Millions of thirdies are seething about this post’s result, but I think it’s pretty fair. Africa even now barely has any arms industry. How could they fare against Europe, which had tons of materials even then, with just some imported modern weapons that they couldn’t maintain?
>>5441918971800s Europe would still BTFO modern Africa. Thirdies are delusional.
>>544191897How can someone end up this delusional, Europe would obviously win, its not even a contestable outcome
>>544191897the comment section is full of people with the unironic conviction that Egypt alone could've defeated anything from Paris to Moscow, and posts that say this get thousands of likeswhenever you wonder about the Palestinian chimpout which thought that it would've btfo'd Israel in a day, or the Iranian shills who made gigantic photoshopped F-35s to show how they're sissifying America, remember that these are the lighter forms of autism and that most of them actually think like this at the back of their shitskinned minds. They don't only believe it for the 1939 Europe, they also believe it right now for 2026 btw. I remember Moroccans saying that about Spain during the Ceuta crisis, as if they were talking about their peer or even inferiors lol.
>>544192140terminal brownness that is being boosted by bricsoid neo-marxist copium a la "Maduro is about to sink the carriers!"
>>544191897The Romans would EASILY annex and ethnically cleanse ALL niggers from africa in current year.
>>5441918972026 europe would steuggle against 1939 europe, despite having eurofighters and f15s, armies of europe were several million strong compared to a handful of thousand today
>>544192238>Basically a Whites vs niggers hypothetical and the retard cunt immediately needs to use arab towelheads to fight instead of any of the more primative subhuman subsaharan nigger countries.GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG
>>544191897They can't stop fighting eachother.
>>544192238Holy fuck the amount of cope in that thread is unreal.>Muh niggers with fighterjets.
Even if you do have modern weapons, if you don't know how they properly work, if you don't know how to make them in mass amounts it's pointless. It's giving a chimp a machine gun.
>>544192238Egypt has 1500 abramsesWhat the fuck are you supposed to do when your best tank at the moment is kv-1
>>544192238How many flight hours do these jets have? How many miles can those trucks roll?They can produce all the oil they want. They still don't have any industry. Are they even making any bombs for their jets? Only SA had any industryMeanwhile 1939 germany have or are a few years away from having top tier nerve gas and the carriers for it. Russia have or will have tens of thousands of tanks, the uk have a navy that can lay waste to every coastal city. Yeah they have modern weapons. But they don't make them, they don't even make the spare parts. They don't have the stockpiles to advance up through europe before v2 rockets loaded with sarin methodically lays waste to the entire continent
>>544193282Let it roll past and blow the supply trucks up. Blow it up with a mine, ignore it and wait for it to break down.Hoq are they rolling those abrams up to the industrial heartland in europe?
>>544191897Twatter
>>544192140Because they picture Europe invading Africa.Europe couldn't occupy Africa, thus Africa would "win".They simply can't imagine a scenario where every thing else is equal: I.E.: a war to conquer new lands nobody inhabit or a scenario of the sort.Because, as we know, they lack the processing power to use conditionals.
>>544193358Egypt and SA have arms industry and you can cannibalise vehicles you have for spare parts. Iran had functional f-14 till the warYou are saying tens of thousands of tanks but those are t-26s and bt-5s. As for navy it gets leveled with anti ship missilesOnly thing that europe can do against jets is wait till they run out of spare parts. All this time they can bomb whatever the fuck they want. They could probably repurpose civilian airliners for bombing runs
>>544193633If Europe were invaded by sand niggers the US will come to aid europe. Sorry jeets. Also gtfo of canada.
>>544192416It's also a question of industry. Back then Europe could actually produce it's own ammunition and just supply itself in general, or at least the major powers could.No one believes that Africa can supply itself and even if it could Europeans would reverse engineer their shit given time.
>>544191897HAHAHAHA niggers are delusional.
>>544191897all fun and games until the rwandan paratroopers show up
>>544193440>let it role pass and blow the supply truck upDo partisan warfare?>minesModern vehicles have better mine resistance>ignore itWhile it’s moving towards important cities>getting to europeRoll through middle east unopposed and push into turkey and USSR, bomb the shit out of landing zones and invade Spain and Italy, maybe even UK>>544193703And what is US supposed to do against tech gap that big?
