for whoever knows what the axes represent here: does this mean yours truly is literally the homosapiens farthest from niggers ever? Because I want a medal if so.
>>543927748>graphic shows "America" is farthest from niggers>Mexicans aren't Americans. They're Spanish Aztec mutts.you're as retarded as your genes made you, so it's not your fault
>>543927914jfc. I don’t know what to say, mutt. Carry on, I guess. Anyone who’s actually read a book, I’d welcome any comment.
>>543927748It'd be interesting to see where mixed race Americans land in this study. I'm assuming by "american" on this chart they mean Native American.
>>543927748In PCA charts like this you always have to look at explained variance (the little % sign on the axes labels). The fact that none of these axes is over 5% let alone 50% tells me this chart is garbage with no explanatory power.That said, obviously racial differences are real.
>>543929376Thanks
>>543929250Im guessing it’s a linear space, since North Africans have a little bigger, and are between Arabs and africans
>>543929376Can you explain this graph and PCA? Why isnt a shift of .15 significant? Im not familiar with these but it looks like a rather tight grouping for everyone else
>>543927748that would be Papua New Guinea and Peru. Mexico is quite close, much closer than Peru. I will compare Peru and Mexico in some other calc and it will show why you are closer than Peru maybe
>>543931735bigger -> nigger
>>543936082Thanks anon. I look forward to reading the unintelligible shit you pull out of your ass in the future.
>>543927748horseshoe subhumanity
>>543936082>BEHOLD the least black person in the world.This is why I try to avoid Poles in general.
>>543936082Mexico has more Anatolian genes - that is, from southern Europe - dating back to the colonial era. Peru, on the other hand, has a significant Amerindian component, comprising native Eurasian genes that migrated from Siberia to the Americas; the ethnic genetic heritage of the Americas is well preserved there
>>543936348All in all, it’s a strange sample. It could be almost pure AASI, which explains why the ancient genetic profile shows such a great genetic distance from modern Black Africans. In other words, Peru represents the region in the world that is currently the most genetically distant from the Sub-Saharan race>>543936348>This is why I try to avoid Poles in general.I won’t hide the fact that, as a Pole, I wouldn’t want to find myself surrounded by Mexicans either. You’re so genetically distant from Europeans that I’d find it hard to trust you
>>543936348those are abos paco
>>543936801If we were to bring extinct people back to life, 100% WHG would be genetically the most distant from the Sub-Saharan race, even more so than 100% Amerindians
>>543927748No it means the common ancestor of niggers and non niggers is at least 100k years genetic distance
>>543937048Those niggers are obviously not the farthest thing in the world to Africans. I don’t know what dollar-store NEET basement academic research you’re pretending to have going.
>>543936082Can Nigerians actually interbreed with Papuans? By that, I mean naturally, not with some million suppressors and stuff.
>>543937770they actually are they both have similar shade but from completely different sources since island abos were so detached from rest of the world for majority of historyits not like either of them figured out how to swim across indian ocean on their own
>>543934272In PCA you take a data set where a row is a different individual and a column is a different gene variant.Then form features/principal components by adding and subtracting a weighted amount of each column, in a way that explains as much as possible of the variation between individuals. The next feature has to be orthogonal to the previous ones. The orthogonal part means no redundant information with the other features and it points in a totally different direction, so it captures different patterns in data. The points in the plot are the value of each individual on the first two components and the percentage is the proportion of the total variation explained by the component.There's no significance, scientists look for clusters and patterns, which obviously exist here.
>>543937133I suppose this is a reconstruction of his appearance. The phenotype can be misleading; the difference lies in the DNA sequence rather than in the phenotype. Based on the phenotype alone, we would assume a Nordic race, but the mutation responsible for blond hair came from the EHG, which can be misleading - just as the skin colour of Aborigines and Black people can be, yet their genetic code is so different that this explains the difference in DNA distance
