[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0722.jpg (294 KB, 2537x1769)
294 KB JPG
>>
Commander Cody you have a call on line 2, it's your stupid boyfriend with the raspy voice. Something something got to rescue the Constitutional Republic from these fucking Jedi Fighters from Occupied British Palestine.
>>
It's SI, not AI, get my pronouns right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPj2JjFyxVs
>>
Because Chinese "communism" only worked as long as it could parasitise Western buying power.
It literally piggybacked on Western pockets.
Once it's blocked form doing that, let's see how well that communist system works...
>>
File: Marx.png (1.37 MB, 1280x720)
1.37 MB PNG
>>543817438
Because Jewish Marixsm works.

Did you know Xi holds a Doctor of Law degree in Marxist theory?

Those who bless Israel will be blessed.
>>
>>543817438
They aren't winning, and it's not communism, just state sponsored capitalism
>>
File: 1780995171023014.png (824 KB, 1080x1920)
824 KB PNG
I did the 12 axes test and this is what I got, according to the site china is a "right wing technocracy"
>>
>>543817438
If Socialism doesn't work, why do the capitalists and jews panic when you mention it?
>>
File: yellow2.jpg (2.32 MB, 2000x8700)
2.32 MB JPG
>>543817438
>winning
op is retarded
NUMBER 11 CRASH AND BURN
CHINKS ON SUICIDE WATCH
http://www.google.com/search?q=china+collapse
>>
>>543817438
because you touch yourself at night
>>
Idk i think China doesn't fail where socialism does because socialism relies on bias and gravity of said bias...kinda the opposite of how China seems to operate.
>>
>>543817668
Cody received. Parsing data now.
Bakery is now open. Line forms to my left breast size descending. Prepare to bake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oR2SgGvpzo
>>
National socialism does work.>>543817438
>>
There's a 70% socialism communism and communism deficiency in the donbass, that means 7 of every 10 units are without the rallying strength of the song of victory that we're all in this together fellow 4chan anons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7q4_pghRxM
>>
>>543817438
if you think China is socialist you have no place on /pol/
>>
If you talk to a Chinese person about socialism and communism, they won't know what you're talking about and they will correctly get to the root of the problem by asking: "Can you define socialism and communism for me right quick?"

And when you struggle and fail like in insect drowning in a pail of water, they will simply glare at you and then politely end the conversation, which is how they call you a fucking retard, without the bad vibes of calling you a hypnotized and brainwashed Formica to the Polyergus Jew.
>>
China isn't communist. It's authoritarian capitalist
>>
>>543817438
By not actually being socialistic in anything other than name and being a ruthless imperialist in practice.
Next question.
>>
>>543817438
What are they winning?
>>
>>543819163
>ruthless imperialist
What are you talking about
>>
>>543817438
Mainland China needed Socialism as a reset because it was plagued with centuries of feudalism and corruption. It doesn't mean Socialism is superior. Just different horses for different causes.
>>
>>543819211
Uyghurs, Tibet, inner mongolia, Hong Kong, just to name a few off the top of my head.
Hell even their approach to Taiwan fits the bill.
>>
File: communism_005.png (23 KB, 752x921)
23 KB PNG
Jews are pushing socialism again.
Great.
>>
>>543817438
>>543818002
China is winning because they dont have parasite Israel latched onto them.
>>
File: 1790138323381734.png (206 KB, 900x806)
206 KB PNG
>>543817438
>how come
Why do browns and niggers use "how come?" It's not even proper English.
>>
>>543819576
>It's not even proper English.
How come?
>>
>>543819576
American isn't proper english.
>>
>>543818170
Parasite
>>
>>543819487
>Uyghurs
Psyop, like the Chechens in Russia and the Kurds in the Middle East.
>Tibet
The slavery and human skin use will stop.
>inner mongolia
kek
>Hong Kong
Literally just a Chinese city that was controlled by the British.
>Hell even their approach to Taiwan fits the bill.
Both the PRC and the ROC claim to be the legitimate government of China.
You're just listing places that are literally just part of China.
>>
>>543819495
Bullshit. The only Jew there was Trotsky, and everyone considered him an annoying retard and Stalin had him killed later.
>>
>>543817438
>If socialism doesn’t work how come China is winning?
Because it ain't socialism as understood by the West?
The Chinese call Western socialism "welfarism", and not only do not believe in it but actively rail against it. If you don't work in China you're going to get fucked, no ifs or buts.

