Pic-tel: current plague vaccines candidates.Most candidates originate from the US (10), followed by China (4), Russia (3), UK (2), Israel (2). One is jointly Russia-China.Chinese and Russian vaccine development is largely centered on traditional platforms. Russia has already licensed a live attenuated plague vaccine, a technology supporting long-standing use since 2002. China is also developing several candidates using live attenuated and subunit technologies.In contrast, the UK, US, and Israeli pipelines are heavily invested in newer genetic technologies. Israel is developing modRNA vaccines, while the UK is testing viral vector and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) platforms. The US pipeline includes various experimental platforms like modRNA, DNA, and nanoparticle technologies.Choose your poison. I choose none but if i was forced under a gunpoint, i choose the Russian-Chinese option xD
Ah, i forgot about France and its bacterial vector vaccine. BTW, bacterial vectors involve using live, modified whole bacteria. This approach carries an inherent risk of replication or potential reversion to virulence in the host. In contrast, Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles (OMVs) used by China and Russia are non-living and non-replicating nanoparticles shed by bacteria. This makes OMVs inherently safer as they cannot cause infection, while whole bacterial vectors carry a potential risk that must be carefully managed.All this graph proves that USA, UK, Israel and France use much more dangerous (potentially genocidal tech) while China and Russia use old safe tech. I am not even kidding xD
>>543919787>>543921092AI slop
>>543923437I am an expert, need LLMs for nothing. But if you dont believe what i wrote, go digest my thread via some frontier algorithm, its going to confirm what i wrote, inferior Pole xD
