>>544541613Thats micro-antisemitism
>>544541613Chocking I can understand, you can literally see it. But how do you determine "incest"? Just because people LARPing as family members, like in some TV sitcom?
Why does incest porn even exist in the first place? People are so fucking weird.
>>544541613cool, is bestiality (porn involving niggers) banned? Let me guess, it's not.
>>544542081It's a psyop, ya dingus.Nobody asked for it. But suddenly Jewish pornographers were pushing it everywhere.
>>544541613Damn, that's basically 80% of professional porn made after like 2018.
>>544542081>Why does incest porn even exist in the first placeJews>people are so weirdJews are not humans they are demons
>>544541613antisemtism will not be tolerated.
>>544541613Why not ban porn altogether? What are the pros of having every kind of disgusting sex scene readily available on the internet?
>>544542081>Why does incest porn even exist in the first place?it was a "no niggers" search term for a long time in a sea of interracial porn. that's it. it has very little to do with the actual taboo.this is why they scrambled to throw the 'step' qualifier on it. theoretically a stepbrother can be a mandingo but none of the IR 'incest' gets any traction unless it's a white guy and tiny asian.if people liked incest porn and jews were happily producing it, it would NEVER get banned. but the kikes don't want us seeing white people happily fucking in any context
Watching other people fucking is self-cuckoldry.
>>544542134>Nobody asked for it. But suddenly Jewish pornographers were pushing it everywhere.so then why is it being banned when the government will go to bat for jews in every single other avenue of life?
>1981 prediction>hacking will be illegal, but the real world will be really safe>2026 reality>everything you do online becomes illegal, while in the real world, thousands of rapists are imported every year
>>544542482denying yourself a quick wank because of newfangled internet morality is self-cuckoldry
>>544542139right?they've effectively outlawed all pornit's fucking madness
>>544541613VPNs./thread
>>544542549already basically did it omce with amateur porn
>>544542072I guess UK has a problem with young incels raping their mothers
>>544542622wasn't that long ago that the internet cried in unison that if they banned the porn there would be revolutionsnow they've done that, and no revolutions happenedthere isn't anything they can't take from you
>>544542778>now they've done that, and no revolutions happened
>>544541613>They'll ban incest porn without a second thought but debate cousin marriage for centuries>saar pakis must be able to marry their cousinThe choking one is retarded aswell. The government put in the OSA to prevent children from seeing porn but one of the reasons for the choking ban was that children were asking about it. So did the OSA not work? Can we get rid of it then?The biggest problem with this country's politics is that they put in policy intended to help but don't actually let the policy take root before they start legislating further. So the country is always in this super position of the law failing to change behavior for the current set of people but extremely effective for the next set. We've seen this happen with discrimination law where the policy goes in, some nigger gets his head bashed in the week after the law to not to bash niggers goes through and then we make additional laws to prevent it further. Same with feminism, same with hate crime laws. And its on purpose.
>>544541613as long as women choking men isnt banned im cool with it
>>544542081sorry to hear that your sister is ugly
>>544542902>this is just for adults>adults can't have it either because they can't be trustednanny state taken to the fucking extreme
>>544542824france are always doing that though
>>544542699The black community has a similar problem
>>544542134Game of Thrones glamorised incest with the Cersei/Jaime Lannister romance. Two attractive and incredibly wealthy siblings were fucking eachother on tv every week while the entire world watched. The show never really portrays it as a bad thing either outside of the political problems it causes which have more to do with bastardry than incest when it comes down to it. I'd bet my left nut that all this incest porn flooding the internet right around the time the show was at its peak.
>>544543382no GoT was years after incest became popular online. incest shit was already spreading fast by 2010 ish thanks to how much interracial was being pushed in every single other category.
>>544543382>>544543479Incest was popularized by Flowers in the Attic. Gen Z got it from TCOAAL.
>showing incestSo they're banning nothing because all incest porn is fake anyways?
>>544543554I got incest from Imoen in Baldur's Gate 2
>>544542072Can you even? How many action tv shows have "choking" in them that are simulated acting sequences? How could you prove any alleged choking in a video is real?
>>544543613"incest" porn is just vanilla porn but they call each other "daddy" "step-bro" etcit's in content and aesthetics, visually fucking identical to "non-incest" porn
>>544541613Unironically a good thing.
>>544542134I remember in like 2017 or something my local radio station kept bringing ip>according to pornhub the fastest growing porn search is "incest"They also were going nuts promoting huawei at the same time.
Better start downloading all the Internet you can before they erase it all., before the Internet is literally overran with ndians and they have to quarantine the place. Before you follow the sharia laws on decency ...
>>544543729but no niggers, usually. hence the popularity of 'incest'
>>544542497wow it's almost like they create a problem then create the solution to get what they actually wanted in the first place before creating the problem came to be
>>544542778Everyone circumventing the law while the authorities sit their impotently fuming is the revolution
>>544541613I voted for this.
>>544542072Not really, choking is part of sex and a lot of women really like it. The incest thing is just silly. Why even ban it though if porn is already banned to those whose are underaged? That would suggest the UK government believes adults are not smart enough to distinguish between fantasy and reality.
>>544543729If they even do that. Tons of it is only identified as incest via the title.
>>544541613Every single woman loves light choking during sex.
