Why is that against the law? Is it because it's copyrighted? Is it just republicans? What happens if you show a picture of shrek's dick to a libertarian?
it was uncircumcised
Unsolicited pornography is always illegal and considered sexual harassment.
>>544036861It is sexual harassment to send pornographic images to someone if that person did not ask for them.ITT: Don’t send nudes (real or fictional) to anyone who doesn’t want them (and even then you shouldn’t since the person who you sent it to could bite you in the ass later).
>>544036864i send goatse to every political text message spammer and i won't stop don't waste my time looking at my phone for stupid bullshit
>>544036861>Leftists makes laws about harassment>Cry when those laws get applied equally
>>544036861In the Yankee-doodle-dandy constitution they have freedom of speech and expression enshrined in law, its why people can say the most outrageous shite they want and get away with it, even if its not true. I'm not joking, look it up on google AI search ifyou don't believe me, they were actually dumb enough to make that schoolboy error in their constitution (right to not have sleeves on your shirt if its hot was another crazy thing they put in, although the meaning to that has been twisted due to a spelling error).Anyway, if green peen guy wants to get off, all he has to do is claim right to free speach and expression and no charges can be brought. You can do this with any flashing if you're brave enough, or even, technically, murder if you class it as "performance art". That is why there has never been a successful conviction for making a snuff movie in the USA.
>>544036862This, it was antisemitic.
>>544036865Seems more like a tubgirl situation, but to each his own, I suppose.
>>544036861SOME
>>544036865Well I'm sure the automated bots that recieved it were QUITE offended by your clever bamboozlement. Keep up the first-world anarchism, brother.
>>544036861>RepublicanIf it had been a Democrat Politicisn they would have just said "Politician".
>premieres in north america less than 6 months after Shrek 2, and it might as well be described as "the anti-Shrek 2"
>>544036870BODY
@republicans: 8::::::::::::D~~~
Did anyone notice that Shrek 2 and Shark Tale also do this thing at the end?https://youtu.be/xr7SZRCmVG0?si=MSLbyl6nGsYrOJ5b
>>544036867why should it be illegal to lie outside of court?
>>544036864>ITT:this stands for 'Inside That Topic' just FYI
>>544036861>early 2010s>internet is full of Shrek is love rape stories raping children>people loved the meme>2026>politicians are so thin skinned they bring legal actions to a fictional cartoon penisI hate the modern world.
>>544036879this meme wore out its welcome almost immediately, imo. retard had what was coming to him for making a cringe callback to a dead meme from over a decade ago.
Shrek is the sixth movie to get a wide theatrical release in north america which is about a cast of CGI only characters
>>544036879>>544036880Rape sloth was always the superior rape meme
>>544036880I always fun it funny but it did become very niche after initial popularity. I found it bizarre and loved the originality the stories people made up of Shrek raping them.
>>544036867Shut the fuck up vlad and go soak up some drones
So where did this get moved from?
>>544037101teevee
>>544036863It's free speech. Same as topless protestors. >>544036863Have you ever seen an irl ogre before? That's not a penis, it's just another strange ogre thing, like the ears, just a lower growth. I am offended at this intentional disingenuous misinterpretation of basic normal ogre healthy body-growths.