Im sorry but there is no way an army from that era has any chance against modern jets. Egypt alone would carpet bomb the shit out of them
>>544192502GEEEEEEEEEEEG
>>544191897Africans have BBC so they can fuck your women and replace you. Haha!
>>544193617I think, from what I read, they believe in wakanda esque super niggers. Also they seem obsessed with automatic rifles as if a war zone is like battlefield and u sprint around and shoot guys in the face close up
>>544193633>You are saying tens of thousands of tanks but those are t-26s and bt-5s.Which is more tanks then they have ammo.>As for navy it gets leveled with anti ship missilesMore ships they they have missiles>Only thing that europe can do against jets is wait till they run out of spare parts.Which isn't very long at all because jets are stupid hard to maintain. South africa can't even maintain their gripens and they're way cheaper then american jets. You know how iran kept their f-14 operational? By not using them.People don't understand how stupid armed 1939 europe was. Millions and millions of trained soldiers and modern small arms aren't that much better then 1939.
>>544193703No way.JewSA would fight for Africa.USA United Statea of Africa.
>>544193887That's what they're doing.Jews are helping them.
>>544193845Okay.Let's say 1939 Europe minus North Africa2026 Africa no north Africa then 1939 Europe would win.The jet I dont know if they had anything that could shoot those down
>>544193838>Do partisan warfare?Europeans did it on each other, there is a 100% chance they would do it on a darkie invasion.>Modern vehicles have better mine resistanceThat doesn't make them invincible. Also the tank crew has to get out to eat and shit and resupply at some point.>While it’s moving towards important citiesSee point above.>Roll through middle east unopposed and push into turkey and USSR, bomb the shit out of landing zones and invade Spain and Italy, maybe even UKUnless you can deal with America financing and feeding Europe than the darkies flat out cannot win. Even outside of that Africans don't have a navy that could stop shipping on the scale from all of Europe and by the time they made one it would already be over. Jets can only do so much if you just run out of missiles and cannot really produce much on your own without gibs from other countires. Don't forget how much modern Africa relies on gibs
>>544191897African BBC would flatten yuroshit cities more than any atomic bomb kek
>>544193845With what bombs? The West gives tons of fucking money to Africa. Without that money they couldn't maintain the war effort and it would only be a matter of time until Europeans would be able to reverse engineer shit like that. Modern Africa isn't a self sufficient continent and most of the nations there are not self sufficient as well
>>544191897>>544192238This is the result of Mutts having become worlds biggest loser. We must restore European colonialism>You meant colonialismRuski and France got an headstart bucko.
While watching OP's pic>Would this be a proper way for a dogwhistle which isn't punishable by law (At least in Germany)
>>544192140Because they can chimp out without consequence when the police have orders not to stop them, and they extrapolate that to an actual war where people are allowed to shoot back.
>>544191897Why exactly niggers think that Europe will play fair and use only their tech? During every war tech was stolen left and right in a matter of month. I doubt that autistic germans and soviets wouldn't make some metal gears in brazil
It's a completely retarded question, 85%of Africans would starve in 1 month if Europe stopped sending them gibs. Europe would not even need to go to war. They would simply do nothing and immediately win.
>>544191897Egypt, South Africa and Algeria would fuck up Europe. Europe would fuck up the rest.
