[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


It's gonna be a blue tsunami
>>
>>543728561
Did he ban cheating on his wife?
>>
>>543728702
At least he cheats on his wife with women, unlike many a politician
>>
>>543728561
Uniparty tactics are evil, not stupid
>>
>>543729172
>at least he rapes, kills and eats other peoples children, and not his own, like other politicians
>>
Its incredible to me people dont realise how ammoral they are
>>
these bastards are going to set us back.
>>
>>543729461
As bad as murdering kids is, it is objectively worse to kill your own.
So uh bad example?
>>
>>543728561
CALIFORNIA UBER ALLES
>>
>>543728561
Trump fucked us so hard this faggot is going to be the next president
>>
So a human will fire them
Then AI will take their job
>>
>>543728561
I cant to see this never be enforced lmao
>>
>>543728561
It's honestly more about lawsuits desu. AI shit makes all kinds of outrageous errors that would result in a huge influx of wrongful termination suits. Ironically, this actually protects employers more in a way.
>>
File: 1777683274537.png (371 KB, 720x884)
371 KB PNG
>>543728561
Bans AI to fire workers, but doesn't ban firing workers for AI?
>>
>>543728561
Lol now Musk will work overtime to make sure Newsom doesn't become president
>>
>>543730232
gavin jewsome thinks he can ban 3d printed guns
>>
>>543729463
One problem people have (myself included until I got black pilled) is that they assume people are as decent and understanding as they are. But a lot of really damaged people only become good parrots but never learn to properly reason. Gavin Newsom is one of those, a good parrot but slightly sociopathic. People think evil is just something in the history books. But it is all around us..remember machiavelli is not long enough ago that very much human evolution has happened.
>>
>>543730211
>but doesn't ban firing workers for AI?
you are a republican faggot, you support all that
>>
>>543728561
Good idea, but it will work as well as making it illegal to fire workers to replace with H-1B. In that it won't work at all and no business will ever be prosecuted.
>>
Gavin Newsom is a non-issue. California is a beaner/addict containment zone.
>>
>>543729172
his wife literally left him fro donald trump jr. kek. he got cucked by a literal trump. also, his current wife went on a long vacation in africa and south america during college when she was "finding herself." also
> He has personal ties to the Jewish community. As a child, Newsom attended Hanukkah celebrations with Jewish extended family, went to a JCC preschool in San Francisco, and spent time at the Jewish summer camp Camp Tawonga. He credits the Jewish values he absorbed—especially tikkun olam—for shaping his identity and worldview and helping him succeed in business and politics. Newsom told his son that they are partly Jewish and have Jewish cousins in the Newsom family when one of his friends expressed antisemitic views. In 2019, he took steps to combat antisemitism by allocating $15 million for synagogue security, $6 million for the Holocaust Museum LA, and $23.5 million for Jewish summer camps affected by wildfires.[
>>
>>543728702
His wife cheated on him
>>
So.....only a HUMAN can fire a worker? An AI chatbot can't?
>>
>>543728561
>ChatGPT, who should I lay off?
>Can you draft a layoff email for each employee?
>Can you move my cursor to the send button
>Ok, I'll hit send and stay compliant
>>
>>543728702
it was allowed since she took the weinstein pp
>>
>>543730460
Read it again. It means an AI paperclip mascot can't be the one to tell you you're fired.
>>
>>543731071
>So.....only a HUMAN can fire a worker? An AI chatbot can't?


How do you sue an AI chatbot?
>>
>>543728561
banning AI is good, but it is absurdly insufficient to stop AI. Anyway glad to see they finally realized they, too, want to "conserve"



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.