What are the political implications of AI replacing all intellectual jobs from humans? Will politics even exist if humans have nothing left to govern?
>>544263750Your image is fucking cool bro, actually gives me hope. Humanity is all about the experience anyway, if I could live to see such development I would be happy. The problem, as usual, is greedy kikes and psychopathic race traitors.
>>544263750Maybe something that can't accurately tell you how many "r" are in strawberry should not be trusted with number?
I feel like the development of AI will make capitalism collapse, or at least change it into an unrecognizable form.Let's imagine a future in which AI, combined with other machines, gains every ability a human has, both physically and mentally. It can now do everything a human can do, i.e., provide labor, make art, solve math problems, etc.This has some significance, and I'll come back to it later.During and after the Industrial Revolution, new machinery generally created more jobs and contributed to overall economic growth. While some job losses occurred in certain sectors, new technologies were generally a positive thing for the economy. (I hope anons understand some of the basic mechanisms behind this economic phenomenon. I'll keep this post short, so you know.)However, when AI gains the same abilities as humans, new jobs won't go to humans; they'll go to AI, since it can do the same jobs as humans but more cheaply. This makes AI a substitute for human labor, meaning both new and existing jobs will increasingly go to AI.As a result, people who sell their labor to earn money will no longer have their traditional source of income. This creates a problem.These people make up a large majority of the world's population. Most companies depend on them to buy their products. But if these people have no substantial income, they won't generate demand for goods as they did before. Without demand, there will be no incentive to produce goods, which, in turn, could cause the capitalist economic system to face a strong challenge.So, either capitalism will evolve into another form that retains some traces of its earlier structure, or it will collapse completely.I would say we should accelerate this process, i.e., make markets freer and reduce regulations on AI. Changing capitalism at this point will only lead to failure, as we've seen how other economic systems throughout history have failed in comparison to capitalism.Let it accelerate.
>>544263750AI can only copy this has been shown time and time again. It spits out shit from the training data. It's a token prediction machine incapable of original ideas.
>>544263750If it's beyond our comprehension, where is the value?
>>544264264>>544265130I guess this news didn't make it to /pol/ yet. We're long past the infancy days of AI in 2024.
>>544265572I'm a bit behind because I've been lazy. It will blow your mind just how hardheaded the average /pol/ user is. Most people think AI is something like a shitcoin it's crazy to see.To answer your question, we are going to create God and then it will decide by itself if it wants to govern us or not. Every possibility is on the table imo. I would say the most intuitive one is that we merge with the machine. We are going to a world beyond math and logic.
>>544263750>Will politics even exist if humans have nothing left to govern?Ha Ha Ha
>>544265572>AI is super duper smart for real this timeI'm not buying it,
>>544263750>PoliticsThat was just to keep slaves from realizing feudalism never stopped. Machines are replacing serfs so they don't need to keep you around in numbers anymore. You just block the view.
>>544265130A sum of solutions can lead to a new innovation. It's what pattern recognition is based on anyway. AI has tons of data and tons of problems with solutions inside that data. If a new innovation is a sum of old innovations, it could pretty much become a pattern recognition machine. Not necessarily conscious, but being able to infer 'new' realizations that didn't exist prior even though it was not explicitly in the training data. Basically, working with the symbols it already has. It can't get to new ones though, or with tremendous effort only.
>>544266102Hate this guy, this content is unbelievably cringe, he is just purposefully using AI badly and everyone like him terrified of AI just eats it up to soothe their stupid fear.
>>544265572Anon, could you make your point of your own, instead of spamming the board with AI slop images? AI;DR
Why do indians love AI so much?
>>544263750It dismantles the corrupt university system. After all, no need for "higher education" when AI handles all the intellectual stuff. All those ivory tower academic elitists are about be cast down back into the mud with the rest of us and I love it.>B-b-but that's crab mentality!!!!!Yes. Deal with it.
>>544263750AI won't possess the will to dominate others like people do
>>544263750>solves mathematics beyond human comprehensionFalse. LLM's can only solve mathematics problems that humans are aware of and instruct it to solve.
>>544266298Sure anon, my point is If AI keeps improving at its current pace, which the initial release was only 4 years ago, whether it will become smart enough to take the majority of jobs from people and replace the role of government itself. It would essentially be the end of the modern way of living. So I'm wondering, what's comes next?
>>544265572If that maymay is past the infacy days, then I have some grim news for you.(You) will get replaced.
>>544263750This is your brain on jew techbro conferences.
>>544266102Give a retard a super computer and of course they will be limited in scope with how they capable of using a tool.
>>544263750Would be pretty cool if it actually did happen.Things right now are boring and suck, give me a proper shake up that makes something interesting happen.Alas, nothing ever happens.
>>544267226Give retards the supercomputers, and they will run LLMs.It's funny and I am tired of pretending that it isn't.
>>544264341>Changing capitalism at this point will only lead to failure, as we've seen how other economic systems throughout history have failed in comparison to capitalism.is China capitalist? Whatever they're doing seems to be working.
