The Stand by Me and Star Trek star gets candid with The Advocate. “Love is love!” he exclaims. “We say it all the fucking time. Why is that complicated? It’s not, man, c’mon!”“J.K. Rowling’s a piece of shit,” says Wheaton. “She’s a hateful, disgusting, despicable human being. She gets off on the suffering of others. I don’t know what her fucking problem is. I don’t know why she can’t leave people alone. I hate her, and what I want everyone to understand is, when you watch this program, you are putting money in her pocket that she turns around and spends to hurt people.”https://www.advocate.com/news/culture/wil-wheaton-gay-trans-rights
Who?
>>544057733
>>544057733>She's a piece of shit!>why is she so hateful?Every day my heart fills with more hate for hollywood and it's little demons.
>>544057735spbp
don't they realize that this kind of shit got trump reelected?
>>544057733>faggot says stupid gay shit C'mon!
The vitriol towards Rowling is fucking bizarre. She was the biggest virtue-signalling WASP out there. But she wouldn't believe in one tenet of the Lefty Manifesto and now she's literally Hitler.
unfortunately for faggots we live in a society and that requires behaving in ways that society deems appropriate.
Did rob Reiner fuck him?
>>544057735
>>544057733>folkx, trust me this time our boycott will totally work!
>>544057733Shut up, Wesley.
>>544057744I hope hogwarts legacy 2 doesnt go overboard with faggotry like they did in the 1st one. Theres no appealing to these people theyre essentially religous zealots. 20 years ago they'd probably be evangelicals crying about Harry potter being devil worship.
>>544057733Who cares?
>>544057733>Wil Wheaton DESTROYS 10yo Harry Potter actorsThis guy is a menace.
>>544057733>“J.K. Rowling’s a piece of shit,” says WheatonSo was Roddenberry, that didn't stop you either Will.
>>544057734some has-been jew kid actor from an obscure 90ies TV show
>>544057733Love is love, until there's an age gap involved and then it doesn't count anymore
>>544057733>The Stand by Me and Star Trek stardoes he count as a star if those are the only things he ever did?
>>544057733He’s 100% right.
>>544057740There are two constants with virtue-signalling SJWs, massive group-think mentality and defining themselves by being in opposition to something. They have no tolerance for individuality or nuance, if you don't blindly go along with everything they do, then you are not one of them and immediately unpersoned. They don't actually give a shit about anything they support, they're just a hate group who have drawn a line in the sand and convinced themselves they're heroes. So if you're not one of them, you're not a hero, and therefore you HAVE to be a villain so they can hate you. Rowling's only deviation was she thought troons shouldn't be in spaces with vulnerable women, like a battered women's shelter. But because she didn't tow the party line, they spread bullshit about how she hates all troon and gay people and is racist or whatever they can think to make her seem evil. If you believe the shit they say, then Rowling purposely built the entire Harry Potter franchise single-handedly for the soul purpose of amassing enough wealth to personally go around murdering trannies.These people are schizo enough they can play a game of telephone in a room by themselves.
>>544057750>an obscure 90ies TV showHey now, Star Trek TNG is awesome. Wheaton being a massive faggot doesn't change that.
Why is this faggot still alive?
>>544057755>TNG is awesomenot the pointhe and his jews literally killed the franchise, no new fans will ever watch itit dies with us
>>544057744>that resonates with consumersHow is this going to work when the vast majority of people don't care about troony tears?
>>544057757I'm just saying, just because you want to insult Wheaton (rightfully so), you shouldn't diminish the quality of a show he just happened to be on. Accuracy is important.
>>544057744HWL was sort of a shit game but I still dont regret getting it on sale. I will do the same for 2.
>>544057733Will Wheaton is just projecting. HE is the piece of shit who is hateful and gets off on the suffering of anyone who disagrees with his bigoted views.
>>544057759Nta, but the latter Wesley episodes were atrocious, especially the one where he treats everyone like crap because "he so wise and powerful and doesn't have time for their mortal games" schtick, then he graciously leaves.
