Slavs are not an ethnicity, it is a linguistic group
>>543924233A linguistic group cannot come into being without an ethnicity
>>543924233delete this
>>543924156many such cases
>>543924156Slavs are just southern fork of Balts, who started to mix with another component from the south - Logkas, who were probably that IE element of Balkan which gave them all IE language. So, the further south you go, the less Baltic and the more Logkas component you see. So yes, southern Slavs are still Slavs, just with higher Logkas and low Baltic component.
>>543924233>Slavs are not an ethnicity, it is a linguistic groupДoлбoeб пoлный. Tы Дyгинa и Хaзapa Пpилeпинa нacлyшaлcя? Бoльшe нe пocти тyт, мнe зa тeбя cтыднo.
>>543924156We're slav-paleobalkan mutts. Basically slavic tribes had settled here and mixed with romanized native Balkan populations for centuries. For example, ancestors Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks and Montenegrins especially have mixed with ancient dinarid tribes, and that's why we're taller than other Europeans. Romanians, Bulgarians and Macedonians are shorter because their ancestors were other Balkan tribes like Dacians, Thracians and other eastern aromanian groups. But basically, Balkan Slavs are anywhere between 35-70% when it comes to slavic admixture
>>543925440>WE
