a test called Turing's Shroud is used to determine if you have a consciousnessanew AI developr claims to have solved thishttps://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/10/01/ai-company-claims-human-interaction-model-passes-turing-test/ How the Test Works-Three players: A human judge, a human helper, and a computer.-Separate rooms: Everyone sits in separate spaces and communicates only through text terminals.-The goal: The judge asks questions to both the computer and the human.-Passing the test: If the judge cannot reliably tell which one is the machine and which one is the human, the machine passes>The test requires the judge to be a real human being.Tavus's Griffindyr bot completed Turing.Developer says 48% of people who went against the bot could not tell it was a bot.>Earlier results by Google, OpenAI and similar, had reached 3% certainty of being a humanThey have given a new class for Griffindyr, it is classed as HIM (Human Interaction Model) or HER (Human Emulation Robot)
The implications for OnlyFans is enormous
I do this test everyday here. I think most people can tell who’s a bot. You get pretty good at it. It’s a skill that will develop over time for more people not just during one test
>>543688501wouldnt that test just measure the discernment of the judge and not if the computer has actual consciousness?
>>543688569I think most anons tend to overestimate their ability to identify who they're talking to.There probably aren't many of us who haven't at least once been wrongly labeled a bot/kike/nigger/jeet/etc.
>>543688529yesbecause we have famela body model generators as well, dont have to use a picture of real person
>>543688501>HIM (Human Interaction Model)more like His Infernal Majesty
>>543688643*beep boop*Uhm ... null program. Of course I am human!!
>>543688501Such a clown test doesn't determine anything about consciousness. Jeez. This is retardmaxxing in full effect.
>>543688501>The goal: The judge asks questions to both the computer and the human. >-Passing the test: If the judge cannot reliably tell which one is the machine and which one is the human, the machine passes This is completely subjective and relies on "the judge," who is a fallible human and subject to a ton of factors. I get that they gave this "test" some official epic test name, but this is childish, retarded, inconsistent, and unscientific.
>>543689069its the best setting they got, I am sure that now situation arises where they need to develop a better test
>>543689205Surely there is a better way to test for intelligence other than one guy's individual perception. DUMB.
>>543690959Right. We should at least have the guy be running an "extensive and exhaustive behavioural benchmark" ... and perhaps invite further qualified test personnel.
Ask the bot if they are a nigger or a kike and watch them fail from the safety protocols, it's that easy kek