>>544193838>>let it role pass and blow the supply truck up>Do partisan warfare?Yeah, have you looked at topography map of the area you suggest they roll through? Its top tier partisan territory all the way if they want to threathen the factories >>mines>Modern vehicles have better mine resistanceYou retard, the crew might survive better but they still have to get out to fix the track. Then they get shot by a k98.>>ignore it>While it’s moving towards important citiesLike what? London, Berlin, Stalingrad? All important cities are deep in western europe or Russia, they have to pass to the balkans doing fuck all.>>getting to europe>Roll through middle east unopposed and push into turkey and USSR, bomb the shit out of landing zones and invade Spain and Italy, maybe even UKThen your supply trucks get btfo in turkey/balkans and the brittish/french/german navy closes the the other route because they don't have enough anti ship missiles to sink it all.4 years later cairo starts getting hit by v2 rockets with sarin and they cant do shit about it.Also you so realize 2026 would starve without 2026 trade right? So Egypt are also dealing with a billion starving bantus
>>544193941>more tanks than they have ammoEven solid shot would absolutely wreck them by virtue of being 120mm and they can make those>more ships than they have missilesDoubtful>jetsThey still have some flight hours left in them, enough to conduct decapitation strikes and damage important industries>>544194088>partisan warfareHighly limited and Africa has manpower for an occupation>minesOk, you immobilised one tank and the rest are barreling towards your position >see point anoveThose mines and partisans aren’t stopping armoured divisions moving towards critical cities, europe is getting blitzkrieged>modern Africa relies on gibsCountries that matter, Egypt, Algeria, SA and Morocco can feed themselves
>>544191897Africa can win easily with a simple trick. They just have to surrender, soon or later Europe will open its gates and let the "refugees" in.
They're ultimately wrong. Modern ships and jets fielded by the wealthy nations such as Egypt and South Africa obliterate WW2 era of the same calibre. Being unable to secure or even punch a hole in the Mediterranea by sea or air invalidates a ground landing, where the Europeans would gain a slight advantage by means of arms manufacture and superior commanders. But if you can:t secure a beachhead, then you can:t even use the mausers. Not to mention that heavy vehicles such as tanks and IFVs that are unpenetrable by WW2 era munitions, meanwhile King Tigers will get wrecked by M72 LAWs and TOW IIs in Egyptian service. They also operate attack helicopters which would be unparalleled CAS.
>>544191897In real life both sides will just start killing each other. These gen z polls are time wasting slop
>>544194299>top tier partisan territoryOnly so much they can do and Africa has manpower for an occupation>get shot by k98It’s not a lone tank, they have support from other tanks, ifvs and infantry, which is significantly better armed>like whatAnkara, Istanbul, Grozny, Madrid and Rome>supply trucks get btfoGermans managed to deal with them and Africa has more>navyHow much can it do when industry and ports are bombed>starving bantusWho cares? Only ones to matter is North Africa and SA
>>544194363>>more ships than they have missiles>DoubtfulAnti ship missiles are expensive and they expire. They wont have more then a few hundred tops.>>544194363>Ok, you immobilised one tank and the rest are barreling towards your position>>see point anove>Those mines and partisans aren’t stopping armoured divisions moving towards critical cities, europe is getting blitzkriegedWell you seem uncapable of understanding the word "topography" and "map" Also core concepts like fuel, supply lines, distance, range etc seems foreign to youSo have fun with your severe mental retardation. You should check that up, you're probably entitled to some gibs or maybe maid. The later would probably suit you best
>>544191897Modern Africans are still fighting with weapons from around the same time period so its not even close
>>544191943fucking europe at any time in its fucking history would obliterate nigger africa right now or any point in the future lmao
>>544194570>Ankara, Istanbul, Grozny, Madrid and RomeAre you fucking retarded? Well we have allready established that you are. But is there no limits to your retardation? Its 1939, those cities are not the industrial power houses they need to take. Not now and certainly not then.
>>544194363>Highly limited and Africa has manpower for an occupationThere aren't really limits. The partisans would be even more united than they were during the war.>Ok, you immobilized one tank and the rest are barreling towards your positionAgain, they have to get out at some point and they cannot build more on their own or supply more shells.>Those mines and partisans aren’t stopping armoured divisions moving towards critical cities, europe is getting blitzkriegedThen what? Just leave them isolated there? They will die because they don't have the discipline and also do not have any selling points to Europe as to how they would be good unlike Hitler who could at least drum up some support and even for him it was an uphill battle going against international finance. It is pure foreign invasion and the international finance would be on Hitler's side this time.>Countries that matter, Egypt, Algeria, SA and Morocco can feed themselvesEven without money gibs? Unlikely. Their economies are just not as flexible as Europe/America at the time were. Even with how many weak links were in Europe.
