Average IQ will always be one hundred because that is the definition. The capabilities one hundred IQ has can always change and I really do believe one hundred IQ is stupid. It is not even a matter of "pretending not to understand", these people cannot understand it and want to twist everything they can and change things so they can fit things in their stupid already assumed axioms which are false or only based on whatever the majority says is okay.Democracy is forever a broken and degenerate system. No, it is not broken because "women vote" or "non-Whites vote" and we would have a great political system without women voting or only White men voting or whatever. If women voting were the worst thing civilization could ever do, well, who is responsible? Women never voted themselves or gave themselves voting. Men voting brought women voting. "Constitutional Republic" is just Democracy, but it is a cope which mainstream "Rightwingers" say to justify Democracy. Anyone crying over White men losing voting privileges, assuming only White men get to vote, is a fan of Democracy and is a moron.
>>544091742Democracy is enslavement by the retarded. Literally letting the dumbest people decide our fate.
>>544091742What's the alternative and why isn't whatever it is stupid?
>>544092378>White land owning males have the right to voteThey already solved it, kikes broke it, retard.
>>544092460I wasn't asking you but if you agree that unintelligence is the problem then why do you think restricting voting to white land owning males would solve that? Do you think such people can't be unintelligent?
>>544091742You think there's a perfect system that just hasn't been discoverd yet.There isn't.And the best one we have becomes a horror if not maintained.Basically you're a stunted child still trying to preserve your pet social narratives while trying to solve the very problems they created without accountability.
>>544093059>>544092460Found the crypto-Leftist Democracy fans. Muh White males need to voooooooooooooote!!!Also, absolute monarchy is the best government system because reality is to what the leaders must comply or else they face ruin, unlike Democracy which encourages Whites to allow more turd worlders to win more elections and turn even the most productive White males into social welfare whores.
>>544093456Who exactly do you think should be the absolute monarch, and how can you ensure that none of his heirs will be stupid?
>>544093568I do not need to worry about heirs because monarchies which are hereditary (which means the one who is in office chooses his successor) might pick the terrible replacement, but it is to their own fault and detriment. Whoever is best for the job will be most monarchs overtime. If he or she is not, then his or her country fails or people rebel. Oppressors are more obvious in monarchies than democracies. Democracies have the illusion that voting actually fixes or changes things.
>>544093762Typical. You think violent revolutions are a feature and not a bug.Also typically you have no suggestion as to who should actually be king, it's all just theoretical. No wonder nobody respects you or your ideas.
>>544093959"Erm, if you do not produce an actual name of a real living human being on this planet right now for someone who fits a concept then you are just an idiot!"The democracy fan seethes when he encounters concepts that do not require majority of people checking a box to confirm.Evolutionary biology and natural selection is true for the same reasons. I do not need to show specific genes that are the best that will reproduce, I just know the concepts.Revolutions are features, not bugs, but democracies can never see it that way because they have the retarded and false idea that authority and legitimacy comes from the bottom, not the top.
>>544091742> its another lets never put responsibility on women for their actions thread> if you dont simp for women you are le dumbAnon you probably think MENSA is a real IQ test lets stop pretending youre anything but a midwit
>>544092672Statistically white men (and white asian men(china korea japan)) score much higher in the percentile then their female or brown counterparts this is observable across all cultures and populations across the world (has high cultural validity) so yes such a rule would fix most problems if youre filtering by intelligence anyone intelligent simply cannot deny this or simply has not actually looked at the statistics on the matter (make sure you use the Welcher Adult Intelligence Scale 4 (or earlier when dealing with just european and ME populations)
>>544094552>Erm I don't have to provide any crucial details of the policy I'm advocating, those are irrelevant to the concept.Sure, whatever. Even the advocate can't practically apply his theory, but I'm sure the people he insulted as being stupid will pick up his slack.
>>544093059there isit requires the removal of cluster B genes from the gene pool
>>544095205>Believing men are superior and have agency and women have no agency and are inferior.>Blaming women and trying to hold them responsible for actions.Pick one, retard. You cannot have men be the superior sex and women are incompetent with no agency and have men evade responsibility.Pet owners are responsible for their pets. Parents (fathers, I should say for you) are responsible for children (sons, we can just focus on male-male relations here).If an eight year old boy breaks something with his father present in a store, then the father is responsible because he has far superior intellect, right?Treat it the same way with women, if you really do believe women are terrible, evil, moronic, and irresponsible, then they cannot take political action (what you want), but one also cannot blame them for anything wrong and men are responsible (what you do not want).Blaming women and even children for your own faults and lack of control and responsibility? How pathetic.Are you Muslim by chance? As for IQ tests, it varies as to which ones are legitimate. IQ tests, in principle, are sound, just because one might have a method that is terrible does not make IQ Tests' principles wrong.But I expect your reactions as much from a Democracy fan.
