I dont care that Jane Doe initially said she was fine with it.We should listen to rape victims, but we cant fully trust rape victims. Why? Because rape victims are often co-conspirators, they are the biggest enemy of themselves, sometimes more than their actual rapists. They will lie and deceive themselves into thinking they werent actually raped, such as this poor girl who desperately tried to reassure the guys that nothing that happened was illegal, even though it very much was illegal. She is one of the perpetrators. Im sure we all are familiar with the case by now so I wont explain it fully. But basically I will agree this doesnt meet New Yorks legal definition of rape.But my definition of rape is different, rape is sex that is coerced by the surrounding social structure. This could be a man with a gun, or this could be a man simply benefiting from living in a patriarchal society that says he can do whatever to his wife. All of this is rape, because coercion is present.Her boundaries were weakened, by alcohol and ketamine. She was in absolute no state of mind to consent, no matter how much she lies to herself. So no, she wasnt making her own choices, her brain was literally not operating properly for her own choices to be madeShe resisted, so they gave her more ketamine. If all of these actions were taken by Matthew Ingalls, he would undoubtedly be in prison. He would be seen as a monster, and he would be.Also, she was clearly unaware of his snapchat messages to 60 men to walk in and whip it out.But Ingalls did not create the rape structure alone. He got wasted, lost his erection, and fell asleep. He didnt repeatedly paw at her crotch. He didnt kiss her without warning. It wasnt Ingalls whom she hid her body from when men poured into the room.Was Jane Doe raped? and was Jane Doe raped by specific people? are different questions.I dont know the answer to the second. The answer to the first is yes.
SNIZZAT THREAD!Posting a wall of text is a minor snizzat loss
>>543995944true, but I disagree because it hurts my feefees :(
>>543996045Jizzat response
>>543995944Yes they are rapist. Rape should not be considered a crime any more than breaking your own property.
>>543995944Rape is a social construct and doesn't exist in the physical world, in nature.
>>543995944Lucy was a man.This is a trans case. read the transcript again with that in mind.
>>543995944ROFLMFAO Retarded rich ROASTIE, gets reemed in the ass & puked on...