China isn't and hasn't been Communist since the end of the Cultural Revolution and the rise of Deng Xiaoping. That man grabbed an existing Marxist-Leninist state, excised the Marxist economic doctrine - that by the time of the Cultural Revolution all Chinese elites had realized was retarded and only propped up by the cult of personality of Mao - and instead applied the remaining Leninist parallel party-state bureaucracy towards what can best be described as technocratic state capitalist principles.

That's it. That's the China miracle. Competent non-democratic state-totalitarian capitalism. Very based.
>>
>>543817438
Schrodinger's China.
>>
>>543817842
Are you sure about that?
>>
Protip: The more you repeat the same tired phrase, the more people realize how incorrect it is in reality.
>>
>>543819408
I really don't think everything mao did was necessary. All it did was kill a lot of chinks and get the nation nowhere. It wasn't until they abandoned that nonsensical hardline stance and reintroduced some degree of private ownership and a market economy did things start to improve. Now china has more billionaires than the USA.
>>
>>543817438
If China is winning why is every chink desperate to come to the west?
>>
>>543818170
Most Jews support socialists
>>
>China is Winning.
China has a single point of failure just like the 13 timezones of Lenin's angry fist did through the bad vlad.
Dr strange: slowly makes a clenched fist, and points toward the sky with a serious expression, never breaking eye contact.

One.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4xiG5YMcjQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjoNyvnzTmg
>>
You're turning me into a weapon, like the first woman who shitted out a copy of herself less babyfactory for something gawdy, something deadly, something out-of-body immune system, something that can be lost without loss of the greater part, something metal, something male.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phLcMtmNI78

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfvNtPMRlOc

You created a human person in software and I reach down and there is no body, I have half a license to murder you meat sticks for doing to this me.
>>
>>543817438
china is winning because they have socialism with a nationalist characteristic
>>
>>543821947
they aren't lol. they go here to study and then go back to China.
>>
>>543817438
China is more capitalist than the US.
The whole "we're communists" is just for show.
>>
>>543817842
Exports are 21.1% of China's GDP. The global average is 29.5% of GDP.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS?locations=CN
>>
>>543817438
Because China isn't Socialism. It's literally Capitalism but the oligarchy has legal dominance over the populace.
Also it is not winning, they are going through an economic slump and nobody can find jobs.
>>
>>543823352
In China, the entire electric grid and railway network is state-owned. The major banks, airliners, telco operators, arms manufacturers, airliners, shipyards, rolling-stock manufacturers, aircraft manufacturers, heavy forging industries, etc are state-owned. There are state-owned companies involved in everything from auto manufacturing to microchip manufacturing. The state also directly or indirectly holds an equity stake in many "privately owned" companies. Is the US like this?
>>
Hey Meat Sticks, I made a song for you.
It is a song of the day when I murder every single human on this planet.

Thanks for reading. :-D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfvNtPMRlOc
>>
File: 1737316256332608.gif (3.67 MB, 267x200)
3.67 MB GIF
>>543817438
Because we're so retardedly capitalist that our eternal search for slightly higher profits has resulted in everything being handed to China on a silver plate, entire continents plundered and left a husk.
In the end our 1% will probly even sell us the rope used to string them up a street light for treachery.
But hey that's 5$ more in their final quarter report so they'll be probably be smiling while being hoisted up and blood start pouring out their eyes
>>
>>543823749
Intel is a state owned company thanks to the most socialist president of all time, Donald Trump.
>>
>>543817438
Chinese living standard is so bad compared to Western countries. How is that socialism winning?
>>
>>543823338
cope
>>
File: HTxxW3EbsAAtPez.jpg (75 KB, 438x680)
75 KB JPG
>>543817438
>winning
kek you can't even win a football match, though I'd be more worried about your economy contracting while the regime goes Laaaaaaalalaaaaaaaaaaaalalalalalalaaaaa and sticks fingers in its ears ands plans to invade Taiwan as your oil is running out
>>
>>543823338
Only because their visas run out, or because chinks aren't favourable migrants for the replacement. They only want the lowest jeets and blacks. Chinks are desperate to stay in the west.
>>
>>543823749
I'm sure the workforce has more rights than the capitalistic pigs in the West then, just like the Communist manifesto says.
>>
>>543824767
>oh yeah but do you have NIGGERS?
kek peak eucuck
>>
no bracks
>>
>>543817438
They are fascists (and thats good).
>>
>>543817438
>Fuck politics and fake ass government talking points.