>>544057733I lovye about 10 minutes away from this dude and its always bothered me to be that close to him.
>>544057740She does go hard with the anti tranny posting, I imagine if she wasnt as vocal about it there wouldn't be as much of an unhinged backlash
I think a substantially large amount of people have realized how horrible trannies by now, so this type of cause is pretty weak
>>544057733>She believes 99.9% of the exact same batshit things they all do Almost like this shit is a mental illness
>>544057752In article headlines if they refer to you as "star of x" instead of your actual name your probably c-list at best
>>544057753Nice bait
This anti-Harry Potter shit has been going on for how long now? A decade? Holy fuck leftist ideology is truly the source of the world's problems.
>>544057740>was the biggest virtue-signalling WASPshe still isher so called tranny hate is deeply rooted in her feminist male-hateliterally the only thing her fucked up brain does right is not being able to pretend fags can be cunts when they really really want to
>>544057733will wheaton is someone who deeply wishes he were gay, that way he could complain all the time and people would have to listen.
>>544057733And how much money has will wheaton donated to charity exactly?
Remember when his name was spelled: "Weaton"?Pepperidge Farm remembers.
>>544057770>tranny hate is deeply rooted in her feminist male-hateAnd transsexualism is a very feminist idea, making the line between genders blur.
>>544057733>J.K. Rowling’s a piece of shitJ.K. is a liberal like him. In real life they only disagree on the transgender issue. Which seems to outweigh everything else.
>>544057774>And transsexualism is a very feminist ideaIt ain't women that came up with troonery.
The mods on /tv/ seem to treat /pol/ as their personal dumpster kek
Idk if you guys remember but he was one of the original (((fags)))
faggot /tv/ mods
>this thread has been moved to /pol/Bet tranny mod got euphoric after this ;)
>>544057733He sounds like a fag.
>>544057749Roddenberry was a deeply flawed individual, but he at least fessed up to his faults and allowed a second opinion to correct him. It's how he kept the things he produced from becoming cringe.
>>544057771
>>544057733GOD DAMN IT WESLEY STOP DESTABILIZING THE WARP CORE I DON'T CARE HOW GOOD A BLOWIE YOUR MOTHER GIVES THIS IS THE LAST STRAW MY BOY!
>>544057733>what I want everyone to understand is, when you watch this program, you are putting money in her pocket that she turns around and spends to hurt people.I'm not saying that he's right, but if he is, I may have to watch this show.
>>544057733wat did the show even do?
So I guess he's trying to get the attention of the illuminati talent agencies in order to get more work.Seen this b4.
>>544057869the hack showed most of them are UNI profs or worse,so no wonder
>>544057869Wokeism constantly ruining every movie and TV show has caused most people on /tv/ to become racist, /pol/ is considered "the racism board" so the mods keep dumping anything explicitly anti-woke here.The problem of woketards ruining film and television isn't going away (or at least not fast enough) and the tranny mods would rather just sweep the complaints off the board.
>man who feels no shame tells others to feel shame
isnt that ripe for a defamation lawsuit?
The fat one got away
>>544057734There was a family guy joke about him
>>544057740It's actually quite simple.Left wing ideology is a mess of internal contradictions that breakdown the instant people actually start analysing them; as such they aggressively go into purity spirals to force people back into line. Rowling's inability to accept Men pretending to be women as women shows a willingness to question the party line and thus she must be punished; lest she apply critical thinking to any other areas of the leftist lines of thought.
>>544057764She's not even anti-tranny. She just, understandably, rejects the claim that MTF transsexuals are the same as biological women. They're not. Of course the perpetually placid and unflappable trannsexual crowd equates this with genocidal hate speech.
>>544058887Doesn't rise to the level of defamation, not even considering the fact she's a public figure; if simple insults were enough to trigger a defamation case Trump would be a true Trillionaire.
