Thanks to AI, that site of propaganda has lost 10% visitors from 2025 to 2026, and 16% mobile visitors.It was always a place for globohomo and lobbyist propaganda.Is the death of Wikipedia a good or a great thing?Considering it's getting replaced by another centralized form of propaganda (AI)?
>>544169264I just use it to read the plots of movies anyway.
That's if anything good for them because it isn't monetized and runs on donations, so it's purely cost savings in the form of lower bandwidth costs
>>544169504that and to see if someone is jewish
>>544169264>Is the death of Wikipedia a good or a great thing?It's very good. The site is a shithole for trannies and leftists.
There standard of evidence is absolutely wack, they only take secondary sources as evidence Publish a peer review paper on your historical or scientific theory? Inadmissible till it is in a review article. make up lies and publish it on gawker? valid source
>>544169506It has a hedge fund like a college, it runs purely off investment returns. the begathons just fund USAID type propaganda
>>544169534Anon, I can tell you're ready. you now have the power to tell for yourself whether someone is jewish or not. You don't need to check early life. I believe in you anon
>>544169264> Wales has visited Israel over ten times. Concerning claims that Israel engages in apartheid against Palestinians, Wales remarked, "I'm a strong supporter of Israel, so I don't listen to those critics," in a 2015 interview with the Jewish Telegraphic AgencySource: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales
>>544169506Less visitors means less donations hopefully.AI is unironically doing a better job, at the end of the day, the propaganda on some subjects may be the same with AI but for the rest it's a million times better than Wikipedia.I did a whole history session on christian/jews and usury last time, and it was way better than the bullshit you'd find on Wikipedia.
>>544169264Wiki gets free labor from losers with an unhealthy desire for power and authority. It's basically reddit.
>>544169264>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_Occupation_Government_conspiracy_theoryCome the revolution, any person having provided material support to ZOG (as for example, perpetuating the notion it doesn’t exist), may subject to summary execution. So, you know … whatever. I guess I’d rather Kike-o-pedia(tm) die on its own than see anyone die over it, because I’m soft-hearted that way.
Remind me again why rightoids have an irrational hatred for Wikipedia?
>>544169264man fuck wikipedia>do my home work for me joe public>also pay me while i walk around in my kimono reminder this sissy stole wikipedia from the poindexter who created it and then got rich off donations
>>544170363>may BE subject to
>>544169952>receiving your information from an advertisement/surveillance software running real-time psyopsYou are the most pathetic faggot nigger slave, barely even conscious.
>one of the biggest achievements of propagating collective human knowledge dying is actually LE GOODPol is never beating the allegations of being a psyop glowie 5th column board
>>544169534I don't need wikipedia for that.I have ascended.
>>544170777everything you believe in terms of the worlds true nature of reality is falsethese things are just to keep you in check
>>544169653>There standard of evidence is absolutely wack, they only take secondary sources as evidenceThis is the wildest shit to me.
>>544169264Complete dependence on AI results is a bad thing. It's no different than a subscription starting as something free, and then enshittifying itself.It's so generous now that AI models are based entirely on scraped Google results from the past, but in 10 years it both has run out of results, and the "sources" fed to it as we go will increasingly be establishment-sources only, and not community sources. This is the entire "trick" with AI that Big Tech and Governments (The WEF cabal) are trying to pull. They want to de-democratize computers and the internet, by making you dependent on a new form of establishment Magnum Opus, which is the same models you're currently using to do "craaazy shit" with, because in 10 years once you stayed subscribed to it, it'll increasingly be only what the government wants from it.The same thing started to happen to Google in the Facebook days, when the European Union made them block many search results and enshittified Google Images over privacy concerns. Corporations doing it for copyright reasons. They couldn't go all the way because it turns out most online come from user contributions, by their own accord, not "muh big tech corporation". Same issue with the social medias or YouTube when they keep saying "We must stop the algorithms!" etc. It's not the algorithms that's generating negativity. It's us, because we're not controlled.This is why they want to fence us in, like the Cable TV days, but they need these new tools to do it, and corporations agree now, because libtards are screaming about "capitalism" so much that all the big sharks are afraid.
>WIKIPEDIA is dying, good thing or great thing?Jikipaedophilia usually debunked its own lies... A. I. will far less likely to expose itself through contradictions.
>>544169264I stopped going after I gained access to the Akashic Records, I actually dont need anything else anymore>t. Third Eyefag