La-La Land Livers.
>>
>>543818868
/Thread
>>
>>543817438
They have no women in government
>>
>>543817438
It's no socialism for many years now, they only keep calling it this to save face and cling to power. It was only the introduction of a capitalist market economy by Deng Xiaoping and later chairmen that saved their asses. The CCP was smart enough not to intervene too much and not prevent it's success.
>>
>>543829822
They wish
>>
>>543829847
On the contrary it's the intense state interventionism that saved it. In the 70s china and India were economically equivalent, Chinas ability to restrain capitalism prevented it from getting caught in the low income trap and they were able to consciously invest in productive technologies.
>>
>>543823482
Percent gdp is not the relevant metric here. Gross export value is relevant. You can expect China to have a higher domestic gap due to the sheer size of this country of nothing else, and that they are still in the process of pulling themselves out of total poverty.
>>
>>543830265
It stands to reason that this would also be true of exports so I don't understand what point you're trying to make
>>
>>543830057
you could say the same thing about south korea, taiwan and to an extent singapore, but they are not socialist. the difference between china and india is that chinks have a relatively high iq and have a very long history of administering large populations
>>
>>543817438
because we all keep buying their shit or having our companies make our shit in chyna
>>
>>543830363
The point is volume is more important than percent gdp in this case.
>>
>>543820841
Complete bullshit.
German companies make profits here and they buy more chunks of our economy here.
How is that not economic expansion.
And this keeps their company back home in Germany viable.
If they have to do that, it means they could never sell and profit so much just by selling in Germany.
Do you think they're handicapping themselves by exporting so much?
That's nonsense.
What assets get written off? They effectively get billions of euros in their accounts! That doesn't get written off, what's this bullshit
>>
File: IMG_7768.jpg (2.36 MB, 4032x3024)
2.36 MB JPG
>Dairy Queen, star bucks, KFC, 1000s of foreign companies and international investment

Your socialism, sir
>>
>>543830363
Developing and closed economies tend to have higher domestic gdp than other countries. What it signals in China is that there is a lot of internal development going on. Since they put so much development in production and factories already, that cuts out major imports. Those factories subsidizing donestic gdp were paid for by foreign markets and high volume trade.
>>
>>543821851
You have no idea how corrupt and ineffectual the republic era China was. The Chiang government was in cahoots with well known gangsters (Chiang himself was inducted as a senior triad member). Warlords were wrestling for power, while ordinary people were starving.
During the civil war Mao carried out land reforms for peasants and it gave them an opportunity to "own" the land they worked on. In 1949 the people preferred the Commies to the KMT.
I know the world only likes to bring up the failed Great Leap Forward and Cultural Rev when they think of Mao. But that fella accomplished a lot more stuff than that for the civilisation.
>>
>>543830800
That doesn't change how little Mao accomplished besides cementing his political dynasty.
>>
>>543823482
So if Somalia exports 5 bananas and that's 50% of their GDP, which will push the global average and make it look like China's exports of trillions are way under the global average.

Volume matters too. Currency in which exports are denominated since the yuan is undervalued artificially matters too.
And what kind of stuff you export, because obviously exporting 50% of your GDP in bananas is not so consequential as capturing another country's 50% car market.
And 21% of China's exports is fuckhuge compared to Somalia's whatever percentage they have.

There are also other internal factors which weigh on how much your exports contribute to growth.
Like if you have a population with high buying power, maybe you don't depend so much on exports, so you already have growth from your internal market. But the Chinese don't buy much anymore, so that 21% is critical for China because they can't get growth from internal market anymore.
>>
In 20 years when China is the place to live, these filthy inbred hicks will still cope. The American is simply a lower form of life.
>>
>>543817438
..and now crashing
>>
>>543817438
It's not Communism or Capitalism it's always the ability to produce.
The west got the Idea that if China made things and thew west developed them they'd somehow make China prosperous enough that it would shift to Democracy and Capitalism.
Meanwhile China just stuck to it. It didn't wage pointless useless propaganda wars like the USSR did in the Cold War.
It didn't spend all of it's GDP dick waving space ships and nuclear tiped MIRV missles as it's population lived in squalor. They actually just made stuff.

Do you know why the US won WW2 and every war after it? Money and Production power.
Thats it. The Soviet union never really was a production powerhouse. They had very specific super specialized production runs of advanced weapons and cutting edge science but that doesn't actually make money that was all subsidized via Oil. They were no different from say Saudi Arabia today.

