Hitler could've won WW2 had he gone scorched Earth against Britain. Instead of larping as a Germanic Pagan Wignat Barbarian, he should've actually been one. Instead of hoping for a secret deal with Britain via Edward VIII & going easy on Britain in the beginning, he should've finished off the British Army in Dunkirk. The British also feared that Hitler would commandeer the French Navy & use it to kamikaze the British Navy, this would've opened the door for Hitler to conquer Britain by crossing the English Channel much like the Ancient Germanic Saxon Tribes did and much like William the Conqueror also did.Hitler did some things wrong, you have to admit /pol/!
>>543765675He was a sensitive man.
>>543765675His worst doing was losing.
>>543766588Imo he should have focused more on vegetarianism and less on overpopulation issues.
>>543765675The only thing he did wrong was being too kind
>>543765675The only thing Hitler did wrong was not going far enough. He was too nice to his enemies. He gave them the opportunity to do what he was capable of doing, but didnt do because he didn't want to be evil. The gentle giant.
If hitler would have taken Britan, Stalin could have kept the third world in check and American could have remained white.Slaves controlling the third world retards sounds fair. Hitler should have won, damn. The only question then would been what happens to japan in this event.
>>543765675>some things
>>543765675None of those are true. He didn't let Britain off at Dunkirk, as the German documents show, the Germans ran ahead of their logistics and had a delay and Hitler was pissed about it.You also saying its a mistake of Hitler that he somehow didn't get the French navy gifted to him lol, that isn't how you plan wars, on the hope someone elses navy ends up in your lap.The fact is Germans had a plan to invade Britain based on defeating our airforce, and the Luftwaffe got beaten and the plan was called off.
>>543765675He was making gambles throught all his rule ofcourse there was going to be a mistake at one point. Live by gambling die by gambling
What he should have done is worked with Britain rather than being, as one anon mentions, "sensitive". During a time when my second cousin was working in British politics, he met with Hitler. It was, by all accounts, a successful venture with the two men bonding over dinner. Like Hitler, dear cousin was well aware of how "difficult" the Jews were to deal with. But he was not sensitive like lil baby girl Hitler was. What happened next? Hitler got sensitive. He proved himself to be suspect.You burn bridges when you do this. Had Hitler not been... Sensitive.... The Europe we see today would have remained a powerhouse, with Britain maintaining world order with our Navy and Germany maintaining world order via her Army. But no, Hitler got sensitive. So now we have to have brown people running around Europe behaving like retards. Thanks a lot, Hitler.
>>543767076Hitler was forced to stretch his logistics anyway later on in the war after the USSR & USA got involved, stretching Germany's logistics a little bit to finish off Britain in Dunkirk would've taken little effort in comparison to the latter fight against both the USSR & USA simultaneously.
>>543767428people?
>>543769373x2
>>543765675germany didn't attack people in dunkirk that was a publicity stunt and a false flag by brits
>>543765675every single thing he did was right.>should've gone scorched earth on britainfrance is and was a large country with a big population, it required an army to deter them chimping out (which they did anyway). Barbarossa and decapitating the east was by far the smarter choice. If it was successful, who would've counter attacked from the east? Uzbeks? the only thing hitler lacked was enough power. if anything blame italians for being useless faggots
>>543772397Hitler needed to realize he was up against the clock, he needed to go scorched earth against Britain at Dunkirk & then again by using the French Naval Assets to neutralize Britain. Instead Hitler waited & waited until the US & USSR armed themselves to the point where Hitler got overrrun.
>>543772480wtf are you on about. you can't just take a country like in total war and nothing happens. you need to control the population as well which also requires man power. holding france was expensive enough, holding also britain while having to deal with USSR would not have worked at all. if anything hitler should have stopped at the neatherlands and entrenched the from the north sea to the mediterania and gone going harder on USSR.
>>543768762You clearly don't understand what logistics mean. They weren't waiting on resupplies of HFCS intravenous drips, Oreos and Pepsi.
>>543772706>>543772723Britain feared Hitler as a threat & feared Hitler's potential actions at Dunkirk as well as Hitler potentially seizing control of the French Navy. Britain supported Russia in both World Wars in crder to counter what they saw as their primary imperial threat, Germany.
>>543771105hitler should've attacked it if he wanted to win
>>543775956x2
sure
ok
>>543765675He made plenty of mistakes. One of them was not machine gunning the entire british army at funkirk.His biggest mistake was ordering the army to stop outside of Moscow. He should have rushed the city.
>>543765675Mate, even if he did do some things wrong he is the most slandered man in the history of mankind. Nobody asked for another lecture, fuck off.
No he could not, no amount of air raids win you a conflict, defeating Royal Navy was required and impossible. And oil was the single most deciding factor, but only non shitty source reachable by land was USSR which is simply too large and too stubborn to defeat. Should have reshaped rhetoric to be less against Stalin since his rule no longer resembled original Trotsky style nonsense and Stalin purged most of the heebs himself which should have been common ground. Then make an actual lasting pact with USSR to have some nazbol alliance and keep buying oil from them to deal with the rest of the world long term.
>>543782644Hitler seizing the French Naval Assets to Kamikaze the British Navy was more likely to succeed as a strategy vs. the ultimate strategy of fighting the US & USSR at the same time.
>>543783521x2
>>543785579x3
>>543782644the british navy can be defeated by U boat warUK only got saved because they sold off their empire to the US
>>543787407French uboats are why France agreed to the Washington Naval Treaty.
>>543765675He abandoned the entire fift army to die because he was a worthless idiot as are 1488s especially the ones here who he would all have shot out of hand especially the American ones. Adolf manager to do pretty much everything wrong, particularly to Germany which he managed to destroy and leave divided for half a century.
>>543788753What about Mussolini?
>>543790056x2
>>543765675Hitler did nothing wrong.
