Whites don't even care about keeping their bloodline clean either. What the fuck happened to white people where in the past people's lineage meant everything to them and their family? Webm very much related.
>>544132630Its only americans. That's why the world refers to you as mutts
>>544132630I'm keeping my bloodline pure by marrying my cousin.
>>544132630>in the past people's lineage meant everything to them and their family?Only to royal families. The rest did not care that much.
white people hate each other more than they hate non-whites
>>544132630Unless the government makes rape legal or encouraged I don't have an option. So, not my problem.
>>544132681It's an inherent moral instinct to prefer kin / the people you know best. Multiculturalism deracinates that more than monarchies or aristocrats.
>>544132676If you think the same thing isn't happening in western European countries too then you have not been paying attention.>>544132681People in the past would never dream of letting their sons or daughters come home with a child like in the webm. They would be ostracized in a heart beat viewed as a fuck up.
>>544132760>like in the webmlike in the OP webm*
>>544132716Millennials were the first generation of European, Anglo, and Yankee whites where a significant proportion of the women were raised to hate white men, but a greater proportion of white men believed that and became passive / slack, or even a few of them supported it, humiliating themselves to try and win the favor of feminists and bugmen.
>>544132760>They would be ostracized in a heart beat viewed as a fuck up.What do you base this claim on?
>>544132717This. Women are refusing to have children. We can't force them to have children, because male simps with guns will stop us.
>>544132630it must be some new form of mental illness.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kmJE0tqFBTw&ra=m
>>544132748>BRAP IDlol
>>544132829Women believe in their emotions, especially fear; we have to find a wife out there and bring her back from it.
>>544132676If only this was even remotely true. I'd actually sleep easier knowing that we were the only ones utterly fucked.
>>544132630millennials were all separated from their fathers by blaspheming feminist pastors. tomorrow is sunday, so go to church and punch your local pastor so hard his mouth gets wired shut
>>544132872Well, we can't do that until the simp problem is resolved.
>>544132820Simple people were more race concious back then and didn't like outsiders outside of their own race within their own in-group. This "claim" of mine has been true for most of human history since it aligns with human nature.
>>544132748>instinct to prefer kinEspecially when you kiss them on the lips at night
>>544132808pastors being more feminist than divorce judges is the reason millennials dont go to church. go to church tomorrow morning and punch your local pastor
>>544132680based
>>544132630>it's like muh TV show!!!!
>>544132903There was no national kinship until around the 19th century. People mated based on religion and language. Natonalism is a fairly young concept, some peasant in the 12th century had little idea he was french or german.
>>544132820Are you fucking joking? People kick their kids out and disown them right now for being gay. Why is it hard to believe that dads would really do the same to their daughters for fucking niggers? It was commonplace. The entire political id of the boomers is rolling back the CRA. This isn't exactly a secret lol. Americans used to fucking hate interracial couples up until the late 80s or so if you look at polling.
>>544132748Brapping out hard truths
>>544132829right. the simp problem is that there are simp pastors and the solution is to punch them until their jaws get wired shut
>>544132996If thread is about 19th-20th century America, then yes. If it is about human history in general, then no.
>>544132630that look of resignation is so telling
>>544132968>There was no national kinship until around the 19th century.This goes deeper then national kinship so I don't even know why you bringing that up from out of no where. People gravitate towards those who look like themselves, the same background as themselves, act like themselves, and the same customs as themselves. There is an inherit urge to reject those outside your own group that was much stronger in the past compared to today for reasons we all know why.>some peasant in the 12th century had little idea he was french or german.Even peasants knew where they belonged and with whom. Peasants knew this long before the 12th century. I mean come on now.
It's never really been about color for me, more shape, size, sound and of course norms. Now I don't care much at all, I just want it all turned to ash.
>>544132630>Whiteslmfao bro what the fuck are you talking about?our country was founded on fucking our way to gray.move back to where your great-grandparents came from if you need to learn the hard way that no one wants to fuck you anyway.
>>544132902so when the pastor asks> who authorized you to decide who gets to have an intact jawyou ask back> who authorized you to decide who gets to have an intact family
>>544132630Well the nobles are still around and white, gaunt, deformed and inbred as ever.But they were never representative for... anything really.
Thought it was Joe Biden by the thumbnail Then I thought the niglet would maul him
>>544132968>Natonalism is a fairly young concept, some peasant in the 12th century had little idea he was french or germanWhile this is true, you're wishfully ignoring the fact that human races were geographically isolated until very recentlyPeople would only ever mix with people who were basically their neighbors in any meaningful degree
>>544133095Peasants had no idea they were Spanish or British. They defined their identity through religion, language and the monarch they served. You are trying to apply 19th-20th century way of thinking to all of history, which just doesn't work.
>>544132630White people are demons that have become self aware
>>544133228No, you're a filthy faggot nigger.
>>544133193Technically true, but they had little trouble doing the mixing once they got access to other people. When Spanish entered South America they heavily mixed with the locals. Anons here think people in the 15th century Europe were some kind of racially conscious purists, but this was not the case.
>>544132630Individualism. Westerners are inherently individualistic so when it becomes no longer necessary to band together for survival people fall into boundless self-centered hedonism. At first it was the tribes, then extended families, then immediate family, then the family has become no longer necessary and now they are even killing their own children.
>>544132924Yeah, I agree, most of them turned into that. We can still support good churches though:>Lutheran Missouri Synod>Orthodox Church>Catholic Churchor any old school Baptist church where you sing hymns, pray, worship God and hear a sermon.They all absolutely are still out there, we don't have to compromise by going to PCUSA or a rock concert building.
>>544133228Nothing demonic about treating beasts like beasts and not saving them from their own retarded instincts.
>>544132630Because capitalism replaced every purpose family had with services you can pay and subscribe to. Tribe, kin, family as building stone of civilization isn't too profitable.
>>544133193Not really correct actually, we have found axes from the balkans in the Netherlands from 5000 years ago, the vikings reached erica long before we did and that we did it was already ~500 years ago.This idea that we must tolerate invasions just because they are newly possible is retarded for more than a few reasons.
>>544133324That is very true, and I know most of all from my life choices.
>>544132630A shit thread, made by an indian who can only procreate from rape.And you cunts are going to let him lead you like fucking dogs?How fucking pathetic are you?
>>544132630>anglokikes are exterminating themselves so we don't have to do it ourselvesWtf I love anglokikes now
>>544132630People have been mixing with other people for thousands of years. There's no such thing as a clean bloodline.
>>544133402Oh please, socialism literally uprooted all of that and did so intentionally, hell just look up Ceausesecu of Romania.Hell literally the Hitlerjügend tried to forcefully replace family with weird ass nationalism that got them killed for what turned out to be nothing.I am not defending capitalism against anything else but next to shit like socialism, fascism or theocracy it is a holy grail.
>>544133298You're partially correctEuropeans weren't racially conscious like anons are todayBut raping and enslaving another group is not the same as thinking they are equal to youEuropeans quickly pioneered racism after coming in contact with other groups they could overpower and which were vastly different from them
>>544132630gay j ws wont let em, theyre busy writing movies to make them all look really stupid
>>544133491The thread is about preservation of pure bloodlines, not racial equality. Of course Europeans back then did not believe that all races are equal, neither did they believe peope were equal in general. Even those of the same race. But they did not care much about some racial purity either.
>>544133491Europeans did not come from nothing you know, we always knew others.Arguably what defines Europe is that despite hailing from such traditions we rose above them and dominated not despite that but thanks to it.
I dont carry bloodlines.I destroy other bloodlines
>>544133628The Loathsome Dung Eater!
>>544133082>all my efforts have culminated in this little nigger. it's all for nothing
>>544132760That guy has an amazing body
>>544133718There is something about his expression that deeply resonates with what it means to be an American today
>>544133217Their religious practices, language, traditions, etc. is all downstream from race and the background they come from not their nationality. To claim peasants who spoke Spanish or English magically didn't know they were Spanish or English basically they didn't know who they were or what set them apart from others is utterly ridiculous. Going all the way back to ancient Egypt they clearly could define who and who wasn't an Egyption and it went further then just language although that was one of the criteria. Human beings being able to define their in-groups goes all the way back to ancient times and you not being able to see this really shows your ignorances of history. Back then people took pride in who they were and where they came from so it's not just some 19th-20th century way of thinking you are just trying to paint it as if it is.
>>544133352Let me add on regarding Protestants, because they have gone the furthest in becoming worldly and using the church to serve imaginary problems in an explicit way:https://concordiatheology.org/2017/08/racism-dealing-with-it/>(picrel, LCMS statement on racism)Sometimes there are more modern notions like this, that racism is a mechanism of social alienation. Racism is infinitely worse than that, namely intentional hatred that leads to murder - anger without a cause.The fact that groups are de facto segregated is not racism.The error protestants make (and which gets amplified throughout) is to snip out people's instinct to make their flock more, "pure", rather than just having faith. It's like a heretical group that blinds people at birth to, "enhance the spiritual eye". The thinking is the same.
>>544132681>>544132820>>544132968>The Rigveda thanks God for "scattering the slave bands of black descent", and for stamping out "the vile Dasyan colour." - Rigveda. II.20.7, II 12.4>This choice sums up the Aryans opinion of their non-white subjects: "Black skin is impious" - Rigveda. II.12.4>One hymn mentions sending thirty thousand Dasas “to slumber” and another hymn sixty thousand slain. A hymn dedicated to the weapons of war (Rig Veda VI:75) refers to a warrior “armed with mail,” using a bow to win cattle and subdue all regions, “upstanding in the car the skillful charioteer guides his strong horses on whithersoe’er he will.” The arrows had iron mouths and shafts “with venom smeared” that “not one be left alive.”>“He, much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus, after his wont, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty thunderer with his fair−complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters.” −−Rig Veda I:100 :18.Ancient Aryans (Sintashta, Andronovo types) who came into contact with blacks described them as worthless bandits/demons who they slaughtered by the thousands. The general large-scale attitude was to either kill or enslave browns (India, Iran, Rome etc). Aryan peoples who only had limited isolated cases of contact still described them as trolls (Finnboga saga ramma). Lineage is front and center in European literature, from the Epic Cycle to the Eddas to the origin stories of various nations in the later middle ages (based on works like Historia Destructionis Troiae). Every single pre-christian European warrior would have boasted of heroic lineage, to demonstrate their martial prowess and right to glory (kleos). Really, this should be clear to anyone who isn't historically illiterate.
>>544132630imagine giving birth to a nigger
>>544133911>Back then people took pride in who they were and where they came fromThat is purely your fantasy, which comes from you trying to extrapolate modern nationalistic thinking to all of history. Yes, peasants who spoke English generally did not consider themselves English or British. They defined themslves throuh the place of birth (some village), or belonging to a certain religion or being a subject to a certain king. None of this has anything to do with modern nationalism, there simply was no such concept back then. Whatever forming national identity there was, existed only among the aristocracy and was there just for poliical reasons, not because they believed in some racial purity. The lack of interracial mixing came from transportation being almost inaccessible for common people beyond a few villages around their own. So, of course they did not mix with some Aztecs, they had no way of doing that. But the moment Europeans got access to transportation routs, they mixed relentlessly with those South Americans.
>>544132630You’re not some noble You’re bloodline is basically gutter oil
>>544134360You're the one living in the fantasy I mean come on man. People knew where they came from, what made them different from others outside their in-group, and what they were a part of they didn't just view themselves on some spit of land with everyone divided from one another. >But the moment Europeans got access to transportation routs, they mixed relentlessly with those South Americans.Talk about blowing things out of proportion because you really only saw it to a certain degree with the Spanish and even then it was limited not "relentlessly". Both the French and English had massive empires heck England's spanned most of the world but you didn't see them mixing all over the place.
What's up with all the demoralization threads here late?Low class and retarded whites are breeding themselves out.If anything niggers are slowly fading out.
>>544134776Forgot picre
>>544132630Neurotypical White male normies killed White America. I explain this in pic rel.
>>544134622>what made them different from others outside their in-groupReligion, language, monarch. Ethncity to a much, much lower extent. Mostly because people were illiterate and had not yet developed a concept of nation. Even the languages across the same culture were so different, germans from nearby towns would not understnd each other.And French did mix with non-whites where they could or saw fit. In the 17th-18h century it was quite a common thing, and the French colonizers saw nothing wrong with taking a black wife in the Carribean region. They would have taken locals as well, but they had mostly been eliminated during the colonization, so they just couldn't. British did the same, they even took Indian wives during the early years of Indian occupation. Guess when this all came to an end? In the 19th century when modern concept of nationalism appeared. Same reason why Europeans did not mix with Africans in Africa - the conquest of the continent happend in the 19th century by he time modern nationalism had already taken shape.
>>544132630Tyrone gosta get those cheeks. The illegitimate father of this child probably has several other illegitimate children.
>>544132630>Why don't white people care about carrying on their bloodlines anymore?I have an inherited genetic flaw of selfish in one of my family trees. its a genetic trait so damaging it doomed my bloodline. Two, if I have kids they will struggle and be poor. So Its a fate worse than death and I dont seek my kingdom on earth. So the greatest gift I can give my kids is death. Continuing this cycle is just untenable.
>>544132630the kid looks alright to be honeststill should have disowned both daughter and wife and anybody else standing with their species-suicide ways
>>544132748>It's an inherent moral instinct to prefer kin / the people you know best. Multiculturalism deracinates that more than monarchies or aristocrats.intrafemale warfarenot suicidal empathy: homocidal virtue signaling>>544132630
>>544132630Reminds me of the handful of mud sharks in our local community Facebook groups crying about their family's disowning them, refusing to financially help them cause they have a half breed nigglet. They beg random strangers on Facebook groups to help them buy groceries, pay bills, buy their kids clothing. But they couldn't think far enough ahead to just not fuck niggers that are notorious for abandoning their children.
>married with 2 kids, married woman of similar European lineage>Kid #1 looks exactly like me, damn near identical to pictures of me at that age>Kid #2 looks exactly like my wife>Sister in law made a weird turtle faced spawn because she married an *tal*an man
>>544133830that guy is so full of roids he probably cant even get it up