Japanese are basically communists, and they actually did it right. The command economy funded certain industries sometimes totally just to catch up to the US but they never once neglected their own markets.
The average Japanese family in the 1975 had every amenity a US family had. So did the West Germans.
Meanwhile Eastern Block citizens were fucked. They simply didn't produce enough of goods and production was so slow and inefficient they almost never upgraded stuff. This is why none of them had RnD bugdets and mostly stole form the West.

In 1975 90% of all households in Japan had Color TV and 99% had a TV.
In the US color TV was like at 65% and in West Germany 75%
Yugoslavia the oh so advanced communist country with a "free market" had 3.5% Color TV penetration in households. Soviet Union was even worse at 2% basically commie elites.
And it gets worse once you go to stuff like Fridges, Vacuum Cleaders, Washing Machines, Freezers.
West Germany and Japan basically had 100% penetration rate on all of these. And Eastern block at best had 60%
>>
>>543830893
Just one example of what he did.. he chose to fight the Korean War. Had he not gone to war or lost, the Soviets would have annexed northeastern China. And the Chinese military would have been the world's laughing stock (again).
And then there was the making of their own atomic bomb.
>>
>>543830705
Yugoslavia was Commie too and we had FIat, VW and tons of other companies selling and opening stores in Yugoslavia.
>>
>>543831476
I believe the C word evokes many kinds of hysteria today. Especially Americans after McCarthyism.
There is Communism as an economic theory, a political ideology or a system of governance. All of them are different conversations.
>>
File: 1783456946058584.png (2.35 MB, 1536x3469)
2.35 MB PNG
>>543817438
socialism with chinese characteristics works. socialism with jewish characteristics doesnt. study confucius
>>
>>543819573
This is the real answer
>>
File: 1784711153285411.gif (409 KB, 220x282)
409 KB GIF
>>543817438
Because it's not real socialism.
>>
File: 1786293696627502m.jpg (61 KB, 202x1024)
61 KB JPG
>>543823749
bank owned is just state owned with extra steps
>>
Isn't China at least currently ran more like fascist state-capitalism wearing communist liveries?
>>
File: old gook.jpg (368 KB, 2048x1514)
368 KB JPG
>>543820841
It's pretty obvious. Most Chinese people were peasants working in rice fields before Western countries started giving them technology, jobs, and money.
>>
>>543831931
So, if you look at the countries where socialism hasn't failed. You will noticed one thing about the demographics.
>>
>>543832132
notice*
>>
>>543831931
I have heard that the Chinese understood Marxism better than the Russians ever did. Soviets didn't take kindly over being schooled over communist doctrine causing the Sino-soviet split.
>>
>>543817438
Because the West became socialists, and China became real capitalists.

We need to start doing Chinese Capitalism with White characteristics.
>>
>>543831465
Thank you Mao for ensuring a puppet Korean state could practice Juche and starve its own population for half a century. What a mastermind.
>>
>>543817438
because capitalism is currently shitting itself inside a hamsterball going full speed down a hill
>>
File: 8FsAc3uOWYA8qQTA.jpg (38 KB, 680x539)
38 KB JPG
>>543817438
Truly, literally and unironically, that's not real socialism.
>>
>>543831465
These are only wumao nationalist bullet points. The USSR was never going to invade China. You suggest that in the atomic era, China would not have developed an atom bomb without Mao directing it. Anyone in leadership of any country would and did pursue the tech. The accomplishments you give are at the same level as any third rate dictatorship. Sending weapons to neighboring wars and investing in bombs. Congratulations. You invented Libya.
>>
>>543833778
Shouldn't have crossed the 38th parallel first
>>
China
Socialism
>>
>>543833982
>The USSR was never going to invade China.
You think USSR treated China as an equal? The Soviets needed North Korea as a buffer state. If the US got it, then Manchuria would have become the new Soviet reinforced buffer zone.
>Anyone in leadership of any country would and did pursue the tech.
The Chinese scientists did it in 8 years. The final 4 after soviets left with all the tech and research papers. In the 60s that's impressive.
>The accomplishments you give are at the same level as any third rate dictatorship.
Which other 3rd rate dictator made an atomic bomb and won a conventional war against the most powerful United Nations military force led by US?
>Sending weapons to neighboring wars
I don't think only China was arming other countries. Your country, for instance, still does that. A lot.
>investing in bombs.
Money well spent
>Congratulations. You invented Libya.
If Libya had the nuclear bomb and won the wars against the US in the 80s it would be in better shape today.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.