>>544096228kek all this seethe and reddit spacing one can be dumber and still be accountable you retard
>>544096772>"One can still be dumber and still be accountable."You are confusing with basic accountability via cause versus accountability versus what comes with authority and responsibility.A shitbull that mauls a child to death is responsible for the child's death, and thus human civilization, at least those oriented generally toward good, execute the pitbull. However, the human owner is MORE responsible and MORE accountable and thus should suffer a punishment.It is impossible to blame women for societies' collapsings while exempting men, especially since men are always more responsible due to having more rational intellect. Men gave women voting, men are responsible for fixing civilization as well as why it collapses.But Democracy fans always love blaming someone else (usually the opposing political party) rather than their own responsibilities and actions.
>>544096228>>544098567
>>544098766You call me a Redditor, you call me a clown, you post memes to mock me, but you never explain how I am wrong.
>>544091742>Democracy is forever a broken and degenerate systemSo is every other system, why?>BECASUE WEAK SELF CENTERED PATHETIC LEADERSHITS ALWAYS DESTROY EVERYTHINGLook at china and it's "communism with chinese characteristics" as a perfect example.
>>544092672What matters is stake in society not intelligence. Smart people will abuse voting harder than dumb people. What you need to do is align the interest of your average voter with the goal of your society. Land owning males have a stake in society everyone else doesn't so they are fine with running it to the ground.
>>544091742But muh "everything must be equals" brain doe!
Is that true? Do they change the average every year and grade on a curve?
>>544093059It's called "removing the state parasites."
>>544091742>Average IQ will always be one hundred because that is the definition.There's longitudinal studies that track rising IQ"s over time. There is a famous phenomenon called "the Flynn Effect" which demonstrates very huge IQ rises over time. This is likely due to improvements in nutrition, we aren't all peasants living as subsistence farmers anymore, afterall. This change in nutrition has also made us taller. However, nutrition was one of the big environmental factors with IQ, and with that largely eliminated by modern technology, any other gaps that exist are likely genetic in origin. We've also seen that recently the Flynn Effect has started reversing itself. This could be due to genetic degredation of the population, the urban sink effect.
>>544098874>hurr durr you cannot prove me wrong>>544093762>hurr durr why must I explain my system?
>>544091742>Democracy is forever a broken and degenerate systemDemocracy seems be an incomplete system. The information that an election gives you in terms of popular sentiment is extremely valuable, and any government would ignore that at their own peril. Women vote best at the local level rather than the national level, which was always intended for men afterall. Given hat people's votes are often uninformed, swayed by ads, you need some type of aristocratic element as well t help guide things. The British thought along these very same lines, so they established a "House of Commons" expressing the democratic will of the people, and the "House of Lords" expressing the will of the nobility. The US congress was modeled directly after this system.
>>544091742A White can have high IQ to work a complicated job, and still be a wimp who can't put up with kike peer pressure like picrel. Need combination of dumber Whites with courage to face the jewish problem to solve it, with smarter Whites who are too wimpy to say anything.
>>544099597The FLynn effect is largely not on g."the magnitude of the selection differential for intelligence in 65 different countries was calculated by consulting the literature and analyzing international datasets (n = 419,444, k = 156), as well as the magnitude of the correlation between fertility and educational attainment (n = 797,455, k = 454). Based on the results of the meta-analysis, the average country’s IQ is declining by 0.35 points per decade. Region comparisons suggest that the relationship between the number of children and intelligence is strongest in Latin America, Iran, and Turkey. In Denmark, Iceland, Estonia, Finland, and Switzerland, intelligence and fertility are negligibly related. However, there were some concerns with the quality of the international data which put the latter finding in question. The magnitude of the decline in IQ globally is about 1.1 point per decade between the years of 2023 and 2100, though the rate at which intelligence is declining is falling. When weighted by population, the magnitude of the decline within countries is 0.4 points per decade, so 36% of the global decline in IQ is within countries. National IQ and the selection differential for IQ correlates at 0.51, while socioeconomic development and the selection differential for IQ correlates at 0.48."https://doi.org/10.26775/op.2025.08.06"A thorough search identified 17 unique datasets that passed the inclusion criteria. Using a Random Effects Model to evaluate the data, the overall weighted effect was r=−0.11, although the data also indicated a sex effect (stronger correlations among females than males), and a race effect (stronger correlations among Black and Hispanic populations compared to Whites). Importantly, the data suggest the correlation has been increasing in strength throughout the 20th century (and early 21st)."https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.036https://warosu.org/sci/thread/16909042
>>544099294This is the distinction made in having the US Senate represent their state, rather than the population of the state. Of course, the majority of Congress doesn't even understand this distinction any more.
>>544100211In English doc?
>>544100806It is in English, saar. All that's being said is that stupid people are breeding more, the majority (64%) of the intelligence decrease is because lower-IQ populations are overbreeding higher-IQ ones, and the association of high intelligence with decreased fertility is stronger in women, Blacks and Hispanics.
>>544091742This only applies to a homogenous population following a normal distributionMost people don't really think
>>544101851Means are not based on a distribution being normal.Also, the average IQ is 85 (everything is relative to the White British). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325146555_Mankind's_IQ_is_84_to_88_Some_provisional_reports_from_THE_NIQ-DATASET_V13