>>544543846the 'problem' was goyim preferring to see whites having sex with whites. jews are constantly battling that problem of white in-group preference. they didn't create the problem.kikes tried everything to make porn degenerate interracial only before crying to the pocket politicians to ban the alternatives people seek out
>>544544027and they may not even know it but this often lets the viewer easier identify which videos are white-on-white porn
>>544541613are muslims going claim this is islamophobic?the mushrikun sons of mut'ha cousin fuckers won't like this
>>544541613Out of all the genres to pick it's school uniforms, choking and stimulated incest. They seem like pretty tame categories. Even acting out a relationship involving step parents and non-biological relations is banned. It feels very boomer coded understanding of what porn is. Probably because it's put together by a bunch of sexless menopausal technocrats who have masturbated since the 1980s. No rapeplay banned No ABDL bannedNo scat porn banned No blood play banned No ryontuna banned No violent BDSM banned No dubcon banned Instead it's like the kind of shit that would get played on some cable channel after midnight.
This only tells you that boomers finally got tired of their stash of 80s porn and are appalled, horrified and outraged that modern porn isn't also set to shitty music while consisting 90% of long shots of ass and balls of the guy as he thrusts and makes dying walrus noises while the woman is barely to be seen and heard and they want everything banned
>>544541613Anything short of executing pornographers is a crime itself, and those weak willed slugs implementing halls measures should be killed in the streets too.
>>544542081Well south asians and west asians(middle easterners) marry and breed with their first cousins and they have flooded into the west by the tens of millions, so thats probably why.
>>544544319fuck old porn was terriblenot a single boomer in the old porn industry, jew or gentile, understood camerawork or cinematography. like not even a fucking hint of lifting a leg or turning to the side.my first ever time watching a porn vid i commented on not wanting to see the dick that much once the guy got involved and the camera began focusing on man-taint and boy was i let down.thankfully i found anime porn in custom starcraft maps and my dick learned life isn't quite so gay
>>544544319>be porn wanker>avoid excessive shots of the female form, especially depictions of female pleasure, to avoid triggering AGP>focus on the male experience, depictions of male arousal and pleasure>become a full-blown gay>the boomer gen
>>544544483>>544544564Let's not even mention closeup shots of the guy's face too, what the fuck were they even thinking
>>544544179I swear to you if you just took a preexisting interracial sex scene, uploaded it to pornhub under an incest title, it would still violate the proposed policy in the uk.
>>544544834>look! this is how good you should be feeling! emulate this man!are boomers the "i can't enjoy this media without self-inserting" peak? or have modern SJWs beaten them?
>>544542081Because family cums first!
>>544541613That's not very family friendly.
>>544544854>see all those blue circles supporting your point?>if you took a blue circle and labelled it illegal red, it would be taken downwhat are we doing here, what are you asserting?
>>544544474DumbThe people who engage in incest do not care for incest porn. The people watching incest porn would never do it. Like everyone loving crime drama who isn't a criminal. And real criminals think it's stupid.
>>544544961The point is the actual policy is going to be written retardedly. There's no such thing as "incest porn"What if a brother and sister film themselves having sex but they're playing characters that aren't related? Or it's unspecified? The standards written into laws for these types of things always relies in something stupid. Where's the text? Is there an actual proposed policy or is it all big talk at this point?
>>544544027jfc...
>>544541613Big loss for British gooners, whores getting choked out until they just start to lose conciseness, and then coming to all delirious and confused while still getting pounded is hot as fuck.
>>544544264dude all of that is already covered by extreme pornographydo you somehow not know?
>>544545164Here's the answer to my question.It's like I said>if they are relatedOk>are pretending to be relatedSketchy>in a certain wayRetardedSo they can pretend to be related in a uncertain way?>reasonable personWhat does the law of the uk think a reasonable person thinks? I'd imagine they think a reasonable person would never assume two different raced people couldn't be related because that would be racist which is unreasonable. There's no way to ever not consider the possibility that two people are related. It also doesn't address the title issue. Most(because theyre the easiest to manufafture) incest porn has no dialogue or set up at all. It's just written in the title. Are the actors in the film pretending to be related? Especially if the video is stolen and reuploaded with an incest title. Does it become.incest porn then? What if I have a character in my porn movie named "mom" and the man she's having sex with loves saying his lover's name over and over? But in the title I specify this is her name and not their relationship? The thing they're upset about is a phantom. That's my point.
>>544541613Never forgethttps://archive.fo/5KAFN
>>544541613lol Sydney Harwin's fucked
>>544545659oh yeah, poor woman
>>544545331>wow, this guy knows the good stuff>i bet he must have got some!>not only do i accept him, i will defer to him with admiration nigga pls, shutcho bitchass up
>>544543382If you think got popularized incest porn, then that tells me you were too young for porn before GOT
>>544545554in previous threads about this kinda thing I've been really active but today I'm just wipedfeel like I'm staring into the abyss reading this shitfuck my lifefuck my actual shitcunt poor white boy life
>>544545554technically though it also applies to "step-" relations too so just because they're not the same race doesn't mean they can't be relatedthink about THAT for a minute, why don't you
>>544541613This is after they have scanned their ID to watch porn
>>544546390think about itthey made porn sites impossible to access without IDthen they collected data on the porn people were visitingthen they used that data to decide to get rid of any genres or niches of content that they don't likeseriously
>>544543705I mean, you can see when someone being choked, whether it simulated or not. With "incest" all you have is "trust me bro".
