If you don’t denounce beaners, you are either a beaner or a traitor
>>543887463not a fan, but you're even browner and more annoying than spics
>>543887463I married one and she had my kids, how's that feel?
>>543887516Just admit you’re brown, bro
>>543887631Traitor
>>543887653No I'm not, but you obviously are spamming this low IQ brown thread everyday. I would cut your head off in front of your parents for raising such a brown nigger retard.
>>543887681I bet she's smarter than you. She's an engineer.
>>543887463Stinky Jeet.
I..... AM.... BROWN......
>>543887463God damn Gupartap, don't you ever shut the fuck up
>>543887463>>543887653>>543887681You are Indian
>>543887516Guaranteed you're a nigger or spic.
>>543887463We are going to war with the beaners. White peoples have to have a lot of sex and have more children. We are at war with beaners.
>>543887463Needful post Saar
>elect a president for the sole purpose of deporting beaners>they still think it's impossible that a real white person hates them
>>543887711There are 70 million beaners in my country, I’m sorry you don’t care about that
>>543889699>>543888644>>543888326>criticize beaners >American flags call you “Indian”
>>543887463now hold on their buckothere are spaniads, spics, and beaners. spaniards are mostly white and can hold a conversation. they usually top out in managerial positions. they might look a little middle eastern so one of their ancestors got raped by muslims, so they'll always be a little off, but they're acceptable to have around. never reproduce with them, but employ them. spics are browner people who definitely have native and middle eastern in them, they're still semi euro so they pass but their brain is still aztec, they still just want to run around killing everyone and fucking other peoples girls. then there are beaners, who are mostly native. they're short, round, ugly, and their women scream "LUUUUUUUUUUUNCH" on the streets of manhattan every day as the men do the most dangerous, back breaking semi-skilled work known to man. you have to understand, all of them serve their own purpose, but spics are actually the worst.
>>543890127there are two Americas, the English one and the Spanish one, and if they start living together then there is no more America.
>>543890339We can easily integrate a couple million european hispanics, if we were still 98% white. The problem is that we are now 57% white and falling fast. Every single nonwhite is just another element in a coalition opposed to us ever having sovereignty and independence again.
>>543889855RACE WAR WITH BEANERS!!!!!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYly1SEl1to
>>543890127>but their brain is still aztec, they still just want to run around killing everyone and fucking other peoples girls.Ignorant take.The Mexica of the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan (and a good deal of this applies to other Nahua/"Aztec" cities and subgroups as well), were huge on diplomatic hospitality, had established practices and institutions around rhetorical public speech/oration, poetry/songs with moral, existential, and other philosophical themes, at least allegedly valued having a proper politically justified casus belli to sanction their wars,weren't especially prone to sacking, massacring, or mass-enslaving those military targets (even cities which repeatedly rebelled weren't necessarily razed, though ), had strict domestic laws and customs around public order and against adultery (punishable by death), to name a few counterexamples.They were also warmongering expansionistic conquerers, did sometimes fabricate or provoke a suitable incident with spies to provide that casus belli, or didn't bother with one at all, certainly sacked, enslaved, and massacred whole cities sometimes even if it wasn't especially frequent, and did sacrifice a few hundred to a few thousand people a year.The Mexica can be accused of many things, compared to even other Nahua groups: Being particularly militaristic, classist, autocratic, puritanical, and ritualistically violent. But they weren't careless, barbarous/savage, crude, indiscriminate, or promiscuous: The Spanish themselves are very clear about this, see the quotes in pic related.
>>543887463I will vote for anyone who promises mass deportations.Treason trials for those who inflicted this.
>>543889895/pol/ is full of beaners what do you expect
>>543892827they were savages that were sacrificing people and everyone hated them for good reasons. the only thing i was wrong about was their brains are also partially muslim, which also makes them crazy rapists and murderers.
bump
>>543893367>they were savagesNo, as I said, and seen in the image you replied to, nearly every conquistador and friar who wrote about the Aztec disagree with you. Note also the Italian and German quotes, including from Albrecht Durer, the famed artistThis isn't obscure info, a key part of why Cortes's expedition succeeded was how they were given diplomatic lodging in various cities (see a description of their rooming while in Iztapalapa in pic related) including in Tenochtitlan, where they were housed in the palace of Axayacatl, a former emperor (enabling the conquistadors to seize treasure and Moctezuma II as a hostage). If the Mexica of Tenochtitlan were so uncouth and belligerent, they would have attacked Cortes & co, not welcomed themBut had you read any accounts of the expedition by Cortes, Diaz, the Anonymous Conquerer, Tapia, Aguilar etc, you'd have already seen their quotes, so you may know jack shit about the expedition>that were sacrificing peopleYes, as I said myself>and everyone hated themNo, the idea that the Mexica were hated for their sacrifices or oppressive rule and that's why Cortes got allies against them is a misunderstanding (and is, ironically, the INVERSE of the real reason why most states who allied with Cortes did so). This results from sources not bothering to delve into local Mesoamerican politics and the specific motives, interests and role each state had in that alliance, and instead only focusing on the republic of Tlaxcala, and projecting Tlaxcala's motives onto the other allies like Texcoco, Huextozinco, Chalco, Xochimilco, Cholua etc. But Tlaxcala's relationship with Tenochtitlan was unique, and so those other states had different motives for, and circumstances of, joining the anti-Mexica alliance vs why and how Tlaxcala initially formed itAnd while the Tlaxcalteca DID hate the Mexica, unlike most of those states, it wasn't from the Mexica's sacrifices or "harsh rule"I'll clarify further across the next few posts2/?
>>543887463Ozona, TX? No fucking way.