>>544192238Europe stomped the fuck out of them in both world wars, in ww1 there was trench warfare in North Africa and the levant same as you know it in western and eastern front, europe fucked them up Same as ww2 the Italians and Germans wiping their nuts across Africa’s forehead and let’s not get into colonialism eitherFuck Africans, shit for brains faggots
80s Africa would since that would include South Africa when it knew how to make nuclear weapons and Libya, modern Africa would get isolated by the German Uboat fleet and starved out.
>>544192238the retardation is why they can't live good lives on the scraps of better people but instead throws rocks and petrol bombshow do one find the motivation to force a fellow man to stop being a dangerous threat only to have to feed and care for his retarded needs for all eternity? Both Israel and Europe must defend themselves from the retards outside of their borders as well as in their legislative organs.
>>544194985>Both Israel and EuropeStop trying to insert yourself into this scenario schlomo
ironically enough, modern africa largely buys weapons from europe. if need arose, europe could rearm itself in less than a year, because we still have (most of) the infrastructure
>>544195028You are still the humanitarian cuck censoring immigrant crime against your native population while claiming guilt for the shitskit overpopulation.A disgrace to your ancestors.
>>544195051The Germans would have reverse engineered F-16s within a month of an 80 IQ (their ace pilot) Egyptian crashing one somewhere over Italy or just straight up defecting cause he hasn't had food in 2 weeks.
>>544195261I'm not like the rest of the people that live under my flag. But atleast i don't hide it, memeflag
Beside that North Africa can't really feed itself, the combat range and production capacity of aircrafts of Europe in 1939 is superior to the African ones. Africa will run out of SA missiles quickly and then Europe will have air superority over Africa and do whatever they want. They can break the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, turn every relevant city of North Africa into Dresden, use chemical weapons wherever they want. Also they have much better scientists and a more flexible industry, it wouldn't take long until Europe build nuclear weapons especially if they "steal" some books from African libraries. And those African high tech weapons won't do near as much as damage to Europe as the allies did to Germany, Germany still produced ~35k aircrafts in 1944 despite the allies dropped nearly 1 million tons of bombs on them in that year alone.
>>544192238>Africans would be just like Soviet scientists!!!!It's not even funny anymore, this is just sad. They really think those jibbering apes are an exact analogue to humans.
>>544191897Pure delusion. Europe would have their shit kicked in and then some. The moment Africa holds back it's resources is the moment the military industrial complex collapses
>>544194181They'd have a vote to make this an official hate symbol and then you'd be arrested for displaying itJews are parasites
Oh wait 1939 Europe? Lol modern Africa would destroy modern 2026 europe
>>544191897europoors dont know about the ghana mech suits.
>>544195682its over for euroniggers
>>5441921401939 Germany would capture and reverse engineer all the modern tech. It would probably help them
Every new battle bring us closer to destruction. it makes us better people and our enemies become better as well.
>>5441918972026 Africa would turn on each other and kill each other while 1939 Europe watched and probably supply them with even more weapons to kill eachother with Im not even joking or trying to be racist or some shit that's 100% would happen
>>544195745The only speed bump would be Egypt
>>544195679are you retarded? 1939 europe had standing armies, fleets and airforces that completely dwarf modern europe
Killed 15000 Kaffers on one day, taking 3 casualties. Would do it again any time with exactly the same tech. We never actually lost a war it was a political decision to stop fighting, or not to fight. That's what the kaffers conveniently forget.
>>544191943Kek most niggers don’t even have a blank account
>>544195679Your fucking brain parasite is acting up again
>>544192238>>544192583>>544194985Most active users online are bots nowI’m surprised pol niggers haven’t figured that out
>>544191897without global south europe would have fuel to fight ww2
>>544195891If your point is that 1939 Europe has more of a chance than modern Europe then I may agree. It's still not enough. All a united Africa has to do is cease bsuiness with the belligerent forces and Europe would be on it's knees.
