How come no one was held accountable for dressing up young boys like prostitutes and having them dance seductively in gay nightclubs for wads of money?
>>543867900It happened once or twice and it didn't become at all common. It's more like good on the gay community for not normalizing that. Why would you ask us to "remember" it that way?
>>543868291Who was held accountable?>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6qU16fT4
>>543867900The fact you got hard to it doesn't make it something worth pursuing.
>Matthew 18:6:>But whoso shall cause one of these little ones who believe in Me to fall, it were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
>>543868433You'd have better luck holding video game developers accountable for violent gamers. If you can't make that happen, I'm not sure how you're supposed to press charges for letting a boy cosplay a woman.
>>543867900Do you actually think there's some law against wearing a dress or dancing that isn’t being enforced?
>>543868791 63 g j 73 hd 45
>>543868805>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU0836FZh_4>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_dcs6AXsk0>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOdCXlbsSEw
Oh I see how it is, so if a boy puts on a dress and receives a tiny amount of the simp bucks that usually go to women it's a disaster?
>>543869058You're not a woman.
>>543868927So you just don’t like how it looks?
I imagine a moment when he was about 10 that he freaked the fuck out and was like "I don't want to do this anymore!" and his parents tried to explain to him that this is who he really is.And he threw a tantrum when mommy tried to get him all dolled up. So his parents said >It's okay, honey you can do a few days without the dresses and come back to it later if you wantThen mommy checked every morning for 2 months.>wouldn't this orange tube top be fierce?>just a little eyeliner and maybe a gloss?But slowly, he realized he wanted to be like the other boys, so mom and dad relented and suddenly they don't want him in the limelight anymore.
>>543867900Not going to happen post year 2023, you lost the culture war, you truly believed that woke was dead, you truly believed in Trump, you were not only wrong but you were exponentially wrong on all accounts. I'm not defending it, I'm only giving you the real news. Ignoring the smart people who warned you has consequences and we have now surpassed that critical threshold culturally speaking that we can't turn back from.
>>543870601Yeah, nah, we're not doing this anymore.
>>543869960The problem as I see it, and I think this is probably an observation that certain feminist trains of thought would make as well, is that the whole exhibitionist "fashion culture" domain of self-expression is implicitly sexualized in a way that makes it inappropriate for children to engage in. It's the same reason why holding "beauty pageants" for elementary schoolers is weird. Taking a 10 year old boy, dressing him up like a tart with a bunch of lipstick and eye liner and spandex, and then having him pout and strut and push his hips out is drawing from a domain of self-expression that's fundamentally derived from how adult women demonstrate sex appeal. I understand that it's fun to own the chuds by playing dumb and being like hurr durr I don't know what you're talking about sounds like you're projecting but in reality that's why it's unnerving
>>543867900It's hot, my little eremenos would love that and I would have too at such a ripe ageSadly most gay men are disgusting
>>543869960I do not like child abuse
>>543867900HELP DADDY GOVERNMENT THE FAGS ARE OPPRESING ME
>>543869960It's amazing how fags don't have the language or concepts to understand how this is wrong. Kids are just objects for your own pleasure.
>>543870716How is that Bud light and Gillette boycott going for ya?
>>543870952What makes it sexual? Something is not merely sexual just because it feels sexual. If we start defining definitions by feeling reality becomes malleable and exists differently for everyone then we slowly start degrading collectively. Just because you associate sex with certain variables and qualities does not make it sexual, look at it from the child's perspective -- the one who is most likely enjoying it. And yes, enjoying it, boys have been dressing up as girls forever. They get to experience new feelings, look pretty, get attention. Even if everyone in the crowd was thinking about raping him which they're not there's still nothing wrong with that. It's a safe environment and we can't start policing people's thoughts, we must judge people by their actions. Ultimately people don't like this because they see the outfit, they see a boy that looks like a girl, and their brain immediately jumps to trans people and pedos and other stuff they don't like and then they look for post hoc justification. Nobody knows why they believe anything anymore until they're in the moment. People usually don't stop to deeply consider things.
