Why isn't it wrong to differentiate breeds of animals by intelligence but not humans of different races?
>>543738890Oh come on. This one isn't even larping as a legitimate question.
>>543738890Im gay and fat
>>543738890because they are a social constructif a black person stop eating waternmelon they become whiteif you stop making 1pbtids you become a human
because mr jew wants everyone to participate in the workforce
ESL thread.
>>543738890Wignats, supposed race realists, deny that races are different as well. For instance, they say WMAF and BMWF are the same and produce the same outcomes, despite full statistics to the contrary.
>>543738890Because if we use science it will show jews are the disgusting abomination crossbreed that shouldnt exist. And that everybody that has african genes is 20% monkey.
>>543738890
>>543738890Breeds of animals are extremely small populations that were systematically inbreed to pass down specific traits. Most of those traits are either useless in nature and/or they come off at great cost for the health of the animal. We humans have such a big population sample that the only ones that we can consider a "breed" would be the small pockets of inbreed retardeds that form in isolated places or closed of communities (like Amish, Mennonites or Orthodox Jews). Besides, no macro group of humanity is breed enough to have significant difference from one another.
>>543739420>Besides, no macro group of humanity is breed enough to have significant difference from one another.skin color is an illusion
>>543739420>no macro group of humanity is breed enough to have significant difference from one anotherand yet i can tell niggers, jews, whites, ... apart, even sub categoriesappearance isnt the only difference, also behaviour
>>543739237Find another hobby, retard
>>543738890Because if we did [Hitler].The post-war consensus is actually a religion.Its roots are Judaism.The jewish model is that the only meaningful distinction is between jews and non-jews.This means that all people are individually different, but meaningless when you try to group them together.This ties into Hitler because Hitler said that his people were a group.Then everyone fought and died.To avoid fighting and dying you can't identify with groups.Because Hitler.This sounds idiotic, but this is actually the foundations of modern liberalism.Go outside tomorrow and test it.Differentiation of groups means conflict and death.This is a religious belief.That's really all you need to know.
>>543739751Glownigger seethe
>>543740179Projection. You only come to threads mentioning Asian women.>>543739922>>543739922>>543739922Don't worry, all your obvious jewry is being archived.
>>543739420Here is how Siberian tigers differ from Bengal tigers:They are slightly bigger and they live in colder climates.Here is how Japanese people are different from Congolese people:Completely different face shape and body shape, identifiable even just from the bonesCompletely different behaviour in terms of ability to grasp complex technological concepts; time-satiation preference (i.e. planning ahead); impulsivity and use of violence; all leading to a ....completely different societal structureBut yeah, yeah, the tigers are definitely distinct whilst Japanese people and Congolese people are the same thing basically, yeah.I think when we get down to it, a society that is capable of travelling through space, practically eliminating violent crime; and on the verge of some kind of robot revolution or perhaps uploading their consciousnesses onto computer systems and perhaps reaching some kind of technological immortality, is really no different at all to a society that lives much like chimpanzees in the jungle. No difference at all. Same thing, really. The Bengal and the Siberian tiger, however... TOTALLY different.
Oh and by the wayHEIL HITLERAND PROTECT ASIAN WOMENSIEG HEIL
