>Jaguar reveals a $130,000 all-electric vehicle. Why?>Nearly two years after Jaguar unveiled its controversial new logo, the prestigious automaker is doubling down on itsfuturistic rebrand with a new model that mirrors the divisive look. But a high-end EV is a tough sell. https://lite.cnn.com/2026/10/10/cars/jaguar-type-01-reveal
Here's the interior. THREEEEE ipads!
>>544163367>>544163331
>>544163414Jaguar is brown. It's literally owned by India. If I was brown I'd like ipads instead of a proper dashboard too.Back when it was a White company, the exterior and interior were much comfier.
>>544163331If the free market doesn't want it, then it wasn't worth anything to begin with, you call it the tragedy of the commons, I call it useless eaters getting their due.
>>544163561>t. useless eater
>>544163367kek retarded. Pic related is my interior. Got an aftermarket BT player and a phone music controller you put on the steering wheel. Works perfectly.
>>544164109>goyim cattle poorfag cope
>>544163526>complains about brown>posts brown interior
>>544164109You could put something nice into that double din.
Imagine that with a twin turbo v8
>>544164455that's what she said
>>544163526That's weird, if I were brown I'd an hero.
>>544163331Nobody wants a Jaguar after their tranny cars.They've destroyed their brand by trying to re-invent themselves.
>>544163367Absolutely disgusting.Everything else is forgivable.
>>544163414shitskins are the only ones that think ipads glued all over the place looks good.
I hate minimalism
>>544163331I'm buying a geely ex5 for $28k USD. Yanks think this is too woke and you should only buy a tesla for $50k.
>>544164885They're both gross, spiritually void and estrogenic vehicles
>>544163331Brought to you by RAW DONG LOVER
>>544164379>If you don't embrace the cheap jeet-coded surveillance slop, you're poor.>UnironicallyNoticed this one quite often in the past few years.
>>544165016I'll keep my manual fiesta st to zip around in and let my wife drive the electric car. The running costs are just stupidly cheap and exempt from several retarded government taxes.
>>544164445Yeah, but it's a tasteful brown.
>>544163331Looks like a Tesla. PASS.
>>544165342>tasteful brownFound the jeet
>>544163367That's a Jaguar?Holly fucking shit, that's fucking rough!
>>544163367Mercedes and BMW are just as bad. Giant fucking screens everywhere instead of expensive rare wood trims on the dash. They say it’s to appeal to younger consumer tastes but it’s mostly just that it’s very cheap to glue a huge tablet to the dash.
>>544163331It looks absolutely shite. I hope JLR go bankrupt for being pathetic sell-outs.European cars are doing very badly at the moment. Modern German cars look just as bad. Chinese cars are the future. Buy a BYD.
>>544163367>>544163331Exterior looks good, but wouldn't think jaguar, then again, most cars look the same now, but that's probably the only good thing about it.
>>544163331>But a high-end EV is a tough sellSince when? High-end EVs were literally what built tesla as a company
>>544163331Liberals equate EVs to robotaxis which they see as a threat to the nig infested public transit system.
>>544163367The outside of the car looks futuristic and high-end but this shit right here is unforgivable.
>>544167275Jaguar already tried restarting the company with classic themed cars (2000s S-Type) and it tanked as a model. When Jag was at its peak in the 60s, its cars were modern af compared to their rivals, and that is how anyone stays ahead, by being cutting edge, not by harking back to older eras and being stuck in the past. Its like keeping Spitfire aircraft design ideas into the jet era, it wouldn't cross over. EVs sell based on how cool and futuristic they look, and its why Germany is suffering as they have a conservative design philosophy of constant improvements, when everyone else in EVs is being radical and futuristic.
>>544163331Nah this is just shitting on a has-been auto brand that was old off to China. Jaguar was never good and the Chinese were stupid in buying it. Kind of like Aston Martin, another shit brand sold to materialistic jeets.
>>544164875I saw one of these on the road a few years ago.
>>544168690Its owned by tata, which is india
>>544167026Every fucking car has an iPad dashboard now. Even work trucks. Cheap automaking bastards.
>>544163331>>544163367it looks like fucking shitthey don't want to copy old stuff, but don't have a iota of original idea in their retarded heads, so they just make nonsense
>>544163561shut the fuck up street shitter, rope your fucking brown head.
>>544163331Dosnt look that bad like this>>544163367oh ffs
>>544168471jaguar is only a thing because of the 60's etype - a beautiful vehicle. people who own jaguars want to believe that they look like they are driving an etype, but they aren't. the stype was designed by retards who tried to turn a mark ii into an etype, but ended up w an slightly ugly, overly busy and fussy looking product. that broke down. anyways, these new electric vehicles look like shit and have o soul. plastic shells on top of battery stacks- enjoy your ball cancer
>>544164597(You)
>>544168471from a design point of view, they just did the same slop as we have in the present. If they did the equivalent of what you said they did in the 60s, then they would have tried some post present slop.
>>544171937>beautifulwhat's beautiful on this garbage?
>>544163367HOOOLEEEESHIT!XZIBIT COULD NOT POSSIBLY PIMP THIS ANY FURTHER! LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM AT IT'S FINEST!
>>544172686It looks just like the concept car from the woke ad with the trannies and fags. Which is shocking because all the auto pundits said it looked terrible.Still a bunch of faggot EUroids and brown people and arabs and chinks will buy it I bet lel.
>>544172527enzo ferrari called it the most beautiful car ever built i think it's cool as shit
It's a Jaguar.But it's not a Jaaaag.
>>544172871>enzo ferraria retarded boomer said something.kys, muttoid.
>>544172839this 1974 jaguar etype model could be fitted with updated internal safety equipment (a modern crash cage) and built looking just like this - they would sell millions of them
>>544163331>>544163367dogshit, why can't they just make an old jag but electric wouldn't even matter if the range was piss poor either
>>544172929Stop everyone, a slavnigger said something.
>>544164109Based and sovl-pilled.
>>544164875>Hates minimalism >No wing>Rims off of a CelicaK
>>544173019When I was in high school my neighbor's dad, he was a dentist, bought one of those and it was $17,000 in "needs some help but runs OK" shape. I wonder what one goes for now lol, bet it's $100k easy.
>>544172904It's a Faguar.
>>544172929