>>544194985What's funny is if this was the sales pitch for the middle east crap, Israel would probably have a lot more popular support
>>544196568>businessyou mean the free food we send them every day? africa almost starved a few years ago because they actually get a lot of their grain from ukraine.you can't eat diamonds, retard
>>544191897Africans are completely unable to maintain machinery. I mean an aircraft, a helicopter, or even something like a tank with a large and complex modern diesel engine. All these assets when sold to Africans come with a mandatory service contract to keep the things running. I know someone who sold an african country some helicopters and they were mostly broken within a few months, none were working within a year. Africans cannot maintain an advanced civilization. The idea that you might need a special oil or lubricant for example is completely beyond them, also the levels of corruption are such that any supplies you buy will be counterfeit or just junk.
Back to your loo, poo.
>>544192583Why do Americans do pic related and worship them
>>544195679It is
>>544196668The loss of European food wouldn't impact them as much as loss of African business will impact Europe.
>>544192238>>544192303Where do those retards think those jets come from?
>>544196850France for one would collapse within a month
>>544196754I've always been weirded out by white people copying black venacular including people doing it ironically but to explain it I think its like having a toddler around and thinking the words he invents is cute.
>>544196850>starving to death wouldn't impact them as muchat this point i'm just giving more (you)s for the entertainment
>>544196882didn't blacks copy ebonics from white southerners in the first place
>>544196944>starving to death Some would starve yes. And Europe as we know it will cease to exist. It would be gone before the first nigger troops ever land on European soil.
>>544196882What is the current opinion of normies that side? Are they getting over it? I've seen videos about the fatigue spreading.
>>544191897>Europeans have to be technologically pushed back to early 20th century to be equal ground with the 21th century Africa
>>544194363Are you out of your fucking mind? I don't know about SA, but aside from fruits and seafood Egypt, Algeria and Morocco are extremely dependent on imports, especially so for the core calories of their diet. Not to mention that what agricultural production they do have locally is much more dependent on global trade than Europe's in 1939 is.
>>544197010you are clearly not following along. the ENTIRE 1939 world didn't produce enough food for 2026 africa. hundreds of millions would starve long before putting together an army.the british fleet could just blockade the suez, gibraltar and the mediterranean coast and the mighty modernized african army (?) would have no way to actually reach european soil
Wait wait let me guess the idea of them winning is by zerg rushing them because that type of tactics worked out for the zulus in... 19th century
>>5441971311939 europe would beat the present USA and every other country. Not because of technology, but because of organization and will to fight
>>544196980Yeah which makes it weird because where I live in the North people mock the (white) Southern accent as how stupid people talk but hate racism against black people. Someone caught saying "y'all" back in my day would probably get mocked as a Oprah fan.
If you dropped 10,000 iron age europeans in africa today, they would be in total control of the continent within a year.
>>544197176>the ENTIRE 1939 world didn't produce enough food for 2026 africa.I am comparing modern iterations of both. Bringing up 1939 food supplies is irrelevant when the point is that modern Africa gets food gibs from modern Europe. There would be virtually no difference in food reserves in both cases since Europe will with hold it either way during a war.>hundreds of millions would starveDelusional
>>544193845Jets with foreign designs, foreign parts, foreign chips, foreign engineersMeanwhile Europe is already towards developing this tech Unless Africa wins the war in a couple of weeks, Europe will quickly catch up in tech Spoiler alert they wouldn't even be able to land in European soil in significant numbers, African navy even in 2026 is ass
>>544191943This. Christ you could take 10,000 armed white men and conquer half the continent. No air support needed. Just boots and rifles.
>>544197313>modern armies fighting ww2 counter part>technology vs will and gritSomeone should get a mangaka this is way better for a Gate type story than japanese army shooting down fantasy romans.
>>544193617Occupation becomes a lot easier when you simply shoot any humanoids you encounter not in your uniform.
