>Did you have a beer this week?>Well now you can’t heckin’ consent to sex. You’re a victim.>The man had a beer too?>That doesn’t count.>It doesn’t matter how you felt in the moment.>You can decide at any time, even 50 years from now, that it was actually rape.>And if you had a beer that day, that’s irrefutable evidence that will be used to convict the ChudCongrats, basically all sex is now a crime, and women can now throw your ass in prison whenever they want.Better start fucking Mormon women now I guess. The next law will be that women cannot legally consent if they had a large, sugary sodapop that day.
>>543681570Imagine unironically drinking in current year
>>543681715Yea, what a massive legal risk. You can write off all the other arguements, but theres basically 100year old systems ready to FUCK you for drinking.
>>543681570you're really stupid if you think the hot upstate girls will allow this to pass.t. grew up in an area where taylor swift is merely a 4.
>>543681570If choosing to have a drink means your subsequent consent to sex is not actual consent, then how do you1) Prosecute the equally inebriated guy who had consensual sex with the woman? Why is her consent null and void but the guy's decision to have sex with her held against him when he was in an altered state of mind, doing things he wouldn't do under normal circumstances?2) Similarly, how do you prosecute drunk drivers? The decision to drive was made while in an altered state of mind... Surely if the consent of a woman who willingly had a few beers is null and void, a drunk driver can't be held accountable for a bad decision made while under the influence?Is she retarded?
>>543681715i drink by myself. i don't know how people regularly drink and be around others in the modern world. seriously, why would you do this to yourself?
>>543682629Nobody cares about anything you just said. They won't enforce this law against non whites. They will only specifically use and enforce this law when prosecuting white people, specifically white males because women are also always innocent.
This week on the USA show, Foids bring back puritanism from first principles
>>543681570I am going to laugh as women get alienated.
>>543682629Do you really think you live in a world where the law applies equally to everybody? Are you really that naive?
>>543681570get drunk hop on a dik/coc not your fault, you were rapedget drunk hop in a car and drive, your fault
>>543682720aru is my spirit animal
>>543681715People are still having casual.sex AND drinking. Things must get much worse until the goycattle does as much as raise an eyebrow at the sheer absurdity governing them and embrace their rapist side
>>543682006Aren't you replaced by spics and nigs? How many of you are left?
>>543681570>voluntary intoxication loophole
>>543681570why do women insist on making sex a bureaucratic nightmare? that's how you get turned into property
>>543681570>86% of 18-35 have never approached a womanI can see why
>>543681570Would Nick Fuentes support this if he was heterosexual?
>>543688021Women are fully aware that it is possible to use sex to gain resources, it's just that most of them do not outright request cash because they don't want to think of themselves as prostitutes. It's obvious when you realize they will never have sex no strings attached even if it's just for a nice meal at a restaurant
