Learn trades or learn how to kill. White collar jobs will be obsolete.
>please keep buying our bondsThey are so fucking desperate lmao
>>544009091> luddite cope.
>>544009002Or, open a business and sell stuff to rich people.
>>544009002How are there hundreds of unsolved math problems? It sounds like math phds are fucking lazy and don't do their work.
>>544009002>It just stole hundreds more
>>544009002Both are better options than white collar frankly. That shit makes you gay as fuck.
>>544009002
>>544009512Every mathematician that didn't invent numbers is a thief.
>>544009002It didn’t actually solve the problem and it hasn’t calculated out pi so I wouldn’t worry about it. Computers have been able to calculate faster than humans for decades anyways. Yawn
well nobody wanted to give me a math job so
>>544009435Long division is boring.
>>544009002I solved 305 math problems. Try to keep up.
>>544009002if white collar jobs disappear its over anywaywe are talking about the majority of employim becoming joblessthe economy will just crash
>>544009002>learn a tradeBy the time you manage to learn enough, AI will already be coming for these jobs too. How? Easy, glasses with a camera in them. It'll walk the average person through any trades project. Someone will have to turn the wrench (for now), but soon AI will be able to guide a beaner making $10 an hour through the job. The days of the six-figure skilled trades income are coming to an end.
>>544009002>trades I’ll just hunt and cut wood but you have fun.
>>544010448> employimFukkin lol
>>544009430>Chatgpt, how do I open a business, borrow a bunch of money under other businesses, and make the first business appear profitable? >Das easy foo, be a white colluh honkey ass nigga, dey been doin' dat fo seven years>Oh golly, thanks Chatgpt!
>>544009002Didn't it "solve" them by stealing work done by people using ChatGPT? Very Jewish thing, taking credit for someone else's work
>>5440090022+2=4
>>544011307YSK Buckmaster and Alpoge did not prove the Fefferman statement for the Millenium Prize problem, did not claim to, and their techniques are markedly different than OpenAIs. The allegation is that they got "scooped" via the models looking in their chat logs, and then taking one of their techniques and having 10,000 internal agents work on it for 88 hours to produce a different, better result than Buckmaster and Alpoge. The chat logs being scanned also probably did not happen, but this is what is being referred to when people use the word "stolen" (aka not stolen at all, and yet another luddite thermonuclear cope).Anyways, any doubts about whether or not the internal model needs to "steal" results is quite quickly put to rest by the deluge of recent results published on 10/6. With the quasi-riemann hypothesis, resolution of Hilbert's 10th problem over the rationals, the advancements in Hodge/BSD, etc. the notion that they had to "steal" from mathematicians is now rendered ludicrous. Quasi-riemann is likely harder than Navier-Stokes btw, it's just that the way the problem happens to be classified makes it a stepping stone to something very, very, very much harder than Navier-Stokes (the Riemann Hypothesis).
>>544009002Learn to make good content
>>544011392Become a gay prostitute?
>>544009091>>544009211It's ogre bros Dubbed the "mathpocalypse" by some commentators and researchers, the rapid flood of machine-generated proofs has stunned the mathematical community, sparking debates over verification, research ethics, and the future role of human mathematicians