>>544197313idk man, the modern usa are likely the only modern country that could actually stand a chance against 1939 europetech superiority isn't everything but when you got a fleet of stealth bombers there's a lot of shit you can get done and very little a good ol flak88 can do about it>>544197375how would you bypass the british fleet then? the brits during ww2 proved they can do amphibious landings in multiple continents
>>544196850>African businessesBusiness is a non existent concept to Africa before Europeans brought society and laws to the continent in the 1800s.Any African businesses that do exist probably don’t last long before succumbing to rampant corruption, civil war, or just general laziness and stupidity of the niggers trying to run them and copy their western superior counterparts.Obviously
>>544197374>dropped 10,000 iron age europeans in africa They would become timmysoup, a new Sub-Saharan delicacy
>>544193845Factories in ww2 were bombed on days that in y.
>>544193845does egypt even PRODUCE its jets? what would they do after they run out? wunderwaffe don't win wars
>>544193617Europe could absolutely occupy Africa and 1939 Europe would have far fewer problems keeping the population in line.
>>544196876>Share of French Foreign Trade: Africa accounts for only about 2% to 3% of France's total global merchandise tradeWhites wonned, browns lost
>>544197524>amphibious landings in multiple continentsAnd then what? Africa is so big they wouldn't wouldn't be able to take over their economic interests while the guerrelas buttfuck them meanwhile London financial empire is quickly reduced to dust. They wouldn't even be able to afford an active fighting fleet
Do people forget that 1939 Europe had complete and utter dominance over Africa, which was an extension to it's economy. That's the best Europe could be with Africa ON their side.
Bing's AI said Africa as a whole gets less of 2% of it's food from foreign aid, but i found a link saying "it imports more than 95% of the active pharmaceutical ingredients and 70% of the medicines it consumes" and I think losing access to that would mess it up worse than having to tighten their belts on food.
>>544191897if united africa is not a threat why do europeans keep murdering their leaders after ww2
>>544194638Hey now from what I've seen they're just about in the Korean war era
>>5441918971939 Europe definitely. Its not even close.
>>544191897Africa has literally not developed at all since the 1800s, and the only notable wars that aren't warlord genocides of small jungle villages were fought on their soil by foreigners. The only thing notable about Africa today is China's loan/resource rape of the entire continent. I don't think BLACKUP is gonna save them from being overmatched and outgunned.
>>544192238Ok your fighter jets launched their 4 rockets. Now what?
>>544191943No it would not this is why despite being so close to Europe Africa was colonised last. Modern medicine and machinery was needed unlike the new world, Australia or even China.Land locked countries like Niger beat both France and the US in the last decade your grandpa wouldn't stand a chance.
>>544197482Harry Turtledove's World War in the Balance series has aliens with modern weaponry interupt WW2 and while they don't really lose but it does not go well for them. Author is a bit of a gooner though, lol.
>>544191897If Rhodesia showed us anything, it's that the one-sided nature of that war wasn't due to equipment advantages.1939 tech is truly not that far removed. Armoured cars would fare the best due to the difficult terrain and tanks could be used in defensive roles, securing chokepoints and towns instead of pushing deep and breaking down deep.Modern Africa would use some RPGs but Europe would quickly figure out how to defend against those after capturing them.>ok that's subsaharan africa, but what about nafricaThe desert fox roamed there in real life. All Europe would need to do find allies among the Berbers who don't necessarily like the urban moors.Those city peoples WILL flee for the mountains and turn it into an ugly guerilla war.Lastly, they need to keep the fucking supplies going. Supply problems necked Rommel, they'll neck anyone else.One presumes this is a unified Europe so that shouldn't be a problem.
>>544192238They genuinely have a shot if the arab countries set up homemade drone production but everything below the Sahara would be an active detriment to their war effortImporting the electronics would still be a problem though since Europe has the Royal Navy
>>544196704The gripen we sold to south africa all became trash when the service contract ended
>>544197053Thankfully I've managed to avoid normies for a decade and can't tell you
>>544193358Friendly reminder that 1939 Europe, considering the geopolitics, WILL have the Soviet Union as an Ally in this fight.Oil will never become a problem for Europe.1939 Europe also has a 1939 Hitler, who we know had a preference for experimental weaponry, and nothing is going to excite him and his scientists more than today's mundane tech which to them must feel alien.They'll also be fielding their own jet fighters within a year.>maybe the fight's over by thenIf nafris and niggers share 1 trait, it's their lack of expedience.They couldn't hurry and finish the war if you gave them a map, a flashlight and open doors.
