Why aren't AI bros making interesting things?I want to see a realistic 007 movie where Bond is killing people on behalf of Prince Andrew to stop the release of the Epstein files. Or to help wire 7 WTC with demolitions and then escort Dancing Israelis to a rooftop without being seen. Or planting CP on devices owned by political rivals.You know, realistic spy shit that Hollywood would never make.
>>543805916People can't relate to something that is not at the least designed by people on a human levelThat and Jews would lose influence and shekels
>>543805916Im a big fan of the new AI soap opera The Chiseled and The Beautifulhttps://youtu.be/8gEpnv626Zo
>>543805916>>543806173There's 2 already up on yt, totally photoreal, one of them premiered out of competition at cannes, but they were made by sandniggers/euromutts, so no one cares. Total cost to make both was 1.5 mil.I'm not linking, but it's a done deal.
>>543805916>Why aren't AI bros making interesting things?Because people who use ai are fundamentally uninteresting and have no creativity. That's why they use ai. All they know is how to copy and steal. It's unsurprising most ai fags are rightoids, the side of the spectrum that was always terrible at art
There is the AI Doctor Who episode that is making cucks seethe.https://youtu.be/-aAYUBOqfRM
>>543805916The technology is there but the tooling around it still isn't mature yet. You can generate these short clips and learn how to get good at it, but the editing and control of the generation is the key part. Flux 3 just came out and hopefully they'll release the weights for it. But the tl;dr is that you want to be able to have fine grained control over things, like you use image generation to generate a story board, then you might break down parts of that into more images, and from there, you go a bit further with generating start and end frames and get the video clips you want. When the tooling is really good you will be then able to say to it, actually drag objects or prompt it and say no I don't want that object to fall, or I want the character to do X instead.At the moment a lot of the tools it's kind of hit or miss you generate 3-10 second clips and hope it doesn't look like total shit. Even when it nails the main parts you wanted you can still see problems in the background and so on. So having a good tool that you can just say to it, in this clip remove that object or change the camera movement to be like this (or even control the path with a spline or something).It will get there. At the moment the Jewish companies are protective with their hosted solutions, they don't want you to be able to generate celebrities or public figures. But the Chinese AI cares less. And, even if they do block this or that, you can combine it with something like doing a DeepFake over the face or something. But you see how that's like a tooling problem, you want to have the equivalent of photoshop or sony vegas specifically for AI, where you download the image/video models you want to use and you have all the tricks to tweak things at a fine grained level to get it much closer to professional level.
Imagine investing countöess billions into that and only thing its good for is generating cat pictures and CP. Thanks nerds
>>543805916People are making tons of interesting things. Personally AI gives a great opportunity to create historical situations that we only have written accounts of. I mean shit you can do anything you can recreate biblical visions, AI is pretty much a real life Chronovisor
>>543808762>People are making tons of interesting things>doesn't post one
>>543805916I am asking myself the same thing. 4chan has created great memes and short videos over the the year, I am expecting a feature-length film with a hilarious and subversive plot. Maybe we could start a collaborative project with people here contributing to different roles: writer, screenplay, cinematographer, research, casting. It would be quite easy to make something so good, so subversive (to {{{them}}}*), and so precisely targeted to their bullshit thjat we all have to live under, that the call the SHUT IT DOWN would go out almost immediately. *I am using braces instead of parentheses to indicate this is a masonic-jewish partnership.
>>543806546AI is a leftist's wet dream, it's going to allow the billions of retarded shitskins around the world to create things they would never be able to in a trillion lifetimes.
>>543808762No. Aronofsky's American history slop is appalling. Whatever historical situation slop you're going to make, it's going to be completely fake and gay and uninteresting.
>>543805916Bruh, be patient. It took nearly 150 years after the invention of moving pictures for Uwe Boll’s masterpiece to be produced.These things take time
>>543805916I will only watch movies made by directors and studios with established reputations from before AI.
>>543807001If you are a serious in making shit, you want to control everything on screen. You can't do that with AI.You can do that with Houdini3D or Blender and and raytraced rendering ebgine of your choice. Spoon is not just right? >move the spoon just a tadAI is good for story boarding, maybe enhancing poorly lit shots with real camera, adding a VFX layer such as flying sparks and smoke in haste and when no time to render properly
>>543809067Facebook groups have some good stuff but you cant post facebook links here since jannies call it Spam
>>543809681why is one finger brown and the other pin...ooooohhhh
>>543806608Holy fuck. This is fucking amazing. And good. Its actually better than the "real" thing.AI has got a lot better than I had thought. All I have seen is the clumsy 10 second crap on social media.But this level of production must take some highly specialized tools, a very powerful PC, and access to data banks way beyond the reach of the average person, right? Or wrong?
>>543805916there are countless ai movies already my dad watches them. They are kinda shit though
>>543805916i think people who really care about making good stuff are paralysed by the progress. Why blow your creative load now when you could wait 2 months and have even better tools at your disposal?
>>543805916Here you go OPhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxIq0VMgaco
>>543806173nah the real problem is AI movie creators feel the need to show off that AI can do things that traditional movie methods can't without a large budget, so they spend all of the short movie on retarded gimmicky stuff and the story and everything in it sucks. AI genned stuff can be stuff so normal, without all that gimmicky crap. The major problem tho is they simply don't have the skill to write a script, produce good dialogue as it's difficult to do all that by 1 person or a small team even and even an LLM hasn't been created yet to do the task of writing a professional script, even then it would need someone with story/movie knowledge to go over it. The actual AI tech is sound, it's the application of it to make something worth watching and anyone watching has to get over the fact all of it was generated and not filmed.
>>543806546Literally every single creative figure from 100+ year ago was more right wing than the Republican party today, and often by a wide margin.
The first full AI film should be one of the Culture books by Ian M Banks.
>>543805916don't you ever watch the news? the ukraine war itself is the current never ending AI movie
because it's still too expensive for rando ppl to make entire films filmsthese crappy 5min cinematic quality ones cost like $20-30k eachhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojyjZYhKKmI
