Why does reality possess intelligible structure at all, and is the structure that makes reality intelligible fundamentally the same structure that makes moral judgment possible?
>>544160595>people who ask questions that literally serve no tangible purpose and are of no utility
>>544160595Op is a faggot
>>544160714My idea is that reality has fundamentally a moral structure, and that the highest realisation of this is God.
It's almost as if we see what we want to see 24 7
And that being cheerful and optimistic is the greatest miracle of God
>>544160595Yes anon, that's what I believe; basically existence is computable, but it's realized in the moral order of God.like a two-phase metaphysics. It's why we can have a perfect physics-instrumentalist model of existence, but it's not one-for-one what reality is, and deep down, no matter how perfect a functional / calculable simulation you could be plunged into, on some sub-conscious or spiritual level, you would have an instinctual arousal that what you were living in wasn't real.Morality / the conscience is a sixth sense that has both a spiritual significance, and for our bodies allows for mental extension, as well as living in general a meaningful life.>>544160901Yes, very much. Left on our own, no matter how much our material needs are met, life has nothing good without God.
>>544160595The practitioner of deconstruction works within the terms of the system but in order to breach it . . . . This double procedure of systematically employing the concepts or premises one is undermining puts the critic in a position not of skeptical detachment but of unwarrantable involvement, asserting the indispensability of e.g. causation while denying it any rigorous justification. This is an aspect of deconstruction which many find difficult to understand and accept. –Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction
>>544160595
>>544160595Structure is inherently interpretable
>>544160595>semioticstry it op but beware this stuff starts simple and then launches into deep nutter space
Sounds wild bruv
>>544161361>>544160595Qrd on this guy?
>>544160595keep going anon, your post looks authentic>>544160714>>544160764Look at these little shills. I'm here to point it out so that they keep on insisting with their demoralization, meanwhile the real deal doesn't happen via these channels, but the shills must remain convinced there is something to shill here.
>>544161550Looney troon who thought if he committed a mass shooting and killed himself, he'd come back as female Danny Phantom character.
>>544161421weak positivist anglominded shit, real semiotics is published in French. Why are you shilling this atrocious reading list?
>>544160595>Why does reality possess intelligible structureIt doesn't
without a system with rules there would be no order
>>544160804> My idea is that reality has fundamentally a moral structureThe shark does 2 things in life. It eats everything that crosses its way. It fucks and makes more sharks. It has been doing this successfully for millions of years. If you ask every other oceanic species they would claim immorality maybe. It's a matter of perspective.
>>544160764>>544160714Demoralization losers
>>544161835Fucking nonhuman retard.You're not a person
>>544162015That's no way to talk about your mum
>>544161303>mint