>>544191897This is just dumb. What's the point of putting such an arbitrary handicap on it? They may as well ask: who would win 2045 Africa or 1232 Europe?
>>544191897THAT IS WHAT WE SHOULD HAVE DONE FROM THE START!the moment that Europe was unshackled from the continent, they should have set out to wipe out the peoples of the global south.now were stuck in worthless bullshit prosocial/cooperation/competition shithole.I as a white canadian should not have to put effort into prosociality and cooperation, I should have my own family and only see the diaspora of the global south in unicef commercials.
>>544191897>Egypt would steamroll Europe aloneEgypt would bee too busy dying in a famine. Guess where all the food feeding North Africa comes from?Also the nignogs and sandpeople brag about the modern weapons they have bought from white countries. However, their production capacity is near zero. 1939 Europe would build a nuclear bomb sooner than 2026 Africa.
>>544191897sounds kinda retarded, if the african countries can scrounge up even like 100 semi-modern planes, missiles and subs, they can pretty much neuter all military and production capabilities of 1939 europe unopposed, and even if that takes everything they've got technologically, they have like 5 times the manpower
>>544199132It seems you don't have a clue about what happened in WW2 and what was needed to actually neuter all military and production capacity in one single European country, not to speak about all of them. They would run out of their missiles very soon. However, the more probable scenario can be extrapolated from this >>544197450 and other IRL African war stories.
>>544198715My money's still on Europe.
>>544199460>oil fields, refineries, rails get bombed with impunity>ships sunk at will???
Africa would win but only because of North African states.If it was just Europe vs niggers, Europe would win easy
>>544200071With exactly what missiles? And are we fighting in 2026 (in which case the European countries can just phone America to get all the tech they need) or 1939, when there are no satellites and no ways to repair their tech, even a transistor is not yet invented and how many electronics factories you think there are in Africa? Can you tell me what are the African electronics giants which manufacture guided munition tier electronics independently? Also you still don't understand how much damage for example Germany took while their war production still went up.
>>544197977united Africa is not and never will be a thing because it's something only a dumbass foreigner could beleive in
>>544200218North Africa would be too busy dying in famine and fighting over their last resources to be able to fight back. Actually that's the case with most of Africa.
>>544200273>And are we fighting in 2026 (in which case the European countries can just phone America to get all the tech they need) or 1939Are your retarded? Europe has what Europe had in 1939, Africa has what they have currently, it's pretty self explanatory
>>544200419Yes but is the rest of the world 2026 or 1939? Or is it forbidden for some reason to contact the outside world? In that case I guess the non-African satellite systems like GPS are off the table in any case. I thought I wouldn't need to overexplain this simple question.
>>544200587It's 2026 africa vs 1939 europe, that's it, what the fuck are you talking about?If we're pitting a ninja against a gladiator, you don't get to argue the gladiator has 13 fucking legions, you were given the setup of the discussion.
>>5441918971939 europe would probably btfo of 2026 europe too, kekthat was a heavily militarized continent where people still had a mindset that enabled absolutely gruesome battlesanyone who thinks 2026 africa would win any war whatsoever must be delusional
>>544200756Okay so that means there's a barrier and impenetrable fog of war around these two continents, got it. Rest of the world doesn't exist in this deathmatch. So no GPS guided bombs for the nignogs either, nor spare parts from China or America.
>>544201027I find it extremely funny that the thought of africa, home to one of the oldest and most significant civilizations in history, winning a fictional one sided scenario involving literal time travel causes you so much butthurt you need to larp as a kike to uhmmm eckshoollee it away.
>>5441918971980s Africa would win even 2000s before Arab Spring but nowadays they are just zerg army.
