should youtube pranksters be killed
>>544173641As a matter of law, no. But if you're getting pranked and kill one, that should just be a misdemeanor.
>>544173641Yes.
>>544173641Absolutely.
>>544173641that food delivery guy who shot that prankster in the gut should have been found guilty for not doing a headshot.
Yes, but carelessly so they can barely survive and then be killed again
>>544173641Bothering his White neighbors for jewish algorithm clout
>>544173641>should youtube pranksters be killedBeing killed is a bit extreme over a prank. Bound and raped would get more clicks.
>>544173775fpbp
>>544173641Livestream the execution of youtube pranksters
>>544173641so it seems, so it seems
>>544173641Absolutely. They should be flayed alive on livestream.
>>544173641>should youtubers be killedthis is the question you should be askingand the answer is yes
>>544173641If someone is shining lights in my window, I'm going to assume they're initiating a burglary.
>won't dare do it in a nigger ghetto
>>544174327whats the matter, scared?
>>544173641nope, in fact this should happen more often until pranksters start shooting back and turning everything into chaosyou deserve this for killing the entertainment so people will seek out more extreme ways of dopamine hits until molotovs start flying
>>544173641Only if they bother people at home, pranks in public are fine.
>>544173641Yes, with prejudice.
>>544173641Yes, without trial. Along with any other faggots who make and/or use gay ass thumbnails like that
>>544173775There was a hilarious case in Virginia where some YT "prankster" asshole was harassing a doordash type of guy in a mall, and the doordash dude panicked and shot the YT asshole.The jury found the doordash dude not guilty of the shooting but hit him with a misdemeanor for somethingorother. I think he had to pay a moderate fine of a few thousand dollars.https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/jury-divided-over-whether-delivery-driver-who-shot-youtube-prankster-acted-in-self-defense/3432763/> Alan Colie, 31, was acquitted of aggravated malicious wounding in the shooting of Tanner Cook, 21, who runs the “Classified Goons” YouTube channel. The jury was split though on two lesser firearms counts, and decided to convict him on one and acquit him on the other. >> Pouilliard said during Thursday's closing arguments that his client felt menaced by the 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook during the confrontation, which was designed to provoke a reaction and to draw viewers to Cook's YouTube channel.>> Colie's defense attorney, Adam Pouilliard, said the conviction on the firearms charge is inconsistent with the law, given Colie's acquittal on self defense grounds. He asked the judge to set aside the conviction. A judge will hear arguments on the issue at a hearing next month.
>>544173775>a misdemeanorNah. Shining flashlights into someone's house in the middle of the night or double kicking someone's front door as a "prank" depends entirely on the occupants to recognize it as threatening behavior in order for the "prank" to succeed by creating a reaction. They know exactly what they're doing. If that reaction they create results in them being killing then that's entirely on them and needs to be recognized as so. Anything less is just conditioning innocent people to not defend themselves and their property and letting prowlers and burglars get away with poorly executed crimes because "it was just a prank bro".
>>544173641Why stop just at pranksters?
>>544173641It would make their slop more interesting to watch.
>>544173641They will be if they keep messing with people
>>544173775This seems reasonable.
>>544173641Shoutout to derf and zachray for making wholesome prank content.
>>544173641Can't wait for the meatcanyon video of this.
>>544174327I bet Moot smiles when he thinks about how gay aussies became
>>544173641You won't do anything.
>>544174927kek he got shot for 53k views
>>544173641Corporal punishment should be reinstated for things like this.
Wasn't there a guy who dressed up as a clown with a big knife that would run at people to scare then and then someone just fucking shot him?
>>544173641yes
100% right...
>>544174327nothin funnier that watching a nigger crush the skull of an obama voter.
This dude is so obnoxious and rarely ever funny, him and that faggot friend of his who looks like harry potter. Theyre literal cunts
>>544174380durka durka lol
>>544174079>a bit extreme over a prankthese alleged "pranksters" are publicly hummiliating peopleand using this humiliation and mental scarring that it leaves behind in people such as >>544174927Colie from this case, to make profit from the click revenue its basically like raping a woman recording it, putting it online in exchange for pay these "pranksters" should face serious charges this shit is the same as mobbing, where the perpetrators crimes leave no scars because damage to the human psyche does not manifest in the same way like damages to the human body
>>544174380you'd get your ass beat too by anyone that size toby maguire brit fag
When the intent is to annoy and/or humiliate people and record it for money it does deserve some level of punishment. It otherwise creates a reward system for nuisance. And it's not all that difficult to determine what the intent was.
