how did left wing editors manage to usurp right wing editors completely on wikipedia?
>>543916624mod position, same shit as on reddit
>>543916624Because Collective always win against individuals
>>543916661im talking about even on articles almost anyone can edit
>>543916670that's not very liberal of you avi, are you against our liberal democracy? that's problematic.
>>543916624Because most rightwing positions are just straight up lies.
>>543916686you can edit whatever you want, its going to be removedsimple as
>>543916624same answer
>>543916807this, lol retarded OP, they escalate everything and the top management is left
>>543916760Sounds like my gay swiss ex
>>543916624Right wingers don't believe in reality.
>>543916686just how almost anyone can write comments on reddit?
>>543916953on reddit they can edit what you saidwhile reddit posts can be used as court evidence
>>543916624International Jewish and Masonic finance capital and funding, either directly or indirectly.Libtard capitalism will be the end of Western/European people.
>>543916807They do an idiotic dance.First they apply standards to you, that they do not apply to themselves:>you need three different sources for this sentence you want to add, while we are allowed to make claims with no sources whatsoever, and add [citation needed] if we are feeling generous>oh and those three different sources need to be independent of each otherthen they attack your sources outright:>sorry, only reputable sources from this list are allowed, like CNN, Buzzfeed and Shaquilas personal blog>You source a scientific paper? Sorry, chud, that's original research, you need to post a mainstream media article that recites itthen they go masks off>wikipedia isn't actually about representing facts, it is about representing the current Zeitgeist based on popular media (this is actually their official position)and only if you STILL decide to stick around, they will remove it, but not honestly and outright, but rather:>an obvious sockpuppet account will remove your addition>you add it back>WHOOP WHOOP, EDIT WAR, mod: "haha, lool, looks like we have to revert it all and ban your addition forever, because it would trigger a war :)"if you STILL persist and use their conflict resolution pages>huh, some account that barely wrote anything questioning the decision of our reputable moderator? I think we should request a doxx of your IP and look into you (they actually do that)if you STILL keep going>banned for steering conflict and disagreeing with a mod :)And that is only if you were successfully tiptoing around subjective rules. If you dared to suggest that an obvious mod-sockpuppet may be a sockpuppet, you would have been banned on the spot for daring to not "assume good faith".
Examine the talk page or revision history for a wikipedia article--you will eventually find a tranny or internet communist.
>White genocide conspiracy theory
>>543916624Are you unaware of how most leftists function?Honest question. They're pernicious little faggots.
>>543916760so are most left wing positions
>>543916624>howWikipedia editors are unemployed, narcissistic, vengeaful, over-self-victimized, over-socialized yet ostracized people who hate civilization. They overlap 99.9999% with the set of all Leftists to ever exist
