tired.'"
>>543678712>The transcript says that Jane Doe responded>"I think it's I'm tired"You literally just restated what I just said, that she was just saying she was tired and not no. She clarifies specifically, when asked for clarification, that it was just an "I'm tired"Look guy this just isn't working no matter how many times you post it.
Niggers
>>543668905>She sucked off a guy that was passed outthey're going to charge that guy with rape too, just watch
>>543678805>>543678712He just stops responding, not once admitting he's wrong. This is how it always goes.Any anons who aren't in the know should read into this, it's peak clown world and the entire transcript is hilarious, no anons here have exaggerated and if anything they've downplayed it.
>>543678805>You literally just restated what I just said, that she was just saying she was tired and not no. She clarifies specifically, when asked for clarification, that it was just an "I'm tired"Saying "I'm tired" is nothing closely to what you describe it as:>she explicitly says that she's not revoking consent.also, they weren't currently having sex at that point when she said she was tired. They were trying to initiate an encounter. Consent to a previous encounter is not consent to a future encounter, so saying it doesn't revoke consent doesn't make sense since it wasn't granted there in the first place.
>>543679147You tried to claim earlier that it was a revoke of consent, which isn't possible in this case if there was no sex happening and no initiation of sex, like you claim.She explicitly says she's not revoking consent when asked to clarify.
>>543679241>You tried to claim earlier that it was a revoke of consent, which isn't possible in this case if there was no sex happening Perhaps I made a grammatical error there. I've been making a bunch. Let me put it a different way, saying "I'm tired" does not grant consent.>no initiation of sex, like you claim.Not what I said.>She explicitly says she's not revoking consent when asked to clarify.This sentence "I think it's 'I'm tired.'" is not this sentence "I'm not revoking consent". Those are 2 entirely differnet things.
>>543679147>also, they weren't currently having sex at that point when she said she was tired. They were trying to initiate an encounter.https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-district-attorney-campus-police-interview/>Before discussing what Jane Doe said when men asked her for sex, the transcript says the investigator warned her that his questions may sound accusatory, but said he needed specific answers to determine the right charges.>According to the transcript, Jane Doe said she swatted one man's hand away and told him she was uncomfortable, and she told another man no a few times or that she was too tired.>"Was it 'no' or was it, 'eh, I'm tired'?" the investigator asked, according to the transcript.>The transcript says Jane Doe responded, "I think it's 'I'm tired.'"
>>543679660she really has no case here, her own testimony has nothing to do with rape. any every opportunity the detective gave her to say "were you forced?" or "did you say no?" she for some reason declines to say yes and just says something else
>>543679718>any every opportunity the detective gave her to say "were you forced?" or "did you say no?" she for some reason declines to say yes and just says something elseshe says she was coerced after that part.saying "i'm tired" or that one is uncomfortable is not granting consent to sex.