>>543867900"Lgbt community" didn't do shit. That was jews, like you, you projecting faggot. It's JEWISH PEOPLE like it always is
>>543867900>How come no one was held accountable for dressing up young boys like prostitutes and having them dance seductively in gay nightclubs for wads of money?Anon...most of the men in that movement are pedos. You should know this by now.
>>543867900Because that's the whole point of being LGBT
>>543869960>the movie Cuties is pedophilic>but this is fineNo.
>>543867900are you saying right now that there aren't smol girls that don't act like sluts in front of people now?
>>543867900Is this the "Press G to Gas" kid?
>>543868291>it didn't catch on with normies so the fags supporting and encouraging it aren't responsible
>>543871601>we must judge people by their actionsIn the perfect city on the hill populated by only enlightened philosopher-citizens of proper volition, sure, that would be the correct standard and approach.We are not residents of such a city and demanding we implement such policy in practice upon our very much unenlightened citizens just leads to a lot of children getting abused. Pretending otherwise is disconnected from reality at best.[spoiler]I say this as a fag. No amount of intellectualist justification will negate that such real life cases are obviously a massive risk and a certainly an optics disaster. No amount of deep consideration is more useful than what should be obvious; just don't involve kids anywhere near this shit and everything is fine.[/spoiler]
>>543868291I remember a lot more times then two times and I would advice to you stay vigilant because pedos just see your movement as a step to normalizing pedophilia and that's part of why people want you to stay away with the LGBT shit from kids so that it's easier to weed out the pedos so next time you introduce LGBT to kids ask yourself would pedos benefit (it's yes because you're introducing sexuality to kids which make them open to sex and they're already dumb as fuck and get easily manipulated by adults)Your comfort/public recognition < The safety of childrenYou will never win that war and it's a good thing
>>543871707Jews and their freemason criminal accomplices like the cops who have actively defended this and all the violent pedophile child and thst has been occuring. >>543870986Like cops raping and mutilating middle school kids hands with bombs.Non-jewish private citizens, even if they're adults, having consensual romantic intimate relationships with those under 18 (who aren't actually little kids) is infinitely safer that those minors being in the hands of, or involved with, jews or the government. We have all watched jews and cops being nothing but evil and tormenting and violent with kids and these are the people we're supposed to listen to about relationships involving kids and how adults with those under 18 is dangerous? No faggot YOU are dangerous for kids any you don't need to be anywhere near them. Look at the people, men and women. arrested for mutually interested sexual it intimate encounters with someone under 18 who both were perfectly fine and had a fine relationship. Then they were arrested by people who (or endorse) shoot and kill kids, imprison then for bullshit then harm them within, physically abuse and torture them in foster care, terrorize kids and treat them violently, blow them up with explosives, and worse. Everything these people say is complete bullshit. THEY are dangerous to kids and society entirely, as we have all seen with the shit they doing to the country. Before judaic bs kid killing and kid torturing government tried to make up baseless restrictions, these relationships weren't a problem and they still aren't for many societies that aren't infected with jews far right judaic garbage.>>543868805There's laws against jews paying for sex and jews doing illegal drugs and jews having sex with children. Now what?
>>543867900That kid unironically stopped the wave of attempted pedo normalization that was going on at the time in its tracks after that video of him dancing while adult men threw dollar bills at him went viral.
>>543873127goylodges are primarily used for child rape throughout history.
>>543867900No? The only people I heard talking about it were rightoid chuds who were doing their version of "quick burn the constitution".
>>543872895When your narrative is that "they're normalizing this" when it was a couple of instances from 10 years ago and there's no follow up, no pushing it, the president and secretary of war are saying trannie this and trannie that, you're wasting your time. The pedos have consistently been rightwing more often.Giving little girls baby dolls and having them play parent is more "introducing them to sexuality". Plenty of children's media show pregnancy and parents with their kids. It's fine to be vigilant, but don't be schizophrenic.
I seent your porn history op