We're putting a tiny continent that's ready for war against a big one that isn't, if you include the USSR Europe's active military would outnumber Africa's personnel 10 or 20 to one at the start. If Europe rushed in and snatches someone's cell phone in the first week and sends it to Finland to start Nokia 50 years early it's going to be game over for Africa
>>544196872even more than that - the current drone stuff going on in both wars shows very clearly that you do not need advanced high tech materiel if you can also simply swarm your enemy with low tech shit and collapse their supply lines that way.they might have their fighter jets right now, but every time one of them is shot down, they aren't replacing that any time soon, if ever.they have no idea just what an arms industry Europe had during WW2.my city is still evacuation districts 2-3 times per year because they find another unexploded bomb from WW2.IIRC, state wide is like 2000 tons of exploded ammo every single year, more than 80 years after the war ended.Europe didn't just use ballistic missiles to hit some strategic targets back then, it simply razed whole regions to the ground with endless bombing runs.
There's only one way to find out
>>544201220What the fuck are you smoking, Putin's ass hair? These are just the usual questions regarding a time travel scenario so that the rules would be clear. The situation would change a lot, and usually for the benefit of Europe, depending on the scenario. Please go to some other thread and whine how Ukrainian nazis oppress Russian liberators or whatever, if a simple time travel scenario is too much for your simple brown brain.
>>544201535>muh pootin lolreally not beating the butthurt allegations
>>544191897How will Mussolini handle the Ghananian mechanized infantry?
>>544201351WW2 Europe could just zerg rush the African military airports with sheer numbers and destroy their handful of jets. We are talking now about some 100s of planes and 1000's of missiles vs 10000's of planes and 100000's of bombs. Just to get the magnitudes right. From Ukraine we know that even a WW1 biplane like flying contraption would still be useful in modern warfare.
>>544191897Theyre forgetting that Europeans would take their equipment from them
>>544201629It was you who started to scream about retards and kike larping when the words became too big for your brain, lol
1939 anti-tank guns or even artillery would still blow up an abrams. Get it together.
If the US is having trouble with iran and Yemen than imagine Europe lol I don’t fault them for not holding the museum continent in high regard
>>544191897>B-b-but muh techReally only like three countries in Africa have functional militaries, they have essentially zero domestic military production outside of South Africa, and far far far fewer numbers of troops, tanks, and planes when war breaks out. You'd see some initial successes by the Egyptians, Moroccans, and South Africans even as they're ravaged by hunger and disease but Europeans would adapt to the tech differences and every loss by the Africans would be nearly irreplacable. Does it cost 20 panzer IVs to destroy a single Oliphant? That's a win for the Euros still as they can build 20 tanks faster than the Africans can build one.After African casualties mount the tide would start turning against them because they simply lack the means to replace large combat vehicles and their forces would be increasily reduced to relying on RPGs, machineguns, and mortars as the core of their military.
So what is the concept of winning here? I have no doubt Egypt has the ability to use some of their air force effectively unopposed and could take out various strategic targets, but let's say Europe gets together to steamroll through the Sahara... To do what exactly? Are they going to drive a column of tanks into some backwater shit hole in the congo?
>>544197977They went against jews
>>544201351It's not even about the None of these countries can make their own jetfuel, or perform maintenance on their equipment.Their fancy jets would become death traps after a few flights.
>>544202608I guess the surrender conditions are same as in WW2, absolute surrender. It's like colonialism but this time the victors will be openly ideologically genocidal and very asshurt, that some uppity nogs have dared to shoot some missiles at them and sink their ships. Endlösung of the nig problem would be guaranteed by the Brits, French, Italians and Nazis. Paradoxically the best scenario for Africa would be to ask for a status quo ante bellum right in the beginning (not like they would surely get it).
>>544198239True. Race is real but sometimes poltroons get ridiculous about it.If Europe was as deadly as Africa then Europeans today would be in a state closer to pre colonial Africans than to our high civilization.
>>544193282Egypt has 1500 abramses in hands of browns. Half of them will be broken already or one week into the war.Btw you can beat a tank with just a hole in the floor and make it trip.
>>544200419>>544200756>>544201220>>544201629Modern day Africa would run out of modern missiles, bombs, rockets and jet spare parts in a few weeks. While Europe still would be full of 1939 military factories, hundreds of them.Also niggers never had a civilisation, they are half animals.
>>544200071Kek. Eritrea and Ethiopia and the rest of the, still fields beat up T-55s
