Do you want to know how I know not even the screeching miggers of /ptg/ sincerely believe Republicans have a chance of holding the House after two years of Trump?Because not one of them has posted a slip showing they've put their life savings on Republicans keeping the House.If you truly, sincerely believed Trump has done such an amazing job, and is so loved by the American people that Republicans will hold both houses of Congress, why wouldn't you bet everything and add an extra zero to the end of your net worth in November?>inb4 miggers squealing "NO U!" and/or posting absolutely anything except proof that they're willing to put their money where their mouth isCome on, pussies. If you really believe your bullshit, post proof that you're about to make your money back tenfold on the easiest bet of your life.
>>543772080TL:DR Still voting for my free $5,000
Miga is a cult. Even after Trump became a 34 time convicted felon, convicted rapist, child gang rapist they still support him.
>>543772133>Immediately tripping the inb4Kek, good job ScooterWhere are the DOGE checks?Where are the tariff checks?
>>543772080>they're willing to put their money where their mouth isPost your position.
>gambling websites Oof
Doesn't look great not gonna lie
>>543772714>inb4 miggers squealing "NO U!"Even if you get called out, you can't help but stick to the script, huh
>>543772972That looks great.
>>543773020What are your positions?
>>543772972D+2 isn't too bad. R+1 would be better.
>>543772972Worst numbers for Republicans in at least 16 yearsBut again, if someone truly believed the polls are made up and Trump actually has the highest approval rating ever, they would have no issue betting against this and getting stupid rich off the easiest bet of their livesAnd yet none of them have
>>543773093>NO U!
>be GOP>implement Tariffs that created a silence tax on its own CitizensYup yup yup, ganna vote for that again
the migger seethe on November 5th will be nuclear
>>543773225>Worst numbers for Republicans in at least 16 yearsIf you truly believe that, why not make a bet on it?
>>543772133oh wow so youre better $5k on the republicans keeping the house?youd be set with that much in winnings, and you seem quite sure itll happen, right?
>>543773499>NO U!There it is againBetting on Democrats at this point has a payout equivalent to a high yield CDBetting on Republicans has a payout of 11 to 1If you truly believed Republicans were going to hold both houses, you wouldn't hesitate to bet everything on themBut of course you know all of this, but you're not smart enough to deviate from the script you got when you clocked in todaySo you'll just respond to this with another "NO U!"
>>543773892There isn't a CD in the world that gives 1-month return of 7% so this argument is even stronger against your position. And no, saying "inb4" the obvious refutation of your position does not magically stop it from refuting you. It just means you identified the clear flaw in your own argument before you even made it, making you dishonest, as well as stupid. To be honest, I expected you to actually have some position but be scared to post because it's some tiny $50 thing, but now I'm wondering why you don't have one at all.
>>543774306>NO U! for the fourth timeThanks for keeping the thread going, scooter
if you are smart you put 5k on the democrats winning, why?if they win you get a lot of cash, if you lose Trump reimburse your 5k, you literally cannot lose
>>543774504I think any normal audience would be rather turned off by your behavior here, which is why I see value in keeping it bumped. Your side is very obviously dishonest, and very obviously insecure. People should see that.
kek you think PTG is bad?check out the shiwi, that USPG thread makes PTG look like trump haters in comparison
>>543774542Putting on a 5,000 dollar bet for Democrats would net you a whole 300 bucks and some change as of right nowPutting a 5,000 dollar bet on Republicans would net you over 50,000 dollarsAnyone who truly believes in Donald Trump and the Republicans would be retarded not to go all in on those odds
>>543774605Still waiting to see your slip, scooterOr do you not believe Republicans are going to keep both houses?
>>543774869I think they probably will keep the House, yeah. Now, you seem absolutely sure they won't, so it would seem like an even better idea for you to put a bunch of money on it.
>>543775138So where's your slip?Why aren't you locking in an opportunity to make back your money tenfold?
>>543775264I said I think they'll probably win, I didn't say I was willing to bet my entire life on it. But you seem pretty sure, and the markets agree. So how much did you throw in?
>>543775559>I didn't say I was willing to bet my entire life on it.Doubt, huh.That's okay though, no need to bet your entire life on it if you don't really believe what you're sayingJust a small amount you can live without if you lose would still be massiveA 100 dollar bet would turn into more than 1000 bucksSo do you not even have that much faith?Or can you not even afford to lose 100 bucks two years into Trump's Golden Age?
>>543775847I threw down a small bet for shits and giggles. How much did you put in?
>>543776263AwesomePost itCrop out any personal info of course, there's a lot of crazies on this board. Just your position.
Betting markets are just a cheaper way of creating narratives than media organizations. They can put down like 40k, which is nothing compared to the cost of tv ads and political campaigns in general, and demoralize people with 2 digit IQs like the OP.
>>543776382I'm not the one with something to prove, so no thanks. Did you bet anything on it?
>>543776544>No I'm lying but not stupidAw. I almost respected you for a second there.
>>543776605I'm not sure why you are so triggered by a pretty basic question. Anyone who screams about other people putting their "money where their mouth is" should be ready to answer the obvious counter of:"Well, how much did you put in?"
>>543776964So far you did nothing but say "NO U!" five timesThen when asked point blank you said you were fairly certain Republicans would keep the House but not enough to bet everything on itThen when called out on that you claimed you actually had made a small betThen when asked for proof you refused and tried to change the subjectBecause you never made a betBecause you don't want to throw away moneyBecause despite everything you say to others and even yourself, you know Republicans are fucked in NovemberThat, my friend, is the entire point of this thread
>>543777347I answered all of your questions honestly, and asked my own very reasonable question: how much did you bet on it? I'm not sure why that question is causing you to throw such a huge temper-tantrum. I think a normal person would either just admit they didn't bet anything, or if they did bet, just say how much.
>>543772080uh oh melty. what did the miggers do to upset you so much?
>>543777593We've both bet the exact same amount of money on this election
>>543778850Well I bought 100 "shares" when it was at $0.19. So you only bet $19 on Democrats winning? Doesn't sound like you're all that confident in them winning.
