Hear me out. If Putler nukes, there's to be NO crying, moaning, "h-how could he do this, war crime!" shouting, this war is being pursued by all involved parties, only one has a world-ending nuclear arsenal. US won't nuke Russia for anything, and vice versa. Most European faggots never go to rand.org and read about our nuclear posture. We won't nuke Russia, and Russia won't nuke us. Period. We don't even want to shoot BB guns at each other, OK? It's that serious.Now, the European plan was to somehow get Russia and the US to nuke each other to smithereens and take out their two biggest rivals in one go. You've been salivating over Article 5, thinking it's a nukes button, but it's going to be thoughts and prayers.Trump stopped helping Ukraine, pulled back a shit ton of troops from the butthurt belt, and is looking to NOT be involved in this, inevitably nuclear, war that Europe is so interested in fighting, through their proxy Ukraine.My guess is Russia will eventually launch conventional strikes against European military industrial and command and control targets, taking out the missile factories, HQ buildings of defense firms, etc. as has been done in Russia. Europe, I don't think, will even retaliate conventionally let alone in a nuclear fashion. I mean what'll Europe do, have Ukriane bomb Moscow even harder? They do that every day already lel. Do it "officially?" lel.One good wave of strikes against Europe's warmaking potential will send the entire continent into utter chaos, the entire EU has been told Russia is a joke, weak, victory is inevitable, Russia is on the verge of breaking up, etc. Meanwhile the UK can't even cruise a single one of its nuclear submarines which carry nukes, all are laid up in port and can't cruise. They failed on their last test launch too. Russia could eliminate the UK's entire nuclear umbrella in one strike lel.Just don't cry if it happens, you European warmongering faggots. We're not playing with you for nuclear WWIII.
>>543721042Putin will not blast a western country's city.The possible scenarios would be either:>Blast nukes OVER cities (mid-air) just as a warning he could do worse.or>Nuke cities in Ukraine, Poland, or other eastern yuro countries no one cares about.In both cases, it would be enough to make the bitches running the EU shit themselves and back off, without actually killing western people.
Any NAFOs wanna resply? Or Eglin spics/women? I'll use my NAFO call (M-x spook in emacs).condor Fort Hancock ARPA Kidnap Ruby Ridge Abu Sayyaf Austin MD5 virusBVD EuroFed Security Consulting SASP enforcers Service disruptionGuantanamo Telecommunications Coderpunks eternity server Symptomspre-emptive nitrate interception LLNL PPS National security ForteNogales Security Council AGT. AMMEFt. Knox satellite imagery EG&G Semtex Suspicious substance MSEEBLU-97 A/B Daisy Hazardous Khaddafi Gorizont Tsunami Warning CenterFSF PLO Narco bannersYakima CQB EBS DREC NBIC Help codes Nuevo Leon bemd Stuck SIGDEVFt. Meade bootleg Guantanamo Domestic nuclear detectionradar Drug cartel al-Qaida NIMA RAID Plume quiche HIC stakeout USSSCyber security SHAPE Pine Gap Security Evaluation grom
>>543721042If Nutler Pukes, we're all fucked
>>543721042This is a very weird take politically (and obviously not going to happen) but technically true, but putting the entirety of the European population into total war is literally the best thing that could happen to this planet, so.
>>543721363Nah USA will be fine. We won't nuke Russia, no matter how much the EuUrofaggots beg, and they won't nuke us.Europe's gonna catch nukes though lel. But this is what they wanted, they voted for it.
You would have to be smoking insane amounts of crack to think that if you put all young European men into a total war scenario they wouldn't save the entire world. This is very obviously NOT going to be allowed by the powers that be.YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT YOUNG EUROPEANS SKILLED IN WARFARE
>>543721504You seem legit retarded or ignorant, so just so you know, both the UK and France have nukes.And France nukes don't depend on the US (unlike UK nukes apparently). Putin wouldn't go as far as risking St Petersburg or Moscow getting nuked.That's why he would either target a peripheral eastern yuro country or make a warning shot over a real countries but not beyond that.
>>543721042>why are you nuking yourself europe ?
No, neither the UK nor France has a credible nuclear arsenal. It seems obvious the British only have nukes on loan from the US, France may have made a handful many decades ago but they obviously can't afford a nuclear weapons program. They chose infinite browns instead.
Bump, not nearly enough NAFOs in here seething for my taste. Let's get those girls in here!
