According Ken Ham, a creationist-apologist, all races originated from just Adam and Eve.>The parents of the human race (pic related) were a brownish Mexican-looking pair, genetically able to produce both dark and light children. His theory doesn't work. Problem 1 - ignores dominant black genes that pollute and don't easily wash-out over time. Problem 2 - ignores the rarity of getting all-white genes: nearly all the children would be just as mixed as the parents. Problem 3 - ignores that selective breeding and separation over many generations required; light-skinned would need to intermarry and avoid all others. Obviously, the races originated from the creation of others besides Adam and Eve; different types of humans made separately and not intended to mingle with those dwelling in the Garden.
>>543955034Adam and Eve were dark ass niggers from Apefrica.
>>543955034Seems we need to clarify the term “human” better
>>543955034So you're cool with the bible you just think it's impossible for Adam and Eve to be lucky?
>>543955034>According to Ken Hamlol, ok retard.
>>543955352https://www.dividedbytruth.org/deceptions/ken_hams_error.htm
>>543955179>common originnot plausible
>>543955034Only Nordids descend from Adam and Eve.
Bible states pretty clearly that the current races are descendants of Noah’s family. They also had wives of mixed races. The races likely, just as today, mostly got their tone from their diets. They even go directly into who fathered the shitskin Ethiopians from what I remember.
i don’t know why some christcucks go to such elaborate mental gymnastics to try and preserve a literal reading of absolutely everything in the bible. evolution doesn’t even disprove the existence of God
>>543956380Yes it does. If you can't believe the world is literally 6,000 years old and Noah's flood is real or Adam and Eve were spic-jeet hybrids, then you can't believe a Jewish rabbi literally died on the cross for your sins.
>>543955034>White man: aabb>Black man: AABBIs the black one all caps because he's yelling?
>>543955034>memeflag>abrahamic delusionmany such cases
>>543955034Hila Klein bred Great Teacher Onizuka?
>>543956915Except the Bible never says the world is 6000 years old that is just the sum total of the listed lifetimes of the biblical geneologies - and it never even says those are complete. This 6000 number is a modern fabrication that was invented well over a thousand years after the Bible was written and is not a accepted figure even by theologians. Just you regurgitating slop strawmen.
>>543957478https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_MundiThis was used by Jews and Christians (who borrowed it from Jews) for almost 2,000 years. There was no serious doubt the world was just a few thousand years old among Christians and Jews. And even if you did accept the world was older, you still have to accept that all humans alive descend from Noah and his family (inbreds) after a global worldwide flood. Otherwise, how can the Bible be true if the first 11 chapters aren't? And the answer is obviously that the Bible isn't true because the first 11 chapters are a neurotic Jewish ripoff of Sumerian legends.
>>543955034Nobody's ready for the implications of this.
None of that matters because it's a completely incorrect characterization of skin pigmentation, a pleiotropic trait. There are many genes that affect the result, not everything follows simple Mendelian inheritance like Punnett Squares in OP demonstrate. We're not peas, there is no short gene or one that changes your skin color. Even the traits he did research on did not all follow that inheritance and he lucked out that it statistically matched giving him confidence in his theory and understanding.
When's the last time a mexican gave birth to a Nord? That discredits his whole theory. The reason for this is that there are more than just two genes with two alleles that contribute to skin color. Even if you mated a male and a female who were each the offspring of a white and an indio, you'd still get a brown because it's unlikely for one child to get all 100 white genes and zero of the indio ones.But niggers still tongue my anus, so keep that in mind, too.
>>543955034I never understood where Negroids and Mongoloids came from. Just Nordids(Adam,) Arabids(Satan/fallen angel/demon, Cain,) and Nephilim/Giants(Watchers/fallen angels/demons.) It's a mystery and I don't know if anyone knows for sure. I assume the other non-Arabid non-Whites are also demon bloods too. Which means we have a demonic infestation here on Earth in the form of the non-Whites. That is a serious threat.
>>543961416Nephilim/Raphaim/Giants*
>>543955034Recessive genes can NEVER out breed or replace dominant genes. Including genes for psychology. If the monogenists are right then we would expect to see non-White dominant genes within the DNA genomes of ALL White European descended people. But we don't. This is why polygenism is true and not monogenism. I am a polygenist.
